ROGER TANEY, CHIEF JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT DRED SCOTT

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Lincoln-Douglas Debates: Video (2:13)

Advertisements

CHAPTER 16.3: THE DREDD SCOTT DECISION. FACTS 1.Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) 2. Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin for four years. 3.

Kansas-Nebraska Act Dred Scott Case Pages Workbook 88.

The Dred Scott Decision

II. Basis of Citizenship

Causes of the American Civil War. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 The U.S. needs a balance of Free and Slave States. Why? Henry Clay (The Great Compromiser)

 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 

The Court ruled that Scott's "sojourn" of two years to Illinois and the Northwest Territory did not make him free once he returned to Missouri.

Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.

Bell Work In your notebooks, respond to the prompt: How can differences among students affect the school? What kinds of differences could lead to problems.

By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.

Fill in your “Describing Historical Event” handout using the following PowerPoint presentation. If you need extra space use the back of your handout. Aim:

Dred Scott v Sandford Facts of the Case: Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. From 1833 to 1843, he resided in Illinois (a free state) and in an area of.

APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.

Dred Scott Decision (1857).

APUSH Review: Dred Scott v. Sanford Everything You Need to Know About Dred Scott v. Sanford To Succeed In APUSH

Peyton Waters and John McArthur 2A DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD(1857)

Dred Scott and John Brown Read and Notes (494 – 502)

Dred Scott V. Sanford 1858 Julien Mercier and Kendal Kulp.

By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.

Slavery and Secession. The Birth of the Republican Party.

Civilisation des Etats Unis--7a: Civil War Prof. Sämi LUDWIG UHA Mulhouse.

Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.

WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.

21.6 & 21.7: The Dred Scott Case & Decision Page

On your own and on the worksheet provided: 1) Write a definition for the word property. 2) List some examples of property.

Jump Start Explain how popular sovereignty was involved in the Kansas-Nebraska Act How did the Kansas-Nebraska Act lead to increased division between the.

 Dred Scott was a slave.  He had lived in a free territory with his owner.  His owner moved back into a slave state.  While there, the.

The Election of 1860 The election of Abraham Lincoln prompted the

Ch. 15, Section 3 Challenges to Slavery

Slavery Dominates Politics

Chapter 14 The Nation Divided Section 3: The Crisis Deepens

Dred Scott Decision 1857.

JOHN BROWN’S BODY John Brown’s body lies a-mouldering in the grave;

Objectives Explain why the Republican Party came into existence in the 1850s. Summarize the issues involved in the Dred Scott decision. Identify Abraham.

Pre-Civil War Events Ms.Bean.

Challenges to Slavery Section Two.

Quote The best way to predict the future, is to create it.

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

DO NOW – US HISTORY What problems would you experience if you had no rights?

Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84

Chapter 14 Section 3 Objectives

Chapter 14 Section 3 Objectives

Background: Who was Dred Scott?

AMERICA’S FIRST TERRORIST?

Dred Scott v. Sanford.

The Dreadful Decision Dred Scott.

Review from last week Kansas-Nebraska Act: Kansas is almost ready to be a state- To slave or not? Stephan Douglas looked to avoid more issues so he proposes.

What causes of sectional conflict led to the Civil War?

What makes you an “American” citizen?

Causes of The American Civil war

Pre-Civil War compromises and events

The Compromise Missouri Compromise (1820)

Dred Scott Decision Scott was not a citizen, could not sue

The Road to the Civil War

The Dred Scott Decision

North vs. South Not Just Slavery.

Events that Helped Spark the Civil War By: Mrs. Andreatta

The Road to Secession Part 2

And The case for freedom

Conflict over Slavery 1850s 2

8X Tuesday Objective: Describe political developments in the US that led to Civil War. Agenda: Do Now: Explain the rise of the Republican Party.

Warm up: Review Previous Lessons

SSUSH9 The student will identify key events, issues, and individuals relating to the causes, course, and consequences of the Civil War. a. Explain the.

Dred Scott Decision (1857).

Chapter 14: The Nation Divided

Day #5 Supreme Court Cases

LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES

Presentation transcript:

Aim #36: Why would compromise no longer work following the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford? ROGER TANEY, CHIEF JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT DRED SCOTT Did you say “Dread” Scott or Dred Scott? Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful Do now! In your notes, copy down the aim and answer the questions on the “Pro-Slavery Association of Clay County” handout

Scott was born into slavery (I) BACKGROUND TO CASE Scott was born into slavery Scott claimed that since he had lived for 10 years in both a free state (Illinois) and a free territory (Wisconsin) he was a free man Owner claimed Scott lacked standing to sue, as he was not a citizen of the US Court had to decide: 1. did Scott have standing to sue? 2. Were blacks entitled to rights as citizens? 3. Could Congress restrict the rights of states to decide if they would be slave or free? Read the majority opinion by Taney and Dissent and answer questions

(II) EFFECTS OF THE DECISION Blacks were not citizens of the US, so didn’t have right to sue in court (whether slave or free) Slaves couldn’t be taken away from owners without due process of law Federal government had no right to regulate slavery in the territories d. the Court declared that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves were categorized as property. Amendment V “…no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or PROPERTY, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”

Song: John Brown’s Body John Brown's body lies a-moulderin' in the grave John Brown's body lies a-moulderin' in the grave John Brown's body lies a-moulderin' in the grave But his soul goes marching on The stars above in heaven are lookin' kindly down The stars above in heaven are lookin' kindly down The stars above in heaven are lookin' kindly down On the grave of old John Brown Glory glory hallelujah Glory glory hallelujah Glory glory hallelujah His soul goes marching on He captured Harper's Ferry with his nineteen men so true He frightened old Virginia 'til she trembled through and through They hung him for a traitor, they themselves the traitor crew But his soul goes marching on Glory glory hallelujah Glory glory hallelujah Glory glory hallelujah His soul goes marching on

JOHN BROWN ON THE WAY TO THE GALLOWS

John Brown: Martyr or Madman?