Introduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical thinking II Authority and dissent, and the written word Mres Philosophy of Knowledge (slides available at cfpm.org/mres)
Advertisements

Critical thinking, session 1: about argument, MMUBS Mres Induction, slide-1 Critical thinking, session 1: About Argument Bruce Edmonds.
Philosophy of Knowledge (Day1) An Introduction to the (European Tradition of) Analytic Thinking Session 1: About Argument Coffee Session 2: What is Philosophy.
Critical thinking II: Authority and dissent, and the written word MMUBS MRes (slides available at cfpm.org/mres)
Critical thinking: developing skills in reading journal articles, MMUBS Mres Induction, 6th October 2003, slide-1 Critical thinking:
Induction: Introduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Course Bruce Edmonds MRes Induction Week.
PoK Session 1 Critical thinking I: About Argument Bruce Edmonds MRes Philosophy of Knowledge (slides available
Critical Thinking. MMUBS Mres Induction, Bruce Edmonds, slide-1 Thinking Critically Bruce Edmonds MRes (slides available at
Critical thinking II: Authority and dissent, and the written word MMUBS MRes (slides available at cfpm.org/mres)
COUNTER-ARGUMENTS What is it? How to write it effectively?
AQA Religious Philosophical & Ethical Studies
Introduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module
STUDY SKILLS SHARON CULLEN.
Critical thinking for assignments to get a better grade
1. Complete the MC questions on the sheet provided.
PHI 208 Course Extraordinary Success tutorialrank.com
Ethics and Values for Professionals Chapter 2: Ethical Relativism
Pre-Writing Workshop Script Writing.
Writing your reflection in Stage 1 & 2 Indonesian (continuers)
Intro to ERWC.
Essay.
Writing a Literature Review
CRITICAL ANALYSIS Purpose of a critical review The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review.
Persuasive Essay.
Reading Arguments Critically
SSP4000 Introduction to the Research Process Wk1: Module Introduction
(Or as I like to say, “What’s your point?”)
Create a balanced argument by representing the opposition
Debate 101 Basic Debate Workshop.
BELLRINGER Write a well-constructed sentence (or two) responding to the following: When you sit down to construct an essay responding to a writing.
The Argumentative Essay:
Quickwrite #5 Using a the quote sandwich method and a template from They Say, I Say, get ready for class discussion by responding to a quotation you find.
(Or as I like to say, “What’s your point?”)
Please take a seat near the front of the lecture theatre. Thank you!
What is Philosophy? MRes Philosophy of Knowledge:
Essay Structure.
Counter-Argument When you write an academic essay, you make an argument Your thesis statement and support When you counter-argue, you consider a possible.
Bellwork Assignment Answer the following questions: What is a thesis statement? What is the purpose of it? Why is it important to have one? Where does.
(Or as I like to say, “What’s your point?”)
Welcome! September 26th, 2017 Tuesday
Essay 4: Response Essay Responding to Reading.
Investigation & Reporting
Investigation & Reporting
The In-Class Critical Essay
National Centre for Teaching and Learning
HINT: It is not the subject of your essay
Argumentative Essay.
Counterarguments Persuasive Writing.
What’s the topic of our essay?
What’s the topic of our essay?
(Or as I like to say, “What’s your point?”)
What’s the topic of our essay?
What’s the topic of our essay?
Essay.
Expanding your position paper: Counter-Argument
Core Course Knowledge Lesson 6
Core Course Knowledge Lesson 6
Debate 101 Basic Debate Workshop.
The art of persuasive writing
FYP Research Skills Module: Defining a Project
Create a balanced argument by representing the opposition
Writing to Express an Opinion
What’s the topic of our essay?
What’s the topic of our essay?
(Or as I like to say, “What’s your point?”)
Essay Writing.
(Or as I like to say, “What’s your point?”)
Argumentative Essay.
Induction: Introduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Course
Expanding your position paper: Counter-Argument
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module Bruce Edmonds MRes Induction Week (slides available on web address at end) Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-1

Introduction(s) Me - Bruce Edmonds You - Please briefly introduce yourselves, your “rough area of study”, plus (optionally) one thing that a friend might say about you Purpose of this session: To introduce you to the purpose and form of the Philosophy of Knowledge module To get you thinking about what you have let yourself in for! To start you thinking! Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-2

A Thesis is... ...a (novel, sound, sufficiently significant) contribution to knowledge That is, your “job” is to learn how to discover new significant knowledge in a sound way and write this up for anyone to read! So what is this “knowledge” stuff that you will be producing for society? Can we rely on it? How can we rely on it? Are there different kinds of knowledge? etc. etc. Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-3

To make it “easier”... Academics disagree about everything, including: the nature of knowledge whether this is relative to culture? whether this is a reflection of an independent reality? etc. etc. Each (sub-)field has its own disputes and answers about these questions... ...indeed they don’t only differ as to what the answers are but even what the questions are! It is a complex mess! Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-4

Why is this? Partly it is due to clever “under-cutting” moves by academics... ...partly due to the different natures of what they are studying... ...and partly due to the different traditions and histories of different academic fields but (in my opinion) it is mostly due to the fact that anything social is very very difficult to understand and study! This, of course, is your task Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-5

The Purpose of the PoK Module is... To get you thinking about these issues To make you aware of some of the difficulties underlying knowledge To get you reading relevant literature with philosophical leanings... ...and to understand it (or some of it) To prepare you for some of the questions and objections you may encounter To produce better knowledge ...whatever that means! ☺ Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-6

Philosophy is... About thinking about such issues and, crucially, arguing about them (at least in the Western Tradition) It will not tell you the answers but will make you aware of some of the possibilities, traditions and arguments Will hopefully get you thinking critically about your own arguments and assumptions Anticipating possible objections Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-7

Example: Argument An argument attempts to persuade other of the truth of a conclusion Or otherwise justify such statements It is what you might say in response to: How do you know that? I don’t believe that Why should I belief that? I disagree Usually, taking the other to the conclusion you are defending in a series of steps Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-8

Exercise 1: Judging arguments In groups of two or three Look at some of the arguments on the sheet, and decide for each : If you think it is a good or bad argument Whether you agree with its conclusion Whether you agree with the steps leading to the conclusion Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-9

Conclusion It is a necessary part of becoming a PhD student that you learn to judge whether arguments presented to you are good or bad The Goodness of an argument is separate from whether one agrees with its conclusion These are not simple things to determine! We will come back to the Western Tradition of Argument in the First Full PoK Session Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-10

The PoK Module Is in two parts: An introduction to the Western Tradition of Academic Thought, Argument and Critical Thinking (2 sessions) An introduction to some of the main disputes in the philosophy of knowledge: Rationalism vs. Empiricism Realism vs. Constructivism Positivism vs. Pragmatism The Linguistic Turn Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-11

The Assessment is... An 5000 word Essay Which is basically a prototype of that part of your thesis that justifies your approach to knowledge and the assumptions behind this This is due in the summer after the second set of PoK sessions Do not worry about it before then! Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-12

The End Bruce Edmonds bruce.edmonds.name Centre for Policy Modelling cfpm.org Manchester Metropolitan University Business School www.business.mmu.ac.uk these slides are linked from cfpm.org/mres Itroduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge Module, MMUBS Mres Induction, http://cfpm.org/mres slide-13