Ion-Side Small Angle Detection Forward, Far-Forward, & Ultra-Forward

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E.C. Aschenauer1. Requirements from Physics on IR E.C. Aschenauer 2 Summarized at: Hadron Beam:
Advertisements

R. De Vita, INFN – Genova Workshop sulle prospettive di fisica adronica a Jefferson Lab Genova, 27 Febbraio 2008 Hall A Upgrade New Multi Purpose Spectrometer(s)
C. Schwarz Physics with Antiprotons - Detector - Detector requirements Overview of the detector concept Selected detector components Simulations.
M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
1 EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook June 27, 2014 Request for these slides: Comment on “EIC working group activities at Jefferson Lab, and how people could.
Full-Acceptance Detector Integration at MEIC Vasiliy Morozov for MEIC Study Group Electron Ion Collider Users Meeting, Stony Brook University June 27,
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
DVCS with Positron Beams at the JLab 12 GeV Upgrade
Lishep06 Gilvan Alves1 Overview of Diffraction from DØ Gilvan Alves Lafex/Brazil  Introduction  DØ RunI x RunII  Special Runs  Outlook.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
MEIC Detector Rolf Ent MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
1 EIC EW Meeting, W&M, VA, May 2010 E.C. Aschenauer.
Difference between Roman Pots and VELO Very forward tracking is typically done using detectors located in Roman pots. They are far away from the interaction.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Lattice /Detector Integration for Target Fragmentation, Diffraction, and other Low-t Processes Charles Hyde-Wright Old Dominion University
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
Test of the GEM Front Tracker for the SBS Spectrometer at Jefferson Lab F. Mammoliti, V. Bellini, M. Capogni, E. Cisbani, E. Jensen, P. Musico, F. Noto,
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Overview of IR Design V.S. Morozov 1, P. Brindza 1, A. Camsonne 1, Ya.S. Derbenev 1, R. Ent 1, D. Gaskell 1, F. Lin 1, P. Nadel-Turonski 1, M. Ungaro 1,
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
November 15-18, 2002V. Obraztsov - Prague ECFA/DESY Workshop 1 Proposal for TESLA beam test zone at IHEP ( Protvino ) Vladimir Obraztsov Institute for.
Current eRHIC IR Design  Important features  10 mrad crossing angle Needs to be integrated into the current STAR and upgrades Important for luminosity.
Status of the TOTEM Experiment and Latest Results
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Some thoughts to stimulate Discussion E.C. Stony Brook, January
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
Integration of forward physics detectors into the LSS of the LHC D. Macina (TS/LEA) Technical Support 2004 Workshop.
Full-Acceptance & 2 nd Detector Region Designs V.S. Morozov on behalf of the JLEIC detector study group JLEIC Collaboration Meeting, JLab March 29-31,
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Interaction Region and Detector
MEIC Interaction Region & Tagging
IF Separator Design of RAON
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
JLEIC Forward Ion Detection Region
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Q1 IR Septum Quadrupole for LHeC
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
How to detect protons from exclusive processes
JLEIC Detector Simulation Forward Ion Detection
Forward (ion-SIDE) Tagging: Motivations, ConCepT, Performance
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Specifications for the JLEIC IR Magnets
End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Update on JLEIC Interaction Region Design
T. Bowcock University of Liverpool For the LHCb Collaboration
Hall “12 GeV” May 27, 2003 NAPP 2003: J.J. LeRose.
EIC Accelerator Collaboration Meeting
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #18 Monday ,April 9, 2012 Dr. Brandt Calorimeter
IR Magnet Design and Engineering Considerations
JLEIC High-Energy Ion IR Design: Options and Performance
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
SR Background Update for JLEIC
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
Geometry Tagging for Heavy Ions at JLEIC
Presentation transcript:

Ion-Side Small Angle Detection Forward, Far-Forward, & Ultra-Forward JLEIC Collaboration 29—31 March 2016 Jefferson Lab Ion-Side Small Angle Detection Forward, Far-Forward, & Ultra-Forward Charles Hyde Old Dominion University

Full Acceptance Detector (-30m, +50 m) Comprehensive Integration of Detector with Accelerator Lattice 3-D imaging: Detect scattered beam particles for |δp|/p > 0.005 and/or θ > 3 mrad Nuclear Final States in Deep Inelastic Scattering: Neutrons in cone (0.5 GeV/c)/(50 GeV/c) = 10 mrad Charged particle fragments from δp/p = -0.5 (protons) to δp/p = +1.5 (3H fragment) Far-Forward Ion

Forward Region 10 mrad < θ < 70 mrad HCal D1 iFFQ1 Outside iFFQ Acceptance 2 Tm (@ 100 GeV/c) Forward Dipole Tracker, PbWO4 EM Calorimeter Flux-exclusion tube or active anti-dipole shield of electron beam.

Beam-Pipe Design for Forward Angle Detection Central beam chamber aligned at -25 mrad. Particles in iFFQ (±10mrad) acceptance don’t exit until detected after D2 or D3 Particles in D1 acceptance exit through 30° taper at end of 73.5 mrad flare. 30° taper minimizes wake-field End-cap particles exit at angles > 50 mrad

Far-Forward Tracking 50 m long Magnetic Spectrometer High dispersion at secondary focus 5 mm separation for dp/p = 0.005 Magnification = -0.5 Tracking resolution compatible with beam emittance Fixed Tracker at Exit of D2 Pair of horizontal RP between D2 and D3 Single side RP after D3

Transport Examples Focus—> Focus @ 43m Focus @ 42m Focus @ 26m (P/z)/(P0/z0)=1.5 Focus—> P0 = 100 GeV/c Focus @ 43m P = 99.5 GeV/c Focus @ 42m P = 90. GeV/c Focus @ 26m P = 50. GeV/c Focus @ Q3 exit

Transport near full momentum <— electron beam 100 tracks P = 99.5 GeV/c Δx>10σ @ Focus P0 = 100 GeV/c iDipole-3 IP+42m P = 99.5 GeV/c Horiz motion Roman Pots

Detection Between D2 and D3 100 tracks at p=90 GeV, filling iFFQ Acceptance Focus @ IP+26 m iDipole-2 Exit = IP+22m RP 1 track @ 100 GeV 1 neutron 4 cm radius beam pipe accommodates 10sigma BSC for P0 from 20 to 100 GeV/c