West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, 2008 10:00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

January 23, 2006 FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT.
1 The Role of Bus Transit in the Regional Transportation, Present and Future Howard Benn, Chair, TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee TPB Regional Priority Bus.
Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan PAC December 14, 2010.
Lec 10, Ch.4, pp : Parking studies (objectives)
Intercity Bus Program: Alternative Strategy for Rural Transport
Virginia Statewide Intercity Bus Study: Final Report and Next Steps 0.
Oakland Industrial Park Transportation Needs Assessment Study Sponsored by A service of Hampton Roads Transit Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE,
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGH POINT Sounding Board/Steering Committee Meeting Service Recommendations January 13, 2015.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
New Intercity Bus Funding Approach Stephen Abernathy, AICP Intercity Bus Program Manager Public Transportation Division.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
New Shuttle Routes. Current Health Sciences Shuttles – Four (4) different primary routes with excessive stops – A few single purpose routes – “Concierge”
Five-Year Mass Transit Fund Financial Forecast April 6,
Comprehensive Operations Analysis. Background ■On March 6, 2014, Escambia County Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement between Escambia.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Service Recommendations September 9, 2014.
Miao(Mia) Gao, Travel Demand Modeler, HDR Engineering Santanu Roy, Transportation Planning Manager, HDR Engineering Ridership Forecasting for Central Corridor.
Public Transit Department Bus and Fuel Procurement Strategy AzTA/ADOT Transit Conference April 2013.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
Human Services Coordinated Transportation Plan Thursday July 20, 2006 GF City Hall Rm A102.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Feasibility Study Jonathan CalderwoodJune 14, 2013 West Shore Communities Feasibility of Sustainable Transportation with Passenger Ferry Service.
Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
Enhancing the Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Access and Use of Targeted Transportation Funds August 17, 2015.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
May 9, 2011 RLS & Associates, Inc. Kent County Transit Needs Assessment Draft Findings and Recommendations.
Sullivan County Coordinated Transportation Plan Proposed Coordinated Transportation Plan.
Blueprint for Tomorrow Fairhope City Council February 9, 2008.
Partnerships that Work Prepared for the Spring 2009 CalACT Conference by Cindy Dahlgren Director of Administration Central Contra Costa Transit Authority.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
Regional Transit Study Final Recommendations March 15, 2010.
1 Palm Tran Transit Survey Coordination Meeting November 18 th, 2008.
Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M University Joe Richmond, University of North Texas Operating Your Own System Versus Contracting.
Prince William County Potomac River Commuter Ferry Study & Route Proving Exercise A Summary of Project Purpose and Results Presented by: Charles “Cody”
Transit Pricing Programs Value Pricing for Transportation in the Washington Region June 4, 2003 Richard F. Stevens Washington Metropolitan Area Transit.
Transportation: Issues and
Transport.tamu.edu TAMING WILD BRONCOS Transit Management Changes, Financing, Training, Staffing Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M.
Review of Fare Collection Concept of Operations and High Level Data Requirements FC RSTWG Webinar May 19, :30 – 4 pm Prepared by: Paula Okunieff,
1 Section 5317: New Freedom Program (NFP) David Schneider Federal Transit Administration ESPA National Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2007.
Placer County Rural Transit Study Expanding Public Transit Service for Rural Placer County.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
E XPANDING M OBILITY O PTIONS IN M ARIN Marin Transit’s Paratransit and Mobility Management Programs 1.
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SERVICE OPTIONS JUNE 14, 2016.
Public Transit & Transportation Network Companies
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
Regional Roads Committee
and Transportation Impacts
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
USDOT ADA Service Requirements
April 23, 2018.
Partnering with Cities
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266

Study Parameters Funding Available: $110,000 Tentative Start Date: ASAP End Date: September 31, 2009

Problem Statement There are several transit providers in West Michigan that provide limited services in different regions Holland MAX/Disability Network recently completed a transit needs study which determined that transportation-to-work as the number one unmet transportation need Rising fuel prices

Purpose – Page 1 Conduct a needs assessment and feasibility study of commuter transit services in West Michigan Why commuter transit services? - Need to meet FTAs definition of Commuter Bus Service 1. Predominantly in one direction during peak periods 2. Having limited stops 3. Using multi-ride tickets 4. Routes of extended length 5. Coordinated relationship to another mode of transportation - Complementary Para-Transit Services 1. Must be origin-to-destination service (door to door) 2. On-call bus service or para-transit feeder service to an accessible fixed route 3. Shall provide complementary para-transit service to origins and destinations within a width of ¾ miles of the fixed route

Purpose – Page 1 Three commuter transit needs 1. Traveling between existing public transit service areas - Harbor Transit - Macatawa Area Express (MAX) - Muskegon Area Transit System (MATS) - The Rapid 2. Traveling from communities without existing transit systems - Allendale Township (except GVSU campus) - City of Coopersville - Georgetown Township - City of Hudsonville 3. Traveling to major employers - Focusing on employers with 500+ employees (standard) - Employers must be located outside of existing public transit service areas - Employer coordinated pick-up/drop-off service at transfer station

Needs Assessment – Page 3 & 4 Service Provider Identification - Public and private transit providers - Non-profit agencies Service Provider Assessment - Type of services provided - Service area - Hours of operation - Fare structures - Capabilities (types of riders that can be accommodated) - Population served/demographics - Total number of riders provided (current and historical) Locations of major trip originations and destinations Survey major employers to analyze specific transportation needs

Commuter Transit Service Options - Pg. 4 & 5 Commuter Bus Routes -Must meet FTAs definition of commuter bus service -Provide direct links between existing public transit service areas and communities without existing transit systems -Minimize travel time (to the greatest extent possible) Commuter Bus Stops -Must meet FTAs definition of commuter bus service -Accommodate areas where the greatest need for commuter transit service is present -Provide service to communities without existing transit systems -Locate stops at or near existing facilities such as park and ride lots Frequency of Service (arrival/departure times) - Accommodate the needs for commuter transit services - Accommodate schedules of major employers

Commuter Transit Service Options - Pg. 5 & 6 Transfer Station(s) -Must meet FTAs definition of commuter bus service -Utilize existing transfer stations 1) Harbor Transit – Transfer Station (previous Greyhound area) 2) MAX – Padnos Transportation Center (Amtrak, Indian Trails) 3) MATS – Herman Ivory Transfer Terminal (Indian Trails) 4) Rapid – Central Station (Indian Trails, Amtrak potentially) -Provide options for new buildings/facilities if necessary 1) Locate to as to accommodate areas of greatest need 2) Must be designed so as to accommodate current and estimated ridership over the next 20 years 3) Provide options for the infrastructure needs 4) Meet accessibility requirements of the ADA -Hours of operation and staffing needs 1) Accommodate the proposed bus route schedule 2) Accommodate other modes of transportation -Impact of transfer station at peak hours (vehicular traffic)

Commuter Transit Service Options - Pg. 6 & 7 Vehicle Fleets - Meet accessibility requirements of the ADA - Most efficient (fuel and cost) for the estimated ridership - Ability to accept multi-ride tickets Multi-Ride Tickets - Requirement of commuter bus service - Promotes commuter use as opposed to infrequent usage of the system Service Provider(s) - Utilize existing public or private transit providers - Create partnerships among major employers - Creation of a new system - Combination of methods, or others proposed by Consultant

Commuter Transit Service Feasibility - Pg. 7 Overall Cost - Capital, administrative, and operational costs necessary to implement and sustain commuter transit services 1) Annual Basis 2) Ten-year period, include maintenance/service costs Itemized Cost - Provide cost to implement and sustain commuter transit services for each of the proposed bus route options - Determine the cost per ride for each bus route option Funding - Identify all funding sources and itemize by their intended purpose - Determine amount of gap funding that will be necessary to implement and sustain commuter transit services - Identify revenue sources that could be utilized to eliminate funding shortfalls 1) Fare box revenue 2) Local millages or other local contributions 3) Advertising and/or other marketing promotions

Commuter Transit Service Feasibility - Pg. 7 & 8 Transfer Station(s) - Willingness/ability of transit agencies to allow the use of existing transfer stations Major Employers - Willingness/ability to adjust hours of operation and/or shifts in order to accommodate commuter transit services - Willingness/ability to provide pick-up/drop-off service for their employees at the transfer station - Willingness/ability to initiate commuter incentive programs and/or other incentive programs (transit vouchers, flexible hours) Service Providers - Willingness/ability of each of the transit service provider options to provide commuter transit services - Willingness/ability of demand-response transit service providers to provide coordinated service at each of the transfer station options

Recommendations - Pg. 8 Commuter Bus Service - Final recommendation must meet the FTAs definition of commuter bus service Final Recommendations - Final recommendation must be based on the need, overall cost, funding availability, and willingness/ability of the service provider(s) to provide commuter transit services.

Coordination - Pg. 8 Harbor Transit Study - Demand-response efficiency study - Explore option to expand service area - Feasibility of fixed-route services Grand Valley Metropolitan Council Study - Determine feasibility of expanding service area Disability Network Study - Focus area: Hudsonville/Georgetown Township - Analyze the impact that lack of transit has on individuals in focus area

Questions?