BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phi-Psi, Feb.-Mar., 2006, S.Uehara1 Experimental studies of charmonia in two-photon collisions at Belle S.Uehara (KEK) for the Belle Collaboration e +
Advertisements

Measurement of non BB Decays of Y(4S) to Y(1S)     and Y(2S)     Silvano Tosi Università & INFN Genova.
Sep. 29, 2006 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin 1 Hadronic Charm Decays From B Factories Henry Band University of Wisconsin 11th International Conference on.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
New Particles at BELLE Beauty 2005 Assisi Spectroscopy and new Particles F. Mandl There is an impressive list of new particles in the charm sector discovered.
Search for LFV  decays involving     ’ at Belle Y. Enari, Belle collaboration Nagoya University.
16 April 2005 APS 2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B→D s * h at Belle Luminda Kulasiri University of Cincinnati Outline Motivation Results.
1 CLEO-c Measurements of Purely Leptonic Decays of Charmed Mesons & other Wonders Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
Charmonium Production at BaBar Jamie Boyd University of Bristol Photon 2003, Frascati 7 th -11 th April 2003 On behalf of the Collaboration.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Crossed Channel Compton Scattering Michael Düren and George Serbanut, II. Phys. Institut, - some remarks on cross sections and background processes  
Moriond QCD, Mar., 2007, S.Uehara 1 New Results on Two-Photon Physics from Belle S.Uehara (KEK) for the Belle Collaboration Rencontres de Moriond, QCD.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
Branching Ratios and Angular Distribution of B  D*  Decays István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (CLEO Collaboration) July 17, 2003 EPS Int.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
1 New Results on  (3770) and D Mesons Production and Decays From BES Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Presented by Yi-Fang Wang Charm07 Cornell University,
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
A High Statistics Study of the Decay M. Fujikawa for the Belle Collaboration Outline 1.Introduction 2.Experiment Belle detector 3.Analysis Event selection.
E. Robutti Enrico Robutti I.N.F.N. Genova HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference July 17-23, Aachen, Germany Recent BABAR results in Charmonium and Charm Spectroscopy.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
QCHS 2010 Lei Zhang1 Lei Zhang (on behalf of BESIII Collaboration) Physics School of Nanjing University Recent.
Two Photon Physics at Belle Augustine E. Chen BELLE Collaboration National Central University June 6, 2006 Charm 2006.
On behalf of the BABAR Collaboration
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
from Belle, BaBar and CLEO
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
Observation of the DsJ(2463)Dspo & Confirmation of the DsJ(2317)Dspo
Charmonium decays in Two-Photon process at Belle
Search for Pentaquarks at
Recent results on light hadron spectroscopy at BES
Search For Pentaquark Q+ At HERMES
Matteo Negrini Università degli Studi di Ferrara - INFN
RAA predictions show enhancement highly sensitive to jet quenching
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Precision Measurement of η Radiative Decay Width via Primakoff Effect
First physics from the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeters
Open heavy flavor analysis with the ALICE experiment at LHC
Measurements of some J/ and c decays at BES
University of Minnesota on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration
Review of Two-Photon Results from Belle
Hidden charm spectroscopy from B-factories
Pentaquark Searches and DsJ Studies in BaBar
e+e−→ open charm via ISR X(4160) in J/ recoil
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
The Pentaquark Q+ Search
First discovery of Double Cabbibo-Suppressed decay: Lc  pK+p- + a
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
e+e−→ J/ D(*)D(*) & ψ(4160) → DD
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
Search for (3770) non-DD-bar Decays
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
Search for Invisible Decay of Y(1S)
Hot Topic from Belle : Recent results on quarkonia
p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX
Recent BESII Hot Topics
Charmed Baryon Spectroscopy at BABAR
New Spectroscopy with Charm quarks at B factories.
Observation of non-BBar decays of (4S)p+p- (1S, 2S)
Presentation transcript:

BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle Study of pp production in two-photon collisions at Belle S.Uehara (KEK) on behalf of The Belle Collaboration BES-Belle-Cleo-Babar J.W.S, Nov., 2007, Beijing BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Motivation of two-photon physics hadrons Resonance formation or Hard scattering with a quark line Hadron production from two quasi-real photons (|q2|<0.001GeV2, with zero-tag condition) Exclusive processes with gg c.m. energy WWgg=0.6 - 4.5 GeV at KEKB/Belle Wide energy region --- Various physics aspects can be studied simultaneously. Light-quark resonances, charmonia Perturbative /Non-perturbative QCD, Hadron production mechanism BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

General physics in gg p+p-/p0p0 final states quark Resonance p soft production of mesons soft hadron exchange p+p- and p0p0 : Physics is almost the same, but gives independent information Electromagnetic production as mesons: s(p0p0)<<s(p+p-) Resonances (I=0, JPC=even++) decaying via strong interaction:               s(p0p0):s(p+p-) =1:2 Test of QCD: s(p0p0)/s(p+p-) : ~0.03 (LO) – 0.5 (“handbag”) c.m.-energy (W) and angular dependences must also be examined. BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Resonances to appear in ggpp (I=0, JPC=even++) mesons --- fJ or ccJ (J=even) f2(1270) has been observed in p+p- and in p0p0 as a big peak. f0(980) not significantly seen in the past experiments. Are any mesons previously reported seen ? f0 1.3-1.5GeV f2 1.6 – 2.1GeV f4(2050) etc. - The charmonia: cc0 and cc2 s(p0p0):s(p+p-) =1:2 Interference between a resonance and continuum component modifies the ratio. We expect that continuum contribution in p0p0 is smaller than in p+p-, in the intermediate or low energies BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle Results of ggp+p- Belle Collaboration Phys. Rev. D 75, 051101(R) (2007) J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 074102 (2007) Phys. Lett. B 615, 39 (2005) W = 0.8 – 1.5 GeV W = 2.4 – 4.1 GeV BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle f0(980) in gg  p+p- f0(980) – is an ordinary qq meson? - an exotic state? - some special theory needed? Its two-photon coupling is a crucial key. Prediction of Ggg : uu, dd --- 1.3 – 1.8 keV ss --- 0.3 – 0.5 keV KK molecule --- 0.2 – 0.6 keV 85.9fb-1 f2(1270) f0(980) Backupに式 P2 F2(1270)の分布説明 Flatte Energy depoの何の分布? かたっぽtag? Pimu separationの精度 p/m separation: by comparing energy deposit in the CsI calorimeter between data and MC f0(980) appears as a small but statistically significant peak. BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle Fit to the f0(980) line shape f0(980) is observed as a clear peak. f0(980) p+p-  Backupに式 P2  |resonance|2 M = Gp+p- = Ggg = MeV/c2 MeV eV Interference term BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

New upper limit for Br (h’p+p-) No h’p+p- enhancement is seen near 958MeV/c2 This is a P and CP mode; previous upper limit: Br (h’p+p-) < 0.02 (HBC (1969)) New upper limit for Br(h’p+p-) < 2.8 10-3 (interference with the non-resonant process allowed) < 3.3 10-4 (no interference) h’ mass BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle p+p- measurements at high energies PLB 615, 39 (2005) Two-photon measurements of  Ggg(ccJ)Br (eV) GggBr(cc0p+p-) 15.1  2.1  2.3 GggBr(cc0K+K-) 14.3  1.6  2.3 GggBr(cc2p+p-) 0.76  0.14  0.11 GggBr(cc2K+K-) 0.44  0.76  0.14 BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Preliminary results of ggp0p0 Belle Collaboration arXiv:0711.1926v1 [hep-ex] (2007) BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Selection of p0p0 candidates Based on data with an integrated luminosity of 95 fb-1 Only 4 photons are visible - Triggered by Calorimeter triggers - No reconstructed track with pt>0.1GeV/c, dr<5cm, |dz|<5cm  - 2 or more photons OR 1 or more p0s ------------------------------------------- - Just 2 p0s with E(decay product photon)>70MeV, pt>0.15GeV/c - Transverse-momentum (pt)-balance of the two p0’s |Spt|<0.05GeV/c - Satisfying a rough trigger condition at offline: N_gamma=4 or Esum_lab>1.25 GeV in the ECL-trigger region, 17<qlab<128.7deg BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Raw-event distribution of p0p0 W = M(p0p0) |cosq*| in gg c.m.s About 1.26M events (before the background subtraction) | cos q*| |cos q*|<0.4 | cos q*| W (GeV) W (GeV) cc0 |cos q*|<0.8 cc2 Estimated background 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 W (GeV) BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

pt-balance distributions and backgrounds W=0.90GeV, |cosq*|=0.05 W=0.66GeV, |cosq*|=0.05 pt-unbalanced backgrounds are seen in W<1.2 GeV Histogram – experimental Low-energy beam-background photons Intermediate or Higher energies Non-exclusive process sources not significantly seen W=1.18GeV, |cosq*|=0.65 W>3.6GeV, |cosq*|<0.4 Dots – experimental Histo. – Signal MC 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 |Spt| (GeV/c) BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle Detection Efficiency Determined by signal MC simulation and fitted with smooth functions of (W, |cos q*|) Trigger efficiency is determined by the trigger simulator after tunings of the energy thresholds the total energy trigger – 1.15 GeV counting number of clusters (>=4) - 110 MeV Close to 100% above W>1.3 GeV Acceptance Around 11% at maximum, typically 5 % Large angular dependence due to geometrical condition of the detector Overall efficiency = trigger efficiency Acceptance W (GeV) BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Unfolding and Energy calibration Correction for a smearing effect from a finite W resolution Apply Unfolding to the experimental W distribution (in each angle region) using an asymmetric Gaussian (1.3% higher side and 1.9 % lower side). Unfolding is applied in 0.9 GeV < W < 2.4 GeV. Experimental sample of h’  gg The energy scale is correct. Histogram: Data Smearing func. peaking at the nominal mass Before (orange) and After (blue) the unfolding |cosq*|=0.225 Yield W(GeV) BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Cross sections of gg p0p0 Obtain first ds/d|cosq*| in each D|cos q*|=0.05 bin Then, accumulate them over the angle Preliminary Note: After the Unfolding, different data bins and errors are no longer independent of each other. Data in the charmonium region are omitted from the plot. Comparison with Crystal Ball at DORIS II (1990) They are consistent. Belle has ~103 times more data. Statistical errors only. BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Systematic-error sources Trigger efficiency - - - 4% @ W > ~ 1.1 GeV (HiE) 5% - 30% @ W< ~1.1 GeV (Clst4) -p0 reconstruction efficiency - - - 6% Acceptance (dominated by pt-balance cut) - - 3% - 5% Background subtraction - - - 20% of the subtraction component 3% in High W where no subtraction applied. Luminosity function - - - 4% - 5% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 55% - 10% @ W<~1.05GeV ~9% @ 1.05GeV<W<~2.7GeV 10% - 11% @ W>~2.7GeV BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle Differential cross section (Angular dependence) gg p0p0 Preliminary Low W  High-W Large angle enhancement appears  disappears Small angle enhancement disappears  appears ds/d|cos q*| (nb) Change  ~ 2.0 GeV ds/d|cos q*| (nb) BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle Resonant structures gg  Resonance  p0p0 Clearly seen: f0(980) and f2(1270) New broad peaks ~1.65 GeV and ~1.95 GeV Hints with lower significance : ~1.45 GeV, cc0 (and cc2) Sizes of the charmonia Ggg(cc0)B(cc0p0p0): 8.4  2.2  0.8 eV (4.5s) Ggg(cc2)B(cc2p0p0): 0.29  0.23  0.03 eV (1.4s) Upper limit < 0.75 eV (90%CL) Preliminary The central values are consistent with the expectations from isospin invariance between the p+p-/p0p0 decays |cos q*|<0.4 BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Cross section ratio s(p0p0)/s(p+p-) |cosq*|<0.6 Preliminary Error bars are statistical only. Systematic errors: About 10% at each measurement point, except p+p- above the charmonium masses (~25%). Preliminary Charmonium region is omitted from the plot. The ratio is 0.3 – 0.4 at W>2.7 GeV BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Conclusion of p+p- measurement - We measure the process gg p+p- with 85.9 fb-1 data. The differential cross sections are obtained in 0.8 GeV < W < 1.5 GeV and |cos q*|<0.6 in the gg c.m. frame. (# We separately published before for the region 2.4 GeV<W<4.1GeV) - We confirm small but statistically significant peak from f0(980). New upper limit for P and CP violating process h’p+p- is obtained. BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Summary for p0p0 measurement - We measure the process gg p0p0 with 95fb-1 data. Preliminary results of the differential cross sections are obtained in 0.6 GeV < W < 4.0 GeV and |cos q*|<0.8 in the gg c.m. frame. - Several resonant structures are seen, including a statistically significant peak from f0(980). Behavior of the angular dependence (forward- and/or large-angle enhancements) changes drastically at around W= 2.0 GeV. The cross section ratio s(p0p0)/s(p+p-) in 3 GeV region is obtained. BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle BACKUP slides BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

KEKB Accelerator and Belle Detector Asymmetric e- e+ collider 8 GeV e- (HER) x 3.5 GeV e+ (LER) s=10.58 GeV  (4S) Beam crossing angle: 22mrad Continuous injection Luminosity Lmax=1.71x1034 cm-2s-1 ∫ Ldt  740 fb-1 (Nov.2007)   High momentum/energy resolutions CDC+Solenoid, CsI Vertex measurement – Si strips Particle identification TOF, Si-aerogel, CDC-dE/dx, RPC for KL/muon BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Measurements of two-photon processes at Belle ggcc2  gJ/y PLB 540, 33(2002) gg(f2'(1525)etc.  )K+K- (1.4 - 2.4 GeV) EPJC 32, 323 (2003) gg (cc0,cc2)p+p-,K+K- (2.4 - 4.1 GeV) PLB 615, 39 (2005) gg (hc )pp (2.025 - 4.0 GeV) PLB 621, 41 (2005) gg  cc2'  DD PRL 96, 082003 (2006) gg (f0(980)etc. )p+p- (0.8 - 1.5 GeV) PRD 75, 051101(R) (2007), Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 074102 (2007) gg (cc0,cc2 )K+K- (2.4 - 4.0 GeV) PLB 651, 15 (2007) gg (hc,cc0,cc2 )p+p-p+p-,K+K-p+p-,K+K-K+K- arXiv:0706.3955[hep-ex], to appear in EPJC gg  a2's  p+p-p0 (1.2 - 3.0 GeV) hep-ex/0610022 gg (hc )LL,S0S0 (2.3-4.0 GeV) hep-ex/0609048 gg p0p0 arXiv:0711.1926 [hep-ex]  BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Reactions at KEKB/Belle The cross sections observable there e+e-U(4S)BB --- 1.1 nb e+e-qq (uds) --- 2.1 nb e+e-cc --- 1.2 nb e+e-t+t- --- 0.9 nb gg  hadrons (Wgg>0.8GeV) --- ~1 nb (within the acceptance) Ee+e-=10.58GeV Q2max=1GeV2 Luminosity function (1/GeV) Luminosity Function for quasi-real gg collisions ds(in ee) = s(in gg) Lgg(W) dW Calculated with equivalent-photon approximation BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Two-meson exclusive final states C = + resonances: Peak structure in the invariant mass distribution Test of QCD: c.m.-energy (W) dependence and angular dependence in high energies General Analysis strategy Invariant-mass of hadron pair = W (c.m. energy of gg) Quasi-real two-photon collisions with final state fully reconstructed --- strict transverse momentum balance is required (| Spt| <50 - 200 MeV/c ) This gives efficient background rejection BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Selection of p+p- candidates Based on data with an integrated luminosity of 85.9fb-1 - Two charged tracks (oppositely charged) with pt>0.3 GeV/c, -0.47 <cos qlab <+0.82 |Spt*| (in e+e- c.m.s) < 0.1 GeV/c - p/K, p/p separations using TOF, Aerogel-Cherenkov and dE/dx Muon background subtraction with fitting the energy-deposit distribution on ECL KLM (muon detector with iron filter) cannot be available in these low energies BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Differential cross section ds/d|cos q*| (nb) BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Angular dependences at some energy points Red dashed lines --- Size of point-to-point systematic error Systematic structure near |cos q*|=0.45-0.55 could be due to a measurement bias BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Fitting formula for f0(980) BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Angular dependence in f2(1270) region Close to |Y2|2 2 Consistent with pure J=2 and l=2 But, mathematically the partial waves cannot be fully separated taking into account the interference between J=0 and 2. BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle Fit to f2(1270) line shape Components: f2 (1270) resonance Smooth continuum: Interfering component (l=2) No-interfering component (I=0) resonance data and fit continuum (sum) This is for consistency check: Known mass and width of f2(1270) (PDG2006) are used. The continuum and relative phase parameters etc. were floated. continuum (l=2) Interference +continuum BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Trigger efficiency study Correlation between the two triggers: HiE (Etot_trg>1.15GeV), Clst4 (>=4 clusters each with >110MeV) (The thresholds have been tuned.) * -- data, dashed histogram – trigger simulator (tsim) HiE in Clst4 large p0 c.m. angle Clst4 in HiE with Nclst=4 Etrg (GeV) Minimum cluster energy (GeV) Clst4 in HiE small p0 c.m. angle Clst4 in HiE with Nclst=4 Minimum cluster energy (GeV) Etrg (GeV) BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

Trigger efficiency from the simulation Trigger efficiency is determined by the trigger simulator, tsim after tunings of the energy thresholds for the total energy trigger (HiE) – 1.15 GeV and for counting number of clusters (Clst4) - 110 MeV In each of 16 c.m. angular bins 0.0 < |cos q*| < 0.8, Fitted by a two-dimensional function of (W, |cos q*| ) BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle

pt-balance resolution and correction to efficiency the pt-balance cut Efficiency is affected by pt-balance resolution. W =1.96 – 2.00 GeV |cos q*| = 0.5 – 0.6 Dots -- experimental Curve – fit to data (considering backgrounds) (peak: 16 MeV/c) Histogram – signal MC (peak: 14 MeV/c) The resolution in the experimental data is by ~15% worse than the MC. Correction factor: 5% - 10%, depending on W and |cos q*| BBCB-WS, Nov., 2007, S.Uehara, Belle