Sustainability Bus – Feasibility Study This project examines the financial feasibility of operating a bus service between Eugene/Springfield and Portland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Public Transit Alliance (NuPTA) RIPEC Study: Transportation at a Crossroads (2002) Growing Smart with Transit: A Report of the Transit 2020 Working.
Advertisements

Motor Vehicle Fleet Performance Audit Jeff A. McMahan, CFE Oklahoma State Auditor & Inspector NSAA Annual Conference 2005 Wrightsville Beach, NC.
Smarter Travel Programmes– Financial impacts for Transport for London COLIN BUCHANAN
©2008 SIVECO Romania. All Rights Reserved. February 16, 2014 PAN-EUROPEAN WORKPLACE MOBILITY PEWTA-EMPLOYERS 2009.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Wants.
About Us Shalha Mohd Said (SMS) Passenger Transport by Rented Buses LLC offers a full service Vehicle Rental Programs for all kinds of company. You can.
Integrated Public Transportation in Santo Domingo: An Educational Investment Carl Allen 5/02/10 A presentation based on research for COPDES, GFDD/FUNGLODE.
Traffic Impact Study “Study to evaluate the impact on a roadway network due to a proposed development”
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Georgia has Led the Nation for 3 Consecutive Years.
NAME Of Transportation Supervisor DATE The Business of Transportation.
Emerging California Passenger Rail Corridors A Comparative Look at the Future For Enhanced Passenger Rail in Coachella Valley/Banning Pass and the Delmarva.
ASSESSING THE VALUE OF BUS SERVICES FOR LEISURE Dr Jo Guiver Nick Davies Institute of Transport and Tourism.
Air Deccan - Cutting Costs, Not Corners The Story of Indias First Low Cost Airline Fin 456-Team 9: Ruchika Chinda, Ruibin Chen, Rishi Gupta, Anuj Sharma.
Transit Capacity & Quality of Service Manual, 3rd Edition Fixed Route Quality of Service.
TTI Passenger Rail Research Overview Curtis Morgan Program Manager, Rail Research Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) January 25, 2013.
ACE Marketing Research AAA Member Poll 2011 Spring Break Travel and Entertainment AAA Texas March 2011.
Financial Literacy Module 1 Assessment Review
Capacity Planning For Products and Services
Intercity Bus Program: Alternative Strategy for Rural Transport
Transportation and Air Traveler Characteristics Findings from the 2011 Washington-Baltimore Regional Air Passenger Survey Transportation Planning Board.
DISTANCE: (d=rt).
27 th June 2006Irene Potter – Learning Partnership Conference.
UATS Director’s Workshop Agenda April 30, 2001  Introduction (12:30 – 12:35)  Development Review and Mitigation (12:35 – 2:10) Break (2:10 – 2:15) 
How to Complete the Ground Travel Worksheet
Filling out a Travel Expense Report. AU One Card Free Travel Benefits Travel emergency assistance and car rental accident reporting VISA-911.
Craig J. Nichols, Secretary Customer Focus Group Meeting Rental Vehicles State Term Contract Contract No May 21, 2014.
Heathrow pods are go Presentation by Fraser Brown, Managing Director Ultra Global PRT.
Northwest ISD Swim Facility Options Study September 23, 2013 Brinkley Sargent Architects Counsilman-Hunsaker.
Parking and Transportation Services Presentation December 2, 2008.
LOUISIANA TRAVEL POLICY TRAINING
Kenia Garcia Monica Molina UC MERCED CAT TRACKS. SURVEY QUESTION 1.
Car Clubs and Business Travel: Opportunities and Barriers Chris Endacott Scottish Urban Car Club Forum.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Feasibility Study Jonathan CalderwoodJune 14, 2013 West Shore Communities Feasibility of Sustainable Transportation with Passenger Ferry Service.
English 212: Technical Writing Sarah A. Bujno. Overview Introduction Criteria Methods Research Results Conclusions Recommendations.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Fall 2001 Lectures 15 Policy Issues II: Public Transportation and Energy Conservation.
OSU Transportation Services Faculty Senate Update December 11, 2014.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
©SHRM 2008SHRM Poll: May 6, Assistance Organizations Are Offering to Help Employees Deal With High Gas Prices in 2008 YesNoPlan to Raising mileage.
Highway Information Seminar October 25, 2012 Adella Santos, NHTS Program Manager FHWA, Office of Highway Policy Information.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
HR: Leading People, Leading Organizations © 2007 SHRM SHRM Weekly Online Survey: May 24, Gas Price Sample comprised of 489 randomly selected.
Chapter 4 - Transportation “Travel by Land” Automobile & Recreational Vehicle Travel.
00 Metropolitan Transit System Transit Serving Point Loma September 23, 2008.
Metropolitan Washington Region 2002 Vanpool Survey TPB Technical Committee Meeting April 4, 2002 Technical Committee Item # 8.
Alameda County Transportation Services – CCBA Panel Reducing Our Carbon Footprint from Transportation Phillip Kobernick, Alameda County General Services.
Pre-Arranged Transportation. PDX GT Facts Ground Transportation office – one contract administrator Commercial Roadway and Hold Lot managed by contractor.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
Route and Network Planning
Transportation Analysis. Issues Is it feasible to reduce bus usage? – Priority for bus users – Paperwork requirements – Impact on practice schedule, safety,
Transportation: Issues and
___________________________ Principles, Practices, Philosophies TOURISM TWELFTH EDITION Charles R. Goeldner J. R. Brent Ritchie © 2012 John Wiley and Sons,
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
Please call the Campus Safety Department at with any questions. NEXT.
Key Trends Shaping Transportation System Management Operations Timothy Papandreou CIO, Director Office of Innovation San Francisco Municipal Transportation.
University Drive Road Diet September 8, Goals and Objectives A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation.
10 by 10 Initiatives. 10% by 2010 Achieve a 10% increase in the use of “alternative transportation modes” by the year Stepped approach: Convert.
Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.
East Carolina University Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Transport in the South Peninsula
STEPS Symposium UC Davis December 7, 2017 Lew Fulton, Co-Director
The Fool on the Hill: Management Considerations for New Law Firms
Benefits of National 1.
East Carolina University Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Charles “Cody” Smith, PE
Mobility as a Service (MaaS):
East Carolina University Enterprise Rent-A-Car
North Suburban Planning Council
Presentation transcript:

Sustainability Bus – Feasibility Study This project examines the financial feasibility of operating a bus service between Eugene/Springfield and Portland. FSI Capstone: April 16, 2013 Sandy Booker, Mel Jackson, Tash OBrien, Yousef Rahmani, Tom Szumita

Sustainability Bus – Bus Proposal This proposal recommends a retrofitted executive coach as an alternative travel option to the current reimbursement or motor pool choices The Office of Sustainability has determined that this service will help reduce the total emissions of the University Bus features will include: – Extra wide seating – Wi-Fi – Conferencing capacity (fold-up conference tables with pivoting seats) Additional benefits of executive coach service include: – Cost savings from auto reimbursement, motor pool rentals, and auto damage and liability costs – Increased safety – Increased productivity - Rather than driving, passengers can utilize the coach as a mobile office and meeting space Our Question – Is this project financially feasible?

Sustainability Bus – Costing Analysis The analysis focuses on five major factors: 1.Current travel patterns 2.Cost of current travel 3.Cost of bus 4.Review of alternative options 5.Will people use the bus?

Sustainability Bus – Travel Patterns and Costs FY10 data was analyzed to determine reoccurring travel destination and frequency Data was obtained from both costs associated with the Universitys motor pool and individual auto reimbursements The results show that – 30% of all costs were for Portland Travel – 47% of all Portland travel was on Thursday or Friday – 14% of all travel costs were to Portland on either Thursday or Friday

Sustainability Bus – Cost of Bus (3 Options)

Sustainability Bus – Feasibility Study The question is – How many people are needed to get out of their cars and onto the bus?

Sustainability Bus – Break-Even Analysis Future reimbursement and motor pool costs are projected using 3% inflation Compared to expected costs of purchase and maintenance using the financing plan, the bus will break-even in FY17 if the annual percentage of people using the bus grows as follows: 20%, 30%, 40%, 45%, 50%

Sustainability Bus – How many people on the bus? Using the break-even data and 20%, 30%, 40%, 45%, 50% growth assumption, and assuming 1.5 passengers per vehicle (current motor pool data indicates 1.67), the chart below shows on average the number of people needed to take the bus. How many people on the bus? FY14FY15FY16FY17FY18 Total Trips (FY10 Reimb and MP)1,118 Average travelers per trip1.5 Total travelers1,677 Average travel weeks/year48 Average travelers per week35 Break-even Percentage20%30%40%45%50% Break-even travelers

Sustainability Bus – Review of All Options 1.Motor Pool Cost per mile - $.20 for midsize, $.25 for full, $.28 for 6 passenger, and $.30 for 8 passenger Plus daily rental - $21 for midsize, $25 for full, $28 for 9 passenger, and $28 for 8 passenger 2.Drive personal vehicle – Reimbursement Driver reimbursed 220 miles round trip to $.565 per mile = $124 per trip 3.Amtrak - $26 one way to Portland ($52 round trip) 4.Virtual Meetings (Skyping, video teleconferencing, etc.) 5.Teleportation – Beam Me Up Pam Costing data unknown Emission usage unknown

Sustainability Bus – Survey Results A campus-wide survey was taken, receiving approximately 250 responses. Statistically, 65% of respondents indicated they would use the bus for most or all trips if the service was offered. Additionally, the responses in the comment section were overwhelming positive, however some of the supplemental provisos raised included: Will it have a flexible schedule? Where will the bus drop off? How will I get around in Portland? Will it be offered in reverse, Portland to Eugene in the morning?

Sustainability Bus – Feasibility Study Pros/Cons More time to work Less stress and easier for someone who doesnt like to drive. Portland has a great metro system to make getting to locations easier if not the central drop off place. Convenient way to get to PDX airport if it went there after downtown drop off. More comfortable mode of transportation with the proposed bus configuration. Reduce emissions Hard to schedule to accommodate different schedules Loss of productivity if in PDX for 2 hrs mtg & have to wait for bus back to Eugene at 5pm. Lack of convenience for getting around PDX if business involves multiple stops. Employees would have to give up reimbursement which is currently $ round trip.

Sustainability Bus – Recommendations & Next Steps While the initial results of our analysis justifies moving forward, we recommend the following next steps: Data Analysis Perform a similar analysis for additional and more recent years. Currently, all analysis was performed on data from FY10 and prior. More recent data will help identify trends and/or inconsistencies. (i.e., Do FY11 and FY12 show similar results?) Additional Surveying More specific targeting: Survey any employee who has received a reimbursement and/or used the motor pool. These employees are potential bus customers. Provide a more specific itinerary: Survey should include the actual plan. Survey comments were concerned with convenient times and locations. The survey should ask if they would use the bus for the specific itinerary, not just in general.