Ana Pinto, Jennifer Oates, Alexandra Grutter, Redouan Bshary 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ancient Endo-siRNA Pathways Reveal New Tricks Julie M. Claycomb Current Biology Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages R703-R715 (August 2014) DOI: /j.cub
Advertisements

Volume 16, Issue 13, Pages (July 2006)
Calibrating color vision
Auguste M.P. von Bayern, Nathan J. Emery  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 16, Pages R673-R676 (August 2013)
Human Development: Faces in the Womb
Liangtang Chang, Qin Fang, Shikun Zhang, Mu-ming Poo, Neng Gong 
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Visual Categorization: When Categories Fall to Pieces
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Chimpanzees Trust Their Friends
Parental alarm calls warn nestlings about different predatory threats
Spontaneous Metatool Use by New Caledonian Crows
Wild Birds Use an Ordering Rule to Decode Novel Call Sequences
Joyce F. Benenson, Richard W. Wrangham  Current Biology 
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Marianne Elias, Colin Fontaine, F.J. Frank van Veen  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 14, Pages R528-R529 (July 2011)
Elephant cognition Current Biology
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Chimeric Synergy in Natural Social Groups of a Cooperative Microbe
Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words
She1-Mediated Inhibition of Dynein Motility along Astral Microtubules Promotes Polarized Spindle Movements  Steven M. Markus, Katelyn A. Kalutkiewicz,
What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Jennifer L. Hoy, Iryna Yavorska, Michael Wehr, Cristopher M. Niell 
Selfish-herd behaviour of sheep under threat
Vision Guides Selection of Freeze or Flight Defense Strategies in Mice
Locomotion: Why We Walk the Way We Walk
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages R262-R263 (March 2014)
Fish choose appropriately when and with whom to collaborate
Selfish-herd behaviour of sheep under threat
Newborns' Cry Melody Is Shaped by Their Native Language
Visual Sensitivity Can Scale with Illusory Size Changes
Daniel Hanus, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Wild Vervet Monkeys Trade Tolerance and Specific Coalitionary Support for Grooming in Experimentally Induced Conflicts  Christèle Borgeaud, Redouan Bshary 
Peng Zhang, Min Bao, Miyoung Kwon, Sheng He, Stephen A. Engel 
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Rooks Use Stones to Raise the Water Level to Reach a Floating Worm
Volume 22, Issue 24, Pages (December 2012)
Auguste M.P. von Bayern, Nathan J. Emery  Current Biology 
Imitation recognition in great apes
Multisensory Integration and Attention in Developmental Dyslexia
FOXO transcription factors
Octopus Movement: Push Right, Go Left
Volume 372, Issue 9632, Pages (July 2008)
Federica Amici, Filippo Aureli, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Self and Other in the Human Motor System
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Self-Control in Chimpanzees Relates to General Intelligence
Category Selectivity in the Ventral Visual Pathway Confers Robustness to Clutter and Diverted Attention  Leila Reddy, Nancy Kanwisher  Current Biology 
Ian C. Fiebelkorn, Yuri B. Saalmann, Sabine Kastner  Current Biology 
Public Versus Personal Information for Mate Copying in an Invertebrate
Volume 16, Issue 13, Pages (July 2006)
The Interaction between Binocular Rivalry and Negative Afterimages
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
Manuel Jan Roth, Matthis Synofzik, Axel Lindner  Current Biology 
Male Fish Deceive Competitors about Mating Preferences
Collective Motion and Cannibalism in Locust Migratory Bands
Individual Recognition in Ant Queens
Functionally Referential Communication in a Chimpanzee
Jonathan Redshaw, Thomas Suddendorf  Current Biology 
Vision: Attending the Invisible
Will Travel for Food: Spatial Discounting in Two New World Monkeys
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Maria J.S. Guerreiro, Lisa Putzar, Brigitte Röder  Current Biology 
Liangtang Chang, Qin Fang, Shikun Zhang, Mu-ming Poo, Neng Gong 
Moshe Nagari, Ariel Gera, Sara Jonsson, Guy Bloch
Presentation transcript:

Cleaner Wrasses Labroides dimidiatus Are More Cooperative in the Presence of an Audience  Ana Pinto, Jennifer Oates, Alexandra Grutter, Redouan Bshary  Current Biology  Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages 1140-1144 (July 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.021 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental Setup to Test for Image Scoring Behavior of Bystanders and Audience Effects of Cleaner Fish (A) A bystander in the central aquarium could observe and approach, behind one-way mirrors, a cleaner-parasitized client pair and a cleaner-unparasitized client pair in adjacent aquaria with the same dimensions (90 × 38 × 38 cm). PVC tubes were provided for fish to use as shelters. The clear partitions in the cleaner-client aquaria depicted in the figure were removed during trials. (B) For the audience effects, new individuals were used and cleaners interacted with their clients once with the bystander behind the opaque partition and once with the bystander visible. An opaque partition (not shown) was placed between the aquaria between trials to block visual contact. Current Biology 2011 21, 1140-1144DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.021) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Image Scoring Rules of Bystanders for Interactions with Parasitized Clients (A–C) Duration (in seconds) that the bystander spent near the parasitized client's aquarium relative to the duration that the cleaner spent interacting with the client (A), the absolute number of jolts by the client (B), and the jolt rate performed by the client (number of jolts per 100 s of interaction with client) (C). (D) Number of client jolts relative to the duration that the cleaner spent interacting with the client. Each point represents mean values of two bystanders being exposed to the same cleaner-client pairs. Current Biology 2011 21, 1140-1144DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.021) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Image Scoring Rules of Bystanders for Interactions with Unparasitized Clients (A–C) Duration (in seconds) that the bystander spent near the unparasitized client's aquarium relative to the duration that the cleaner spent interacting with the client (A), the absolute number of jolts by the client (B), and the jolt rate performed by the client (number of jolts per 100 s of interaction with client) (C). (D) Number of client jolts relative to duration that the cleaner spent interacting with the client. Three cleaner-client pairs never interacted, which explains why n = 7 in (D). Current Biology 2011 21, 1140-1144DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.021) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cleaner Wrasses Increase Cooperation with an Audience Behaviors of cleaners in the absence (absent) or presence (present) of a bystander. Data are presented as box-and-whisker plots with boxes representing medians and interquartiles; error bars are 10th and 90th percentiles, and points are outliers. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. (A) Duration (in seconds) that the cleaner spent interacting with the client. (B) Number of jolts (per 100 s) by client. (C) Percentage of jolts relative to all cleaner mouth contacts with the client. Current Biology 2011 21, 1140-1144DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.021) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions