Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 127, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 Complex Assembled on DNA and Its Implications for DNA DSB Repair  Laura Spagnolo, Angel Rivera-Calzada,
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory.
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Structure and Organization of Coat Proteins in the COPII Cage
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Rahul C. Deo, Caroline M. Groft, K.R. Rajashankar, Stephen K. Burley 
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
Structural Basis for the EBA-175 Erythrocyte Invasion Pathway of the Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum  Niraj H. Tolia, Eric J. Enemark, B. Kim Lee.
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Structural and Biophysical Studies of the Human IL-7/IL-7Rα Complex
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Topologies of a Substrate Protein Bound to the Chaperonin GroEL
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Architecture of a Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages 941-952 (December 2015) Structural Basis of Neurohormone Perception by the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Torso  Simon Jenni, Yogesh Goyal, Marcin von Grotthuss, Stanislav Y. Shvartsman, Daryl E. Klein  Molecular Cell  Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages 941-952 (December 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.026 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2015 60, 941-952DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.026) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of the mPTTH-sTorso Complex (A) Initial experimental electron density map after single anomalous diffraction (SAD) phasing and statistical density modification including 2-fold noncrystallographic symmetry (NCS) and multicrystal density averaging. The map was calculated to 4.5 Å resolution. Anomalous difference Fourier peaks are shown in green and orange for the tantalum and platinum 1 derivatives, respectively. The main chain of the final model is shown as black ribbon. (B) Final feature-enhanced electron density map at 2.7 Å resolution calculated with phenix.fem (Adams et al., 2010). (C) The heterotetramer complex. Molecule A of sTorso (right side) is colored blue (Domain I) and yellow (Domain II). The same domains of molecule B (left side) are colored light blue and khaki. Central dimer of mPTTH is colored green and lime. Modeled glycans are marked with asterisks. (D) sTorso is shown in surface representation, in two orthogonal views. The dimer of mPTTH from the complex is enlarged and boxed to the right. Strands of hairpins are labeled A–D for monomer A, and a–d for monomer B. Each cystine is labeled 1–7 to highlight disulfide pairing. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 941-952DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.026) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 sTorso’s Fold and Dimer Interactions (A) FN3 domains of sTorso are nearly orthogonal to each other. Cystines are numbered 1–8 in orange text. Disulfides are shown as sticks. Side chains involved in hydrophobic interactions between the N-terminal helix and the first domain are colored purple. The linker region between domains that could not be modeled (residues 156–170) is drawn as dashes. (B) N-terminal helix dimer interactions between receptor monomers. The view is from the perspective of the mPTTH dimer in Figure 1C. The Q43 label sits on the receptors’ 2-fold symmetry axis. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 941-952DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.026) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 mPTTH Binds Asymmetrically to the sTorso Dimer The 2-fold axes of the receptor and ligand dimers are shown in blue and green, respectively (center panel). Their point of intersection is shown as a black dot. The angle between these axes is ∼3.5°. A blue circle defines the plane of the membrane. Detailed interactions between the ligand and receptor are shown in four windows surrounding the center panel. Interactions observed in the complex with receptor A (right windows), but not maintained in the complex with receptor B (left windows) are labeled with red text. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 941-952DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.026) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Analysis of Negative Cooperativity (A) SEC-MALS of mPTTH, sTorso, and different complex ratios. The molar mass determined by MALS is drawn as a heavy black line. Thin black dashed horizontal lines at 25, 35, 60, and 95 kDa identify the approximate expected masses for dimer mPTTH, monomer sTorso, heterotrimer, and heterotetramer, respectively. The vertical dashed lines mark the peak locations from the upper trace. (B) ITC of sTorso titrated into mPTTH. The isotherm is fit with an equation for two sequential binding events in the lower panel. (Inset) Thermodynamic parameters from the ITC experiment. First and second binding events are colored black and red, respectively. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 941-952DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.026) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Structural Comparison to the IL-17R Complex (A) sTorso-mPTTH complex with sTorso molecule B removed for clarity. mPTTH is in surface representation with monomer B colored gray. Domain III of Torso, which is not included in our crystal construct, is shown as a red dashed oval. (B) The IL-17R complex (PDB 3JVF) aligned to strands of sTorso Domain II and colored as in (A) for clarity. (C) The mPTTH dimer shown as a cartoon and colored as in (A). (D) IL-17 dimer aligned manually to optimize cystine knot overlay with mPTTH. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 941-952DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.026) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Torso’s Phylogenic Tree The Torso node of the protostomia RTKinome. Two main branches separate arthropod (lower) and nonarthropod (upper) sequences. The GenInfo Identifier (GI) number of each sequence is listed at the branch termini. Branches of related taxa are colored and labeled where appropriate. Complete sequences from known human parasites are labeled with an asterisk. See also Figures S4–S6. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 941-952DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.026) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model of Torso Activation (A) Schematic of the kinetic model for receptor-ligand interactions. L, R, C, and D represent ligand, receptor, complex, and dimeric receptor complex, respectively. VL and VR are the rates of ligand and receptor production, respectively; k1on, k2on, k1off, and k2off are binding rate constants; kRe is the receptor turnover rate; kCe and kDe are monomeric and dimeric endocytosis rates, respectively. (B) Kinetics of dimer concentrations for various combinations of receptor levels (R0/Kd1) labeled High, Medium, and Low and cooperativities (Kd2/Kd1). Kd1 is constant at 4 nM. (C) Heatmap showing the magnitude of dimensionless Mean Residence Time (MRT), defined as MRT∗kDe, for different receptor concentrations and cooperativities, as defined in (B). Receptor concentration as R0/Kd1 represents the extent and rate of the first binding step; values ≫1 represent a fast first binding step, and values higher than 1 can be used to study the second binding step. See also Table S2. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 941-952DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.026) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions