Evaluation on Maximum CO2-Delta in 2-Tests-Approach

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current status of alternative warming up procedure Annex 4 § (OIL#19) WLTP-06-25e T. Yamaguchi, Japan
Advertisements

WLTP-06-31e WLTP correction algorithms progress report from TUG (chassis dynamometer corrections) and TNO (coast down corrections) preliminary results.
WLTP-DTP-14 Geneva, DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Progress Report DTP Subgroup Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines (LabProcICE)WLTP-DTP-14.
Proposal tire & vehicle selection for WLTP DTP10 06-Jun-2012 JAPAN.
WLTP rev1e BMW, Christoph Lueginger WLTP Road Load Family
Resistance Forces on A Vehicle P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Estimation of Vehicle Demands ….
WLTP-08-19e BMW, Christoph Lueginger WLTP Road Load Family
WLTP Road Load Family concept
WLTP Phase 1B Main Open Issues Road and Dyno Load Presentation at WLTP IG Meeting Geneva Open Issues Road and Dyno Load- K. Kolesa Working paper.
WLTP 8th DTP Meeting Geneva, DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Progress Report DTP Subgroup Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines (LabProcICE)
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
WLTP N/v tolerance Simulation results and conclusion BMW,
André Rijnders RDW (NL) and Ernst Peter Weidmann ACEA-LCV
Feasibility of the 3 litre per 100 Km small family petrol car with regular port injection Luis E. Arimany Supervisor : Matthew Harrison.
Assessment Criteria for the Acceptability of Cycle and Testing Procedure Informal working document DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Assessment Criteria.
12 V SoC – Monitoring - Assessment of Tolerances Audi AG WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-105.
WLTP 6th DTP Meeting Geneva DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Parameter Setting for Validation 2 DTP Subgroup Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines.
GTR proposal for Roadload determination JAPAN June 2015 WLTP-11-13e.
WLTP-DTP-12 Geneva, DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Progress Report DTP Subgroup Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines (LabProcICE)WLTP-DTP-12.
WLTP ANNEX 4, ROAD LOAD CALCULATION Proposal for calculating the road load of individual vehicles C. Lueginger, BMW; A. Feucht, Audi WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-202.
OICA CO 2 Impact through Weight Variation on Light duty Vehicles WLTP DTP6, Geneva OICA, Volkswagen WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-076.
Vehicle selection / Family concept - Japan - ICE lab proc mtg 2012/Sep/4-6 WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-142.
Starting notes for Annex 4 Phase2a Issues
Electric Motors as Automotive Prime Movers
Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process Status report
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
CO2 and pollutant emissions LDV
HDV CO2 verification test (“SiCo”)
Drafting Subgroup Meeting Part of IWG #16, The Hague, October 2016
Draft Dyno requirements for GTR (proposal broadly as per CFR § )
Tire condition for Coast Down
Improvement of Family definitions
NEW ISSUES TASK FORCE PROGRESS REPORT 20th IWG meeting WLTP-20-15e
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
Proposal for a mid vehicle concept
Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-229
Idea of family CO2/FC family criteria
Handling of wind tunnel + chassis dyno method for RLD
Consideration of ‘Family’ in gtr
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
01 General requirements Road load matrix family vehicle definition 02 Annex 4 Wind tunnel for road load matrix family 03 Annex 6 CO2 interpolation range.
Interpolation family criteria OVC-HEV and NOVC-HEV (new proposal)
Proposal tire & vehicle selection for WLTP
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Correlation Improvements
Electric Motors as Automotive Prime Movers
Rolling resistance and CO2
Vehicle warm up and stabilisation – RLD and dyno
Pilot project: Analysis of the relevance of influencing factors when determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption during type approval of passenger cars.
WLTP Correlation engine modeling
Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines
UTAC/ICE_Lab C. Vallaude, Brussels, 14-15/11/12
WLTP Correlation measurement
Meeting of the Steering Group on Simulation (SGS) Back-translation: implementation and accuracy implications Munich - 24 April 2014
Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines
Table of running resistances – PSA proposal
Table of running resistances – PSA proposal
Proposal for aerodynamic options
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Specifications for 4WD Chassis Dynamometer in WLTP
Comments Ref:WLTP (17/09/13)
Proposal for aerodynamic options
Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines
LAT Technology Modeling
Conformity-of-Production
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-183rev1
UNECE WLTP COP task-Force Revision on testing Frequency
Combined approach for vehicle test weight, stepless inertia and vehicle selection Revised proposal by The Netherlands (Andre Rijnders ), T&E (Iddo Riemersma)
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation on Maximum CO2-Delta in 2-Tests-Approach WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-238 Evaluation on Maximum CO2-Delta in 2-Tests-Approach Simulation example with wide spread family data A. Feucht Audi AG 28.6.2013

Comparison of simulation values against interpolation with 2-test-approach Family of A4 sedan (bc), A4 hatchback, A5 Coupe, A5 Cabrio, A4 allroad (wc) Same 4-cyl. gasoline engine and 7-gear-aut. transmission, 4WD, same n/v-ratio TML: 1674kg; TMH 1948 kg Difference in cd*A: 0.1526 m2 Rolling resistance: min: 6,5 kg/t; max: 10,5 kg/t Weight RR Aero ⊿CO2 total =32.8g ① ③ ② ④ ⑧ ⑤ ⑦ ⑥ Worst Best 9 Annette Feucht, I/EG-341, 20130521_max_Delta_2-tests-approach, 21. Mai 2013

Results Overall deviation between the simulation test and the interpolated values is less than 0.7 g/km for the standard gasoline engine with an interpolation range of 32.8 g/km Intermediate range „individual“ vehicle, which is most likely to be configured by the customer, shows even less deviation in all phases. Annette Feucht, I/EG-341, 20130521_max_Delta_2-tests-approach, 21. Mai 2013

Conclusion Interpolation between measured best- and worst-case-vehicle regarding to rolling resistance coefficient, aerodynamic drag and weight is at least as accurate as measuring more configurations for interpolation. This is because in a CO2-measurement of an individual set of parameters the tolerances and measurement insecurities add up (RLD + dyno setting + WLTP measurement) and with a reasonable number of measurements the overall-tolerance is at least 1 g/km rather 2-3 g/km (0,1 l/100km). It is demonstrated that the 2-test-interpolation method also works for best-case to worst-case differences of over 30g/km if only mass, rolling resistance and aerodynamics are changed in a car. Annette Feucht, I/EG-341, 20130521_max_Delta_2-tests-approach, 21. Mai 2013