Pre-Wave Survey: Technology Adoption Future Research Experimental Design: Solomon 4 Group How can you access OneBusAway? Pre-Wave Survey: Using OBA Pre-Wave.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

OTREC Points of Pride 2008 OTREC Proposal and Project Management System – a web- based project management system where faculty submit abstracts, proposals,
International Collaboration in the Cloud: from Michigan to New Zealand Dr. Deanne Cranford-Wesley Davenport University and Dr. Krassie Petrova Auckland.
GPS A UTO -S LEEP FOR E NERGY -E FFICIENT L OCATION T RACKING Sean Barbeau, Phil Winters, Nevine Georggi Center for Urban Transportation Research Rafael.
Office of Marketing SmartBenefits ® Sales Team Dates and processes in this presentation are subject to change. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
Real-Time Transit Information – A Regional 511 Perspective Nisar Ahmed June 13, 2013 T3 Webinar, RITA.
Innovations in Multi-Modal Transit Mapping Margaret Carragher E.I.T Advisor: Dr. Kari Watkins P.E. October 16, 2013 GIS in Transit Conference, Washington.
Innovations in Multi-Modal Transit Mapping Margaret Carragher E.I.T Dr. Kari Watkins P.E.
Real-Time Passenger Information Systems
ONEBUSAWAY: IMPROVING THE USABILITY OF PUBLIC TRANSIT Brian Ferris, Kari Watkins, and Alan Borning University of Washington.
Using Mobile Apps to Measure Spatial Travel Behavior Changes of Carsharing Users Sisinnio Concas, S. Barbeau, P.L. Winters, N.L. Georggi, J.M. Bond Center.
Smart Phones and Smart Travelers Sean J. Barbeau Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida.
In Portland, Oregon TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada Mark Bradley Research & Consulting.
Campaign for a Fair Transfer Vivian Satterfield, OPAL Associate Director Jared Franz, OPAL Law & Policy Associate Eavan Moore, BRU Research & Advisory.
Harassment, Intimidation and Bullying NJ State Board of Education February
Rajinesh Ravendran PhD Candidate Computer Science Discipline Queensland University of Technology INTERACT 2011 Doctoral Consortium Online Banking Customization:
BEST 2014 BEST special topic 2013 Use of PT information channels Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project Manager 2014.
Higher Access to Higher Education Fairlight Lower Learning Technologies and Resources Manager Mobile Strategy Engages Faculty and Non-Traditional Students.
Comenius Individual Pupil Mobility. Individual Pupil Mobility Aims of the action-1  Allow secondary school pupils to spend between 3 and 10 months in.
Metro Transit Operations Improved Through Technology.
An Approach for Base Transit Trip Matrix Development: Sound Transit EMME/2 Model Experience Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., Seattle October,
TAD T RAVEL A SSISTANCE M OBILE A PP TO H ELP T RANSIT R IDERS Sean J. Barbeau Center for Urban Transportation Research & Department of Computer Science.
City of West Covina Green Line Evaluation. Presented By Presented By Joanne Coletta Jim Jobst Leticia Llamas Kelly McDonald Ana Rosales Enrique Salgado.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Understanding Changes in Ridership Unit 7: Forecasting & Encouraging Ridership.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Technology Session: 21 st Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and.
Does Technology Belong in the Classroom? Presented by: Molly Carlson.
Game Theory and ILP in Transit Policing: From Analog to Digital Sullivan JP; Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Los Angeles County.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida OneBusAway Sharing real-time transit info via open-source software Sean J. Barbeau,
15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Tuesday, May 19 th, 2015 – Atlantic City, NJ Integrating Travel Demand Models & SHRP2 C11 Tools:
Alasdair Cain & Jennifer Flynn National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida Mark McCourt &
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Policy In Motion: Route360 Bryce Adams, Elizabeth Joseph, Julie Lindsey, Charles E. Maddox, Lauren Waters 1.
1 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Customer Satisfaction Measurement FY 2006 Q3 Comparison April 28, 2006.
ITS for BRT Systems: How Does Boston’s Silver Line Compare With Other BRT Systems? Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS Georgia Annual Meeting.
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Collection With Surveys Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
BEST Survey 2011 City report: Stockholm Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
1 Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida Do Variable-Pricing Strategies Influence Activity-Travel Patterns of Carsharing.
Michael Emerson earned his Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill in Now a prominent professor at Rice University,
On-Board Transit Survey Presentation to TCC Dec. 13, 2002 Heather Alhadeff, AICP
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Communicating with Travelers Unit 8: Improving Transit Quality.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2010 Survey.
Mary Ross, P.E./Myung Sung. 2 3 Lower Atlantic Regular Gas Price HIGH: $4.03- July 2008 LOW: $1.60- Dec 2008.
Thinking About Thinking About Nature Christina P. Colon, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Biological Sciences Kingsborough Community College City University of.
Lori Simon-Rusinowitz, Ph.D., Min Qi Wang, Ph.D., Dawn M. Loughlin, Ph.D., University of Maryland Center on Aging Developed in collaboration with: Kevin.
Considering the Potential of Phone Application Driver Monitors for Young People – A Systematic Review of Monitoring Acceptability and Effectiveness. Presented.
Lecture 3: Group Application Exercise This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute of Technology; Dr. Jeff LaMondia, Auburn.
NEW HAVEN – UNION STATION RIDERSHIP SURVEY JONATHAN SEERY ADVISOR: DR. NICHOLAS LOWNES.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
1 “CSE Volunteers” -- Computer Science and Engineering students to assist Hillsborough County Information & Technology Division Hillsborough County K-12.
Street Smart Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Campaign: Results and Funding Status Briefing to the Transportation Planning Board, January 18, 2006 Michael.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Course Overview Unit 1: Introduction.
Angela Nannetti CBSE 7202 T Fall Table of Contents Hypothesis/Research Design.………….3 Threats to Internal Validity………………4 Threats to External Validity……………...5.
BEST 2010 BEST 2010 Results of the survey Kjetil Vrenne BEST Project Manager May 27 th, 2010 BEST Survey 2010 Results & Analyses Page 1.
Agenda Methodology Major Findings –Perceptions of Congestion –Ease of Travel –Transportation Planning Issues –Interest in Using Public Transportation.
2009 COMMUNITY SURVEY Presentation of Final Results January 21, 2010.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
The JARC Program: New Research on Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefits David Schneider Transportation Program Specialist Federal Transit Administration.
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SERVICE OPTIONS JUNE 14, 2016.
Flamingo Fares Tampa Bay
GTFS-realtime v2.0 Sean J. Barbeau, Ph.D.
Michael A. Case, Interim Executive Director
Theoretical Background
Flamingo Fares Tampa Bay
Transit Customer Satisfaction with Mobile Fare Payment (Paper No
The basics of Social Science Research Lecture 3
Exploring The Effect of Autonomous Vehicles on Transit Ridership
Overview Background Methods Findings Future research
Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Pre-Wave Survey: Technology Adoption Future Research Experimental Design: Solomon 4 Group How can you access OneBusAway? Pre-Wave Survey: Using OBA Pre-Wave Survey: Ridership References (1)Watkins, K., Ferris, B., Borning, A., Rutherford, S., and Layton, D. (2011) "Where Is My Bus? Impact of mobile real-time information on the perceived and actual wait time of transit riders." Transportation Research Part A (2)Ferris, B., Watkins, K., and Borning, A. (2011) "OneBusAway: Behavioral and Satisfaction Changes Resulting from Providing Real-Time Arrival Information for Public Transit." Proceedings of the 2011 Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. (3)Tang, L., Thakuriah, P.V. (2012). Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: A case study in the City of Chicago. Transportation Research Part C, v.22, 2012 June, p.146(16) (4)Zhang, Feng. (2010). Traveler Responses to Real-Time Transit Passenger Information Systems. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland. Objectives & Methodology Background Information Research Questions & Literature AN EXPERIMENT WITH REAL-TIME TRANSIT INFORMATION IN TAMPA Candace Brakewood, PhD Student, Georgia Tech, | Dr. Sean Barbeau, Principal Mobile Software Architect for R&D, USF, | Dr. Kari Watkins, Assistant Professor, Georgia Tech, Acknowledgements This project is funded by the National Center for Transit Research at the Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR), a University Transportation Center (UTC). The authors would like to thank the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority for their support of the OneBusAway project, particularly Shannon Haney. We are also grateful to the 400+ bus riders in Tampa who have agreed to participate in this exciting study. Objective: Quantify the impacts of real-time bus information on transit rider behavior and satisfaction Methodology: Behavioral experiment including small deployment of OneBusAway Data Collection: Before and after web-based survey distributed through transit agency website & list Location: Tampa, Florida A Solomon four group research design is used to control for other variables. Participants were randomly assigned into groups after completing the initial survey. Most HART bus riders have access to digital technologies. 46% of survey respondents use an Android smartphone and 64% use computers. Post-Wave Survey: Conduct the post-wave survey in May Statistical Analysis: Compare the survey answers from the OneBusAway test group with the control group Regression Analysis: Model change in frequency of bus travel (per week) due to OneBusAway Mobile Website Android App iPhone App 51% of HART bus riders say they would ride the bus more frequently if they had real-time bus information. PRE-TEST of Control Group (231 participants) POST-TEST of Control Group (231 participants) 65% of HART bus riders say they would use real-time information every time they ride the bus. Wheres the bus? PRE-TEST of Experimental Group (232 participants) POST-TEST of Experimental Group (232 participants) February 2013 (Completed) May 2013 (Coming soon!) Does real-time information increase transit ridership? Prior research by Tang et al. (2012) and Zhang (2010) Ridership Does real-time information decrease wait times? Prior research by Watkins et al. (2011) Wait times Does real-time information increase satisfaction with transit service? Prior research by Ferris et al. (2011) and Zhang (2010) Satisfaction Does real-time information increase the perception of safety? Prior research by Zhang ( 2010) and Ferris et al. (2011) Safety Does real-time information decrease the transfer penalty? No known prior research Transfer OneBusAway: Originally deployed in Seattle, Washington & recently adapted for New York City Tampa, Florida: Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority (HART) is the third instance of OneBusAway Collaboration: USF is leading the development for Tampa & Georgia Tech is conducting the evaluation