Officer Evaluation System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Feedback.
Advertisements

People are our business USAF First Sergeant Academy PERSONNEL EVALUATION AND AND RECOGNITION PROGRAMS RECOGNITION PROGRAMS Reference: AFI & AFI.
Member in School Supervisor writes Narrative-Only PRF/ coords SR approval SR/appointee gives copy of approved N-O PRF (sealed if necessary) to individual.
Feedback. Definition / Objective Types of Feedback Feedback Process Raters Errors Avoiding Raters Errors Requirements Explanation of Forms Used Overview.
Performance Management
Performance Feedback.
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Performance Evaluation
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
BLSDM Evaluation Training (AFI , MPFM & 07-45, AFI )
Performance Evaluations BUPERSINST B
Enlisted Evaluation System
Performance Management 2012 Conducting Performance Evaluations Office of Human Resources UMW: “Putting U First”
Performance Feedback. Overview Definition / Objective Types of Feedback Feedback Process Rater Errors Avoiding Rater Errors Requirements Feedback Forms.
Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) Counseling.
Revised Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reporting System
OFFICER PERFORMANCE REPORTS YOU ON A PIECE OF PAPER OfficerPerformanceReport PromotionRecommendationForm.
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. Evaluation.
United States Fire Administration Chief Officer Training Curriculum Human Resource Development Module 6: Managing the Workforce.
Enlisted Evaluation System
Counseling and Evaluations for the Noncommissioned Officer 1.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
OVERVIEW  Program Objectives  Feedback Procedures  First Sergeant’s Role.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Officer Professional Development and Mentorship.
Frequently asked Questions ( FAQs) How much time does a board spend reviewing my file? (A) Depending on the size of the board (total population) and your.
1 Officer Evaluation System. 2 Overview  Elements of the OES  Performance Feedback  Performance Reporting  The Evaluation Process  OPR  Inappropriate.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
PRF Process Member selected for School For AF Officers
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
OVERVIEW  Objectives  Individual Responsibilities  Performance Feedback  EPR Management AFI Officer & Enlisted Evaluation Systems AFI
Supervising Military Personnel HR for Supervisors.
TACTICAL OFFICER LEADERSHIP. Tactical Officers are Individual Developers I believe that no other faculty or staff member has as much direct effect on.
Officer Evaluation System
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Navigating the Performance Review Process
Performance Management
Performance Management
The Most Effective Tool to Measure SOFT SKILLS
TOPS TRAINING.
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Performance Evaluations
Environmental Systems
Teacher Evaluation Process
ANG PROMOTION PROGRAM.
T.O.P.S
Developing Airmen AF Mentoring Program.
Nurturing and Retaining Youth Referees
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Performance Management System
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Army DACM Office Program Application Helpful Hints
Performance Management Training: Year-End Review
Enlisted Evaluation System
Developing Airmen AF Mentoring Program.
Employee Performance Management System
Mentoring.
Objectives At the end of the session the participants will be able to:
FSGP Process Step 1: Review of Scientific Merit
The Individual Development Plan (IDP)
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)
Professional Review Panel
Topics in Applied Microbiology
Improving the Sailor Performance Evaluation Journey
Improving the Sailor Performance Evaluation Journey
Topics in Applied Microbiology
Counseling Subordinate-centered communication that outlines actions necessary for subordinates to achieve individual and organizational goals. Why should.
Performance appraisal Narayan Gopal malego Uttam Acharya
Objectives At the end of the session the participants will be able to:
Presentation transcript:

Officer Evaluation System Instructor Name

Overview Airman Comprehensive Assessment Performance Reporting The Evaluation Process Officer Performance Reports Inappropriate Comments Other Types of Performance Reports The Appeal Process Career Progression System Desired Objective Officer Promotion System Promotion Recommendations

Officer Evaluation System ACA OPR PRF

Airman Comprehensive Assessment Feedback is the single most important means for changing behavior

Types of Feedback Day-to-day Airman Comprehensive Assessment (ACA) A scheduled session between the rater & ratee Documented on a form Signed by both individuals, original goes to ratee

Officer Evaluation System ACA OPR PRF

Performance Reporting The Evaluation Process Observation Evaluation Documentation

Performance Reporting Observation Requires planning & preparation Requires communication Requires feedback Evaluation Judge observed performance vs: Predetermined standards Performance of others Members of the same “AFSC and Grade”

Performance Reporting Documentation Records the results Provides a long term record of an officer’s professional development Primary instrument for identifying best qualified

Performance Reporting Officer Performance Report (OPR) Completed Annually Change of Reporting Official (CRO) Minimum 120 days of supervision AF Form 707

AF Form 707

AF Form 707 Performance standards are the same for all grades Performance factors summarized on front of form Mark “Does Not Meet” if evaluator’s comments make the report referral, or if a performance factor in Section IX on reverse is marked “Does Not Meet Standards”

AF Form 707 Rater Overall Assessment 6 lines Must be bullet format

AF Form 707 Performance Factors Same for all ranks Only mark if officer does not meet the standard

AF Form 707 Referral Letter Included on back of report

Performance Reporting Inappropriate Comments Charges/investigations not completed or acquittals Recommendations for decorations Race, gender, age, religion, etc. of ratee Drug/Alcohol abuse rehabilitation programs Previous ratings or reports Developmental education (completion or enrollment) Advanced academic education Promotion recommendations

Performance Reporting Other Types of Performance Reports Training Report (AF Form 475) Used for training of 8 weeks or more Filed upon completion, interruption, or elimination from training Letter of Evaluation (AF Form 77) Used when ratee is away from reporting official CRO with less than 120 days of supervision Under supervision of someone other than your supervisor Provides input to rater

Performance Reporting Uses of Performance Reports Promotions Assignments Investigations Disciplinary/Legal Actions NOT used as counseling tools

Performance Reporting The Appeal Process Ratee must prove that report is inaccurate or unjust Rating can be upgraded or removed MPF will assist in preparing package Decided by AFPC Have up to three years to contest a report

Officer Evaluation System ACA OPR PRF

Career Progression System Objective: To provide the rank/grade commensurate with each position’s responsibility and leadership requirement

Officer Promotion System Desired Objectives for Promotion 0-2 (1st Lt) 2 Years 0-3 (Capt) 4 Years 0-4 (Maj) 11 Years 0-5 (Lt Col) 16 Years 0-6 (Col) 21-22 Years

Officer Promotion System Fully Qualified: For promotion to 1st Lt and Capt Best Qualified: For promotion to Maj thru Col Promotion Zones Below the Primary Zone (BPZ) First opportunity is promotion to O-5 (Lt Col) In the Primary Zone (IPZ) Above the Primary Zone (APZ)

Promotion Recommendations Promotion Recommendation Form (AF Form 709) Prepared by Senior Rater “Best Qualified” Based on Performance and Performance - Based Potential No earlier than 60 Days before the Selection Board

Promotion Recommendations Promotion Recommendation Form (AF IMT 709) Prepared by Senior Rater “Best Qualified” Based on Performance and Performance - Based Potential No earlier than 60 Days before the Selection Board

Promotion Recommendations “Definitely Promote”- strength of performance and potential warrants promotion “Promote”- qualified for promotion, compete on basis of performance, potential, etc... “Do Not Promote”- promotion not warranted

Summary Airman Comprehensive Assessment Performance Reporting The Evaluation Process Officer Performance Reports Inappropriate Comments Other Types of Performance Reports The Appeal Process Career Progression System Desired Objective Officer Promotion System Promotion Recommendations