Guiding Local Assessment Practices: Challenges and Decisions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Advertisements

An Overview of “Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcome Measurement Results” Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Anne Lucas, NECTAC/WRRC
Data-based Decision Making: Tools for Improving Practice National Conference Call May 10, 2011 Anne Lucas, NECTAC/WRRC Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Using data for program improvement Early Childhood Outcomes Center1.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 15: Discussion Facilitator Exit Information.
Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 2: Evaluator Entry Information.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 4: Using Assessment Tools in the Child Outcomes Measurement Process Entry & Exit Sample Information.
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities Presented by Jeanna Mullins, Mid-South Regional Resource Center, RRCP Document developed by members of the Systems.
Sophia Gatowski, Ph.D., Consultant National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges Sophia Gatowski, Ph.D., Consultant National Council of Juvenile &
The State of New Hampshire’s Family Involvement with the Child Outcomes Process.
Charting the Course- Integrating the IFSP with Early Childhood Outcomes in West Virginia.
Approaches to Measuring Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Prepared for the NECTAC National Meeting on Measuring Child and Family Outcomes,
1 Training Strategies and Resources for States Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form Saundra Harrington (VA) Part C Mary Peters (WI) Section 619 Chelsea.
Maryland’s Plan Implementing the New CCDF Rules for Child Care Subsidy.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Using Family-Centered Practices to Promote Family Outcomes Don Bailey Melissa Raspa ECO Annual Conference July 30, 2010.
Moderation. What it’s not Moderation can provide: Insights into the standards attained by different pupils: progress (learning over time) rate of learning.
Arizona Early Intervention Program -Assessment Part II-
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Maryland’s Early Childhood Intervention and Special Education System of Services Birth through Five 1 Maryland State Department of Education, Division.
Engaging Families in NH’s Part C Child and Family Outcomes Systems Presented by: Michelle Lewis (Parent, ICC Vice Chair, New Hampshire PTI)
1 Collaboration Across Part C and 619 on Child Outcomes Measuring Child and Family Outcomes.
PREKINDERGARTEN DISABILITIES CONTACT MEETING MAY 9-10, 2012 Guidance Update for the BDI-2.
1 Assuring the Quality of Data from the Child Outcomes Summary Form.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
Human Services Program and Profession HN Seminar Unit 5.
1 Early Childhood Transition: Facts, Figures, Fantasies and the Future Objectives 1. To share selected findings based on the SPP/APR and NECTC study 2.
Child safe guarding Child protection in your organisation.
SPP/APR - SSIP Stakeholders Meeting # 4. Agenda for Today What’s New –OSEP Evaluation Tool –Updated timeline Workgroups Report Out –Data –Infrastructure.
PSY 490 Week 3 Individual Ethics Awareness Inventory Complete the Ethics Awareness Inventory Prepare a 700- to 1,050-word summary of your findings from.
Purpose The purpose of Module 1 is to orient new staff to child outcomes measurement and the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF).
Megan Kurteff Schatz February 23, 2017
WWB Training Kit #11 Using Functional Communication Training to Replace Challenging Behavior.
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Participatory Toolbox
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities
Spotlight on Title 1.
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Authentic Assessment in Early Intervention
CEDS: Common Data Elements and Definitions for Part C and 619 Programs
2016 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
The Late French Immersion Program
Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator
Community Input Discussions:
Curriculum and materials
Training Presentation
The Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center
Early Childhood Conference: Improving Data, Improving Outcomes
Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator
Kindergarten Formative Assessment Process
Chicago Public Schools
Using the Decision Tree for Summary Ratings Discussions
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Trends in Child Outcomes (C-3 / B-7) and Family Outcomes (C-4)
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities
Presented by: Marcella Franczkowski, Assistant State Superintendent
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community June 12, 2013
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Involving children and young people
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Understanding the Strengthening Families Protective Factors
Introduction to the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Harmony School of Excellence-El Paso Annual Title I Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Guiding Local Assessment Practices: Challenges and Decisions Marcella Franczkowski, MD Part C & Section 619 Tom Stengel, MD Part C Phyllis Mondak, VA Section 619 Sharon Ringwalt, MSRRC & NECTAC Measuring Child and Family Outcomes--2010

What are the issues? What do we hear from states? Why assess? How might assessment tools be used? What are other sources of information? Who conducts assessments?

Additional issues What are the advantages of one tool, of a limited list of tools, of a wide array? For the State For local programs/providers For children and families How do you select which tool(s) to use? With what criteria? With whose input? What is the role of State staff?

Poll Question 1 What has been your state’s role in guiding local assessment tool choices: For eligibility? For measuring outcomes? For program planning? We have selected one tool or a small list of tools that local programs/providers must use We recommend that local programs/ providers use certain tools We do not select or recommend specific assessment tools Other

Maryland’s experience

Poll Question 2 Has your state formed a specific work group for reviewing assessment tools for various purposes? Yes, we have a work group that reviews local assessment practices for various purposes. We have a workgroup that is looking at various practices, including assessment. I’m not aware of a work group looking at these issues. We do not have a work group reviewing local assessment practices.

Virginia’s experience

Poll Question 3 To what extent are your local programs/ providers linking child outcomes data across Part C and 619? Our Part C exit data ARE used for 619 entry data Our Part C exit data CAN BE used for 619 entry data We do not share outcomes data across Part C and 619 I’m not sure

Discussion Questions for Marcella, Tom, and Phyllis? Are there issues we have not touched upon? What additional processes or approaches are states using to guide local assessment practices ? What strategies have states developed to share data across Part C and 619?