Volume 161, Issue 4, Pages (May 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Initial T Cell Receptor Transgenic Cell Precursor Frequency Dictates Critical Aspects of the CD8+ T Cell Response to Infection  Vladimir P. Badovinac,
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Development and Migration of Plasma Cells in the Mouse Lymph Node
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages e5 (February 2018)
Inflammatory Monocytes Activate Memory CD8+ T and Innate NK Lymphocytes Independent of Cognate Antigen during Microbial Pathogen Invasion  Saïdi M'Homa.
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
B-1a and B-1b Cells Exhibit Distinct Developmental Requirements and Have Unique Functional Roles in Innate and Adaptive Immunity to S. pneumoniae  Karen.
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Controls the Formation and Maintenance of Gut-Resident Memory T Cells by Regulating Migration and Retention  Nu.
Saskia Hemmers, Alexander Y. Rudensky  Cell Reports 
Dynamics of Blood-Borne CD8 Memory T Cell Migration In Vivo
Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Blimp-1 Transcription Factor Is Required for the Differentiation of Effector CD8+ T Cells and Memory Responses  Axel Kallies, Annie Xin, Gabrielle T.
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Francis Coffey, Boris Alabyev, Tim Manser  Immunity 
Oral Tolerance Can Be Established via Gap Junction Transfer of Fed Antigens from CX3CR1+ Macrophages to CD103+ Dendritic Cells  Elisa Mazzini, Lucia Massimiliano,
An Interleukin-21- Interleukin-10-STAT3 Pathway Is Critical for Functional Maturation of Memory CD8+ T Cells  Weiguo Cui, Ying Liu, Jason S. Weinstein,
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
CD4+ Lymphoid Tissue-Inducer Cells Promote Innate Immunity in the Gut
T Cells with Low Avidity for a Tissue-Restricted Antigen Routinely Evade Central and Peripheral Tolerance and Cause Autoimmunity  Dietmar Zehn, Michael.
Myung H. Kim, Elizabeth J. Taparowsky, Chang H. Kim  Immunity 
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e8 (April 2018)
Matthew A. Williams, Eugene V. Ravkov, Michael J. Bevan  Immunity 
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Courtney R. Plumlee, Brian S. Sheridan, Basak B. Cicek, Leo Lefrançois 
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages e4 (March 2019)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages e5 (April 2019)
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Presentation transcript:

Volume 161, Issue 4, Pages 737-749 (May 2015) Quantifying Memory CD8 T Cells Reveals Regionalization of Immunosurveillance  Elizabeth M. Steinert, Jason M. Schenkel, Kathryn A. Fraser, Lalit K. Beura, Luke S. Manlove, Botond Z. Igyártó, Peter J. Southern, David Masopust  Cell  Volume 161, Issue 4, Pages 737-749 (May 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.031 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2015 161, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Isolations Underestimate Total Memory CD8 T Cells and Distort Distribution (A and B) Quantitative Immunofluorescence Microscopy (QIM) methodology. (A) Organ volumes were determined by displacement. Tissue sections were stained for Thy1.1 (red) and DAPI (teal) to identify memory P14 CD8 T cells and nucleated cells 120–150 days after LCMV infection of C57Bl/6J mice. P14 counts per section were extrapolated to total organ volume and corrected to eliminate double counting. Whole FRT image scale bar, 2,000 μm; cropped close up of FRT image scale bar, 250 μm. (B) Total DAPI+ nucleated cells by QIM were extrapolated to total organ volume (black circles) and validated independently by DNA extraction (red squares), n = 4. (C) Comparison of α-CD8α i.v. Ab− P14 per tissue determined by cell isolation and flow cytometry (gray) or QIM (black). (D and E) Total P14 frequency determined by (D) flow cytometry or (E) QIM relative to DAPI+ nucleated cells per organ as determined by QIM. Fold differences shown are relative to LN. n ≥ 6, graphs show mean and SEM. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. See also Figures S1 and S2. Cell 2015 161, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Isolation Efficiency Is Biased by Tissue Compartment and Cell Phenotype P14 immune chimeras were analyzed 120–150 days after LCMV infection. (A) Representative image of CD8α i.v. Ab+ (white arrow) or CD8α i.v. Ab− (yellow arrow) P14 CD8 T cells in lung. CD8α i.v. Ab (teal), Thy1.1+ P14 (red), Collagen IV (green), and Cytokeratin 8/18 (Blue). Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Ratio of i.v. Ab+ to i.v. Ab− P14s by flow cytometry (gray) and QIM (black) methodology. (C) Representative image of P14 CD8 T cell in small intestine epithelium (intraepithelial lymphocyte [IEL] indicated by yellow arrow) and lamina propria (lamina propria lymphocyte [LPL] indicated by white arrows). Thy1.1+ P14 (red), Collagen IV (blue), and Cytokeratin 8/18 (Green). Scale bar, 50 μm. (D) Ratio of LPL to IEL P14 by flow cytometry (gray) and QIM (black). (E) Representative image of CD103− (top panels) and CD103+ (bottom panels) P14 CD8 T cells in vaginal epithelium. CD103 (teal). Thy1.1+ P14 (red), Collagen IV (green), and DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 50 μm. (F) Ratio of CD103− to CD103+ P14s by flow cytometry (gray) and QIM (black) in FRT. (G) Percent of vaginal IEL or LPL P14 expressing CD013, determined by QIM. n ≥ 6, graphs show mean and SEM. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. See also Figure S2. Cell 2015 161, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Majority of Memory CD8 T Cells in NLT Are TRM (A) Ninety days after infection with LCMV Armstrong, P14 immune chimeras were conjoined to naive C57BL/6 mice using parabiosis. (B–E) P14 immune chimeras conjoined to naive C57BL/6 mice were analyzed 30 days after parabiosis surgery. (B) Thirty days after parabiosis surgery the fraction of resident memory P14 CD8 T cells was calculated for the indicated tissues. n = 3, representative of nine mouse pairs from three independent experiments. Graphs show mean and SEM. (C) Representative images of P14 CD8 T cells in the small intestines and spleens of LCMV immune and naive parabionts, P14s (red) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 50 μm. (D) Distribution of resident and recirculating P14 CD8 T cells in nonlymphoid organs calculated by QIM. (E) P14 immune chimeras were analyzed 120–150 days after LCMV infection to determine the distribution of P14 CD8 T cells in secondary lymphoid organs (SLO), nonlymphoid tissues (NLT, including i.v. Ab− cells within liver, lung, kidney, pancreas, salivary gland, uterus, vagina and cervix, small intestine, large intestine, stomach, and thymus) and circulating blood and marginated pool (BMP) (includes i.v. Ab+ cells from all tissues examined), n ≥ 6. Cell numbers from all tissues were calculated by QIM, except circulating blood, which was enumerated by cell isolation and flow cytometry. See also Figure S2. Cell 2015 161, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Memory CD8 T Cell Migration Is Compartmentally Restricted within NLT P14 immune chimeras conjoined to naive C57BL/6 mice (as in Figure 3) were analyzed 30 days after parabiosis surgery. (A) The fraction of P14 CD8 T cells that are resident in the indicated tissue compartments, small intestine (SI), large intestine (LI), stomach (ST), epithelium (IEL), lamina propria (LP), submucosa (SM), and muscularis externa (ME). (B) Representative thymus images in immune and naive parabionts. P14 CD8 T cells (red), DAPI (green), and Cytokeratin 5 (blue). Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) Percent of P14 CD8 T cells that are resident in the thymus, medulla, and cortex. (D) Percent of i.v. Ab+ P14 CD8 T cells that are resident within the kidney and liver. n = 3, representative of nine mouse pairs from three independent experiments. Graphs show mean and SEM. See also Figure S2. Cell 2015 161, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 CD69 Is an Imperfect Marker of Tissue Residence (A) P14 CD8 T cells from immune parabionts were analyzed for the expression of CD69 in the pancreas, salivary gland, and FRT by QIM. (B) The fraction of CD69+ and CD69− P14 CD8 T cells that were resident. (C and D) The percent of P14 CD8 T cells that were resident among i.v. Ab+/− and CD69+/− in the kidney (C) and (D) liver. (E) Representative image of a CD69+ i.v. Ab+ P14 CD8 T cell in a large vessel in the liver. α-CD8α i.v. Ab (green), P14 CD8 T cells (red), and CD69 (purple). Blue arrows indicate α-CD8α i.v. Ab+ CD69+ P14 CD8 T cells. Scale bar, 20 μm. n = 3, representative of nine mouse pairs from three independent experiments. Graphs show mean and SEM. See also Figure S2. Cell 2015 161, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Migration of Memory CD8 T Cell Subsets (A and B) P14 CD8 T cells analyzed by QIM from naive parabionts were quantified based on their localization within the parenchyma or afferent lymphatic Lyve-1+ vessels and for the expression of CD69 in the (A) salivary gland and (B) female reproductive tract. (C) Representative image of a P14 CD8 T cell in the FRT afferent lymphatics of a naive parabiont. Lyve-1 (blue) and P14 CD8 T cells (green). Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) Fraction of CD69− P14 CD8 T cells in the FRT of the naive parabiont that were CD62L+ or CD62L−. n = 3, representative of nine mice from three independent experiments. (E) CD62L+ (5 × 105) or CD62L− (5 × 105) memory OT-I CD8 T cells isolated from the spleen of VSV-OVA immune chimeras were transferred into P14 immune chimeras and the next day P14 immune chimeras were challenged transcervically with 50 μg gp33 peptide. Two days later, total numbers of OT-I CD8 T cells were enumerated in the FRT. n = 6, representative of two independent experiments. Graphs show mean and SEM. See also Figure S2. Cell 2015 161, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Cell Isolation and Flow Cytometry Underestimates Endogenous LCMV-Specific Memory CD8 T Cells in Mouse FRT and CD8 T Cells in Human Cervical Tissue, Related to Figure 1 (A) C57BL/6 mice were infected with LCMV Armstrong i.p. 140 days after infection, total numbers of gp33-specific CD8 T cells were enumerated by flow cytometry and also by QIM of in situ H-2Db/gp33 MHC I tetramer stained sections of spleen and FRT. (B) Enumeration of CD3+ CD8β+ T cells in human endocervical and ectocervical specimens by flow cytometry (gray) or QIM (black), n = 3. Graphs show mean and SEM. Cell 2015 161, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Memory CD8 T Cell Immunosurveillance Is Regionalized, Related to Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 Nonlymphoid tissues, which contain the vast majority of host cells, are the primary barriers between the host and the outside non-sterile environment. Most memory CD8 T cells that patrol these frontlines are segregated populations (TRM) that confine their surveillance locally (signified by blue arrows) and do not migrate between other NLT, SLOs, or blood. Inflammation caused by local reinfections that are not rapidly eliminated attracts both TEM and TCM reinforcements from blood and marginated pools. When reinfections breach frontline barriers, pathogens and associated foreign antigens reach the SLOs where immunosurveillance is dominated by TCM that are poised to proliferate and provide additional reinforcements that migrate to NLTs. Cell 2015 161, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions