Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax Connector Bus Service Plans HOT Lanes and Dulles Rail Phase I Fairfax County Board of.
Advertisements

1 The Role of Bus Transit in the Regional Transportation, Present and Future Howard Benn, Chair, TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee TPB Regional Priority Bus.
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Division Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Project August 2012.
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Beltway CTB Briefing
MUNI Operations Overview and Recent Innovations Julie Kirschbaum San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, Operations Planning and Scheduling Manager.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan Planning for the Future – BRT 46 th St Station Concept Plan Public Input.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan and Construction John Dillery & Mac Sweidan Kingfield Neighborhood Association June 2010.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
James DeRosa TOD Forum February 22, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) “Think Rail, use Buses” Exclusive Transit Lanes Fewer stops along route Improved boarding.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates Public Meeting
Comprehensive Operations Analysis. Background ■On March 6, 2014, Escambia County Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement between Escambia.
Goal: 10,000 interactions in 2015 –Extensive civic engagement Goal: To develop a great regional transit system –Update every five years –All options considered.
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan Planning for the Future – BRT 46 th St Station Concept Plan Public Input.
Freedom to work Freedom to text Freedom to read.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Public Comment Mobility Vision Plan 2035 MVP Website 2035 MVP Brochure and Survey. Provides specific information on the Plan Update. Survey – your opinion.
I-35W and 46 th Street Final Service Restructuring Plan.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Eastside Transit Alternatives Kick-Off Meeting Mesquite City Hall September 11, 2013 Kick-Off Meeting Mesquite City Hall September 11, 2013.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
DC Circulator Transit Development Plan TPB Access for All Advisory Committee October 28, 2010.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Board Transportation Committee December 1, 2015 Randy.
Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update.
Defining Alternative Scenarios MTC Planning Committee and ABAG Administrative Committee May 13, 2011.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Service Guidelines and Standards Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Meeting September 2015 capmetro.org |1.
Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) Collier Area Transit February 8, 2012 Report Findings and Recommendation s.
Service Development Process 1. Our mission: To meet our constituents’ present and future public transit needs by offering safe, clean, reliable, courteous,
Regional Transit Framework Study Regional Council September 24, 2008.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project Presentation to the San Francisco.
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
GMT NEXT GEN TRANSIT PLAN PROJECT OVERVIEW
Regional Roads Committee
GMT NEXT GEN TRANSIT PLAN PROJECT OVERVIEW
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Transit for Tomorrow strategic plan
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
FY 2019 Recommended Wake Transit Work Plan
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
Transit Competitiveness and Market Potential
Bus Rapid Transit Study
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
HRT Workshop: Transit Strategic Plan and Aug-Dec working items
Presentation transcript:

Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014

On Time Performance (OTTO) Alternative Fuels Operations Real Time Information Transit Signal Priority Skyway Technology Assessment Technology Route Restructuring Bus Rapid Transit Bus Stop Assessment Skyway System Plan System Planning and Development Commuter Service Park-n-Ride Commuter Rail Jacksonville Transportation Center Regional Partnerships and Planning Transit Blueprint Projects Transit Excellence Regional Transportation Commission

Route Restructure A holistic review of the transit system route structure and operations Thorough data collection and analysis Peer analysis Route analyses Financial and operational reviews Extensive public and stakeholder input

Citizen Advisory Groups Stakeholder Meetings Community Survey Customer Satisfaction Surveys Constant Customer Relations and Social Media Operator Input Origin and Destination Survey 2010 Census Community Input and Data Sources

Takes too long to get across town Why do I have to go downtown to get anywhere? Doesnt go where Im going Service should run later Would like to see service connect to entertainment centers Inconvenient to transfer and costs more Service is too infrequent System is confusing Wish could see when next bus is coming on my phone Bus is late often My bus is too crowded Buses look empty

Geographic/Development Challenges Low population and employment density Existing Route Structure Developed in 1980s Major changes in development pattern over last 30 years System/Resources Spread Out Long routes with fewer transfers Headways too high (low service frequency) Too many stops Centralized, Radial Service Few Choice Riders Desired Improvements Require Overhaul of Route Structure Efficiencies have been realized in recent years Observations

Opportunities Provide more direct routes Coordinate route structure with BRT implementation Reduce overlapping service Fewer stops but more amenities (i.e., shelters) Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Plan Improve service frequency/hours of service on key corridors Provide true express service with Park-n-Ride facilities Better connect with emerging population, employment and activity centers Make system easier to use Clarify route names Real time information

Bus Rapid Transit Branded Buses Minute Bus Frequency Branded Transit Stations Intersection Improvements Real Time Information Transit Lanes Park-n-Ride Lots Feeder Bus Service

Key Questions/Issues Allocation/Competition for Resources Service Quality vs. Coverage Decisions Based on System-wide Performance or Individual Demand Niche Markets Public Expectations Speed of Implementation Funding

Route Restructure – Schedule Data collection / analysis – Current (complete by Dec.) Draft framework for changes - January Draft Route Restructure – March JTA Board Adopts Restructure Plan– May Initial set of service changes – June Larger set of service changes – Sept./Oct. and Dec.* *80% of service changes complete in 2014

Contact Information: Carl Weckenmann (904) Questions/Comments