Non-Gaussianity: from Inflation to CMB anisotropies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observational constraints on primordial perturbations Antony Lewis CITA, Toronto
Advertisements

Primordial perturbations and precision cosmology from the Cosmic Microwave Background Antony Lewis CITA, University of Toronto
CMB and cluster lensing Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge Lewis & Challinor, Phys. Rept : astro-ph/
Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Constraining Inflation Histories with the CMB & Large Scale Structure Dynamical & Resolution Trajectories for Inflation then & now Dick Bond.
Large Primordial Non- Gaussianity from early Universe Kazuya Koyama University of Portsmouth.
Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
Non-Gaussianity of superhorizon curvature perturbations beyond δN-formalism Resceu, University of Tokyo Yuichi Takamizu Collaborator: Shinji Mukohyama.
Gradient expansion approach to multi-field inflation Dept. of Physics, Waseda University Yuichi Takamizu 29 th JGRG21 Collaborators: S.Mukohyama.
Beyond δN-formalism for a single scalar field Resceu, University of Tokyo Yuichi Takamizu 27th Collaborator: Shinji Mukohyama (IPMU,U.
Temporal enhancement of super-horizon scale curvature perturbations from decays of two curvatons and its cosmological implications. Teruaki Suyama (Research.
Gravitational Radiation from Symmetry Breaking Kate Jones-Smith Harsh Mathur, Lawrence Krauss CWRU BCCS Workshop December
Cosmological Structure Formation A Short Course
Curvature Perturbations from a Non-minimally Coupled Vector Boson Field Mindaugas Karčiauskas work done with Konstantinos Dimopoulos Mindaugas Karčiauskas.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
The Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields: the Vector Curvaton Case Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, Karčiauskas, Lyth, Rodriguez, JCAP 13 (2009)
The Statistically Anisotropic Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, MK, JHEP 07 (2008) Dimopoulos, MK, Lyth, Rodriguez,
CMB as a physics laboratory
The Galaxy Formation Paradigm Paradigm R. Giovanelli Astro620/Spring ‘07 Remember to mention.pdf file.
The Statistically Anisotropic Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, Karčiauskas, JHEP 07, 119 (2008) Dimopoulos,
Constraining Galactic Halos with the SZ-effect
Probing Dark Matter with the CMB and Large-Scale Structure 1 Cora Dvorkin IAS (Princeton) Harvard (Hubble fellow) COSMO 2014 August 2014, Chicago.
CMB acoustic peaks.
Trispectrum Estimator of Primordial Perturbation in Equilateral Type Non-Gaussian Models Keisuke Izumi (泉 圭介) Collaboration with Shuntaro Mizuno Kazuya.
Yoshiharu Tanaka (YITP) Gradient expansion approach to nonlinear superhorizon perturbations Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Helsinki,
Different physical properties contribute to the density and temperature perturbation growth. In addition to the mutual gravity of the dark matter and baryons,
Conservation of the non-linear curvature perturbation in generic single-field inflation Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics Atsushi Naruko In Collaboration.
Early times CMB.
Extra dimensions? Are they necessary ? Andrew Beckwith, AIBEP.org
Cosmology from CMB Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us about the.
Academic Training Lectures Rocky Kolb Fermilab, University of Chicago, & CERN Cosmology and the origin of structure Rocky I : The universe observed Rocky.
21 st of March of 2011 On the role of the boundary terms for the non-Gaussianity Frederico Arroja 이화여자대학교 EWHA WOMANS UNIVERSITY FA and Takahiro Tanaka,
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Cosmic Microwave Background  Cosmological Overview/Definitions  Temperature  Polarization  Ramifications  Cosmological Overview/Definitions  Temperature.
The Cosmic Microwave Background Lecture 2 Elena Pierpaoli.
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
How can CMB help constraining dark energy? Licia Verde ICREA & Institute of space Sciences (ICE CSIC-IEEC)
Quantifying nonlinear contributions to the CMB bispectrum in Synchronous gauge YITP, CPCMB Workshop, Kyoto, 21/03/2011 Guido W. Pettinari Institute of.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
the National Radio Astronomy Observatory – Socorro, NM
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
L2: The Cosmic Microwave Background & the Fluctuation History of the Universe & the Basic Cosmological Parameters Dick Bond.
Primordial non-Gaussianity from inflation Christian Byrnes Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation University of Portsmouth Work with David Wands, Kazuya.
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
Unesco July 2005Francis Bernardeau SPhT Saclay1 Models of inflation with primordial non-Gaussianities Francis Bernardeau SPhT Saclay Collaboration with.
Three theoretical issues in physical cosmology I. Nonlinear clustering II. Dark matter III. Dark energy J. Hwang (KNU), H. Noh (KASI)
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
Vector modes, vorticity and magnetic fields Kobayashi, RM, Shiromizu, Takahashi: PRD, astro-ph/ Caprini, Crittenden, Hollenstein, RM: PRD, arXiv:
Unified Dark Matter Models Daniele Bertacca Dipartimento di Fisica “Galileo Galilei”, Via Marzolo 8, Padova, Italy
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Neutrino Cosmology and Astrophysics Jenni Adams University of Canterbury, New Zealand TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete.
Fully nonlinear cosmological perturbation formulation and its applications J. Hwang & H. Noh 51 st Recontres de Moriond March 19-26, 2016 La Thuile, Italy.
Non-linear Matter Bispectrum in General Relativity SG Biern Seoul National Univ. with Dr. Jeong and Dr. Gong. The Newtonian Cosmology is enough for matter.
The cross-correlation between CMB and 21-cm fluctuations during the epoch of reionization Hiroyuki Tashiro N. Aghanim (IAS, Paris-sud Univ.) M. Langer.
Understanding the CMB Neutrino Isocurvature modes S. MUYA KASANDA School of Mathematical Sciences University of KwaZulu-Natal Supervisor: Dr K. Moodley.
Testing Primordial non-Gaussianities in CMB Anisotropies
Cosmic Inflation and Quantum Mechanics I: Concepts
Quantum Spacetime and Cosmic Inflation
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
A Measurement of CMB Polarization with QUaD
Precision cosmology, status and perspectives
Ignacy Sawicki CEICO, Institute of Physics, Prague
General, single field Inflation
Nonlinear cosmological perturbations
The impact of non-linear evolution of the cosmological matter power spectrum on the measurement of neutrino masses ROE-JSPS workshop Edinburgh.
University of Portsmouth
A Closure Theory for Non-linear Evolution of Power Spectrum
宇宙磁场的起源 郭宗宽 中山大学宇宙学研讨班
Measurements of Cosmological Parameters
CMB Anisotropy 이준호 류주영 박시헌.
Presentation transcript:

Non-Gaussianity: from Inflation to CMB anisotropies Nicola Bartolo Dipartimento di Fisica G. Galilei, Padova, Italy

Plan of the talk Large-scale CMB anisotropies and primordial NG  Large-scale CMB anisotropies and primordial NG (second-order radiation transfer function for large-scales)  CMB Anisotropies on all scales: Boltzmann equations at second-order  Conclusions - B. N., Matarrese S., Riotto A., Komatsu E., 2004 Phys. Rept. 402, 103 - B. N., Matarrese S., Riotto A., 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 231301 - B. N., Matarrese S., Riotto A., 2005, JCAP 0508, 010 - B. N., Matarrese S., Riotto A., 2005, JCAP 0605, 24 - B. N., Matarrese S., Riotto A., 2006, JCAP 0606, 24 - B. N., Matarrese S., Riotto A., 2006, astro-ph/0610110 Based on: - CAMBIARE PRELIMINARIES?

Motivations Planck and future experiments may be sensitive to non-Gaussianity (NG) at the level of second- or higher order perturbation theory Crucial to provide accurate theoretical predictions for the statistics of the CMB anisotropies Fundamental: a) what is the relation between primordial NG and non-linearities in the CMB anisotropies on different angular scales? b) what is the non-linear dynamics of the baryon-photon fluid and CDM+ gravity near recombination? - CAMBIARE PRELIMINARIES?

Large-angular scales 3 main effects: a) Sachs-Wolfe effect b) Early and late Integrated Sachs-Wolfe c) Tensor contributions In this limit we do not really need to solve the Boltzmann equations. The relevant effects comes from gravity (at the last scattering surface and from the scattering surface to the observer). - CAMBIARE PRELIMINARIES?

Second-order Sachs-Wolfe effect B. N., Matarrese, Riotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004 gravitational potential at emission specifies the level of primordial non-Gaussianity which depends on the particular scenario for the generation of perturbations Such an expression allows to single out the non-linearities of large-scale CMB anisotropies at last scattering . Evolving them inside the horizon requires the full radiation transfer function at second-order in the perturbations

Fully non-Linear Sachs Wolfe effect  Non-linear perturbations a la Salopek-Bond (1990) definition of the non-linear  quantity  Non-perturbative extension of the Sachs-Wolfe effect N.B., S. Matarrese, A. Riotto JCAP 2005 - scrivere anche terzo ordine, o solo accennare? Linear order Second order see expression in N.B. , Komatsu, Matarrese, Riotto (2004)

From primordial NG to CMB anisotropies Evaluate the non-Gaussianity generated during inflation (or immediately after as in the curvaton scenario): primordial “input’’ The value of (2) is different for different scenarios Post-inflationary nonlinear gravitational dynamics is common to all scenarios After inflation, follow the evolution of the non-linearities on large scales by matching the conserved quantity (2) to the initial input, plus Einstein equations at second-order: non-linearities in the gravitational potentials  The non-linearities in the gravitational potentials are then transferred to the observable T/T fluctuations: additional non-linearities are acquired

Sachs-Wolfe effect: a compact formula Initial conditions set during or after inflation standard scenario curvaton scenario Post-inflation non-linear evolution of gravity: order unity NG - mettere in realta’ K?? Forse e’ meglio. - usare la zeta di Salopek e Bond? N.B., Matarrese, Riotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2004)

Extracting the non-linearity parameter fNL Connection between theory and observations This is the proper quantity measurable by CMB experiments, via the phenomenological analysis by Komatsu and Spergel (2001) k = | k1 + k2 |

Primordial non-Gaussianity Standard single field models (Maldacena (2002), Acquaviva, Bartolo, Matarrese & A.R. (2002), Lidsey and Seery (2004)) Multiple field models (Kofman (1990+), Bartolo et al., Bernardeau & Uzan (2002+), Rigopoulos, Shellard and Van Tent (2003+), Rigopoulos, (2003+), Lyth, Wands, Malik, Vernizzi (2004+)) Curvaton models and or modulated perturbations (Lyth, Ungarelli and Wands (2002); Bartolo, Matarrese and A.R. (2004); Lyth, Rodriguez, Malik (2005+)) From preheating (Enqvist et al. (2004+), Barnaby and Cline 2006)) Ghost (Arkani-Hamed et al. (2003)) and DBI inflation (Silverstein and Tong (2003)) may be either tiny, or moderate or very large

Inflation models and fNL N. B., E. Komatsu, S. Matarrese and A.Riotto., Phys. Rept. 2004 model fNL(k1,k2) comments Standard inflation K universal, goes to zero in squeezed limit -1/6 +K(k1,k2) curvaton -11/6 - 5r/6 + 5/4r +K(k1, k2) r ~ (rs/r)decay modulated I = - 5/2 + 5G / (12 aG1) I = 0 (minimal case) 1/12 – I +K(k1, k2) order of magnitude estimate of the absolute value multi-field inflation may be large ? “unconventional” inflation set-ups second-order corrections not included Warm inflation typically 10-1 post-inflation corrections not included ghost inflation - 140 b a-3/5 post-inflation corrections not included DBI - 0.1 g2

Angular decomposition The linear and non-linear parts of the temperature fluctuations correspond to a linear Gaussian part and a non-Gaussian contribution At linear order Initial fluctuations Linear radiation transfer function Ex: Linear Sachs-Wolfe Linear ISW

2nd-order radiation transfer function on large-scales Express the observed CMB anisotropies in terms of the quadratic curvature perturbations with the gravitational potential at last scattering, and are convolutions with kernels and generalize the radiation transfer function at second-order

2nd-order transfer functions for the Sachs-Wolfe Primordial NG Non-linear evolution of the gravitational potentials after Inflation and additional 2nd-order corrections to temperature anisotropies

2nd-order transfer functions for the late ISW growth suppression factor Primordial NG Non-linear evolution of the gravitational potentials after inflation Additional second-order corrections to temperature anisotropies (ISW)2 Expression for 2nd-order Early ISW, vector and tensor modes available as well in B. N., Matarrese S., Riotto A., 2005, JCAP 0605

NG = NG from gravity (universal)+ NG primordial On large scales: NG = NG from gravity (universal)+ NG primordial Gravity itself is non-linear Non-linear (second-order) GR perturbations in the standard cosmological model introduce some order unity NG:  we would be in trouble if NG turned out to be very close to zero such non-linearities have a non-trivial form: their computation  core of the (large-scale) radiation transfer function at second-order

WHAT ABOUT SMALLER SCALES ? Aim: - have a full radiation transfer function at second-order for all scales - in particular: compute the CMB anisotropies generated by the non-linear dynamics of the photon-baryon fluid for subhorizon modes at recombination (acoustic oscillations at second-order) Remember: crucial to extract information from the bispectrum are the scales of acoustic peaks according to the phenomenological analysis of Komatsu and Spergel (2001)

2nd-order CMB Anisotropies on all scales Apart from gravity account also for: a) Compton scattering of photons off electrons b) baryon velocity terms v Boltzmann equation for photons Collision term Gravity effects + Boltzmann equations for baryons and CDM+ Einstein equations

Metric perturbations Poisson gauge i and ij second-order vector and tensor modes. Examples: using the geodesic equation for the photons Redshift of the photon (Sachs-Wolfe and ISW effects) Direction of the photons changes due to gravitational potentials Lensing effect (it arises at second-order) PS: Here the photon momentum is ; ( quadri-momentum vector)

Photon Boltzmann equation Expand the distribution function in a linear and second-order parts around the zero-order Bose-Einstein value Left-hand side

The collision term C[f] Up to recombination photons are tightly coupled to electrons via Compton scatterings e(q) (p)  e(q’) (p’). The collision term governs small scale anisotropies and spectral distorsions   Important also for secondary scatterings: reionization, kinetic and thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich and Ostriker-Vishniac effects Crucial points to compute the second-order collision term: 1) Little energy /T is transferred expand in the perturbations and in /T  q/me. At linear order the Boltzmann equations depend only on ni, at second-order there is energy exchange (p dependence) and thus spectral distorsions. 2) Take into account second-order baryon velocity v(2) 3) Take into account vortical components of (first-order  first-order) 

The 2nd-order brightness equation with optical depth Source term Second-order baryon velocity Sachs-Wolfe effects Gravitational lensing Quadratic-Doppler effect Coupling velocity and linear photon anisotropies

Hierarchy equations for multipole moments and Expand the temperature anisotropies in multipole moments System of coupled differential equations Suppression of anisotropies Free-streeming of photons: From . It gives a projection effect of inhomogeinities onto anisotropries At linear order responsible of the hierarchy Residual scattering effects and gravity

Integral Solution and One can derive an integral solution in term of the Source Important: The main information is contained in the Source, which contains peculiar effects from the non-linearity of the perturbations   The integral solution is a formal solution (the source contains second-order moments up to l=2), but still more convinient than solving the whole hierarchy

CMB anisotropies generated at recombination KEY POINT: Extract all the effects generated at recombination (i.e. Isolate from the Source all those terms  optical depth ’ ) Visibility function sharply peaks at recombination epoch *

Need to know the evolution of the photon energy density Yields anisotropies generated at recombination due to the non-linear dynamics of the photon-baryon fluid Need to know the evolution of the photon energy density (2)00 , velocity and gravitational potentials around recombination

Boltzmann equations for massive particles The Source term requires to know the evolution of baryons and CDM  Left-hand side : just extend to a massive particle with mass m and energy E=(m2+q2)1/2 example:  Collision terms: electrons are coupled to protons via Coulomb scatt. driving e= p= b and ve= vp v (“baryons”); + Compton scatterings e

Momentum continuity equation Photon velocity 2nd-order velocity Quadrupole moments of photon distribution

Acoustic oscillations at second-order In the tight coupling limit the energy and momentum continuity equations for photons and baryons reduce to

The quadrupole moment at recombination 1) At second-order vector perturbaztions are inevitably generated Two important differences w .r. s to the linear case: 2) At second-order the quadrupole of the photons is no longer suppressed in the tight coupling limit Similar term analyzed by W. Hu in ApJ 529 (2000) in the context of reionazation

Non-linear dynamics at recombination Modes entering the horizon during the matter epoch (-1* < k < -1EQ) Acoustic oscillations of primordial non-Gaussianity Non-linear evolution of gravity

Linear vs. full radiation transfer function primordial non-Gaussianity is transferred linearly: Radiation Transfer function at first order Non-linear evolution of gravity: the core of the 2nd order transfer function (how these contributions mask the primordial signal? how do they fit into the analysis of the bispectrum?) Numerical analysis in progress (N.B., Komatsu, Matarrese, Nitta, Riotto) (from Komatsu & Spergel 2001)

Modes entering the horizon during radiation epoch (k > -1EQ ) In this case the driving force is the quadrupole

Modes entering the horizon during radiation epoch (II): The Meszaros effect Around the equality epoch EQ Dark Matter starts to dominate Consider the DM perturbations on subhorizon scales during the radiation epoch Meszaros effect: This allows to fix the gravitational potential at  >EQ through the Poisson equation and to have a more realistic and accurate analytical solutions for the acoustic oscillations from the equality onwards

Meszaros effect at second-order Combining the energy and velocity continuity equations of DM for a R.D. epoch Solution Initial conditions:

Meszaros effect at second-order Dark Matter density contrast on subhorizon scales for  < EQ Can be used for two pourposes:  fix the initial conditions for the evolution of the gravitational potential and photons perturbations at  >EQ for subhorizon modes  Interesting for NG and Large Scale Structure studies: determine the full second-order transfer function for matter perturbations (primordial non-Gaussianity parametrized by aNL is transferred linearly, but the core of the transfer function is given by the remaining terms). See N.B, Matarrese & Riotto, JCAP2222, for the case of modes entering the horizon after equality

Second-order transfer function First step: calculation of the full 2-nd order radiation transfer function on large scales (low-l), which includes: NG initial conditions non-linear evolution of gravitational potentials on large scales second-order SW effect (and second-order temperature fluctuations on last-scattering surface) second-order ISW effect, both early and late ISW from second-order tensor modes (unavoidably arising from non-linear evolution of scalar modes), also accounting for second-order tensor modes produced during inflation Second step: solve Boltzmann equation at 2-nd for the photon, baryon and CDM fluids,which allows to follow CMB anisotropies at 2-nd order at all scales; this includes both scattering and gravitational secondaries, like: Thermal and Kinetic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect Ostriker-Vishniac effect Inhomogeneous reionization Further gravitational terms, including gravitational lensing (both by scalar and tensor modes), Rees-Sciama effect, Shapiro time-delay, effects from second-order vector (i.e. rotational) modes, etc. … In particular we have computed the non-linearities at recombination (Bartolo, Matarrese & A.R. 2005+)

Conclusions  Up to now a lot of attention focused on the bispectrum of the curvature Perturbation . However this is not the physical quantity which is observed is (the CMB anisotropy) Need to provide an accurate theoretical prediction of the CMB NG in terms of the primordial NG seeds  full second-order radiation transfer function at all scales   Future techniques (predicted angular dependence of fNL, extensive use of simulated NG CMB maps, measurements of polarization and use of alternative statistical estimators ) might help NG detection down to fNL~1: need to compute exactly the predicted amplitude and shape of CMB NG from the post-inflationary evolution of perturbations.