MODULE 3 By: Chris Martinez.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

Libertarianism and the Philosophers Lecture 4
Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
John Rawls A Theory of Justice.
EM Winter Read for Friday  Chapter  Cases Eminent Domain Battling Over Bottled Water  Articles Isbister: Income distribution Maxwell:
Business Ethics Business Ethics. JOIN KHALID AZIZ ECONOMICS OF ICMAP, ICAP, MA-ECONOMICS, B.COM. FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 1,3,4 ICAP MODULE.
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
Chapter Three: Justice and Economic Distribution
L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:
Ethics and Morality Theory Part 2 11 September 2006.
COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham
Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.
What is a Just Society? What is Justice?.
Deontological tradition Contractualism of John Rawls Discourse ethics.
An Introduction to Ethics Week Nine: Distributive Justice and Torture.
Ethics of Administration Chapter 1. Imposing your values? Values are more than personal preferences Values are more than personal preferences Human beings.
Ethics Theory and Business Practice
Economic Theories Economics: A study of human efforts to satisfy seemingly unlimited wants through the use of limited resources. Resources include both.
Distributive Justice II: John Rawls Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
1 The Free Enterprise System. 2 What is “Free Enterprise”? Free: Having liberty; not controlled by others. Having liberty; not controlled by others.Enterprise:
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.
Rawls IV: Wrapping-up PHIL Original position, cont. of discussion Exclusion of prejudices while contracting in the OP:  'One excludes the knowledge.
Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.
Arguments against the Market  Engels complains that free market is completely wasteful.  This is also a utilitarian argument. It leads crisis after crisis.
Justice and Economic Distribution
CAPITALISM VS SOCIALISM MARKETING I. WHAT IS CAPITALISM? Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership goods and services. Characterized.
Egalitarian Liberalism: Justice in the Modern State
Today you will need…  A blank piece of notebook paper  Have one person from your table group grab the following from the table by the door. (one for.
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
Equity and Sustainability. Roseland and Equity North/South comparison … fairness The developed nations need to consider ‘our own poor’ … Definitional:
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Essential Question: How did the political theories of socialism and communism reflect the changes brought about by the period of industrialization?
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Walk the Line Activity Agree or Disagree There is nothing unjust about having lots of poor people in a rich country. There may not be equal opportunity,
The Industrial Revolution Lesson 5 How to Solve the Inequality of the Industrial Revolution.
Reward and Punishment.
Justice Retribution distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live.
Justice. What is justice? It seems we develop a sense of fairness from an early age and most people would agree with Plato that the only life worth living.
Communism and Capitalism To understand the conflict of the in Russia and the differences that come up after WW2 and the eventual Cold War you need to know.
Ethics Topic 3.
Moral Principles Paul L. Schumann, Ph.D.
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
Deontological tradition
Political theory and law
BUSINESS, LAW & ETHICS misbahuddin azzuhri.
Marxism PSIR308.
Three philosophies and LD Debate
John Rawls Ronald Dworkin
Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
CORE DEMOCRATIC VALUES
THE ECONOMY: THE CORE PROJECT
Theories of justice.
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
Capitalism vs. Socialism
Three Dimensions of Justice
Module 3 (Adamczak) Theories of Justice.
Economic Systems Capitalism, Socialism & Communism
Global Economic Justice
Alexis wagner BA F323 University of alaska fairbanks 7 june 2017
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Presentation transcript:

MODULE 3 By: Chris Martinez

QUESTION Can it ever be unjust to accumulate wealth?

UTILITARIAN ANSWER “Utilitarian must examine various factual issues to determine which economic system and principles will best promote social well-being or happiness. Many utilitarian favor increased worker participation and a more equal distribution of income. ”(Shaw 89) Yes it could be unjust. From this point of view there is no right answer. It all depends on what side of the argument you are in. As mentioned above, if you were to be a very wealthy individual who worked hard to get to where they are then no it wouldn’t be unjust. On the other hand, if you were a unable to make ends meet but put in the same amount of effort then yeah it can be unjust to be wealthy. You will determine what is just or unjust depending on what benefits you.

LIBERITARIAN ANSWER “The libertarian theory identifies justice with liberty, which libertarians understand as living according to our own choices, free from the interference of others.”(Shaw 91) No it can never be unjust. From my understanding of this theory, one is accountable for oneself and no one else. It is also mentioned that it is a belief that everyone is entitled to their belongings so it would not be unjust because those who decide to accumulate wealth are owners of it as long as they earned fairly. Those who decide not to do it, it is solemnly their fault because, as this theory mentions, we live by our own decisions.

RAWLS’ THEORY OF JUSTICE “Rawls’s principles permit economic inequalities only if they so in fact benefit the least advantaged.”(Shaw 103) Yes it could be unjust. Through Rawls’s theory we seem to be playing a board game as a society where we choose rules that are unbiased and knowingly choose them upon what is the best alternative to be least-well- off as a society. So in respect to this question. Accumulating wealth can be just or unjust depending on whether or not it benefits the least advantages.

PERSONAL OPINION As an individual I am inclined to agree with the libertarian answer to this question. This is because I believe that we should have the right to do as we please and be accountable for our own actions without anyone interfering in my doings.