WG Document Status Compiled By: Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram IETF 97 - TEAS Working Group

draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity From: Dieter Beller [2016-10-18] Current Status: Posted rev (-06) addressing WG LC comments Open Issues: None. Next Steps: Request further review. IETF 97 - TEAS Working Group

draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording From: No Update Received [Is there still interest in this draft?] Current Status: Published new rev (-05) to keep the draft active. No changes to content. Open Issues: Comments received from Pavan ( June 6th, 2016) on the list are yet to be addressed. Next Steps: Address outstanding comments and request WG Last Call. IETF 97 - TEAS Working Group

draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection From: Huaimo Chen [2016-11-07] Changes (since IETF-96): Published new rev (-08) Changed the title Current - “Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Ingress FRR Protection” Updated “Problem Summary” Section: Added text explaining why this is different from “Pseudowire Protection” Open Issues: None. Next Steps: Follow chairs’ recommendations. IETF 97 - TEAS Working Group

draft-ietf-teas-network-assigned-upstream-label From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram [2016-11-06] Current Status: No changes to the draft since IETF-96. Open Issues: None. Next Steps: Authors believe that the draft is ready for LC. IETF 97 - TEAS Working Group

draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram [2016-11-07] Changes (Since IETF-96): Published new rev (-03) Removed references to [RI-RSVP-FRR] and [SUMMARY-FRR] drafts. Open Issues: Should the document be split into two? Next Steps: Debate and address the open issue (and then request WG LC). IETF 97 - TEAS Working Group

draft-ietf-teas-pce-central-control From: Adrian Farrel [2016-11-06] Current Status: New adoption (-00 published 2016-09-01). Various solution use-case documents exist, but haven’t generated feedback into this document. Open Issues: None. Next Steps: Document could use a careful re-reading (more WG review). Editor’s working copy contains fixes for a few minor typos. Authors suspect the document may already be cooked. IETF 97 - TEAS Working Group