Giving Effective Presentations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
September1999 October 1999 Giving Effective Presentations Marie desJardins CMSC 691B February 20, 2006.
Advertisements

T Seminar on Network Security Today’s agenda 1.Seminar arrangements 2.Advice on the presentation.
How to Give a Journal Club Talk
September1999 October 1999 Presenting Your Research: Papers, Talks, and Chats Marie desJardins University of Maryland,
Project Workshops Presentations Why is Presentation important? Whatever profession you enter after graduation, you will have to stand on your feet.
Making Oral Presentations Joe Orlins, P.E., Ph.D. Civil and Environmental Engineering Rowan University.
1-Apr-03 Environmental Science Seminar (ES2111) Spring 2003 Communicating Scientific Results Aisling D. O’Sullivan, Ph.D. Visiting Post-Doctoral Fellow.
Making a Presentation Discussion Points Masters-Doctoral Seminar.
Presenting Your Research: Papers, Presentations, and People Marie desJardins University of Maryland Baltimore County
Advanced Research Methodology
Get the most information out of the time you have available.
Strategies for Interpreting a Prompt and Succeeding at the In-Class Timed Writing Essay.
Presenting Your Research: Papers, Presentations, and People Marie desJardins KOCSEA Technical Symposium October.
CMSC 100 Computing in the World: Ethical Implications of Computing Professor Marie desJardins Tuesday, November 27, 2012 Thu 11/29/12 1 Future of Computing.
University of Sunderland Professionalism and Personal Skills Tutorial Presentation Skills.
Presenting Your Research: Papers, Presentations, and People Dr Rojnath Pande.
HW & Systems: Networks IS 101Y/CMSC 101 Computational Thinking and Design Thursday, October 24, 2013 Marie desJardins University of Maryland, Baltimore.
Dana Nau: CMSC 722, AI Planning Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License:
September1999 October 1999 Giving Effective Presentations Marie desJardins HONR 300 / CMSC 491 May 4, 2011.
Computers and Society Carnegie Mellon University Spring 2005 Lorrie Cranor and Dave Farber 1 Computer Reliability.
Making Oral Presentations Joe Orlins, P.E., Ph.D. Doug Cleary, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Rowan University.
Reflection helps you articulate and think about your processes for communication. Reflection gives you an opportunity to consider your use of rhetorical.
Presenting Your Research: Papers, Presentations, and People Marie desJardins CMSC 601 April 21, 2009 Thanks to.
Research Methods and Techniques Lecture 6 Presentation Skills © 2004, J S Sventek, University of Glasgow.
Presenting Research. Facts Most people are intimidated in front of and audience. – Often more intimidating than flying, poisonous snakes, death… Most.
CMSC 304 Giving Effective Presentations Professor Marie desJardins April 16, /16/13 1 CMSC Presentations.
Constructing and Giving Research Presentations Paul Wagner (for MICS 2005)
Oral Presentation Advice on Talk Outline Converted to PPT a text document by Mark Hill, UW- Madison.
Presenting Your Research: Papers, Presentations, and People Marie desJardins CMSC 601 April 18, 2012 Thanks to.
Research talk 101 Jim Miles California State University, Long Beach 9/9/15.
Big6 Research and Problem Solving Skills 6 th Grade Project Creating a Travel Brochure.
CMSC 601: Paper Summary Presentations Adapted from slides by Prof. Marie desJardins February 2011.
September1999 October 1999 Giving Effective Presentations Marie desJardins HONR 300 / CMSC 491 April 5, 2016.
CS 664 Sample Presentation
Hidden Slide for Instructor
Studio 2. Guidelines for Good Presentations
Presentation skills Dr S. A. Pope.
Presenting Your Research: Papers, Presentations, and People
To present a paper method (technology) how to present it
Publicity: Networking, CVs, and Websites
PowerPoint Xpress Start
Milestone 4/6 – Presentation and Demonstration
Session 8 Exam techniques
Infectious Disease Seminar
Introduction to Engineering Oral Presentation Details
Research Live Presentation Template
Studio 2. Guidelines for Good Presentations
CMSC 601 Basic Research Skills Spring 2011
Studio 2. Guidelines for Good Presentations
Giving a “good” talk (or at least having good slides)
Effective Presentation
Publicity: Networking, CVs, and Websites
How to give a scientific talk
Tackling Timed Writings
Capstone Presentation Guideline
Cornell Notes Note-taking strategy that will improve your study skills and your grades!!
Giving Effective Presentations
COMP 208/214/215/216 – Lecture 5 Presentation Skills 恭喜發財.
Adapted from slides by Prof. Marie desJardins
Preparing a PowerPoint Presentation
CMSC 601: Giving Effective Presentations
Studio 2. Guidelines for a Good Presentation
Recap – NO NOTES! What key ideas / terms / arguments can you remember from the two theories we’ve covered so far: Direct Realism Indirect Realism.
CMSC 601 Basic Research Skills Spring 2011
Presenting Your Research: Papers, Presentations, and People
CS 6640 Sample Presentation
Scientific Presentations
How to Give a Journal Club Talk
How to Create Effective PowerPoint Presentations
Thesis Presentations MSCS 491.
Presentation transcript:

Giving Effective Presentations Marie desJardins (mariedj@cs.umbc.edu) CMSC 691B February 17, 2004

Sources Robert L. Peters, Getting What You Came For: The Smart Student’s Guide to Earning a Master’s or Ph.D. (Revised Edition). NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1997. Justin Zobel, Writing for Computer Science: The Art of Effective Communication. Singapore: Springer-Verlag, 1997. Mark D. Hill, “Oral presentation advice” Simon L. Peyton Jones, John Hughes, and John Launchbury, “How to give a good research talk” Patrick Winston, “Some lecturing heuristics” Dave Patterson, “How to have a bad career in research/academia” 2/17/04

Outline Rules for presentations General guidelines for preparing talks Paper presentation guidelines for this class 2/17/04

Rules for Presentations

# 1 Rule Know what on earth you’re doing up there! Rule #2: Know what you want to say Rule #3: Know your audience Rule #4: Know how long you have 2/17/04

Rule #2: Know What You Want to Say Just giving a project summary is not interesting to most people You should give enough detail to get your interesting ideas across (and to show that you’ve actually solved the problem), but not enough to lose your audience They want to hear what you did that was cool and why they should care Preferably, they’ll hear the above two points at the beginning of the talk, over the course of the talk, and at the end of the talk If they’re intrigued, they’ll ask questions or read your paper Whatever you do, don’t just read your slides! 2/17/04

Rule #3: Know Your Audience Don’t waste time on basics if you’re talking to an audience in your field Even for these people, you need to be sure you’re explaining each new concept clearly On the other hand, you’ll lose people in a general audience if you don’t give the necessary background In any case, the most important thing is to emphasize what you’ve done and why they should care! 2/17/04

Rule #4: Know How Long You Have How long is the talk? Are questions included? A good heuristic is 2-3 minutes per slide If you have too many slides, you’ll skip some or— worse—rush desperately to finish. Avoid this temptation!! Almost by definition, you never have time to say everything about your topic, so don’t worry about skipping some things! Unless you’re very experienced giving talks, you should practice your timing: A couple of times on your own to get the general flow At least one dry run to work out the kinks A run-through on your own the night before the talk 2/17/04

Comments on Zobel / Peters Zobel recommends one minute per slide Unless you have VERY little information on each slide, this is a racing speed Peters recommends writing out your presentation, word for word This is a very bad idea for most people, and will lead to extremely stilted delivery The only alternative, if you’re not an experienced public speaker, is to PRACTICE 2/17/04

General Presentation Guidelines

Organizing a Talk Talks are linear: Your audience can’t flip back to see what you said last They can’t use the section headers as a guideline → Help them keep track of where you are in the talk → Don’t try to cover as much ground as you would in a technical paper Give an overview (& use it throughout) Start with a slide or two on key ideas/contributions Give a high-level summary (or simple example) before you dive down into (not too many) details Recap at the end 2/17/04

Slideology 101 Don’t just read your slides! Use the minimum amount of text necessary Use examples Use a readable, simple, yet elegant format Use color to emphasize important points, but avoid the excessive use of color “Hiding” bullets like this is annoying (but sometimes effective), but… Don’t fidget, and… Abuse of animation is a cardinal sin! 2/17/04

How to Give a Bad Talk Advice from Dave Patterson, summarized by Mark Hill Thou shalt not be neat Thou shalt not waste space Thou shalt not covet brevity Thou shalt cover thy naked slides Thou shalt not write large Thou shalt not use color Thou shalt not illustrate Thou shalt not make eye contact Thou shalt not skip slides in a long talk Thou shalt not practice 2/17/04

Handling Questions Questions during the talk: If your presentation will answer the question later, say so and move on If your presentation won’t answer the question, either: Give a brief answer Defer the question to the end of the talk Make sure you understand the question before answering it Ask for clarification if you need it Restate the question, and ask whether you’ve gotten it right Have backup slides for questions you can anticipate (but don’t have time for in the main presentation) 2/17/04

Paper Summary Presentations

Goals of Paper Presentations Convey why this is an important and/or interesting problem Review key ideas in the paper Convey why this is an important and/or interesting approach Critique the work Stimulate discussion 2/17/04

Paper Summary Presentations Content: You should provide a well organized presentation of the key contributions and important ideas in the paper. Timing: You should aim for a ten-minute presentation. This works out to (roughly) four to six slides – no more! As in a real talk, you will get 5-minute, 2-minute, and time’s-up warnings from the session chair. I will cut you off if you go too long! Audience: Your audience consists of computer science graduate students. (I don’t count.) Some are in your field, some are not Most will not have read the paper (at least not in depth) You can’t assume a lot of existing knowledge On the other hand, you only have ten minutes! Be selective! 2/17/04

Summary Presentation Content Just as when writing a paper on your own work: Describe the problem Starting with a simple example can be very helpful Explain why it’s important (or at least why they think it’s important) State how the authors solved the problem at an appropriate level of detail Tell what explicit and implicit claims the authors make Describe the authors’ experimental and/or analytical evidence for these claims (and indicate whether you think the evidence is sufficient to support the claims) Stimulate discussion by pointing out interesting aspects of the approach, flaws, limitations/assumptions, open questions, ... 2/17/04

Giving the Presentation PowerPoint slides are fine, but not required Draft slides can be sent to me* for review, if you want feedback beforehand Feel free to use the whiteboard, especially to work through an example Practice your presentation, even if it’s just to yourself, to make sure your timing is correct As with written summaries, leave out details that you don’t have time to explain Be prepared to fill in the missing details during the discussion session if you are asked questions! 2/17/04 * Draft slides must be sent at least 24 hours before your talk

Grading and Feedback Students are required to fill out a short feedback form for each presentation You will receive these forms I will also give you written feedback Your grade will be based on: Your level of preparation The clarity of your presentation The timing of your presentation Other students’ evaluation of your presentation The ensuing discussion 2/17/04