CompactLight WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation Physics | ELBE | SRF Photo Injector for Electron- Laser Interaction LA 3 NET conference: Laser applications at accelerators, Mallorca,
Advertisements

Tessa Charles Australian Synchrotron / Monash University 1 Bunch Compression Schemes for X-band FELs.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Overview of ILC Plans D.Rubin April 17, D. Rubin2 ILC R&D Activities and Plans 1.Positron Source 2.Damping Ring 3.Low Emittance Transport - damping.
AS Diagnostic Collaboration Mark Boland
New Electron Beam Test Facility EBTF at Daresbury Laboratory B.L. Militsyn on behalf of the ASTeC team Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Science.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
Undulator parameters choice/wish based on a simplified XFEL cost model Jürgen Pfingstner 29 st of July 2015.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
CLIC and High Gradient FEL Design D. Schulte for the CLIC collaboration and FEL friends D. Schulte, LSUM, Ankara, October
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Y. R. Roblin, D. Douglas, A. Hofler, C. Tennant, G. Krafft EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF OPTICS SCHEMES AT CEBAF FOR SUPPRESSION OF COHERENT SYNCHROTRON RADIATION.
1 GdA_CLIC meeting  Research & Innovation Action  INFRADEV : Design studies INFRADEV : Design studies Project: “X-band technology.
Introdcution to Workpackage/Activity Reflection D. Schulte.
Introduction D. Schulte for K. Kubo and P. Tenenbaum.
Commissioning and Utilisation of ERLP David Holder ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
WP8-HGA High Gradient Acceleration M. Biagini (INFN-LNF) WP8 coordinator Tiara Kickoff Meeting, CERN, Feb , 2011.
Interface between TAC SR and SASE FEL Possibility for testing CLIC structure Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
A. FaccoEURISOL DS Orsay, 3 Feb 2005 Task 7 Proton Accelerator “The objective of the Proton Accelerator Task is the design a 5 mA CW, 1 GeV proton linac.
X-band Based FEL proposal
ELI PHOTOINJECTOR PARAMETERS: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND SIMULATIONS C. RONSIVALLE.
WP9 updated Upgrade of SPARC test facility for high gradient acceleration of electron beams for SuperB collider and FEL projects WP number9Start month1End.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Overview Turkish Projects TAC / TARLA Avni Aksoy Ankara University Institute of Accelerator Technologies.
Dr Mark Boland Principal Scientist Accelerator Physics AXXS Australian X-band XFEL Source at the Australian Synchrotron On behalf of the Accelerator Science.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Capabilities and Programmes of STFC’s Accelerator Science & Technology Centre (ASTeC)
CALIFES A proposed electron beam test facility at CERN
CompactLight H2020 Design Study Proposal
CompactLight: H2020 Design Study Proposal +Feedback from TIARA
Contribution of Ankara University Accelerator Technology Institute
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Robert Bosch, Kevin Kleman and the WiFEL team
UK X FEL Kick-off Meeting
Status of the MAX IV Short Pulse Facility
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Plans of XFELO in Future ERL Facilities
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Status and Interest of the X-ray FEL SINAP
Planned Oslo work in the XbFEL collaboration
CompactLight H2020 Design Study Proposal
X-band FEL beam dynamics issues
CTF3 Collaboration Technical Meeting January 2008
Design of an ECHO-seeded FEL at nm wavelength
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Kick-Off preparatory meeting
WP 9: Beam-driven plasma acc.
Gu Qiang For the project team
Paul Scherrer Institut
Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review
Where Do We Stand With Start-End Simulations
Revised Commissioning Strategy
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
The Cornell High Brightness Injector
ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule
Diagnostics overview and FB for the XFEL bunch compressors
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Design of an ECHO-seeded FEL at nm wavelength
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
Presentation transcript:

CompactLight WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting Avni Aksoy On behalf of WP6 Team Ankara Üni. Institute of Accelerator Tech avniaksoy@ankara.edu.tr January 25, 2018 January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

Outline Introduction Tasks and deliverables Facility options Participant data Workflow Conclusion January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

WP6: start to end modelling integrated performance studies of the facility Performing start to end simulations, which cover the beam transport from the cathode to the FEL exit for Soft X-Ray & Hard X-Ray including; including Space Charge effects, Coherent Synchrotron Radiation in magnetic compressors, Wake Field effects in the X-band linac and in undulators. Providing key parameters and performance estimates of the overall facility. Definition the basis for technology choices for critical components and for developing detailed designs of subsystems and components including: accelerating structures, undulators, power sources, modulators, pulse compressors, waveguide network, instrumentation and alignment system. Mechanical tolerance studies will be also performed. it will include beam-based alignment and tuning methods that can relax tolerances. Development of tools for modeling the machine, as the basis for the final integrated performance studies. January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

WP flow chart WP6 is closely linked to WP3, WP4 and WP5. WP6 may start by receiving input from WP2. At start stage it is not necessary to combine the results of WP3, WP4 and WP5 January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

Task 6.1: Study of the existing design and simulation tools for the evaluation of the facility performance. Analyse and improve their capabilities if necessary. We already started collecting the available simulation tools for the section of interest i.e. Gun&injector: 7! Parmela, Astra, GPT, Andrea’s code. . . ? Linac: 7! Placet, Elegant, GPT, LiTrack, MadX . . . ? FEL: 7! Genesis, Ginger. . . ? Other tools not related with beam dynamics in particularly RF structure optimization tools Cost optimization tool for entire facility Task 6.2: Using the above mentioned tools, design and evaluate the performance of the machine from the e-gun up to the undulator exit. By definition the facility parameters the tools will be selected and the integration will be performed with some optimization algorithm January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

Example One of previous study

Deliverables brief description and month of delivery D6.1: A report providing a global analysis of the most advanced computer codes available for the facility design and performance evaluations (R, PU, M18). D6.2: Final report of the accelerator lattice and FEL design and performance (R, PU, M36). there will be internal reports as well which are going to be prepared frequently. January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

Facility options January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

Preliminary Parameters Unit Value Beam Energy GeV 4.2 Bunch charge pC <250 Normalize emittance μrad <0.5 Repetition rate Hz 100-1000 Undulator period mm 10 Undulator strength # 1.3 Min/Max Wavelength Nm 0.1-? Photons per pulse 10^12 Pulse bandwidth % 0.1 The parameters needs to be checked as a first ste. i.e The table shall first needs to be confirmed. For example 4.2 GeV is sufficient? January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

WP6 Participants No Participant Name Acro. Effort 1 Ankara University (Turkey) AU-IAT 12 2 Elettra – Sincrotrone Trieste (Italy) ST 4 3 CERN (International) CERN Science and Technology Facilities Council-Daresbury Laboratory (UK) STFC 5 Institute of Accelerating Systems and Applications (Greece) IASA 6 Upsala University (Sweden) UU 7 The University of Melbourne (Australia) UoM 8 Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (Australia) ANSTO 9 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (Italy) INFN 10 Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile (Italy) ENEA 11 Consorcio para la Construccion Equipamiento y Explotacion del Laboratorio de Luz Sincrotron (Spain) ALBA-CELLS Vrije University Amsterdam (Netherlands) VU TOTAL 78 January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

Tasks WP-6 can be split in to Gun & Injector S-band based Injector C-band Based Injector X-band Based Injector Thermioyonic gun based Injector Linac Sband gun + Sband Linac + Xband linearizer + .. All Xband + Optic linearizer All Xband + Kband linearizer BCs Alignment Beam Delivery FEL generation Soft X-Ray FEL Hard X-Ray FEL Integration existing facility Beam Dynamics And others i.e. Compton Back Scattering ? January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

Tasks and Contributions January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

Tentative work flow January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

WP6 flow chart January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting

Conclusion WP6 will mainly be doing beam dynamics and FEL generation simulations As a first step we are collecting the available simulation tools at collaborating institutions We will also collect the previous studies which are related to our WP The parameter table will quickly be checked and preliminary simulations will be prepared for sub-sections of entire facility As soon as we get feedback from WP2 the simulations will be adapted to the requirements. January 25, 2018 WP6 – Kick-Off Meeting