Unitary Spherical Super-Landau Models Andrey Beylin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Xkcd Xkcd.com. Section 3 Recap ► Angular momentum commutators:  [J x, J y ] = iħJ z etc ► Total ang. Mom. Operator: J 2 = J x 2 + J y 2 +J z 2 ► Ladder.
Advertisements

Sect. 8.2: Cyclic Coordinates & Conservation Theorems
The Quantum Mechanics of Simple Systems
Reflection Symmetry and Energy-Level Ordering of Frustrated Ladder Models Tigran Hakobyan Yerevan State University & Yerevan Physics Institute The extension.
What is symmetry? Immunity (of aspects of a system) to a possible change.
One assumes: (1) energy, E  (- ℏ /i)  /  t (2) momentum, P  ( ℏ /i)  (3) particle probability density,  (r,t)  = i  /  x + j  /  y + k  / 
Gauge Invariance and Conserved Quantities
Happy 120 th birthday. Mimeograph Constraining Goldstinos with Constrained Superfields Nathan Seiberg IAS Confronting Challenges in Theoretical Physics.
P460 - angular momentum1 Orbital Angular Momentum In classical mechanics, conservation of angular momentum L is sometimes treated by an effective (repulsive)
P460 - angular momentum1 Orbital Angular Momentum In classical mechanics, conservation of angular momentum L is sometimes treated by an effective (repulsive)
Modified Coulomb potential of QED in a strong magnetic field Neda Sadooghi Sharif University of Technology (SUT) and Institute for Theoretical Physics.
Spin and addition of angular momentum
Orbital Angular Momentum
Symmetries and conservation laws
XI. International Workshop
Masses For Gauge Bosons. A few basics on Lagrangians Euler-Lagrange equation then give you the equations of motion:
Conformal higher-spin fields in (super) hyperspace Dmitri Sorokin INFN, Padova Section Based on arXiv: , with Ioannis Florakis (CERN)
MSEG 803 Equilibria in Material Systems 6: Phase space and microstates Prof. Juejun (JJ) Hu
Central Force Motion Chapter 8
ADE Matrix Models in Four Dimensional QFT DK, J. Lin arXiv: , ``Strings, Matrices, Integrability’’ Paris, August 19, 2014.
Dynamically Equivalent & Kinematically Distinct Pseudo-Hermitian Quantum Systems Ali Mostafazadeh Koç University.
Higher Derivative Scalars in Supergravity Jean-Luc Lehners Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics Albert Einstein Institute Based on work with.
6.852: Distributed Algorithms Spring, 2008 April 1, 2008 Class 14 – Part 2 Applications of Distributed Algorithms to Diverse Fields.
Uniform discretizations: the continuum limit of consistent discretizations Jorge Pullin Horace Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Louisiana State.
1 The Mathematics of Quantum Mechanics 2. Unitary and Hermitian Operators.
Super Virasoro Algebras from Chiral Supergravity Ibaraki Univ. Yoshifumi Hyakutake Based on arXiv:1211xxxx + work in progress.
Gauge invariant Lagrangian for Massive bosonic higher spin field Hiroyuki Takata Tomsk state pedagogical university(ТГПУ) Tomsk, Russia Hep-th
Permutation-symmetric three- particle hyper-spherical harmonics I. Salom and V. Dmitrašinović.
Hirophysics.com PATRICK ABLES. Hirophysics.com PART 1 TIME DILATION: GPS, Relativity, and other applications.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
2 Time Physics and Field theory
5. Quantum Theory 5.0. Wave Mechanics
Vibrational Motion Harmonic motion occurs when a particle experiences a restoring force that is proportional to its displacement. F=-kx Where k is the.
9/10/2007Isaac Newton Institute1 Relations among Supersymmetric Lattice Gauge Theories So Niels Bohr Institute based on the works arXiv:
Monday, Apr. 4, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #16 Monday, Apr. 4, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu Symmetries Why do we care about the symmetry?
Extension of the Poincare` Group and Non-Abelian Tensor Gauge Fields George Savvidy Demokritos National Research Center Athens Extension of the Poincare’
The nonperturbative analyses for lower dimensional non-linear sigma models Etsuko Itou (Osaka University) 1.Introduction 2.The WRG equation for NLσM 3.Fixed.
Sect. 2.6: Conservation Theorems & Symmetry Properties Lagrange Method: A method to get the eqtns of motion. Solving them = math! n degrees of freedom.
Announcements Reading quiz shifted to tomorrow 9/12 Lectures through Monday posted Homework solutions 1, 2a, 2b posted.
Intro to SUSY II: SUSY QFT Archil Kobakhidze PRE-SUSY 2016 SCHOOL 27 JUNE -1 JULY 2016, MELBOURNE.
Arnau Riera, Grup QIC, Dept. ECM, UB 16 de maig de 2009 Intoduction to topological order and topologial quantum computation.
Anisotropic Mechanics J.M. Romero, V. Cuesta, J.A. Garcia, and J. D. Vergara Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, UNAM, Mexico.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
Quantum One.
Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and the
Lecture 4 Complex numbers, matrix algebra, and partial derivatives
The Hydrogen Atom The only atom that can be solved exactly.
Schrodinger wave equation
Lagrange Formalism & Gauge Theories
Takaaki Nomura(Saitama univ)
Algebraic Bethe ansatz for the XXZ Heisenberg spin chain
NGB and their parameters
Adjoint sector of MQM at finite N
Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 10 Chapter 14 in H&M.
Fundamentals of Quantum Electrodynamics
Quantum One.
Fermion Condensate in Lower Dimensions
Quantum One.
The Harmonic Oscillator
Quantum One.
Quantum Two.
What is the GROUND STATE?
Fun with the supercurrent I: FI-terms
Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics
Orbital Angular Momentum
Chapter II Klein Gordan Field Lecture 5.
3d CFT and Multi M2-brane Theory on
Geometrical Construction of Supertwistor Theory
Off-shell Formulation of Supersymmetric Field Theories
Lecture 8 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
Presentation transcript:

Unitary Spherical Super-Landau Models Andrey Beylin Department of Physics, University of Miami Based on the paper: Unitary Spherical Super-Landau Models arXiv:08064716 A.B., Thomas L. Curtright, Evgeny Ivanov, Luca Mezincescu, Paul K. Townsend

Story of the question Original Model by Landau (1930) – particle on the plane First extension by Haldane (1983) – particle on the sphere with magnetic field generated by a monopole. First supersymmetric extension on the supersphere Superflag model Restoring unitarity for planar super Landau models. Revision of the supersphere and superflag. Further generalizations? C P 1 ! ( j ) » = S U 2 S U ( 2 j 1 ) = [ £ ] 2:10:05 AM

Outline of the Talk Planar cases Supersphere Superflag Construction Fixing negative norms with “metric operator” Hidden N=2 worldline supersymmetry. Supersphere Superflag Fixing negative norms Equivalence between supersphere and superflag models Further generalization? Summary and conclusions. 2:10:05 AM

References Fuzzy $CP(n|m)$ as a quantum superspace arXiv:hep-th/0311159 A super-flag Landau model arXiv:hep-th/0404108 Planar super-Landau models arXiv:hep-th/0510019 E.Ivanov, L.Mezincescu and P.K.Townsend Planar Super-Landau Models Revisited arXiv:hep-th/0612300 T.Curtright, E.Ivanov, L.Mezincescu and P.K.Townsend Supersymmetrizing Landau models arXiv:hep-th/07052249 E.Ivanov Unitary spherical Super-Landau models arXiv:hep-th/08064716 A.B., T.Curtright, E.Ivanov, L.Mezincescu and P.K.Townsend 2:10:05 AM

Model on the superplane We define superplane as a superspace parameterized by complex coordinates . Superplane Lagrangian is Full symmetry group is infinite dimensional, while those inherited from supersphere are super-translations, super-rotations, and phase rotation . The superplane can be viewed as the coset superspace C ( 1 j ) ( z ; ³ ) 1 L = b + f ; 1 L b = j _ z 2 ¡ i N ( ¹ ) ; f ³ + ´ : 1 I U ( 1 j ) I U ( 1 j ) = [ £ Z ] 2:10:05 AM

Model on the planar superflag Ghosts in the quantum theory for the superplane suggest spontaneous breaking of symmetry. Introduce interaction with Goldstino in the Lagrangian Also we can understand this Lagrangian geometrically and write it in terms of invariant forms on the coset superspace I U ( 1 j ) » 1 L = ¡ 1 + ¹ » ¢ j _ z 2 ³ ´ i N M K = I U ( 1 j ) [ £ Z ] 2:10:05 AM

‘Metric operator’ Imagine we have a quantum system and its natural inner product is not positive definite. Let be a complete set of energy eigenvectors with Lets fix our norm with ‘metric operator’ Where j f A i 1 S i g n ( h f A j B ) = ¡ ± 1 h f A j B i ´ G 1 G j f A i ´ = ( ¡ ) g ; y 1 2:10:05 AM

‘Improved’ Hermitian conjugation With respect of new norm we will get Hermitian conjugation which is different from the original one so we get Here we introduce shift operator h f A j O B i = G ­ y ® ¡ 1 ¢ O z ´ G ¡ 1 y = + S S O ´ G ¡ 1 £ y ; ¤ 2:10:05 AM

Shift operators Lemma. Since , the Hamiltonian is Hermitian in both inner products Moreover, if the operator is a constant of motion, then the corresponding shift operator is also a constant of motion. This is the signal that the system may have some `hidden' symmetries. [ G ; H ] = 1 H 1 H = y z . 1 O 1 2:10:05 AM

Superplane Quantum problem for the particle on the superplane is easily factorizable. All states except LLL have a negative norm. It is possible to find ‘metric operator’ Using Lemma we find that shift operators associated with odd generators are new integrals of motion. They satisfy which is just worldline supersymmetry. Infinitesimal transformations generated by are atypical G 1 f S ; z g = 2 N H 1 N = 2 1 ² S + ¹ z 1 ± z = ² _ ³ ; ¡ ¹ 1 2:10:05 AM

Planar superflag(1) Difference form the superplane case is that we have an additional parameter . It is possible to solve this model with factorization method as well, but unitarity properties will depend on . Consider different cases: will return us on the supersphere, after elimination of , which become auxiliary. For situation is similar to the superplane – we can obtain ‘metric operator’ , fix the norm and recover worldline supersymmetry. But there are no supersymmetric ground states, so worldline supersymmetry is spontaneously broken for . M 1 M 1 M = 1 » 1 M < 1 G 1 N = 2 1 M < 1 2:10:05 AM

Planar superflag(2) In case we have states with negative norm only for . All the lowest levels have positive norm. This implies that ‘metric operator’ have to be level dependent. While it is possible to find so all the states have positive norm, we will not have worldline supersymmetry in this case. For this case anticommutator of shift operators will be M > 1 l > 2 M 1 ( l < 2 M ) 1 G 1 f S ; z g = 2 N j H s u y ( M > ) 1 2:10:05 AM

Supersphere (1) Riemann supersphere is a complex Kähler supermanifold. Its geometry is determined by Kähler potential, metric, connections The classical Lagrangian of the superspherical Landau model is C P ( 1 j ) » = S U 2 K = l o g ¡ 1 + z ¹ ³ ¢ ; B A @ i d Z ´ ( ) L = _ Z A ¹ B g + N ³ ´ 1 2:10:05 AM

Supersphere (2) After quantization we get this form of the Hamiltonian The energy levels of the Landau model of a supersphere could be found exactly using a factorization method. Energy eigenvalues are Wave functions H = ¡ ( 1 ) a + b g A ¹ B r N ; @ K E ` = ( + 2 N ) 1 ª ( N ) ` = r + 1 A ¢ 2 ¡ © : ; ¹ B 2:10:05 AM

Supersphere (3) The Hilbert space has a natural -invariant norm Norm of the eigenvectors on the component level S U ( 2 j 1 ) j ª 2 = R d ¹ e ¡ K ¤ ; z @ ³ : 1 j ª ( N ) ` 2 = C Z d z ¹ 1 + · ¡ A Ã Â ¢ F ¸ : 2:10:05 AM

Superflag(1) is a complex Kähler supermanifold, which we call superflag, with coordinates In contrast with the supersphere, Lagrangian for the Landau model on the superflag built with the invariant form, not the Kähler potential of the superflag. We have The superflag Lagrangian now will be S U ( 2 j 1 ) = [ £ ] Z M = ( z ; ³ » ) ¹ 1 ! + = K ¡ 1 2 n _ z £ » ¹ ³ ¤ o ; ¢ ( ) : L = j ! + 2 h _ Z M ( N A B ) c : i 1 2:10:05 AM

Superflag(2) Resulting Hamiltonian for the quantum theory For an integer the Hamiltonian may be diagonalized with energy levels and eigenfunctions given by H N = ¡ K 2 1 ³ r ( ) z » ´ ¹ ; A @ i : $2N$ E N = ` ( 2 + 1 ) ; : © ( ` ) = D 2 N + 1 ¢ a n z ; ³ » > ´ r ¡ : 2:10:05 AM

Superflag(3) Invariant inner product on the superflag is given by Final result for Hamiltonian eigenfunctions in component fields after all integrations and removing derivatives h ¨ j ª i = R d z ¹ @ ³ » K ¡ 2 ¤ : 1 j ª ( ` ) N 2 = C Z d z ¹ 1 + £ ½ M ¡ Ã A F Â ¾ : 2:10:05 AM

Unitary norm As for planar cases we want to find ‘metric operator’, but we have to restrict ourselves with . We have two cases Here are generators of the . M < 1 2 M < ¡ N 1 G a n = 1 2 N + ` h J ( F ¡ M ) i : ¡ 2 N 1 < M . ~ G a n = 1 ¡ 8 ( F 2 M N ) + : ( F ; J 3 § ¦ Q ) 1 S U ( 2 j 1 ) 2:10:05 AM

Hidden symmetries There are hidden worldline supersymmetry for planar superflag at . For superflag model in the case we does not have worldline supersymmetry. But if Lagrangian possess ‘enlarged’ symmetry group This symmetry algebra is a subalgebra of the enveloping algebra of . For LLL is an exception, it doesn’t have symmetry. M · 1 ¡ 2 N 1 < M · M 6 = 1 f J § ; 3 Z ~ ¦ Q · G g 1 s u ( 2 j ) 1 s u ( 2 j 1 ) M = 1 S U ( 2 j ) 1 2:10:05 AM

Generalized superplane Superplane model have atypical transformation with respect to hidden worldline supersymmetry. Consider two chiral superfields and in . Superplane Landau model can be recovered from Our idea is to generalize this Lagrangian We can solve it for N = 2 1 © 1 ª 1 N = 2 ; d 1 S = ¡ R d t 2 µ © ¹ + ª ½ £ D ¤ 1 S = ¡ R d t 2 µ © K ( ; ¹ ) + V ª ½ £ D ¤ : 1 K ( © ; ¹ ) = l o g ¡ 1 + ¢ V 2 : 2:10:05 AM

Summary and conclusion Superflag Landau model with charges is quantum equivalent to the superspherical Landau model with charge . All superflag Landau models admit positive norm. In general, this norm have to be a ‘dynamical’ combination of the original and ‘alternative’ norm involving a ‘metric operator’. Redefinition of Hermitian conjugation give rise to `shift‘ operators which turn to be new ‘hidden’ symmetry generators. This generators form a closed subset for 2 N = ¡ 1 ; M 2 N 1 ¡ 2 N < M 1 2:10:05 AM