The interaction between public and private enforcement of EU competition rules Helena Penovski European Competition Network and Private Enforcement Unit.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The EU Competition Law Fining System: A Reassessment
Advertisements

Dr Daniele Calisti European Commission – DG Competition
The civilian consequences of competition law violations Copenhagen 28 September European Commission, DG Competition How can we construe a European.
Financial Services and Consumer redress Unit DG SANCO The Commission‘s initiative on Collective Redress.
The fundamentals of EC competition law
Liability and Procedure in European Antitrust Law The EU Damages Directive Does the European Union overstep the mark again?
Enforcement pluralism Regulation of market conduct –EU Commission General surveillance of compliance with the Treaty “Trustbuster”: DG Comp –National Competition.
Workshop Good Practices for Ship Vetting 12 October 2011.
Investigation and Enforcement of competition law.
THE VITAMINS‘ CARTEL global dimension 1997 Case filed in Alabama: Robertson v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche, Ltd Donaldson & Hosenbein, Inc. v. Hoffmann-LaRoche.
ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION : SOME REFLECTIONS ON LAW AND PSYCHOLOGY Workshop: Arbitration & Psychology Brunel University, London 24 May 2013 Dr Pablo Cortés.
European Commission, DG Competition Fifth Annual Conference on Competition Enforcement in the CCE Member States 21 February 2014, Bratislava 1 Due Process.
1 European Commission, DG Competition Filip Kubik European Commission, DG Competition Brno, 12 November 2008 White Paper on Damages Actions for Breach.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENS SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP CONSUMER
European Commission, DG Competition, Directorate G, Cartels Interface Between Leniency and Settlements in European Commission proceedings Sari Suurnäkki,
SEMINAR ON OUT-OF-COURT DISPUTES RESOLUTION OF CONSUMER DISPUTES Belgrade, 27 th and 28 th June 2013 Sava Centar.
Anti-Fraud Strategies
Accessibility Antidiscrimination Public Procurement Inmaculada Placencia Porrero Deputy Head of Unit Unit D3 Rights of Persons with Disabilities European.
European Commission, DG Competition, Cartel Directorate 1 RECENT TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS IN COMPETITION LAW AND POLICY 2008 Leniency – experience, practical.
Problems of competition enforcement and redress: EU trends and new solutions Professor Dr Christopher Hodges Head of the CMS Research Programme on Civil.
Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Relevant changes to the amount of fine. Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating.
Settlements Wouter Wils * BIICL, 15 May 2008 * All views expressed are strictly personal.
4. Regulatory Measures and Procedures 1. General measures Include regulations or administrative rules of general applicability aimed at implementing or.
Session 4: Collective Claims of Consumer Asscociations Patrick von Braunmühl Federation of German Consumer Organisations (vzbv)
INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT Presentation by Duncan T. Morotsi 15 th March
LUMSA – International Commercial Law 30 October 2015 Prof. Avv. Roberto Pirozzi
Imbalance between Private and Public Enforcement in Colombia Webinar Series - ICN Alfonso Miranda Londoño December 15,
© Konrad Ost Private Enforcement – What for? The perspective of the competition authorities Konrad Ost CLF-Meeting London 15/03/2006.
1 Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine Guidelines on setting fines imposed for violations of the law on protection of economic competition GENERAL APPROACHES.
European Commission, DG Competition, A, A-4 ECN The ECN, coherency and the review of decisions of the Commission and the National Competition Authorities.
Safeguarding Adults Care Act 2014.
THE ROLE OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS IN ENHANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION SEVENTH ANNUAL COLLOQUIUM OF THE IUCN ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL.
XII Treviso Antitrust Conference May 2016 Maria João Melícias Member of the Board of the AdC The art of consistency between public and private antitrust.
Competition law and its application in the UK Nicholas French Partner, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Beijing,16 September 2009 To insert other ready-formatted.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
ICC roundtable Istanbul, 30 April 2010 Procedural Fairness: Update on Recent OECD Activities Antonio Capobianco OECD Competition Division
SMEs and private enforcement of competition law Rachel Burgess Ph:
competition rules in inland transport
Pre-action Procedure for Financial Cases
Privacy in the Digital Age: the UN General Assembly Resolution
Competition Law and its Application: European Union
Green Paper Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules
Competition Law in the Energy Sector
European Union Law Week 6.
„Administrative cooperation within the ECN“
ANTITRUST DAMAGES CLAIMS UNDER EU AND NATIONAL LAW A TRANSPORTATION SECTOR FOCUS Pedro Callol.
Competition Law Enforcement in the E.U. - Dawn Raids -
Mark Krotoski September 15, 2015
Impact of private enforcement on public anti-cartel enforcement
Calculated risk between the leniency benefits and class actions in Colombia Gabriel Ibarra Pardo - Ibarra Abogados December 2015.
the antitrust administrative proceedings
Discovery / disclosure issues in EU cartel enforcement
European Commission's fining policy 10 February 2015
ICN | The interplay between private enforcement and leniency policy
November 17, 2015 ICN Cartel Working Group SG1 call series
European actions.
ICN Cartel Working Group SG-1
The Role of National Courts in the Enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU - Towards more effective antitrust damages actions in Europe.
Commissioner’s Legal Advisor - Italian Competition Authority
ECN+ Empowering the national competition authorities to be more effective enforcers - Results of Public Consultation.
ICN Cartel Working Group SG 1 Call Series Linda Plumpton
Interplay of public and private enforcement – cartel sanctioning and deterrence ICN Cartel Working Group SG 1 call series 15 September 2015 Marc Braithwaite,
Private enforcement – Why and how?
The interplay between private enforcement and leniency policy
Fines, Sanctions and Compensation The teeth in the GDPR & Data Protection Act 2018 by Simon McGarr, CIPP/E Data Compliance Europe.
Part D-I The Economics of Tort Law
The European Aviation Safety Policy
Konrad Ost CLF-Meeting London 15/03/2006
Calculated risk between the leniency benefits and class actions in Colombia Gabriel Ibarra Pardo - Ibarra Abogados December 2015.
Investment dispute settlement: The Multilateral Investment Court
Presentation transcript:

The interaction between public and private enforcement of EU competition rules Helena Penovski European Competition Network and Private Enforcement Unit DG Competition European Commission

Public and private enforcement – complementary tools with different objectives Public enforcement is a key driver of antitrust enforcement in the EU Its purpose - effective deterrence (individual and general) by detecting infringements of the competition rules in Articles 101 and 102 TFEU and imposing sanctions. Private antitrust enforcement in the EU has so far been less prominent. Its main purpose – compensation Anyone who suffered harm as a result of a breach of EU competition rules has a right to claim full compensation before national courts.

Public and private enforcement – complementary tools with different objectives Public and private enforcement complement each other. In the EU the interaction between them in a number of areas is regulated in the Directive in order to enable the antitrust enforcement as a whole to function properly.

Recent legislative changes in the EU Damages Directive 2014/104/EU aims to develop private enforcement in Europe while ensuring that public enforcement continues to work well Ensures claimants can claim compensation for actual loss, loss of profit and interest from the time the harm occurred until compensation is paid Ensures parties have easier access to evidence they need Allows claimants to rely on final decisions by a national competition authority finding an infringement and gives them more time to claim damages

Encourages parties to choose consensual dispute resolution as an alternative avenue of redress Provides special rules on the disclosure of evidence included in a file of the Commission or a national competition authority; • Protecting leniency programmes and cartel settlement procedures • Avoiding interference with pending investigations The disclosure of information before the national courts should not unduly affect the effectiveness of enforcement of the competition rules by the Commission and national competition authorities.

Thank you for your attention!