Program Review and Accreditation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Advertisements

Periodic Department Review A System of Affirmation LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Program Review 2014 Report to College Council, May 2, 2014.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
Office of Special Education: Vision Statements Parent Advisory Council – Specialized Services November 05, 2012 Gina Ross - Elementary Megan McCullough.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
WRITING LEARNING OUTCOMES AND MAPPING CURRICULUM UK Office of Assessment.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
EDUCATIONAL MASTER PLAN TIMELINE Mr. Rick Miranda Acting Vice President, Academic Affairs/Asst. Superintendent Dr. Kristi Blackburn Dean of Institutional.
Annual Program Assessment With a Five- Year Peer Review John Henik Associate Vice President, Academic Affairs Dave Horsfield
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Accreditation Update August 24, 2016 Susan Mills, Accreditation Liaison Officer.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
University p&t forum Introductions April 24, 2017.
Texas Woman’s University Academic Degree Program Assessment
Accreditation Self-Study
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Adult College and Career Education Leadership
The assessment process For Administrative units
Program Review Training
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Moving forward to Fall 2018 visit
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
ACCJC 18-Month Follow-up Report
Assessment Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/14/2018
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Program Review Annual Summary 2016
Sam Houston State University
Bakersfield College Annual Program Review Work Session 2013
Yuba Community College District Board of Trustees Meeting
ISER Committee Presentations
Blue Mountain Community College Non-Academic Program Review
Summary Report 2017 Prepared by the Program Review Committee
Academic Senate The ISER What you need to know. 9/19/2018
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Program Review Feedback Process
ISER Committee Presentation-College Council
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
AIQ Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/25/2018
Program Review Feedback Process
Completing your Program Review
Planning and Goal-Setting
Sam Houston State University
Strategic Enhancement
Program review Summary Report 2018
Unit Planning Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
Accreditation follow-up report
Alicia Aguirre, Co-Chair
Completing your Program Review
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
What is accreditation? Accreditation is a voluntary system of self-regulation developed to evaluate overall educational quality and institutional effectiveness.
Presentation transcript:

Program Review and Accreditation Opening Day Fall 2018

What is Program Review? It is a process by which we Maintain high quality programs Support student learning and college operations Support accreditation standards Standard 1.B.5-9 addresses Institutional Effectiveness Standard I.C. 1-5 addresses Institutional Integrity Standard III addresses Resources Reflect the Bakersfield College Vision, Mission, and Core Values Statements Commit to an ongoing institutional planning, implementation, and evaluation cycle necessary to ensure continuous program and service improvement Closing the Loop

Why complete your Annual Program Review or Comprehensive 3 year Review The results of program review are used to continually refine and improve program practices resulting in improvements in student achievement and learning through Goals Program analysis Assessment Curriculum To inform the planning process and the justification and allocation of needed resources and budgeting processes Faculty & classified positions Technology needs Facilities needs “Other” needs

Who reads my Program Review? How are the Program Reviews used? The Program Review Committee (PRC) does an initial read of your program review to offer feedback. Programs can use this feedback to strengthen their program reviews. Resource requests are sent to the following Staffing requests to FCDC ISIT Facilities “Other” to CTE Manager Budget Manager The President Accreditation Visiting Teams Verifies what we say in the Institutional Self-Evaluation Report (ISER)

Program Review Timeline 2018-19 Program Review Schedule   August 8 Chair Academy August Program Review (PR) data available KCCD website: https://ir.kccd.edu/program-review/ Course Book reports https://www.kccd.edu/institutional-research/reports/course-book BC Office of Institutional Effectiveness https://www.bakersfieldcollege.edu/oie Your own program  August 13 Flex week Flex week workshop to help you review and begin work in L148 Computer Lab September 10 First Review date of PRs for feedback (optional) September 17 PRs due to Area Administrators from Chairs, Directors, or Managers September 24 PRs due to Program Review Committee (PRC) from Administrators Sept. 26-Oct. 24 Oct 2 PRC reviews PRs ACCJC Visiting Team October 30 PRC feedback due to Chairs/Deans Nov. 2-faculty Nov. 16-classified FCDC votes on Allocation Requests November 26 Technology requests through ISIT Committee PRC submits written PR summary to President and College Council December TBA PRC presents Program Review Analysis to College Council and Admin Council

Where can I get help? Drop in workshops during Program Review Committee meetings (TBA) Co-chairs (click on names for emails) Kim Nickell, Kristin Rabe, Manny Mourtzanos, Stephen Waller This presentation located on the KCCD Program Review page Welcome to your Program Review Packet

Updates to the Program Review documents Program Review documents have been reformatted for ADA compliance and as we transition into eLumen. Pilot for eLumen for 2018 Removed Best Practices and Professional Development form and added a question to focus on department achievements Evidence of Department Dialog of program data Program efforts in Guided Pathways, affinity groups, completion coaching communities Role in Rural Initiatives, Inmate Education, Dual Enrollment Strengthened Equity Gap question

How to address the Program Review questions: Begin with last year’s Program Review Roll over your answers and update where necessary Be clear and concise

Describe how the program supports the Bakersfield College Mission: A straightforward description of what your program or service area does: functions performed, instructional areas included, and/or support services provided. Except in cases of reorganization or new programs/functions added, the description can be carried forward, unchanged, but you may edit this section if you’d like.

Creating Program Goals (Comprehensive): Focus on the College’s mission and strategic goals. Goals should align closely to those of the College’s Goal statements should describe the expected performance of the student or specific behaviors expected from graduates of the program Goal statements should include action words and modifiers. Administrative unit goals should reflect upon how the area supports student success. Curriculum changes, shifting demographics or staffing needs, goals and objectives may shift during a three-year period. These changes should be addressed in the Program Review. Remember, resource requests are not goals; resources needed should be included in the action plan.

Progress on Program Goals (Annual) This section will also “roll over” from last year’s report. If nothing has changed, you may leave it as is. Update any new developments or achievements of goals, timelines, or relevant information. Changes occur from year to year: curriculum changes, shifting demographics or staffing needs. You can revise or update your goals and objectives. Creation and Progression of goals will help in the justification of resources

Assessment Form and Curriculum: Instructional Transitioning these areas into eLumen Assessment will part of your regular end of semester work in eLumen. There will be a new form this year. Assessment Form Template Curriculum Part of the Comprehensive Program Review

Resource Requests Streamlined for this cycle Resource Request Form All requests except Human Resources in one form Resource Request Form

Where to obtain program data KCCD IR/Program review website https://ir.kccd.edu/program-review/  Course Book reports https://www.kccd.edu/institutional- research/reports/course-book BC Office of Institutional Effectiveness https://www.bakersfieldcollege.edu/oie Your own program

Program Analysis Questions #1-#6 This is the time to look at your data, which includes but is not limited to trend data located KCCD IRB Course Book reports https://www.kccd.edu/institutional-research/reports/course- book, BC Office of Institutional Effectiveness https://www.bakersfieldcollege.edu/oie English example Human Services example Look back at last year. Has anything changed significantly? Show how your department engages in dialog through meeting notes, workshops, retreats. What is impacting your program’s function (positive or negative)? Are your students succeeding? Are there demographic differences? Large discrepancies between groups and achievement? What barriers to student learning are you seeing?

Program Analysis Question #7 Let your department shine! Questions #8 &#9 What efforts, if any, has your program or area contributed to these initiatives. Are there any future plans to be involved?

Resource Analysis from Previous Cycle The Annual Update and the Comprehensive Review both ask you to reflect on your resource requests that your received from the previous cycle Explain how effective your resources were and their impact on student success. By assessing resources, programs are essentially “closing the loop” and providing evidence to support and strengthen the Program Review process and budget allocation and collaboration with other committees. document

Conclusion Thoughtfully summarize and highlight the important changes, trends, achievements, and needs of your program or area. Approach the conclusion as if the President were to just read this area first.