FAIR Trial design: Patients with SFA in-stent restenosis (ISR) were randomized to either a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB) (dose 3.5 μg/mm2) or routine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENDEAVOR IV Acronym: ENDEAVOR IV. Lead investigator: Dr Martin Leon from Columbia University, New York Source: Transcatheter cardiovascular Therapeutics,
Advertisements

Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides PEPCAD II ISR Study Paclitaxel-eluting devices: randomized comparison of the SeQuent™ please.
Advanced Angioplasty 2008 London Sequent Paclitaxel-Elutng Balloon Scientific Program Wolfgang Bocksch,M.D.,PhD. Director Cardiac Catheterization.
Www. Clinical trial results.org  Major Endpoints: Death, MI, stent thrombosis, TLR, TVR, MACE, and CKMB >3x nl  Major Endpoints: Death, MI, stent thrombosis,
FAST (Femoral Artery Stenting Trial) Final Results Hans Krankenberg (on behalf of the FAST Investigators) Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center Prof.
M.Unverdorben; TCT Problem The treatment of stenoses of small coronary arteries (SVD) and of restenoses after stent deployment (ISR) still show.
Rapamycin- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents With Identical Biodegradable Polymeric Coating and Design Trial Presented at The American College of Cardiology.
EXAMINATION Objective Assess the safety and performance of a new-generation DES vs. a BMS in the setting of primary PCI for treatment of patients with.
Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis by Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloons Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Session 2006 Presented by Dr.
Upendra Kaul, MD for the TUXEDO INDIA Investigators Paclitaxel Eluting Versus Everolimus Eluting Stents in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary.
Angelo Cioppa, MD  I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report:  Research contracts  Consulting  Employment in industry  Stockholder.
Paclitaxel Eluting Stent Versus Conventional Stent in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (PASSION) Trial Presented at The American College of Cardiology.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating a Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon in Patients TReated with Endothelial Progenitor Cell CapTuring Stents for De Novo.
RESOLUTE US One-Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal Multicenter RESOLUTE US Study Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the Resolute.
Prospective, Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent versus Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Coronary Restenosis.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
ISAR-CABG Objective To compare the efficacy of DES with BMS in a randomized trial powered for clinical events Sample 610 patients with de novo SVG lesions.
Is there any role for intravascular ultrasound in bifurcation lesions? Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, MD University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
UpdateDEB Lesions Learned from the Trials and Daily Clinical Practice Ralf Langhoff, MD Center for Vascular Medicine Berlin-Wilmersdorf St. Gertrauden.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Vascular Surgery – Director: prof. Coppi Silingardi R. Veronesi J. Gennai S.
Superficial Femoral Artery – Where Does the Data Stand? Director, Endovascular Services Mehdi H. Shishehbor, DO, MPH, PhD Cleveland Clinic.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Pilot Trial of Cryoplasty or Conventional Balloon.
November 9, 2015 February 20, 2017 Using real world evidence – industry perspective Pma indication expansion Melissa hasenbank, phd Sr. Clinical Research.
Bare Metal Stent Self Expandable Stent Balloon Expandable Stent
(p for noninferiority = 0.01)
Global Experience with Peripheral DCBs/Stent Studies: C.R. Bard
Lutonix® Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon to Treat Obstructive Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries Preliminary Six-Month Results from.
DCB for In-Stent Restenosis: Is It Superior to DES?
The (Potential) Role of Drug Eluting Balloons in BTK Interventions
Stent Graft for the Treatment of ISR:
NORSTENT Trial design: Patients with obstructive coronary artery disease were randomized to a drug-eluting stent (DES) (n = 4,504) versus a bare-metal.
Eric J Dippel, MD FACC Davenport, Iowa, USA February 19, 2017
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
Drug Eluting Balloons Bodo Cremers, MD
TAXUS IV Trial Slow-rate release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with bare stent in patients with single de novo coronary lesions Presented.
DES Should be Used as the Default Stent in ACS!
Long-Term Survival Benefit of DCB Versus DES for ISR Despite Angiographic Disadvantage of DCB Bruno Scheller Klinische und Experimentelle Interventionelle.
Drug-Coated Balloons in Peripheral Artery Disease
Are we using fewer Covered Stents for SFA Occlusive Disease?
ISAR‐PEBIS (Paclitaxel‐Eluting Balloon Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for In‐Stent Restenosis of Superficial Femoral Artery): A Randomized Trial.
Stenting of Coronary Arteries in Non Stress/Benestent Disease
(p < for group 1 or 2 vs. group 3)
Panelists. Panelists Drug-Coated Balloon for PAD.
AcoArt I Trial design: Patients with femoropopliteal artery disease were randomized to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty (n = 100) vs. standard peripheral.
Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai
TAXUS II and IV: two-year follow-up
Angiography-guided PCI
BBK II Trial design: Patients undergoing a two-stent approach for a de novo bifurcation lesion were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either culotte stenting.
Primary endpoint at 1 year
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Maurits T. Dirksen
EXCEL Trial design: Patients with unprotected left main disease were randomized to either PCI with an Xience everolimus-eluting stent (EES) or CABG. They.
Drug-Coated Balloons:
REALITY: 8 month results
EXCITE ISR Trial design: Participants with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis were randomized to excimer laser atherectomy + adjunctive angioplasty (n.
TUXEDO–India Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and coronary artery disease undergoing PCI were randomized to receive Taxus Element.
EVERBIO II Trial design: Patients with CAD were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either Absorb BVS, Biomatrix Flex stent [BES], or Promus Element EES.
ILLUMENATE Trial design: Patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or popliteal arterial stenoses were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to either balloon.
Presented at ACC 2003 Late Breaking Clinical Trials
ZEUS Trial design: Patients who were deemed uncertain DES candidates due to bleeding, thrombotic, or restenosis risk were randomized to receive either.
(p < 0.05 for paclitaxel angioplasty vs. either control)
Drug-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis
A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing treatment modalities for de novo superficial femoral artery occlusive lesions  Constantine.
Can Drug-Coated Balloons Be a Solution for Complex Peripheral Lesions?
SMART-STRATEGY Trial design: Patients with a bifurcation coronary lesion were randomized to a conservative strategy (n = 128) vs. an aggressive strategy.
Primary safety endpoint
Sirolimus Stent vs. Bare Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Adnan Kastrati
NOBLE Trial design: Patients with unprotected left main disease were randomized to either PCI with a drug-eluting stent (DES) (88% biolimus) or CABG. They.
TYPHOON Trial Trial to Assess the Use of the Cypher Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Balloon Angioplasty (TYPHOON) Trial Presented at.
Panelists. Panelists Drug-Coated Balloon for PAD.
Presentation transcript:

FAIR Trial design: Patients with SFA in-stent restenosis (ISR) were randomized to either a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB) (dose 3.5 μg/mm2) or routine balloon angioplasty (BA). They were followed for 12 months. Results (p = 0.002) Primary endpoint, binary recurrent ISR by ultrasound (US) at 6 months for DCB vs. BA: 15.4% vs. 44.7%; p = 0.002 Recurrent ISR by US at 12 months: 29.5% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.004; freedom from TLR: 90.8% vs. 52.6%, p < 0.0001 Thrombosis at 12 months: 2.1% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.52 % Conclusions DCB is safe and effective for the treatment of ISR in the superficial femoral arteries. At 12 months, binary restenosis was close to 30% with DCB, but clinical TLR was <10%. These outcomes are fairly similar to those observed with DCBs in de novo lesions Important trial since long-term patency following SFA ISR treatment remains poor Primary endpoint DCB (n = 62) BA (n = 57) Krankenberg H, et al. Circulation 2015;132:2230-6