Bush/Rumsfeld Defense Priorities/Objectives A Mandate For Change

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Force Core Functions
Advertisements

InformationInWarfareIW-100 College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education.
Navy’s Operational Authority for Naval Networks, Information Operations, and FORCEnet 2004 Strike, Land Attack & Air Defense Annual Symposium Vice Admiral.
ERS Overview 5/15/12 | Page-1 Distribution Statement A – Cleared for public release by OSR, SR Case #s 12-S-0258, 0817, 1003, and 1854 apply. Affordable,
Sensors and location technologies – the front end of ISR
Applications in Acquisition Changing Defense Environment.
Defense Transformation: Concepts and Affordability Jack Treddenick George C. Marshall Center DRESMARA 16 October 2006.
U. S. Fleet Forces Command
This Briefing is:UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters U.S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 3-Jan-071 Air Force Cyber Operations.
Precision Humanitarian Missions in Strategic Stability Operations Dave Warner, M.D., Ph.D. MindTel, LLC. FOR OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT USE ONLY.
Structural issues in Network Enabled Defence Matie du Toit (SISPA) Hugo Lotriet (University of Pretoria)
Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Force (EAF) Getting lighter, leaner, and more responsive Col.
XMSF and The Road Ahead CAPT Michael Lilienthal, MSC, USN Director Defense Modeling and Simulation Office XMSF Early Adopters’ Workshop.
Azad Madni Professor Director, SAE Program Viterbi School of Engineering Platform-based Engineering: Rapid, Risk-mitigated Development.
New Army Terms Table D-1. New Army terms Army positive control Army procedural control civil support1 combat power (Army) command and controlwarfare command.
C4ISR and Information Warfare
Environment, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) in the DoD Business Management Modernization Program April 2005 John Coho I&E Business Transformation.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Lt Gen Bill Lord, SAF/CIO A6 Chief of Warfighting Integration and.
Air Force Doctrine Document 2-1: Air Warfare
34 th IFPA-Fletcher Conference on National Security Strategy and Policy Security Planning and Military Transformation after Iraqi Freedom LTG Robert Wagner.
Joint Vision Why a New Document n Sustain and build on momentum of Joint Vision process ã Continue evolution of the joint force n Lessons learned.
FLTC Perspective Focused Long Term Challenges (FLTCs) are an innovative approach to match user requirements with relevant technology development, while.
A Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) Model
Import of New Security Environment Keys to Transformation: Exploit Technology Exploit DOD ability to integrate processes Result: JV2010 Vision shall.
Air Force Strategy to Resources
SponsorProblem AssessRisk SolutionStrategy Measures of Merit (MoM) Human & OrganisationalIssues Scenarios Methods & Tools Data Products
Wait, did I forget my network? Analyzing the Role of Weapons in the Precision Engagement Pillar of Network Centric Warfare J. Bryan Lail,
IS Metrics for C2 Processes Working Group 3 Brief Team Leaders: Steve Soules Dr. Mark Mandeles.
Network-Enabled Platforms – Tools to Maximize Operational Performance.
Advances in Decision Modeling: The DMSO Vector Lt Col Eileen A. Bjorkman Chief, Concepts Application Division Zach Furness C4I Program Manager 31 July.
AT&L Goals and Objectives Honorable Michael Wynne Acting Under Secretary of Defense (AT&L) March 2004.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force Warfighting Integration & XMSF Allen Murashige HQ USAF/XIW 6 Sep 2002.
Unclassified1 United States Joint Forces Command JFCOM “LITTLE C” UPDATE JI&E ENTERPRISE CONFERENCE 9-12 Jan 2007 Col Kelly Mayes Chief Campaign Design.
1 Joint Doctrine: The Authoritative Vocabulary For and Explanation of Joint Warfare and Joint Operations October 16, 2015 Representing Reality\Big Data\Big.
MORSS – WG June 2004 Joint Forces Ready to Fight FOUO Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability (JAEC) Bill Millward Technical Lead, JAEC.
Shared Operational Context: A Needed Transformation
JNTC Joint Management Office
Latest Strategies for IT Security Margaret Myers Principal Director, Deputy CIO United States Department of Defense North American Day 2006.
Authorized for Public Release IAW SPR dtd RDML MARK R. MILLIKEN Navy International Program Office.
Authorized for Public Release IAW SPR dtd RDML Mark R. Milliken Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy, International Programs (DASN IP)
This Briefing is Unclassified Space Situation Awareness (SSA) for the Warfighter 25 August 2005 HQ AFSPC/DRC Lt Col Troy Pannebecker.
Presented by Dr. E. David Spong President, Boeing Aerospace Support Industry’s Grand Challenge “Global Logistics Projection”
JBMC2 Roadmap Development Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (AT&L) US Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM)
Network Centric Planning ---- Campaign of Experimentation Program of Research IAMWG Dr. David S. Alberts September 2005.
Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Opportunities in DoD Business Transformation May 4, 2006.
Employment Considerations: Considerations at the Outset of Combat
UNCLASSIFIED 6/24/2016 8:12:34 PM Szymanski UNCLASSIFIED Page 1 of 15 Pages Space Policy Issues - Space Principles of War - 14 June, 2010.
Info-Centric Scenario Development Presentation to 19 th ISMOR Oxford, UK 29 August 2002 William J. Krondak Michael P. Coville.
GORT Planning/Guidance Session with LTG Barclay
Machine Reasoning and Learning Workshops III and IV Kickoff Wen Masters Office of Naval Research Code 311 (703)
“Existing world order is being redefined.” Henry Kissinger Jan 2015
Brad Stubbs 19 Nov 02 DISA/TIS/TS3
TRANSFORMATION UPDATE
Program Executive Officer Commander, U.S. Joint Forces Command
Programme Board 6th Meeting May 2017 Craig Larlee
Software Assurance Security Issues
13 November 2018.
NDIA Targets, UAVs and Range Operations
Air Force Cyber Operations Command Mission: Warfighting
Joint Operational Capabilities to determine
ADEISA – Industry’s contribution to ADF Superiority of the EMOE
Engineering Autonomy Mr. Robert Gold Director, Engineering Enterprise
Cybersecurity ATD technical
AGCCC Battle Analysis Adjutant General School - Advanced Officer Training Division.
Steering Committee Brief to the DoD M&S Conference 2008
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
Joint Vision 2020.
S&T Main Focus Areas Linkages to 2018 NDS
Presentation transcript:

Bush/Rumsfeld Defense Priorities/Objectives A Mandate For Change Bush Priorities Develop the capabilities to defend against missiles, terrorism, and threats against space assets and information systems Create the military of the new century by taking advantage of new possibilities offered by the ongoing Technological Revolution Rumsfeld objectives for deterring and defending against new threats Modernize US C3I capabilities Modern C3I infrastructure is the foundation upon which military power rests and is fundamental to the transformation of US military forces. We must also strengthen our intelligence capabilities and space capabilities and protect those assaults against various forms of attack Transform US Defense establishment --- by swiftly introducing new weapon systems. Technology as enabler for transformation to address new threats

Some Concepts Associated With Transformation Asymmetric uncertain threats and new demanding missions Flexibility to dominate over spectrum of operations Agile dispersed forces networked by C4ISR to enable new warfighting concepts Network centric warfare and effects based outcome Rapid decisive operations enabled by Joint Adaptive C2 Information Superiority and Decision Dominance Tailorable assured survivable system-of-system information infrastructure Global information Grid Reengineered force structure, organization, doctrine, --- Mission capability packages Assimilation of within-reach technology while preparing for long-term less understood problems Exploration, innovation and adaptation Potential for fundamental changes on unprecedented scale

OSD Analysis Framework Blue Battlespace Entities Shared Awareness Red Entities C2 Command Concept Suppliers Perceptions Intent ROEs Organization Doctrine Combat Adjudicator Degree of Synchronization (Includes IO) Shooters Decision Behavior Perceptions Perceptions Operational Outcome Mission MOEs Shared Information Information Dissemination / Management Quality of Information Analysis Sensors Quality of observations Ground Truth

Modeling and Simulation for C4ISR Assessment DoD Goal: Integrated framework for examining & understanding the casual relationship between C4ISR system performance and combat outcome (PBD 07OC) DoD Challenge: Modeling C2 in a manner that facilitates assessment of C4ISR contribution to combat outcome DoD Approach: Establish R&D program for modeling critical aspects of C2 Focus on modeling for C2 decision-making Task DISA and others DISA Strategy: Practical, Multi-Pronged Approach Develop a five year R&D plan to improve modeling of C2 decision-making Define and evolve initial M/S research and analysis capability Explore approaches for modeling C2 Decision Making in the analysis of C4ISR issues of interest to DISA customers In conjunction with with JFCOM focus experimentation to develop needed data

Objectives of Workshop Improve Models for C2 Decision Making Practical strategy Use full C4ISR assessment capability Credible insights regarding impact Target opportunities for improvement Better models for near term Areas to focus sustained research

Scope and Focus of Workshop Combat operations and scenarios Small scale contingencies/major theater war Analyses using the JWARS Campaign Model Evaluation of operations plan Assessment of C2 concepts/system mixes Decisions in the context of the IS value chain Quality of information (QOI), decision, combat outcome QOI, shared awareness, collaboration, synchronization, outcome Multi-level modeling and experimentation Improved representation of decision making in JWARS Improved modeling of decision-making in supporting tools Data for key modeling parameters and variables

Echelon of Decision-Making Format for Workshop Briefings to set the stage Operational domain oriented working groups Operational scenarios/vignettes Campaign Echelon of Decision-Making Strategic Operational Tactical Korea SWA Disrupt by Fire Precision Strike Dominant Maneuver Columbia Lebanon Kosovo Take the Hill What decisions / decision elements can / should be modeled? How might they be modeled?

Setting The Stage The Operational View Dr. Hayes JWARS Capabilities LTC McIntyre DMSO Developments LTC Bjorkman Impact of C4ISR Dr. Hiniker Organizational Models Dr. Serfaty Cognitive Models Dr. Leedham

Modeling C2 Decision-Making Processes Summer Workshop July 2001 Dave Signori RAND Dick Hayes EBR