ENSAR2 Status and Progress ENSAR2 management group Muhsin N. Harakeh Coordinator ENSAR2 on behalf of ENSAR2 management group NuPECC Meeting 15-16 June 2018 Oslo, Norway

First reporting period ended 31 August 2017 18 months + 2 months ENSAR2 Started on: 1 March 2016 First reporting period ended 31 August 2017 18 months + 2 months (reports have been submitted on 31 October 2017) Mid-term Review of ENSAR2 30 January 2018 End date of ENSAR2 on: March 1, 2020

ENSAR ENSAR started on September 1, 2010 End of the ENSAR project December 31, 2014 (after prolongation by 4 months) Last PCC and GA meetings in Vienna 12-13 February 2015 By end of February: Third periodic and final (Scientific & Financial) reports were submitted… Last financial payment was made around mid August.

A quick historical overview ENSAR2 A quick historical overview Pre-proposal for ENSAR2 as response to the EC consultation by October 2012 In February 2013, ENSAR2 came on the short list of the EC to be targeted for a call. We asked the community to help in the preparation of the ENSAR2 proposal (in particular suggestions for NAs and JRAs).

Preparation of FP8 ENSAR2 ENSAR Scientific Steering Committee (SSC) Creation of the Scientific Steering Committee with representatives of ENSAR2 TNA facilities and experts of their scientific fields: beginning of March 2013 ENSAR Scientific Steering Committee (SSC) ENSAR Muhsin N. Harakeh Ketel Turzó CERN/ISOLDE Maria Borge Karsten Riisager CNRS/ALTO Faiçal Azaiez Wolfram Korten COPIN/IFJ-HIL Adam Maj Krzysztof Rusek ECT* Wolfram Weise Paul-Henri Heenen GANIL Marek Lewitowicz Martin Freer GSI Jürgen Gerl Lola Cortina Gil IFIN-HH Livius Trache Norbert Pietralla INFN/LNL-LNS Rosa Alba Suzana Szilner JYU Rauno Julin Rolf-Dietmar Herzberg

Preparation of FP8 ENSAR2 Call for new ideas: deadline on April 15, 2013 42 new ideas received 14 Networks 27 Joint Research Activities 1 Transnational access to AGATA These do not include 10 TNAs Some of the Networking and Joint Research activities are connected to projects selected by the ERANET-NuPNET: GANAS, NEDENSAA, and FATIMA (R&D on detectors), EMILIE (EURISOL technologies) and SARFEN (nuclear theory)

Preparation of FP8 ENSAR2 Preselection of work packages for presentation Presentation of new ideas during ENSAR Town Meeting, Warsaw, Poland – June 17 to 20, 2013 SSC meeting in Roissy on 10 September October 2013: ENSAR2 proposal well advanced 7

ENSAR2 New Ideas - 1 After a 3-step selection process and after discussion with EC officers on 14-10-2013: 10 TNAs 7 JRAs 12 NAs EC financial contribution request: 10 M€ Transnational Access Activities:  50% Joint Research Activities: ≥ 35% Networking Activities: ≥ 15%

ENSAR2 New Ideas - 2 TNAs GANIL-SPIRAL2 (France) LNL-LNS (INFN, Italy) ISOLDE (CERN, Switzerland) JYFL (Finland) ALTO (CNRS, France) GSI (Germany) KVI-CART (The Netherlands) NLC (HIL/IFJ PAN, Poland) IFIN-HH/ELI-NP (Romania) ECT* (Italy) NEW NEW NEW

ENSAR2 New Ideas - 3 JRAs PASPAG: Particle and gamma detection PSeGe: AGATA detector + applications TheoS: Theory of Nuclear Structure & Reactions RESIST: Resonant ionisation techniques for separators SATNuRSE: Simulations and analysis tools EURISOL facility (all stages) TecHIBA: Stable ion beams + medical isotopes

ENSAR2 New Ideas - 4 NAs FISCO2: FInancial and Scientific Coordination 2 NA NuSPRA(SEN): Nuclear Structure Physics, Reactions and Astrophysics (and Superheavy Elements Network) MIDAS: ECR ion sources NUSPIN: Nuclear Spectroscopy Instrumentation MediNet (ASTARTE+ Ion-Beam Therapy) GDS: Active targets (TPC gaseous detectors)+ GES ENSAF: Small-scale accelerator facilities NuPIA: Nuclear Physics Innovation

ENSAR2 1st Horizon 2020 call: ENSAR2 submitted on deadline 2 September 2014 On 30 June 2015 we got the official news ENSAR 2 is FUNDED. Requested changes difficult to implement during vacation period. After many delays ENSAR2 started 1 March 2016

Physical Sciences (3 activities) Research Infrastructures for Nuclear Physics This activity aims at further integrating the key research infrastructures for studying the properties of nuclear matter at extreme conditions, using advances in nuclear physics experimentation to open new scenarios for fundamental research and employ them for new societal and industrial applications. It must present a long-term sustainable perspective on the integration of relevant facilities and related resources. Furthermore, it should also target new users and stimulate new scientific activities to take full advantage of new possibilities offered by relevant ESFRI infrastructures. Research infrastructures for high-energy astrophysics Research Infrastructures for planetary science

Access should be provided only to key research infrastructures of European interest, i.e., those infrastructures able to attract significant numbers of users from countries other than the country where they are located. Other national and regional infrastructures in Europe can be involved, in particular in the networking activities, for the exchange of best practices, without necessarily being beneficiaries in the proposal. Proposals from advanced communities will have to clearly demonstrate the added value and the progress beyond current achievements in terms of integration and services, of a new grant. The strongest impact for advanced communities is expected typically to arise from focusing on innovation aspects and widening trans-national and virtual access provision, both in terms of wider and more advanced offer of scientific services, than in terms of number of users and domains served. Furthermore, in particular for communities supported in the past under three or more integrating activities, the creation of strategic roadmaps for future research infrastructure developments as well as the long-term sustainability of the integrated research infrastructure services provided at European level, need to be properly addressed. The latter requires the preparation of a sustainability plan beyond the grant lifecycle as well as, where appropriate, the involvement of funders.

ECT* Jochen Wambach jwambach@ectstar.eu ELI-NP Dan Ghita dan.ghita@eli-np.ro FAIR-GSI GANIL Marek Lewitowicz Marek.Lewitowicz@ganil.fr IFJ-PAN Adam Maj adam.maj@ifj.edu.pl INFN-LNL Marco Cinausero marco.cinausero@lnl.infn.it INFN-LNS Stefano Romano romano@lns.infn.it IPN Orsay Fadi Ibrahim ibrahim@ipno.in2p3.fr ISOLDE-CERN Gerda Neyens gerda.neyens@cern.ch JYFL Paul Greenlees paul.greenlees@jyu.fi KVI-CART Ad van den Berg berg@kvi.nl Univ. Warsaw Pawel Napiorkowski pjn@slcj.uw.edu.pl ENSAR2 Muhsin N. Harakeh m.n.harakeh@kvi.nl

Thank you for your attention

ENSAR2 is the integrating activity (IA) for European nuclear scientists who are performing research in three of the six major subfields defined by NuPECC: Nuclear Structure and Dynamics Nuclear Astrophysics Applications and Societal Benefits. Its core aim is to provide access to nine of the complementary world-class large-scale facilities: GANIL (F), GSI (D), LNL-LNS (I), JYFL (FI), KVI-CART (NL), CERN-ISOLDE (CH), ALTO (F), IFIN-HH/ELI-NP (RO) and NLC (PL) as well as ECT*

ENSAR2 New Ideas - 4 NAs FISCO: FInancial and Scientific COordination NA ASTARTE: Advancement of radiation therapy detectors NucApp: Nuclear applications FULN: Fundamental understanding of light nuclei ENSAF: Small-scale accelerator facilities NUSPIN: Nuclear Spectroscopy Instrumentation GDS: Active targets (TPC gaseous detectors) MIDAS: ECR ion sources PREFUNIS: Precision tests of FIS (finally dropped out) GES: Advanced electronics network (finally dropped out) CWG: Nuclear structure, astrophysics and reactions Ion-Beam Therapy

ENSAR2 Partners of 10 TNA Facilities 30 beneficiaries 15 countries JYL Community: 2700-3000 scientists and highly qualified engineers UoY Close collaboration with infra-structures outside European Union: Canada: TRIUMF Vancouver China: IMP Lanzhou India: BARC Mumbai VECC Calcutta Japan: RIKEN Tokyo RCNP Osaka Russia: JINR Dubna South Africa: iThemba Cape Town United States: NSCL East Lansing ANL Argonne UWAR-HIL & IFJ PAN I RUG-KVI ULIV JLU KUL Köln GSI GANIL CEA ULB MedAustron JOGU ATOMKI-HAS ARRONAX ALTO-CNRS LMU ECT* ELI-NP / IFIN-HH USC ISOLDE-CERN LNL-INFN CIEMAT UMIL FFCUL NCSRD CSIC Univ. Sevilla LNS-INFN 19

ENSAR2 - Total budget

Organisation of ENSAR2 Meetings: 1 /year Meetings: 1 /year Meetings:

Management Group Coordinator: Muhsin N. Harakeh Deputy Coordinator: Marek Lewitowicz Manager: Ketel Turzó Financial Officer: Veronique Vandevoorde Administrative Officer: Sandrine Dubromel Impact Studies Coordinator: Sabrina Lecerf-Rossard General Assembly Chair: Adam Maj Executive Board of PCC TNAs: Gerda Neyens Ari Jokinen JRAs: Andres Gadea Olof Tengblad NAs: Silvia M. Lenzi Christoph Scheidenberger

ENSAR2 Research Infrastructures (ENRI) Cooperation and Coordination Agreement between GANIL, LNL/LNS (INFN), ISOLDE (CERN), JYFL (JYU), ALTO (CNRS), GSI, KVI-CART, NLC (IFJ PAN & UNIWARSAW), IFIN-HH/ELI-NP, ECT* (FBK) and ENSAF network Accelerator facilities Experiments in nuclear (astro)physics Nuclear theory Expensive, technically advanced experimental equipment Coordination Facility Coordinating Group (FCG) Directors, chairpersons of local PACs of the ENRI participating laboratories, a representative of ENSAF network and the coordinator of ENSAR2.

The mission of the overarching Facility Coordinating Group is to do the coordination and harmonisation between the ENSAR2 research infrastructures and also their PAC’s and thus go a long way in the spirit of the ‘Integrating activity’ programme through integration of the transnational access. Further aspects of the collaboration between the RIs: Accelerator physics Radiobiology, hadron therapy and other applications Educational programme (e.g., Euroschool on Exotic Beams) International dimension

International dimension Following the new rules, ENSAR2 will be able to provide transnational access to ENRI facilities to international users from outside the European Union and associated countries. This could be up to 20% of the total ENSAR2 quantity of access allocated to transnational access. The coordinator of ENSAR2 will contact directors of international large research infrastructures in Canada, China, India, Japan, Russia, South Africa, and USA to promote mutual collaboration on access to these international research infrastructures and ENRI facilities. The directors of the ENRI RIs with this ENRI agreement delegate the signature of the Memorandums of understanding (MoUs) between the international labs and ENSAR2 to the ENSAR2 coordinator.

International dimension The MoUs would be signed by the various directors of the international Research Infrastructures and ENSAR2 coordinator in which the terms for access of European citizens to the international labs and vice versa will be recorded. The ENRI agreement is valid through the contract period of ENSAR2 from 1 March 2016 to 1 March 2020. Similarly, the MoUs are valid up to 1 March 2020

Purpose of the memorandum Example MoU ARTICLE 1 Purpose of the memorandum The objective of this MoU is to establish a general framework of collaboration and project relationship, implemented by RNC-RIKEN and IA ENSAR2 to increase cooperation between the Parties in general and to provide a framework for establishing specific collaborative activities between the parties. The collaboration aims: to provide access to the facilities at RNC-RIKEN for European physicists and vice versa to the facilities of IA ENSAR2 RIs to Japanese physicists following the rules of the various infrastructures, i.e. approved projects based on scientific merits and feasibility, and to increase cooperation and mutual support between the Parties in general.

APPENDIX I Each Party shall be responsible for its own costs and expenses under this MoU, except as otherwise agreed in writing by the Parties. RNC-RIKEN will cover the daily expenses of European physicists, while performing experiments at RNC-RIKEN, according to local per diem rules and vice versa, IA ENSAR2 will cover the daily expenses of Japanese physicists, while performing experiments at IA ENSAR2 RIs, according to local per diem rules of the IA ENSAR2 RIs. In the case of IA ENSAR2 support, mutual spokesmanship for the experiments is required.  

Close collaboration with infrastructures outside European Union: Japan: RCNP Osaka; MoU signed on 30 January 2017 China: IMP-CAS Lanzhou; MoU signed on 3 March 2017 South Africa: iThemba Cape Town; MoU signed on 9 March 2017 JINR Dubna; MoU signed on 11 March 2017 Japan: RIKEN Tokyo; MoU signed on 30 March 2017 U.S.A.: NSCL East Lansing; MoU signed on 19 September 2017 ANL Argonne; MoU signed on 13 March 2018 India: VECC Calcutta; No response BARC Mumbai; No response Canada: TRIUMF Vancouver; were not interested

Close collaboration with infrastructures outside Europe: Japan: The Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, (KEK) Center for Nuclear Study (CNS), University of Tokyo Both at RIKEN India: Tata Institute of Fundamental Research MoUs signed on 12 October 2017 We have negotiated a similar agreement with FRIB (Facility for Rare-Isotope Beams) Theory Alliance (at MSU) and ECT* to form the European-U.S. Theory Institute for Physics with Exotic Nuclei (EUSTIPEN). This is now functioning.

NA01-FISCO2 Management of the ENSAR2 project: Coordination of all technical, scientific, financial, administrative, contractual and legal activities of the ENSAR2 Integrating Activity Comments/news Preparation and signatures of MoU with non-European Research Infrastructures Impact Studies in progress (coordination: Sabrina Lecerf GANIL) Submission of first periodic reports Submission of an amendment of the Grant Agreement: Modification of deliverables and milestones, New Portuguese partner: FFCUL is replaced by FCiencias.ID by July 1st 2017.

NA01-FISCO2- Dissemination D1.1: Dissemination of knowledge and outreach activities ENSAR2 Web site created: http://www.ensarfp7.eu ENSAR2 participated in public outreach events and supported web site for layman: http://nupex.eu/

NA01-FISCO2-Task 2 : Studies and reporting Social, Environmental and Economic Impact Analysis I. Reminder Two complementary impact studies: FISCO (socio-economic and environmental studies) wider scope NUPIA (Innovation) based only on Nuclear physics Deadlines: - Milestone : mid-term report on month 18 - Deliverable D1.3: final report on month 36 II. List of partners involved in the socio-economic and environmental study 12 RI Number of people working on this study : 36 (Directors not included) Number of meetings already performed Three with the working group; Two with FCG members

Social, Environmental and Economic Impact Analysis Actions performed since the beginning of ENSAR2 Set up of the working group Thirty six persons involved Meetings organised Three meetings with working group August 23rd, 2016 February 7th, 2017 July 4th, 2017 Two meetings with FCG group October 6th, 2016 October 10th, 2017

NA01-FISCO2-Task 2 : Studies and reporting Social, Environmental and Economic Impact Analysis IV. Situation Beginning of 2017: Result of the working group’s brainstorming  very broad approach Suggestion to shrink the scope: - Concentrating only on Nuclear physics - Reducing the number of areas and indicators  for the three fields: Economic impact Social impact Environmental impact

NA01-FISCO2-Task 2 : Studies and reporting Social, Environmental and Economic Impact Analysis Actions February 2017 → June 2017 : State-of-the-art characterisation of each RI - Description of the RIs (with their phase of design and construction) and their ecosystem/cluster in which they are installed All major links have to be highlighted. + SWOT Analysis of ENSAR2 + Data collection on ENSAR2 + ENSAR (for RIs involved in ENSAR) Submit end of 2018. Aim: to obtain an overarching description of RIs embedded in ENSAR2

On 19 January, the enterprise selected is INNO TSD. External enterprise 2 calls for tender: 1st call 14 enterprises asked to get information “call for tender” 2 (French enterprises ) answered and made an offer (invitation to tender void) 2nd call 15 enterprises have already asked to get information for the current “call for tender” 5 (French enterprises ) answered and made an offer. The selected enterprise should be hired at the end of January 2018. On 19 January, the enterprise selected is INNO TSD.

Social, Environmental and Economic Impact Analysis Evaluation of existing practices in each RI (state-of-the-art) Case studies in each RI Synthesis and final report made by the external enterprise 03/12/2018 Sending data to Sabrina Lecerf: 04/06/2018 Performing case studies in RI: 04/12/2017-04/06/2018 Sending data to Sabrina Lecerf: 30/11/2017 Collecting Data in RI: 01/02 03/07/2017