DeLoG Evaluation results 2016

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Southern Voices networks Asia Consortium and networks.

Advertisements

WP4 – 4.1 and 4.2 Preparatory activities for the creation of the WATERMODE permanent network 1 Technical Committee Meeting Venice, June 24-25, 2010 VENETO.

Excellence with Impact Declan Mulkeen January 2011.

Follow-up to the Sixth Round of mutual evaluations November 2014 Rome 43 rd Plenary Meeting of the European Judicial Network.

CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.

DAC Network on Development Evaluation Illuminating development challenges and results.

HIV/AIDS COORDINATION AND FAITH BASED ORGANISATIONS: EXPERIENCES FROM UGANDA JOHN RWOMUSHANA, MD, MSc Director, Research and Policy Development UGANDA.

INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee Meeting Stockholm, 8-10 September 2015 SAI capacity from a Post-2015 development agenda perspective The PASAI cooperative.

Formative Evaluation of UNGEI Findings and Selected Recommendations Presentation to UNGEI GAC 14 February 2012.

March 2015 Inter-American Network for the Prevention of Violence and Crime.

Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.

The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.

The Söderköping Process Gaspar Bergman Head of Secretariat, Söderköping Process *The Cross-Border Co-operation/Söderköping Process is a project.

The European Network for Quality Assurance in VET Giorgio Allulli Vicechairperson of ENQAVET Board MEDA-ETE Annual Forum2008.

EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.

1 Item 2.1.b of the agenda IT Governance in the ESS and related issues Renewal of mandates STNE Adam WROŃSKI Eurostat, Unit B5.

PARIS21 Light Evaluation Report to the Steering Committee meeting in April 2006 on the evaluation and with recommendations on the future of PARIS21, including.

1. International Partnership on Religion and Sustainable Development (PaRD) Constituting Meeting Key Outcomes Berlin 2.

"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,

June 24, 2016 UNAIDS Partnerships- Strategies, structures and social relationships Sally Smith Partnership Adviser.

Seite 1 GTZ Independent Evaluation in the Thematic Priority Area “Decentralization” (2008) Overview of Results and Recommendations Implications.

Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.

Swiss Resource Centre and Consultancies for Development Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SDC SAM Project – International Knowledge Hub Setting.

Coordination and Partnerships of SDG4-Education 2030 Le Thu Huong Section of Partnerships, Cooperation and Research, UNESCO Paris.

State Steering Committee

PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE

Vietnam Development Partnership Forum

External Evaluation of the Balkans Civil Society Development Network

Responding to Times of Challenge ATMCH Meeting March 5, 2006 Jeffrey G

The ESS vision, ESSnets and SDMX

EERA e3s and Energy Consumers

Governance, Fragility and Conflict Assessments in German Development Cooperation DeLoG Annual Meeting 2017 Thematic session 2: Decentralization and local.

The UNESCO Week for Peace and Sustainable Development:

Evaluating ESD in RCEs: The Start-up Tools

LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (LED) in RWANDA

Session Plan Objectives & means of engagement – CBC, PSC, IDI

FAME DIRECTOR’S OFFICE

Strategic Planning Preparation

Oceans and Society: Blue Planet

Somalia NGO Consortium

Overview of the New Skills Agenda for Europe

PEMPAL – Facilitating Practical Solutions in PFM across ECA

Reffering to the presentation on 28 June, TWG in November?

Eagle Bluff Board Strategic Planning Interviews

Dr. Thania Paffenholz Oslo 14 February 2011

The partnership principle in Poland

DAC Evaluation network meeting Update on NONIE

Follow us: June 15-16, 2017 Steering Committee Meeting Summary of Conclusions and Action Items Follow.

Opening seminar of the project

SESSION 3 Statistical Co-operation in Thematic Areas

Changes need to result to:

Portuguese Presidency

IATI External Evaluation 2015

Product Stewardship Institute Advisory Council Meeting The Lenox Hotel – Boston, MA September 14, 2012.

Quality in Evaluation: the international development experience

Action Points 6 November 2007 Cape Town, South Africa

European Business and Biodiversity Platform Information point

ESF Conference: Summary of Key Learning's in Working Group 1: Implementing the YEI and the ESF to support the Youth Guarantee: developing partnerships.

The European Bioeconomy Network

EUPAN Handbook.

LOGIN Institutional Structure

Evaluation use in practice

League of Advanced European Neutron Sources

CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature

Being a Local University: Towards New Assessment Tools and Indicators Dr John H Smith Senior Adviser, European University Association (EUA) Brussels Member,

Towards PCSD: building on the experience of the European Commission in the promotion and the implementation of PCD Hellenic MFA and Hellenic Aid, 7 May.

FROM SUPERVISION TO INNOVATION The Basque Inspectorate of Education experience BASQUE INSPECTORATE OF EDUCATION. MADEIRA, May 2019.

FAME DIRECTOR’S OFFICE

cooperation in statistics Proposal for the organizational structure

SADC TFCA Network – an overview Tawanda Gotosa – TFCA Technical Adviser SADC Secretariat.

Presentation transcript:

DeLoG Evaluation results 2016 Jochen Mattern, Coordinator of the DeLoG Secretariat

Assessment: OECD-DAC criteria (sectoral project, incl. DeLoG) Individual and overall rating of the OECD-DAC criteria: Relevance: 14 – very successful Effectiveness: 13 points - successful Impact: 12 points - successful Efficiency: 15 points - very successful Sustainability: 10 points - somewhat successful Overall, the technical cooperation measure is rated very successful with a total of 13 out of 16 points. 08.12.2018

Dimensions and functions of the network services & products Member interests & contributions Steering structure DeLoG MISSION Exchange & knowledge transfer Thematic orientation & inputs Advocacy for DLG

What were the main topics covered in the interviews? Satisfaction with role and services of Secretariat Ideas and proposals for optimisation of network Perception of BMZ and SDC (funding) and GIZ (host) Added value and (personal)benefit of network Further thoughts 08.12.2018

Main findings / feedback Added value of network: exchange, learning, information sharing, networking, visibility Services rated as beneficial: Annual meeting, knowledge and communication products (newsletter, website, updates) Satisfaction with Secretariat: efficient, well organised, friendly and service oriented, but needs more staff Secretariat is seen as neutral (no influencing of GIZ/BMZ) 08.12.2018

Observations Steering (and) structure: heterogeneity of members, formal vs. informal character Strategic orientation and mandate Knowledge broker vs. agenda setter Way of neworking Defined setting vs. Flexibility Focus on few main topics vs. Broader , inclusive, orientation 08.12.2018

Challenges How to balance / manage different expectations of members partner contributions / engagement funding level of long-term commitment 08.12.2018

Recommendations Create more formalised elements (e.g. steering board) Enhance the role of DeLoG‘s for visibility of DLG in the international agenda Use localising the SDGs as frame, but have more flexibility in the workstreams Cooperate with other actors and networks Restructure of workstreams 08.12.2018

THANK YOU 08.12.2018