Tracking Variable Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SU1 sample 176 k events Athena Full Reconstruction.
Advertisements

1 Preliminary stuff Summer09 ppMuMuX sample with CMSSW_3_3_2 –it requires opposite charge generated dimuons from heavy processes or K, pi, K0 L decays.
PDCMSSW - Luca Perrozzi1 Looking for… Punch throughs… Looking for… Punch throughs…
Tentative flow chart of CMS Multi-Muon analysis 1 – DATASETS 2 - RESOLUTIONS 3 – FAKE RATES 4 – NUCLEAR INT MODEL 5 – IP TEMPLATES MODEL 6 – SAMPLE COMPOSITION.
1 Reconstruction of Non-Prompt Tracks Using a Standalone Barrel Tracking Algorithm.
07/16/2002 p. 1 Muon Fake RatesPetra Merkel Muon Fake Rates Concept: determine rate of fake muons due to pion/kaon punch-through (PT) muons out of pion/kaon.
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Efficiency and Purity Studies Outside the VXD: Applying AxialBarrelTrackfinderZ and GarfieldTrackFinder By: Tyler Rice, Chris Meyer August 21, 2007.
1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Analysis Meeting 12 th June 2007.
1 W’  tb  lnubb: the first read. 2 introduction sample: W’  tb  lnubb generator: PYTHIA number of events: 5000 will only use events in the good run.
Increasing Field Integral between Velo and TT S. Blusk Sept 02, 2009 SU Group Meeting.
1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Jet Note 8 Meeting 7 th June 2007.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
Progress on B-tagging Efficiency Monica Dunford May 22 nd, 2007.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
Drell-Yan study in CMS at 10 TeV, with 100 pb -1 Monika Jindal K.Mazumdar, D. Bourilkov, J.B. Singh 1LHC Physcis meeting.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.
Issues with cluster calibration + selection cuts for TrigEgamma note Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 12/08/2010.
ANALYSIS AT CERN KAZUKI OSHIMA 2 particle correlation about Pb-Pb 3.52TeV.
Electron physics object tutorial C. Charlot / LLR Automn08 tutorials, 14 oct
DN/d  and dN/dp T analysis status Gabor Veres for the working group QCD meeting, Jan 12, 2010.
Tracking Variable Study Follow up Ryan Kelley Boris Mangano Vivek Sharma.
1 Geometrical efficiencies of a patch Pixel detector via GEANT J. Joseph, S. Margetis and J. Vanfossen Original note based on a MathCAD simulation by H.Wieman.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
Heavy stable-particle production in NC DIS with the ZEUS detector Takahiro Matsumoto, KEK For the ZEUS collaboration.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
Use of the D0 Central Preshower in Electron Identification John Gardner University of Kansas APS April 6, 2003.
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
Estimating the isolated lepton rate in multi-jet events Manuel & Alexander Ivo, Stan, Martijn, Auke, Els et al.
Τ HLTrigger Optimization Mike B 6 th Nov. 2 M. Bachtis - UW The tau High Level Trigger scheme in CMS For the events that pass the L1 Trigger jet reconstruction.
Full Sim Status Estel Perez 27 July 2017.
Elena Bruna Yale University
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
Graphs Earth Science.
2018/6/15 The Fast Tracker Real Time Processor and Its Impact on the Muon Isolation, Tau & b-Jet Online Selections at ATLAS Francesco Crescioli1 1University.
Tree based validation tool for track reconstruction
Ashley Huff Dr. Ayana Arce Duke UniverSity REU
Studies for Phase-II Muon Detector (|η| = ) – Plans
Bernard Andrieu (LPNHE,Paris)
Modified HEEP ID for Z’ SUSY Search
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
Electron -converted photon –pi0 discrimination
Bose-Einstein correlations in 8 TeV DATA with jets
May 2006 Hadronic Calibration Workshop Jet Session at Munich
N. ILINA, V. GAVRILOV (ITEP, Moscow)
Tatia Engelmore, Columbia University
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Electron Identification Based on Boosted Decision Trees
Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs
RecoTracks Revisited.
 discrimination with converted photons
Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification
Samples and MC Selection
Converted photon and π0 discrimination based on H  cut-based analysis Zhen Zhang IHEP
Topology rapidity study
Muon Trigger Acceptance Study
Comparing RS RecoTracks to CTF RecoTracks
 discrimination with converted photons
Higgs  update Catalin and Tony May 22, 2007
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi
An Easy to Use Track Comparison Tool
Presentation transcript:

Tracking Variable Study Surf’n’Turf Friday the 13th Ryan Kelley Boris Mangano Vivek Sharma

Purpose The purpose of this study is to look at tracking variables in order to determine which tracks are ‘good’ and which are ‘fakes’. Basically, what is a good set of cuts to use (for example isolation studies)?

Define matched vs. unmatched Loop through all recoTracks in the event and use the RecoToSimAssociator function (associate by hits) in CMSSW to determine if this track is matched to a generator level particle. If there is no genTrack associated, then it is an unmatched or fake recoTrack.

Tracking Variables Considered GenTrack PT < 1 GeV cut. Don’t understand the two ‘towers’. Most Powerful Cut-- hits > 7.

Tracking Variables Considered Sharp peak between d0 < 1mm. Fakes are very spread. Similar spread for both matched and unmatched. z0 < 30 cm doesn’t really give you anything.

Tracking Variables Considered Factor of 10 difference and increasing from 2 > 10.

Z (Matched)

Z (Unmatched)

QCD (Matched)

QCD (Unmatched) Need to run on a larger sample

Ratio of all tracking cuts to no cuts

Things to do Try reverse matching: Defined unmatched as a GenTrack that doesn’t have a RecoTrack. What are the eta towers. Run on larger towers. Try to cut on expected hits instead of total hits--some of the  regions have more layers than others. A hard number may be not work well the regions with fewer layers.

|| < 1 cut