Control of Lipid Metabolism by Tachykinin in Drosophila

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dpp Signaling Determines Regional Stem Cell Identity in the Regenerating Adult Drosophila Gastrointestinal Tract  Hongjie Li, Yanyan Qi, Heinrich Jasper 
Advertisements

Remote Control of Insulin Secretion by Fat Cells in Drosophila
Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
Infection-Induced Intestinal Oxidative Stress Triggers Organ-to-Organ Immunological Communication in Drosophila  Shih-Cheng Wu, Chih-Wei Liao, Rong-Long.
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Ilp6 and egr regulate epithelial homeostasis.
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
Alejandra Figueroa-Clarevega, David Bilder  Developmental Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
An Essential Role of Hrs/Vps27 in Endosomal Cholesterol Trafficking
translin Is Required for Metabolic Regulation of Sleep
Age-Related Changes in Insulin-like Signaling Lead to Intermediate-Term Memory Impairment in Drosophila  Kento Tanabe, Motoyuki Itoh, Ayako Tonoki  Cell.
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (August 2016)
The Circadian Clock Gates the Intestinal Stem Cell Regenerative State
A Leptin Analog Locally Produced in the Brain Acts via a Conserved Neural Circuit to Modulate Obesity-Linked Behaviors in Drosophila  Jennifer Beshel,
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Li E. Cheng, Wei Song, Loren L. Looger, Lily Yeh Jan, Yuh Nung Jan 
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages e10 (February 2019)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
The Drosophila Hindgut Lacks Constitutively Active Adult Stem Cells but Proliferates in Response to Tissue Damage  Donald T. Fox, Allan C. Spradling 
In Vivo Analysis of Centromeric Proteins Reveals a Stem Cell-Specific Asymmetry and an Essential Role in Differentiated, Non-proliferating Cells  Ana.
A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine  Fanju W. Meng, Benoît Biteau  Cell Reports 
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 20, Pages (October 2015)
Tissue Damage-Induced Intestinal Stem Cell Division in Drosophila
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Cilia-Mediated Hedgehog Signaling in Drosophila
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (August 2016)
Piwi Is Required to Limit Exhaustion of Aging Somatic Stem Cells
Benoît Biteau, Heinrich Jasper  Cell Reports 
Clock and cycle Limit Starvation-Induced Sleep Loss in Drosophila
Kanyan Xu, Xiangzhong Zheng, Amita Sehgal  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Age-Related Changes in Insulin-like Signaling Lead to Intermediate-Term Memory Impairment in Drosophila  Kento Tanabe, Motoyuki Itoh, Ayako Tonoki  Cell.
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Shree Ram Singh, Wei Liu, Steven X. Hou  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 27, Issue 13, Pages e6 (July 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (September 2016)
Conversion of Quiescent Niche Cells to Somatic Stem Cells Causes Ectopic Niche Formation in the Drosophila Testis  Phylis Hétié, Margaret de Cuevas, Erika.
Misregulation of an Adaptive Metabolic Response Contributes to the Age-Related Disruption of Lipid Homeostasis in Drosophila  Jason Karpac, Benoit Biteau,
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Piezo-like Gene Regulates Locomotion in Drosophila Larvae
ROS Regulate Cardiac Function via a Distinct Paracrine Mechanism
Coordination of Triacylglycerol and Cholesterol Homeostasis by DHR96 and the Drosophila LipA Homolog magro  Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Transferrin 1 Functions in Iron Trafficking and Genetically Interacts with Ferritin in Drosophila melanogaster  Guiran Xiao, Zhi-Hua Liu, Mengran Zhao,
Intestinal Stem Cells Exhibit Conditional Circadian Clock Function
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (August 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Control of Lipid Metabolism by Tachykinin in Drosophila Wei Song, Jan A. Veenstra, Norbert Perrimon  Cell Reports  Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 40-47 (October 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.060 Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2014 9, 40-47DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.060) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Characterization of TKg-Gal4 as a Specific Driver for TK EEs (A and B) TKg-Gal4 specifically targets TK EEs, but not TK brain cells. GFP expression driven by TKg-Gal4 perfectly colocalizes with TK-positive cells in the gut (A) but is not detectable in TK brain cells (B) (TKg>GFP is UAS-srcGFP/+; TKg-Gal4/+, green; anti-TK, 1:500, red; DAPI, blue). (C and D) TK-positive cells (TKg > GFP, green) are one of heterologous pair of EEs (anti-Pros, red nuclei). (E) EEs and ISCs are intermingled among the large ECs. EEs are polygonally shaped, arranged in heterologous pairs, and juxtaposed to two large-nuclear ECs, whereas ISCs are triangularly shaped and reside next to three ECs. ISCs are labeled with GFP (esg>GFP is UAS-GFP, esg-Gal4, green), and EEs are labeled with Prospero (anti-Pros, red nuclei). The cell outlines are labeled with membrane-enriched Armadillo (anti-Arm, red). Nuclei are labeled with DAPI (blue). (F) Confocal projection image showing that TK-positive cells (TKg > GFP, green) simultaneously contact both the gut lumen and hemolymph. Actin is labeled with phalloidin (red). (G and H) TK EEs (TKg>GFP, green; DAPI, blue) also produce NPF (anti-NPF, red) in the middle midgut (G) and DH31 (anti-DH31, red) in the middle-posterior midgut (H). Cell Reports 2014 9, 40-47DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.060) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Gut TKs Affect Intestinal Lipid Metabolism (A) TKg-Gal4 allows specific ablation of TK EEs in the gut (upper), but not TK neurons (lower). Control is TKg>Con (TKg-Gal4/+), and cell ablation is achieved by expressing reaper (RPR1) in TKg>RPR1 (UAS-rpr1/+; TKg-Gal4/+) animals (anti-TK, 1:500, red; DAPI, blue). (B) qPCR analysis showing the dramatic decrease of TK mRNA in TKg>RPR1 and TKg>TK-i (UAS-TK-RNAi/TKg-Gal4) guts (n = 3; 30 guts or 60 heads per group). (C) Lipid droplet accumulation marked with fluorescent dye Bodipy in the gut (TKg>Amon-i is UAS-Amon-RNAi/+; TKg-Gal4/+. TKg > DH31-i is UAS-DH31-RNAi/+; TKg-Gal4/+. TKg > NPFi is TKg-Gal4/UAS-NPF-RNAi; n = 3; 30 guts per group). (D and E) TK EEs ablation or TK knockdown in TK EEs increases both circulating TG in hemolymph (D; n = 3; 60 flies per group) and systemic TG storage (E; n = 3; 18 flies per group). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Cell Reports 2014 9, 40-47DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.060) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 TKR99D/PKA Signaling Is Essential for EC Lipid Metabolism (A) TKR99D is expressed in lipid-absorptive ECs (lipid, green; TKR99D > mCherry is TKR99D-Gal4/UAS-mCherry, red; DAPI, blue). (B) qPCR results of TKR99D expression in Myo1A > white-i (Myo1A-Gal4/+; UAS-white-RNAi/+) and Myo1A > TKR99D-i (Myo1A-Gal4/+; UAS-TKR99D-RNAi/+) guts (n = 3; 30 guts per group). (C) CREB transcriptional activity, detected using CRE-Luci, is decreased in TKg > TK-i guts under normal diet (Non) but restored to normal level when flies are fed with 10 mM Forskolin in normal food (Forskolin). (D and E) Lipid level in guts (D) and TG storage (E; n = 3; 18 flies per group) of Myo1A > Con (Myo1A-Gal4/+; UAS-white-RNAi/+), Myo1A > PKA (Myo1A-Gal4/+; UAS-PKA-C1/+), Myo1A > TKR99D-i (Myo1A-Gal4/+; UAS-TKR99D-RNAi/+), and Myo1A > PKA + TKR99D-i (Myo1A-Gal4/+; UAS-TKR99D-RNAi/UAS-PKA-C1) animals. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Cell Reports 2014 9, 40-47DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.060) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Gut TKs Suppress Intestinal Lipogenesis (A and B) Expression levels of FAS in gut analyzed by qPCR (n = 3; 30 guts per group). (A) FAS mRNA expression in guts of TKg>white-i (TKg-Gal4/UAS-white-RNAi) and TKg > TK-i (TKg-Gal4/UAS-TK-RNAi) flies. (B) FAS mRNA expression in the gut of Myo1A > Con, Myo1A > TKR99D-i, Myo1A > PKA, Myo1A > TKR99D-i + PKA, Myo1A > SREBP (Myo1A-Gal4/UAS-SREBP), and Myo1A > SREBP-i (Myo1A-Gal4/+; UAS-SREBP-RNAi/+) flies (n = 3; 30 gut per group). (C) Midgut lipogenesis was analyzed by 14C-labeled lipids derived from 14C-glucose in TKg > white-i, TKg > TK-i, Myo1A > Con, and Myo1A > PKA guts (n = 3; 90 guts per group). (D–G) Intestinal lipid level (D and F) and whole-body TG storage (E and G; n = 3; 18 flies per group) in adult flies. (D and E) Myo1A>Con and Myo1A>SREBP adult flies. (F and G) Myo1A > white-i, Myo1A > TKR99D-i, Myo1A > SREBP-i, and Myo1A > TKR99D-i + SREBP-i (Myo1A-Gal4/+; UAS-TKR99D-RNAi/UAS-SREBP-RNAi) adult flies. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Cell Reports 2014 9, 40-47DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.060) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions