BDS civil construction Single IR upgrade scenarios discussion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linac-LHC ep Collider Options F. Zimmermann, F. Bordry, H.-H. Braun, O.S. Bruning, H. Burkhardt, A. de Roeck, R. Garoby, T. Linnecar, K.-H. Mess, J. Osborne,
Advertisements

J. Strait Fermilab October 21, 2005 The Neutrino Detector of the Future: A Massive Liquid Argon TPC.
Ideas and Speculations for the Headon Extraction Line L. Keller Oct. 19, Give up the 3.5 m Separation between the Charged Dump and the Incoming.
Considerations on ILC Crossing Angle K. Yokoya LCWS13, BDS, Tokyo Univ. 2013/11/12 LCWS Yokoya1 Motivation Gamma-gamma collider CLIC.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Issues of stability and ground motion in ILC Andrei Seryi SLAC October 17, 2005 Selected pages from: Full talk at
A.Seryi, Oct. 26, BDS comparison and positron source A.Seryi October 26, 2005 Discussion of BDS and positron source is given in [1] “Comment on.
Is there synergy between ILC and SuperB? Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
Global Design Effort - CFS Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 - SLAC Reduced Bunch Number 1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Status of ILC Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 17-Aug-07.
November 07, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 Beam Delivery System updates BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Hitoshi Yamamoto, Andrei Seryi Valencia GDE.
Philip Burrows MDI session, LCWS06 Bangalore, 10/3/06 SiD MDI Issues Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University Thanks to: Marty Breidenbach,
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
ILC BCD Crossing Angle Issues G. A. Blair Royal Holloway Univ. London ECFA ILC Workshop, Vienna 14 th November 2005 Introduction BCD Crossing Angle Rankings.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
Proposed machine parameters Andrei Seryi July 23, 2010.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
September 20, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 Process of change of BDS baseline to 14/14 configuration BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Hitoshi Yamamoto,
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 ILC UPDATE Vancouver to Valencia Ewan Paterson Personal Report to SiD Collaboration Oct 27, 2006.
Si D in 14mrad/14mrad/z=0 ILC T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Advisory Group 14 August 2006.
1 Tunnel implementations (laser straight) Central Injector complex.
Status of ILC BDS Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory Andrei Seryi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory ILC-CLIC.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
GDE questions, including one or two IRs Grahame Blair, Tomo Sanuki, Andrei Seryi for WG4 Snowmass, CO, August 25, 2005 Grahame Blair, Tomo Sanuki, Andrei.
1 Update on Q2 Main linac starting gradient, upgrade gradient, and upgrade path Results of WG5 discussions after feedback from plenary on Tuesday New Option.
October 20, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ILC Interaction regions : The GDE perspective Talk based on several talks presented by BDS area leaders Andrei.
11/15/20051 Radiation Protection Issues for ILC (not exhaustive) A. Fassò, N. Noriaki, H. Vincke Radiation Physics.
Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.
N. Walker, K. Yokoya LCWS ’11 Granada September TeV Upgrade Scenario: Straw man parameters.
Philip Burrows MDI Panel Meeting 15/08/06 Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University SiD and IR/MDI Issues.
IWLC10, 18 th -22 nd October10, CERN/CICG 1 Global Design Effort Updates to ILC RDR Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin & James Jones ASTeC, STFC.
P OSSIBILITIES FOR MAINTAINING AA AND PP CAPABILITIES IN PARALLEL WITH E RHIC V. Ptitsyn Collider-Accelerator Department BNL RHIC and AGS Users Meeting,
1 Gamma Gamma Collider Physics Report Tim Barklow SLAC Apr 18, 2009.
Implication of gamma-gamma on 14mr tunnels discussion (questions for discussion with WG-C and WG-A) Valery Telnov Budker INP IRENG07, Sept.19, 2007, SLAC.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
JAI Fest Welcome! JAI Fest meeting 10 Dec 2015 Andrei Seryi John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science.
CR1: Insert Dogleg K. Yokoya CMB mtg /9/25 CMB Yokoya1.
K. Yokoya LCCPDeb at ECFA LC 2016, Jun.1
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
For discussion of Final Focus and IR of plasma-based collider
D0 and its integrability
Staging in the TDR.
Beam Delivery update Andrei Seryi December 12, 2005
Technical Feasibility of Anti-DID Coil
CLIC Study Aim Conceptual design report in 2010
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
Beam-Based Feedback in LCLS-II
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
Cost Comparison of Undulator and e-Driven Systems
ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements
BC2 Commissioning Parameters
Beam Delivery System Schedule at ILC2010
Detector hall in mountain regions
Extract from today’s talk given to DCB
Andrei Seryi Materials for discussion TILC-08
Central Region Working Group
Pushing the LHC nominal luminosity with flat beams
NLC 2001 Beam Delivery Layout
AC Power for a Super-B Factory
Cost Algorithm for a Super-B Factory
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
The Feasibility of Using RHIC Magnets for MEIC and Cost Impact
Alternative Ion Injector Design
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
ILC Beam Switchyard: Issues and Plans
Presentation transcript:

BDS civil construction Single IR upgrade scenarios discussion Andrei Seryi October 11, 2005

Single IR baseline and upgrade Assume baseline is single IR with 14mrad Upgrades : A) 14mrad and small angle, min separation between detector, no room for shielding B) 14mrad and small angle, larger separation between detectors, shielding OK, but adds ~1km or more to the BDS length C) 14mrad and 20mrad (or more), gg, large separation between detectors

Single IR baseline features 14mrad crossing angle at IR Assume linacs angle is 14mrad as well In principle compatible with linacs oriented along the same line, if dictated by a particular site, division point at ~2700m Can have single or two push-pull detectors Tunnel stubs included which allow upgrade to have two detectors in a single IR that can be chosen much later

Single IR with 14mrad Tunnel stubs for beam dump Tunnel stubs for future upgrades. At first stage can be used as alcoves for diagnostics electronics, lasers for laser wires, etc.

Upgrade to two detectors, Version A 14mrad and 0-2mrad Min separation between detector (assume their Δ=Ø=~15m), no room for shielding Detector cannot be serviced independently For disassembly, detectors first need to be moved out But this version saves ~1-2km of the BDS length (~30-60GeV CM higher energy reach)

Upgrade A: 14mrad & small xing Detectors are placed with min separation, no shielding in between The middle tunnel stub was used to continue tunnel to 2nd IR

Upgrade to two detectors, Version B 14mrad and 0-2mrad Large separation between detector, sufficient room for shielding Detector can be serviced independently For disassembly, detectors may stay on place But this version adds ~1-2km to the BDS length (~30-60GeV CM lower energy reach)

Upgrade B: 14mrad & small xing Detectors are placed with larger separation, sufficient to have shielding in between The first tunnel stub was used to continue tunnel to 2nd IR BDS is lengthened by 1-2 km

Upgrade to two detectors, Version C 14mrad and 20mrad (or more) Large separation between detector, sufficient room for shielding Detector can be serviced, constructed, assembled independently, on place Gamma-gamma compatible

Upgrade C: 14mrad and larger xing The middle tunnel stub was used to continue tunnel to 2nd IR Detectors have large separation, sufficient for shielding and to construct the gg detector on place

Discussion The assumes single IR baseline with 14mrad can be upgraded to A) 14mrad and small angle, min separation between detector B) 14mrad and small angle, larger separation between detectors C) 14mrad and 20mrad (or more) large separation between detectors, OK for gg Need to discuss possible civil construction issues and feasibility of closely placed detectors in B)