Archaeal CRISPR-based immune systems: exchangeable functional modules

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multifaceted roles for lipids in viral infection Nicholas S. Heaton, Glenn Randall Trends in Microbiology Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Advertisements

Box H/ACA Small Ribonucleoproteins
by Prarthana Mohanraju, Kira S
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Codon Bias as a Means to Fine-Tune Gene Expression
Expanding the Biologist’s Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9
CRISPR + CAS = Defensive or Immune System
CRISPR-Cas Systems: Prokaryotes Upgrade to Adaptive Immunity
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 13, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
RNA-Guided RNA Cleavage by a CRISPR RNA-Cas Protein Complex
Closing the gap on DNA ligase
Gene Evolution: Getting Something from Nothing
Finding the Missing Code of RNA Recognition by PUF Proteins
HOPX: The Unusual Homeodomain-Containing Protein
CRISPR-based adaptive and heritable immunity in prokaryotes
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Calorie Restriction à Lamarck
Takuo Osawa, Hideko Inanaga, Chikara Sato, Tomoyuki Numata 
CRISPR CRISPRs (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) are repetitive nucleotide sequences followed by a short spacer DNA segments.
Harnessing CRISPR–Cas systems for bacterial genome editing
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
CRISPR-Cas Systems: Prokaryotes Upgrade to Adaptive Immunity
The Evolution of Adaptive Immune Systems
Addison V. Wright, James K. Nuñez, Jennifer A. Doudna  Cell 
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Mouse Genome Engineering via CRISPR-Cas9 for Study of Immune Function
The emergence of mecC methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Figure 1 Adaptive immune system of bacteria and archaea
Pharmacogenomic variability and anaesthesia
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
USH2A Gene Editing Using the CRISPR System
Joseph Bondy-Denomy, Alan R. Davidson  Trends in Microbiology 
Guide RNA Functional Modules Direct Cas9 Activity and Orthogonality
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 164, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Dipali G. Sashital, Blake Wiedenheft, Jennifer A. Doudna 
RNAi: Prokaryotes Get in on the Act
Gene Evolution: Getting Something from Nothing
Ryan N. Jackson, Blake Wiedenheft  Molecular Cell 
The Evolution of Antiviral Defense Systems
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
The Noncoding RNA Revolution—Trashing Old Rules to Forge New Ones
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages e5 (April 2018)
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering
Advances in Industrial Biotechnology Using CRISPR-Cas Systems
A CRISPR Approach to Gene Targeting
Regulatory RNAs in Bacteria
Box H/ACA Small Ribonucleoproteins
Structure of an RNA Silencing Complex of the CRISPR-Cas Immune System
RNA Targeting by Functionally Orthogonal Type VI-A CRISPR-Cas Enzymes
Hayun Lee, Yi Zhou, David W. Taylor, Dipali G. Sashital  Molecular Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Matthew A. Campbell, Piotr Łukasik, Chris Simon, John P. McCutcheon 
Crystal structures of Nova-1 and Nova-2 K-homology RNA-binding domains
Ciaran M Lee, Thomas J Cradick, Gang Bao  Molecular Therapy 
CRISPR/Cas Systems towards Next-Generation Biosensing
Drug target miRNAs: chances and challenges
The Biology of CRISPR-Cas: Backward and Forward
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages e4 (January 2019)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages R19-R23 (February 1999)
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2019)
Potent and sequence-specific removal through genome targeting with CRISPR-Cas systems. Potent and sequence-specific removal through genome targeting with.
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Archaeal CRISPR-based immune systems: exchangeable functional modules Roger A. Garrett, Gisle Vestergaard, Shiraz A. Shah  Trends in Microbiology  Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages 549-556 (November 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.08.002 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Scheme for the three primary functions of CRISPR systems. In the adaptation step, Cas proteins excise the protospacer sequence from a foreign DNA genetic element and insert it into the repeat adjacent to the leader of the CRISPR locus. Pre-CRISPR RNAs are then transcribed from within the leader and are subsequently processed into crRNAs each carrying a single spacer sequence and part of the adjoining repeat sequence. At the interference stage, crRNAs are assembled into protein targeting complexes that anneal to, and cleave, matching spacer sequences on either invading elements or their transcripts. Trends in Microbiology 2011 19, 549-556DOI: (10.1016/j.tim.2011.08.002) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Representative gene maps of six main classes of archaeal CRISPR systems. (a) CRISPR/aCas-pCas-iCas, common in archaea; in this example those of S. islandicus are shown. (b) CRISPR/aCas-pCas-iCas-iCmr; studied experimentally in P. furiosus. (c) CRISPR/aCas-pCas-iCas-iCsm; from Caldiarchaeum subterranum. (d) CRISPR/aCas-iCsm; shown for Thermoplasma volcanium. (e) iCmr from Hyperthermus butylicus. (f) iCsm from Methanocaldococcus vulcanius. Genes encoding the functional domains are color-coded: aCas module, light blue; pCas gene, orange; iCas module, yellow; iCsm and iCmr modules, red. t.r. genes in green encode putative transcriptional regulator genes that are not considered to be part of the functional modules. R indicates proteins carrying RNA-recognition motifs (RAMPs). (a) belongs to the type I CRISPR system; (b) and (c) are mixtures of type I and type III, whereas (d–f) are classified as type III [15]. Trends in Microbiology 2011 19, 549-556DOI: (10.1016/j.tim.2011.08.002) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Phylogenetic tree of the archaeal Cas10 subtypes Cmr2, Csm1 and Csx11. These are the largest and most conserved sub components of the interference modules of type III CRISPR systems, where the iCmr module has been implicated in RNA targeting [23] and the iCsm system in DNA targeting [41]. The deep branching reflects the very divergent sequences. Analysis of the five subfamilies A–E indicates strong biases in their distributions among crenarchaea and euryarchaea, and family D is archaea-specific and is present in crenarchaea, euryarchaea and unclassified archaea. The Figure is reproduced with permission from [44]. 10% indicates the amount of amino acid sequence change for the given length on the tree branches. Trends in Microbiology 2011 19, 549-556DOI: (10.1016/j.tim.2011.08.002) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Examples of genetic exchange of functional modules where amino acid sequences from shared genes in each functional module are compared [17]. (a) Comparison of the aCas and iCas modules for type I CRISPR/Cas systems of four closely related S. islandicus strains. Pairwise they show a high sequence identity of 99% for two modules, but when the two pairs are compared the combined iCas proteins remain almost identical in sequence, whereas the aCas modules show only 74% sequence similarity between the pairs, consistent with the aCas module having been exchanged for one of the group of strains [17]. (b) A similar study was performed for shared genes of four thermoneutrophilic Pyrobaculum strains, where two pairs each show similar levels of amino acid sequence similarity for their aCas and iCas modules (about 70%), but when the two pairs are compared the aCas sequences remain constant at about 70% whereas the iCas module yields only 28% similarity – indicative of the iCas modules having been exchanged. Gene contents of the two pairs of iCas modules also indicate that they belong to different subtypes. Gene modules are color-coded as in Figure 2. Abbreviations: C, CRISPR locus; t.r., transcriptional regulator (in green); n.d., gene identity not determined. Trends in Microbiology 2011 19, 549-556DOI: (10.1016/j.tim.2011.08.002) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 A type III CRISPR system of the acidothermophile A. hospitalis carrying four interwoven antitoxin–toxin vapBC gene pairs that are highly divergent in sequence [52]. Functional module genes are color-coded as in Figure 2, and include genes of unknown function (grey). Numbers of repeats are indicated for each CRISPR locus. Trends in Microbiology 2011 19, 549-556DOI: (10.1016/j.tim.2011.08.002) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions