Kristina M. Johnson, Michael Carey  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mahadeb Pal, Alfred S. Ponticelli, Donal S. Luse  Molecular Cell 
Advertisements

Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
The DNA Polymerase III Holoenzyme
Structural Changes in TAF4b-TFIID Correlate with Promoter Selectivity
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Nucleosome Sliding via TBP DNA Binding In Vivo
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Tat Stimulates Cotranscriptional Capping of HIV mRNA
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Activating and Silencing the Mitotic Checkpoint through CENP-E-Dependent Activation/Inactivation of BubR1  Yinghui Mao, Ariane Abrieu, Don W. Cleveland 
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Transcriptional Activators Enhance Polyadenylation of mRNA Precursors
TFIIH Plays an Essential Role in RNA Polymerase I Transcription
Transcription: Why are TAFs essential?
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Mediator-Regulated Transcription through the +1 Nucleosome
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages (November 2002)
Stabilization of Chromatin Structure by PRC1, a Polycomb Complex
John F Ross, Xuan Liu, Brian David Dynlacht  Molecular Cell 
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Tae Kook Kim, Tom Maniatis  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
The Rpd3 Core Complex Is a Chromatin Stabilization Module
Mu Transpososome Architecture Ensures that Unfolding by ClpX or Proteolysis by ClpXP Remodels but Does Not Destroy the Complex  Briana M. Burton, Tania.
Transcriptional Fidelity and Proofreading by RNA Polymerase II
RNA Polymerase Pausing Regulates Translation Initiation by Providing Additional Time for TRAP-RNA Interaction  Alexander V. Yakhnin, Helen Yakhnin, Paul.
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to RNA Polymerase II
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
Ahmed H. Hassan, Kristen E. Neely, Jerry L. Workman  Cell 
DNA Topoisomerase I and PC4 Can Interact with Human TFIIIC to Promote Both Accurate Termination and Transcription Reinitiation by RNA Polymerase III 
Volume 125, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Joshua C. Black, Janet E. Choi, Sarah R. Lombardo, Michael Carey 
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Michael Kruppa, Robyn D Moir, David Kolodrubetz, Ian M Willis 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Facilitated Recycling Pathway for RNA Polymerase III
Gaku Mizuguchi, Toshio Tsukiyama, Jan Wisniewski, Carl Wu 
Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein Blocks the 5′ Splice Site-Dependent Assembly of U2AF and the Prespliceosomal E Complex  Shalini Sharma, Arnold M.
A Transcription-Independent Role for TFIIB in Gene Looping
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Functional Characterization of Core Promoter Elements: DPE-Specific Transcription Requires the Protein Kinase CK2 and the PC4 Coactivator  Brian A. Lewis,
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Jin Mo Park, Janis Werner, Jung Mo Kim, John T Lis, Young-Joon Kim 
Ssu72 Is an RNA Polymerase II CTD Phosphatase
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
TFIIA Regulates TBP and TFIID Dimers
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Reconstitution of the Transcription Factor TFIIH
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Kirk M Brown, Gregory M Gilmartin  Molecular Cell 
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Functional Coupling of Capping and Transcription of mRNA
The Yeast Capping Enzyme Represses RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Transcription: Why are TAFs essential?
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (January 1996)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Assembly of a Mediator/TFIID/TFIIA Complex Bypasses the Need for an Activator  Kristina M. Johnson, Michael Carey  Current Biology  Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages 772-777 (April 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00283-5

Figure 1 Cooperative Assembly of Med and DA on Promoter DNA Templates Is a Rate-Limiting Step in Activated Transcription (A) A model for cooperative recruitment of Med and DA to promoter DNA that is superimposed on a schematic of the immobilized promoter template used in this study. (B) Human mediator and DA bind cooperatively to promoter DNA. A total of 100 ng TFIID, 12 ng recombinant TFIIA, and 0.5 U Med were incubated with 40 fmol immobilized G5E4T DNA template either alone (lanes 1 and 2 for DA; lanes 5 and 6 for Med) or together (lanes 3 and 4) in the absence or presence of 5 ng GAL4-VP16. We note that the inclusion of TFIIA was required in all experiments for efficient TFIID binding. Immunoblots probed with antibodies against the indicated factors are shown. (C) Preassembly of the DAMed complex is a rate-limiting step in transcriptional activation. Either 100 ng TFIID (with 12 ng TFIIA) or 1 U Med alone, both together, or neither factor was preincubated with 5 ng GAL4-VP16 and 40 fmol immobilized template. Unbound factors were removed, templates were washed, and 35 μg ΔNE and all factors not added in the preassembly reaction were incubated for 5 min with NTPs. Transcription was analyzed by primer extension. The extension product is demarcated with an arrow. A cropped image of an autoradiograph is shown. All subsequent immobilized template transcription and recruitment experiments use the same amounts of protein and DNA as this experiment. Current Biology 2003 13, 772-777DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00283-5)

Figure 2 Preassembly of the DAMed Complex Stimulates Recruitment of GTFs and RNA Polymerase II Either Med or DA alone, both together, or neither factor was preassembled with GAL4-VP16 on the immobilized template. Subsequent to a 30-min preassembly step, unbound factors were removed. ΔΔNE was added to each reaction for a second 20-min incubation. Immunoblots probed with antibodies against the indicated factors are shown. The insert panel contains immunoblots that demonstrate the composition of the purified fractions in the proportions used in this experiment. Only representative subunits are shown. All other Med subunits, TFIID subunits, and GTFs follow an identical pattern (data not shown). RNA pol II is present in nearly equal amounts in the Med fraction and ΔΔNE (data not shown). Current Biology 2003 13, 772-777DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00283-5)

Figure 3 Preassembly of the DAMed Complex in the Absence of Activator Can Stimulate Activated Levels of Transcription and Recruitment of GTFs (A) Preassembly of DAMed generates activated levels of transcription in the absence of an activator. In lanes 1 and 2, Med, DA, ΔNE, and NTPs were all added simultaneously to immobilized DNA templates in the absence (lane 1) or presence (lane 2) of GAL4-VP16. In lanes 3–8, the DAMed complex was preassembled in the absence (lanes 3–5) or presence (lanes 6–8) of GAL4-VP16. A second incubation with ΔNE and NTPs was performed for either 5 min (lanes 3 and 6), 20 min (lanes 4 and 7), or 60 min (lanes 5 and 8). Transcription was measured by primer extension; a scan of the autoradiograph is shown. (B) Preassembly of DAMed enables maximal recruitment of GTFs in the absence of an activator. In lanes 1 and 2, Med, DA, and ΔNE were all added together for 60 min in the absence (lane 1) or presence (lane 2) of GAL4-VP16. In lanes 3 and 4, DAMed was preassembled for 30 min in the absence (lane 3) or presence (lane 4) of GAL4-VP16. Unbound factors were removed, and a second 20-min incubation with ΔNE was performed. Immunoblots displaying representative subunits are shown. Current Biology 2003 13, 772-777DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00283-5)

Figure 4 Preassembly of GAL4-VP16 with Med Inhibits Transcription and Correlates with a Decrease in TFIID Recruitment (A) Preassembly of GAL4-VP16 with Med inhibits transcription. In lanes 1 and 2, Med, DA, ΔNE, and NTPs were all added simultaneously to immobilized templates in the absence (lane 1) or presence (lane 2) of GAL4-VP16. In lanes 3–11, either Med alone (lanes 3–5), DA alone (lanes 6–8), or DA and Med together (lanes 9–11) were preassembled with GAL4-VP16 on immobilized templates for 30 min. Unbound proteins were removed, and ΔNE, NTPs, and all factors not added in the preassembly step were incubated for either 5 (lanes 3, 6, and 9), 20 (lanes 4, 7, and 10), or 60 min (lanes 5, 8, and 11). Preassembly of GAL4-VP16 with Med prevents subsequent TFIID binding and recruitment of GTFs. Transcription was measured by primer extension; a scan of the autoradiograph is shown. (B) Lane 1 represents recruitment of Med, DA, and GTFs when no factors are preassembled. In lanes 2–4, respectively, GAL4-VP16 was preassembled on immobilized templates with Med, DA, or both Med and DA together. After the 30-min preassembly step and removal of unbound factors, ΔNE and all factors not added in the preassembly reaction were incubated with the templates for 20 min. In lane 5, GAL4-VP16 and ΔNE were incubated for 20 min in the absence of any other factors. Immunoblots displaying representative subunits are shown. Current Biology 2003 13, 772-777DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00283-5)