How To Target Your Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
Advertisements

METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
1 The Credible Evidence Rule and Compliance Certifications Peter Westlin OAQPS, EMAD.
Harmonization of Part 60 and Part 75 CEM Requirements Robert Vollaro
© Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP CAA Title V Regulatory Requirements Malcolm C. Weiss, Esq. (310) Jeffer, Mangels, Butler.
Compliance Overview Motor Vehicle Diesel Fuel Rule.
ADEC Air Permits Title V Permit Renewal Project Workshop Jim Baumgartner Title V Section Manager.
TITLE V COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION AND DEVIATION REPORTING Annette Maxwell and Erica Solis Office of Compliance and Enforcement May 5, 2015.
New Source Review in the SCAQMD November 2, 2005 Judy B. Yorke Yorke Engineering, LLC x25
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Nonattainment Area New Source Review Updates Rule Development Workshop Chapters and October.
Managing Air Quality Data 101 Presented by: Chris Bellusci & Claire Lund, PE (Sanborn Head) International Conference for Environmental.
Approaches for forest certification System versus performance ? Presentation prepared by Pierre Hauselmann for the WWF / WB Alliance Capacity building.
1 Improving Environmental Protection and Reducing Administrative Burden North Carolina Division of Air Quality Improving Environmental Protection and Reducing.
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule – Implications for PSD Review for GHG September 2012 Ramesh Narasimhan.
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
Indiana New Source Review Reform Plantwide Applicability Limitations (PALs) IDEM/Office of Air Quality September 7, 2004.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of the Rules and Applications Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Guidance on Establishing Monitoring to Comply with CAM and Other Title V Requirements A Summary of Technical and Policy Materials Barrett Parker, EPA,
ALTERNATIVES TO BART -TRADING- Lily Wong USEPA – Region 9 September 1, 2005.
Title V Operating Permit Program 1 Section 1: Intro to Title V Laura McKelvey U.S. EPA.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of Rules and Permitting Issues Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
RECLAIM Seminar October 26, 2005 Judy B. Yorke, P.E., C.P.P. Yorke Engineering, LLC x25
Title V Compliance Certification Troutman Sanders LLP Greg Blount, Margaret Campbell, Debbie Cline.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
June 13, 2013 Joy Wiecks Fond du Lac Reservation 1.
Region 9 Title V Permit Review Guidelines Ray Vogel EPA/OAQPS.
Minor NSR Program and Highlights of the Proposed Tribal Major Nonattainment and Minor NSR Rules Jessica Montañez U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
Best Available Control Technology/Lowest Achievable Emission Rate Evaluation Sarah Fuchs Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) November 24, 2009.
Alternatives to BART Rule Discussion with WRAP Nov , 2006.
How to target your review Genevieve Damico U.S. EPA (312)
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
1 Draft Landfill Methane Control Measure California Air Resources Board April 22, 2008.
Kevin McLeod & Chris Horton OCE, Region 12 Houston 1.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Climate: ANPR, SIPs and Section 821 WESTAR October 2, 2008.
1 New Sources in Nonattainment Areas: Citizens Against Refinery’s Effects Action to review EPA approval of Virginia SIP SIP included: Permit for refinery.
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
Department of Environmental Quality
Complying with Periodic Emissions Monitoring Requirements
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Testimony before Code Enforcement Board
Preparing for Permit Review
Introduction to the Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule
Recommendations for Finalizing RGGI Model Rule
Capacity Conversion – 616s
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Emissions Tracking and Types of Emission Estimates
Pinal County Air Quality Workshop
Practically Enforceable Permit Conditions
Simple but Complicated Air Quality Permitting for Generators
AIR PERMITTING GUIDANCE
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
Department of Environmental Quality
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
John Bunyak National Park Service
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS
Air Quality Permitting
Major New Source Review (NSR)—Part 1
Air Quality Committee May 13, 2015
Cupa violation Review BAESG Meeting May 20, 2019 Matthew Burge
Internal Control Internal control is the process designed and affected by owners, management, and other personnel. It is implemented to address business.
Pinal County Air Quality Workshop
Uinta Basin General Conformity
Making Effective Comments
Presentation transcript:

How To Target Your Review Genevieve Damico U.S. EPA

What should I review in a permit? Programmatic issues Monitoring Reporting Inclusion of regulatory standards Emission units

Background Title V requires monitoring, Recordkeeping reporting (MRR) to assure compliance Practically enforceable permit limitations include MRR that reasonably demonstrate compliance. Note: There is some debate as to whether Title V can require additional monitoring

Evaluation MRR and testing work together. Important to evaluate these aspects of permit holistically Frequency of MRR should be appropriate to measure compliance with Emission limitations Operational restrictions

Evaluation Chart Operational Restriction or Emission Limitation Monitoring Recordkeeping Reporting Testing

Considerations Are emission factors appropriate? Is the emissions test performed “periodically”? Is the data collected reliable?

Questions To Ask Would permittee, permitting authority, and I have sufficient information to measure compliance? Is frequency of MRR sufficient to determine compliance? Do I have access to results of MRR and testing? Does permit contain all required MRR and testing requirements from Federal rules and SIP?

Best Bang for the Buck Units subject to pre–1990 rules Units subject to SIP requirement for which no reasonable compliance assurance method is specified Units subject to old NSR permits Voluntary terms created in Title V permit

Before Making Comments List areas you feel are insufficient for measuring compliance; make suggestions for practically enforceable MRR and testing List applicable MRR and testing from Federal rules and SIP; cite corresponding rules

Evaluation Chart Operational Restriction or Emission Limitation Monitoring Recordkeeping Reporting Testing 30 widgets/ day 3.5 lbs VOC/gal of coating Keep MSDS Manufac- turer will test 4,000 tpy NOx rolled monthly Monitor SCR temperature Amount of fuel burned Report deviations No greater than 30% opacity Do method 9 monthly Evaluation Chart

Why is it important to develop an enforceable Title V permit? If an applicable requirement was missing from permit, facility may argue they are not liable for potential violations If a condition is written unclearly and ambiguously, facility may argue they followed condition based on their interpretation

Why is it important to develop an enforceable Title V permit? (cont.) Source may lack sufficient monitoring, recordkeeping, or reporting to determine compliance Conditions in permit might prevent enforcement by EPA and state agencies

Ensuring Practical Enforceability Applicable requirements must be properly translated into permit Wording changes must not affect meaning of requirement Conditions should be enforceable as a practical matter Proper averaging times and recordkeeping frequencies should be specified Permit shields should be properly applied

Applicable Requirements Must Be Properly Translated Into Permit Does the permit contain… An emission limit or work-practice standard for each emission point subject to a standard? Monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting “General Provision” requirements All pre-construction permit requirements

Wording Changes Must Not Affect Meaning of Requirement Credible evidence Enforcement authority can use “any and all information” Wording changes that change requirements to something less stringent

Enforceable as a Practical Matter If an inspector were to visit facility, would s/he be able to easily determine if facility is in compliance?

Proper Averaging Times and Recordkeeping Frequencies Are Specified Make sure averaging time is specified (e.g., 15 ppm over 24-hr period) Frequency of recordkeeping corresponds to averaging time

Permit Shields Should Be Properly Applied Title V permit should explicitly state that a condition is not applicable to the facility Comment on permit shields you believe were given in error

Additional Considerations when Reviewing an Emission Limit Ensure that Emission units subject to limit are specifically identified Limit is clearly written Reference diluent concentration is included (ex: 15% O2) Source is required to comply with limit at all times unless exceptions are specifically allowed for by applicable requirement Reference test method is identified

Which of the following is not practically enforceable? Permittee must regularly change filters in baghouse Boiler #1 can emit not more than 39 tons per year of NOx Emission test shall be conducted while emissions unit is operating at or near maximum capacity

Which of the following is “credible evidence buster” language? Monitoring methods specified in this permit are sole means by which compliance with associated limit is determined Compliance with emissions limit shall be determined by test method X Reference test method results supercede parametric monitoring data