Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Richard J. Berman, Partner Arent Fox LLP Washington, DC
Advertisements

Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
Patent-Extender Drugs: Loop-holes in the Law Sandy H. Yoo 4/14/06.
Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA Lawrence T. Welch Eli Lilly and Company.
The Gaming of Pharmaceutical Patents Brief Overview.
An Introduction to the Hatch-Waxman Act and ANDA Litigation
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
FDA Counsel.com 1 ANDAs, OTCs, Orphans and Cosmetics -- Key Issues Wednesday, August 18, 2004 SDRAN RAC STUDY COURSE Michael A. Swit, Esq. FDACounsel.com.
What You Need to Know About Biosimilars: Products, Recent Deals, IP Issues and Licensing August 2, 2012 Madison C. Jellins 1.
1 Hatch-Waxman Boot Camp July 19-20, 2010 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
Hatch-Waxman Reforms Under The “Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, And Modernization Act 2003” Brian V. Slater, Esq. Fitzpatrick,
The Hatch-Waxman Act and How it Works: Balancing Incentives to Innovate with the Need for Affordable Drugs Minnesota Intellectual Property Association.
Patent Term Adjustments and Extensions
Safekeeping of 35 U.S.C. 156 Extensions
A New Pathway for Follow-on Biologics Presented by: Steve Nash May 7, 2010.
Regulation of Generic Drugs Office of Generic Drugs Craig Kiester Regulatory Support Branch.
© 2009 Pharmaceutical Law Group PC Market Exclusivity Paradigm Gregory J. Glover, MD, JD Pharmaceutical Law Group
1 Patent Term Extension under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
The Life Sciences Lawyer’s Guide to PTA and PTE
Subsequent Entry Biologics (SEBs) – Canada Presentation to AIPLA Biotechnology Committee January 25, 2012 Daphne C. Lainson
Data exclusivity, patents and registration of medicines Karin Timmermans TWN Regional Workshop Kuala Lumpur on bilateral trade agreements Aug
Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D. AIPLA BIOTECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE Pinning Down a Moving Target: Patenting Biotech in Uncertain Times.
FDA Focus On Consumer Protection
Follow-on or Biosimilar Biologic s Points to Consider Paul Kim Foley Hoag LLP Massachusetts Biotechnology Council Thursday, May 28, 2009 © 2008 Foley Hoag.
Infringement Claims and Defenses Professor Todd Bruno.
Safe Harbor or Not: Application of 271(e)(1) to Pioneering Drug Discovery Activities Susan Steele October 21, 2003.
© 2008 Dechert LLP Pharma v. Pharma or Pharma & Pharma: The Legal Interface Between the Makers of Original and Copied Versions of Medicines AIPLA Antitrust,
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
Our PatientsOur PeopleOur BusinessOur Community © 2008 Endo Pharmaceuticals. All Rights Reserved. Biosimilars 2009 Update Pending Legislation Review Pam.
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
Copyright © 2010 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. The Biosimilars Act—A Basic Introduction Michael H. Hinckle K&L Gates Research Triangle Park, NC.
SCHOOL LAW Keeping US Out of Court. Ind. Code § : Indiana Code - Section : Grounds for suspension or expulsion (a) The following.
Patents. WHAT IS A PATENT- Patent, under the Act, is a grant from the Government to the inventor for a limited period of time, the exclusive right to.
GMP- A Regulatory Perspective. Regulatory Perspective in entering Global Pharma Markets.
Hatch-Waxman As Amended (MMA) Thomas O. Henteleff Kleinfeld, Kaplan and Becker, LLP November 9, 2005.
Defenses & Counterclaims III Class Notes: March 27, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Other amendments. Automatic stay scope 11 U.S.C. § 362(a): Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition...operates as a stay, applicable.
 An Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) contains data which when submitted to FDA's CDER, Office of Generic Drugs, provides for the review and ultimate.
Regulation of Generic Animal Drugs in the United States
Recent FTC Pharmaceutical Cases: Background and Examples Sue H. Kim This presentation was prepared from public sources. The views expressed herein do not.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
Cheaper Drugs Today And Better Drugs Tomorrow History The industry’s lobbying efforts were well-timed. In the late 1970s, the U.S. economy was in recession.
Four Ways Suppliers Limit Their Risk Contractually
University of Ottawa - Faculty of Law
Inter Partes Review and District Court
The Life Sciences Lawyer’s Guide to PTA and PTE
New Drug Application(NDA) Vs Abbreviated new drug application (ANDA)
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
International Trademark Association U.S. Roundtable Program
MECHANICS LIENS: New Changes & Old Issues
Premarket Notification 510(k) process
ITC and Trademark Infringement Cases
Interactive Session: Presentation of Scenarios and Q&A
Patent Term Extension In Israel
VIETNAM COSMETICS REGULATORY AUTHORITIES
Patent law update.
America Invents Act: Litigation Related Provisions
Hatch-Waxman Overview
Subsequent Entry Biologics: IP Issues
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
Regulatory Enforcement & Citizen Suits in the New Administration
TORTS RELATING TO INCORPOREAL PROPERTIES
Linda M. Chatwin, Esq. RAC Business Manager, UL LLC
Arbitration Proceedings II
Overview of IP Protection Mechanisms in the United States
Main S+D Provisions of the WTO-Agreement on Trade Facilitation
Class 11 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Adequate Protection
Generic vs Name Brand Drugs
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA Lawrence T. Welch Eli Lilly and Company

Hatch-Waxman Act – Submission of Patent Information Applicant shall file with the application the patent number and the expiration date of any patent which claims the drug . . . or which claims a method of using the drug and with respect to which a claim of patent infringement could reasonably be asserted . . . . 21 U.S.C. §355(b)(1) October 21, 2009 James P. Leeds

Hatch-Waxman Act – Patent Certification Provision An abbreviated application for a new drug shall contain- (vii) a certification, . . . with respect to each patent . . .- (I) that such patent information has not been filed, (II) that such patent has expired, (III) of the date on which such patent will expire, or (IV) that such patent is invalid or will not be infringed . . . 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)

Submission of Patent Information to FDA ● NDA, amendment, supplement ● after NDA or supplement approval ● newly listed patents 21 C.F.R. §314.53(c) October 21, 2009 James P. Leeds

Hatch-Waxman Act – Enable and Encourage Competition ANDA approval process copy of reference (approved) drug reliance on innovator’s safety and efficacy data requires only bioequivalence § 505(b)(2) approval process variant of reference (approved) drug partial reliance in innovator’s safety and efficacy data requires some additional studies October 21, 2009 James P. Leeds

Patent Challenges Applicant must provide certification for Orange Book listed patents for reference drug no patent information patent has expired date of patent expiration patent invalid or not infringed First ANDA applicant with ¶ IV certification eligible for 180-day exclusivity 30-month stay of approval is available October 21, 2009 James P. Leeds

Patent Challenges If multiple patents are listed for reference drug, generics may file ANDA’s with both ¶ III and ¶ IV certifications. Generics can request/receive approval for one or more of the innovator’s indications. October 21, 2009 James P. Leeds

Hatch-Waxman Act – Timing for Generics Paragraph IV certification 4 years after first approval for NCE’s anytime for non-NCE’s FDA approval of ANDA Innovator brings suit expiration of 30-month stay court decision finding patent invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed expiration of 180-day exclusivity No suit by innovator immediately after review October 21, 2009 James P. Leeds

Hatch-Waxman Act – 180-Day Exclusivity Provision The approval of the application . . . shall be made effective . . . (iv) If the application contains a [paragraph IV] certification . . . and is for a drug for which a previous application has been submitted under this subsection [containing] such a certification, the application shall be made effective not earlier than one hundred and eighty days after – (I) first commercial marketing, or (II) date of court decision, whichever is earlier. 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(5)(B)

180-Day Exclusivity - Successful Defense Requirement If an ANDA contains a certification that a relevant patent is invalid, unenforceable, or will not be infringed and the application is for a generic copy of the same listed drug for which one or more substantially complete ANDAs were previously submitted containing a certification that the same patent was invalid, unenforceable, or would not be infringed and the applicant submitting the first application has successfully defended against a suit for patent infringement . . . approval of subsequent ANDAs will be made effective no sooner than 180 days from whichever of the following dates is earlier: (i) first commercial marketing; or (ii) date of a court decision. 21 C.F.R. § 314.107(c)(1)(emphasis added)

35 USC 271(e)(2) 2) It shall be an act of infringement to submit - (A) an application under section 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or described in section 505(b)(2) of such Act for a drug claimed in a patent or the use of which is claimed in a patent.

35 USC 271(e)(4) 4) For an act of infringement described in paragraph (2)- (A) the court shall order the effective date of any approval of the drug … to be a date which is not earlier than the date of the expiration of the patent which has been infringed, (B) injunctive relief may be granted …and (C) damages or other monetary relief may be awarded … if there has been commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell, or sale. The remedies prescribed by subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) are the only remedies which may be granted by a court for an act of infringement described in paragraph (2), except that a court may award attorney fees under section 285.

What Does an Ideal PL Law Look Like? Patent notification Require patent information in drug registration applications Require publication of drug patent status information Certification process Require a generic applicant to certify in its drug registration its position on the listed patents relevant to its generic application Notice to the originator Reqire a generic applicant to notify the innovator of its application for drug registration and explain the reasons for claiming that the underlying patent will not be infringed or is invalid Allow for a reasonable period of time for the originator to file an infringement suit and inform the regulatory agency – the reasonable period of time depends on local legal procedures and review times Automatic stay of approval Require suspension of market approval of a generic drug until resolution of the patent dispute Back to Contents  Company Confidential Copyright © 2010 Eli Lilly and Company