URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Overview 2010 Programme FA: 14 June 2007 Start: 2 Sept 2007 Completion: 31 June 2011 Budget: €10,155,000 (EU), €155,000 (National)
Advertisements

BMT Cordah Limited 1 Offshore Wind Energy Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Phase 1 “Progress and Lessons” Mark Jennison and Trevor Baker BMT Cordah.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Enhancing the Climate Resilience of Africa’s Infrastructure ACPC Role.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
BUSINESS CASE Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Ignacio Zozaya Boeing Research & Technology Europe CAATS II Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
Eric R. Johnson Hillsborough County, (Tampa) FL
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Wetlands and Poverty Reduction Project Anglophone regional practitioners training course MODULE 3 POLICY SETTING AND ADVOCACY By Teddy Tindamanyire, Isah.
Evidence-based policies and indicator systems 2006 Conducting effective research and analysis to support policy delivery. The Green Book: Appraisal and.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Slide 1 An Alfred McAlpine plc company. Thursday, 04 October 2007 Land Management Guidance (v2) Philippa Towler.
1 of 27 How to invest in Information for Development An Introduction Introduction This question is the focus of our examination of the information management.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
4. Aesthetic Evaluation of Urban Watercourses URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 What is Solution Assessment & Validation?
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Guide to Options Comparison Revision of the SAFEGROUNDS Guidance James Penfold, Quintessa SAFESPUR, 4 October 2007.
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION. CASE STUDIES AESTHETICS SELECTION OF OBJECTIVES FOR REHABILITATION SCHEMES TECHNIQUES OF REHABILITATION SOCIAL APPRAISAL.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION. The URBEM Framework.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Aspect 1 Defining the problem - Problem: The design context will normally offer a variety of potential problems to solve. A focused problem and need is.
Training on Safe Hospitals in Disasters Module 3: Action Planning for “Safe Hospitals”
Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Guidance Notes for Development Organisations Charlotte Benson and John Twigg Presented by Margaret Arnold.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Beach Modelling: Lessons Learnt from Past Scheme Performance Project: SC110004/S Project Summary.
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION. The URBEM Framework.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
Introduction and Overview
Stages of Research and Development
Kick Off Meeting Largs, Scotland
Social return on investments (SROI)
Traditional Knowledge
Forming a Strategy for your Business.
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
The Logical Framework Approach
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION
Cumulative Effects Assessment and Marine Spatial Planning
Engineering Processes
CARE Country Office Training 2016
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION
WORKSHOP 17th Sept 2008 EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
CIS-Workshop on River Basin Management Plans
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
RECARE set-up Rudi Hessel on behalf of coordination team
Gem Complete Health Services
Health Capital Technical Topics
Developing a shelter strategy
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION
Pilot River Basin Water Framework Directive.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
RECOGNIZING NATURA 2000 BENEFITS AND DEMONSTRATING THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF CONSERVATION MEASURES Progress meeting EC 16 May 2011 Johan Lammerant.
THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (WFD)
Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011
Training module 8 Adoption of territorial assessment tools
Monitoring and evaluation Part 1 Lecture 10. Appraisal Vs Evaluation  Appraisal is before an activity takes place  Evaluation after the activity has.
And now the Framework WP4.
Presentation transcript:

URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION

The URBEM Framework

The URBEM Framework for Assessing and Managing River Rehabilitation The framework includes Generic approach for assessing and managing river rehabilitation, encompassing the tool for assessing the potential for rehabilitation of an urban watercourse Support guidance Information that is available to inform the decisions taken in the generic approach Decision guidance Tools and assessment procedures that elicit a decision The framework links to all the other outputs of the URBEM project and can be expanded to include non-URBEM tools, methods and information

Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart EVK4-CT-2002-00082 Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart SUPPORT GUIDANCE 1 Setting up the project DECISION GUIDANCE 2 Deciding options 3 Implementing GENERIC APPROACH TO ASSESSING AND MANAGING RIVER REHABILITATION

Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart EVK4-CT-2002-00082 Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart SUPPORT GUIDANCE How to navigate the framework 1a Formulating river rehabilitation goals 1b Defining method of assessment River Rehabilitation Information 1 Setting up the project DECISION GUIDANCE 2a Development of options 2b Assessment of options 3 Implement, monitor and review What tools and assessment procedures are available? 2 Deciding options 3 Implementing GENERIC APPROACH TO ASSESSING AND MANAGING RIVER REHABILITATION Indicators of success Key

How to navigate the framework S1.1 Introduction to the Framework Glossary and Appendices S1.2 S1.3 Training and Dissemination WP9 WP1 WP11 Each of the boxes above represents an output that provides information on how to use the URBEM framework and the other URBEM outputs

Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart EVK4-CT-2002-00082 Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart SUPPORT GUIDANCE How to navigate the framework 1a Formulating river rehabilitation goals 1b Defining method of assessment River Rehabilitation Information 1 Setting up the project DECISION GUIDANCE 2a Development of options 2b Assessment of options 3 Implement, monitor and review What tools and assessment procedures are available? 2 Deciding options 3 Implementing GENERIC APPROACH TO ASSESSING AND MANAGING RIVER REHABILITATION Indicators of success Key

River Rehabilitation Information Study site monitoring Rehabilitation techniques WP3 WP8 Existing Case Studies WP2 S2.1 S2.2 S2.3 These boxes describe the URBEM outputs that give information on urban river rehabilitation. These outputs can inform decisions regarding the assessment and management of river rehabilitation.

Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart EVK4-CT-2002-00082 Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart SUPPORT GUIDANCE How to navigate the framework 1a Formulating river rehabilitation goals 1b Defining method of assessment River Rehabilitation Information 1 Setting up the project DECISION GUIDANCE 2a Development of options 2b Assessment of options 3 Implement, monitor and review What tools and assessment procedures are available? 2 Deciding options 3 Implementing GENERIC APPROACH TO ASSESSING AND MANAGING RIVER REHABILITATION Indicators of success Key

What tools and assessment procedures are available? D1.1 Aesthetic Evaluation Methodology D1.2 Social Appraisal Tool D1.3 Multi-Criteria Decision Making WP4 WP7 WP5 These tools can be used at appropriate stages in the generic approach by technical specialists in the relevant areas. The results from using the tools can then be used to inform the decision making process.

Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart EVK4-CT-2002-00082 Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart SUPPORT GUIDANCE How to navigate the framework 1a Formulating river rehabilitation goals 1b Defining method of assessment River Rehabilitation Information 1 Setting up the project DECISION GUIDANCE 2a Development of options 2b Assessment of options 3 Implement, monitor and review What tools and assessment procedures are available? 2 Deciding options 3 Implementing Indicators of success GENERIC APPROACH TO ASSESSING AND MANAGING RIVER REHABILITATION Key

Which indicators can be used for decision-making? D2.1 Indicators of Success Recommends suitable success indicators for different objectives Provides information on application Indicators of success have been developed as a means of evaluating the potential for a rehabilitation project to achieve its objectives and assessing whether the project actually does achieve its objectives.

Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart EVK4-CT-2002-00082 Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart SUPPORT GUIDANCE How to navigate the framework 1a Formulating river rehabilitation goals 1b Defining method of assessment River Rehabilitation Information 1 Setting up the project DECISION GUIDANCE 2a Development of options 2b Assessment of options 3 Implement, monitor and review What tools and assessment procedures are available? 2 Deciding options 3 Implementing Indicators of success GENERIC APPROACH TO ASSESSING AND MANAGING RIVER REHABILITATION Key

Key Start of process Process part Jump to different process Process decision End of process S Point for participation of stakeholders Main links between processes or information Link to work package 1 This describes the symbols in the diagram of the generic approach. Note the icons for identifying stakeholder participation opportunities and links to specific work packages of the URBEM project.

The generic approach to assessing and managing urban river rehabilitation The following slides describe the generic approach which includes The steps in the tool for assessing the potential for rehabilitation of an urban watercourse The steps of construction and utilisation in river rehabilitation The generic approach does NOT include the process of developing policy or strategic planning

Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart EVK4-CT-2002-00082 Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart SUPPORT GUIDANCE How to navigate the framework 1a Formulating river rehabilitation goals 1b Defining method of assessment River Rehabilitation Information 1 Setting up the project DECISION GUIDANCE 2a Development of options 2b Assessment of options 3 Implement, monitor and review What tools and assessment procedures are available? 2 Deciding options 3 Implementing GENERIC APPROACH TO ASSESSING AND MANAGING RIVER REHABILITATION Indicators of success Key

1a Formulating river rehabilitation goals Set high level goals and more specific objectives Example Goal: To improve the aesthetics of the river Objectives: Increase the natural components of the river, increase the accessibility of the river The goals should be complete so that they include all aspects that might affect the final decision

Process 1a – Formulating River Rehabilitation Goals Start Assess Baseline Condition 1a.1 1a.2 Set goals and objectives* 1a.3 Set Boundaries 1a.4 Identify Controlling Factors S S S Go to Process 1b * Can relate to policy, development plan or project 1. Set broad goals 2. Consultation with stakeholders 3. Set specific objectives 1. Define time-scale of plan or project 2. Define spatial extent of assessment 3. Define time-scale for assessment 4. Determine resources for assessment 1. Check legislative requirements 2. Determine financial limits 4. Check relevant strategies and plans (including flooding, environmental, landuse planning etc) 5. Identify stakeholder requirements (including public) 6. Identify physical constraints 1. Review information on urban catchment 2. Identify stakeholders 3. Site characterisation: identify issues at catchment, reach and site scales 2, 3, 4, 7 5, 2, 4, 7 7

Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart EVK4-CT-2002-00082 Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart SUPPORT GUIDANCE How to navigate the framework 1a Formulating river rehabilitation goals 1b Defining method of assessment River Rehabilitation Information 1 Setting up the project DECISION GUIDANCE 2a Development of options 2b Assessment of options 3 Implement, monitor and review What tools and assessment procedures are available? 2 Deciding options 3 Implementing Indicators of success GENERIC APPROACH TO ASSESSING AND MANAGING RIVER REHABILITATION Key

1b Defining method of assessment This stage determines how you will measure the objectives and how you will evaluate different options for achieving the objectives The assessment will involve using a multi-criteria decision making method so that options are assessed in terms of how they fulfill the criteria set for achieving the objectives The tool is flexible so the decision maker can select the most appropriate approach for their situation Some MCDM methods require the selection of weights for criteria which takes into account the relative importance the decision maker attaches to the criteria. Guidance is given on how to weight criteria.

Process 1b - Defining method of assessment From Process 1a 1b.2 Define scale of measurement of criteria Set criteria 1b.1 Normalise criteria scales 1b.3 Select MCDM method 1b.4 Is MADM method compensatory? 5 Note: Normalisation method depends on the criteria 1. Define criteria for each specific objective 2. Define success indicators and acceptability criteria (initial review to be refined during assessment). 3, 4, 5, 10 Yes No Assign weights to criteria 1b.5 Go to Process 2a 5, 10 Note: investigate uncertainty with sensitivity tests 5 5, 10

Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart EVK4-CT-2002-00082 Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart SUPPORT GUIDANCE How to navigate the framework 1a Formulating river rehabilitation goals 1b Defining method of assessment River Rehabilitation Information 1 Setting up the project DECISION GUIDANCE 2a Development of options 2b Assessment of options 3 Implement, monitor and review What tools and assessment procedures are available? 2 Deciding options 3 Implementing Indicators of success GENERIC APPROACH TO ASSESSING AND MANAGING RIVER REHABILITATION Key

2a Development of options Develop options for rehabilitation projects, using the supporting information modules where appropriate Assessing the consequences of options may be based on detailed studies or on past experience Each option should be assessed in terms of the selected criteria. Scores should be checked for consistency between options.

Process 2a - Development of Options Identify options 2a.2 Describe the consequences of options 2a.3 Score options 2a.4 S Go to Process 2b From Process 1b 1. Consider controlling factors 2. Consider objectives 3. Consider likely cost 4. One option should consider the ‘do nothing’ scenario 1. Use of modelling and other assessment methods as appropriate 2. Use of past experience Note: score each criteria on each option using the normalised scale 5 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10

Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart EVK4-CT-2002-00082 Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart SUPPORT GUIDANCE How to navigate the framework 1a Formulating river rehabilitation goals 1b Defining method of assessment River Rehabilitation Information 1 Setting up the project DECISION GUIDANCE 2a Development of options 2b Assessment of options 3 Implement, monitor and review What tools and assessment procedures are available? 2 Deciding options 3 Implementing GENERIC APPROACH TO ASSESSING AND MANAGING RIVER REHABILITATION Indicators of success Key

2b Assessment of options Apply the MCDM method to each option to evaluate how well they achieve the objectives

Process 2b - Assessment of Options Go to Process 2a to identify any further options, if none then go to Process 1a to revise objectives No 2b.1 Apply MADM method Review Assessment 2b.2 Is solution acceptable? From Process 2a Yes 1. Consider controlling factors 2. Consider objectives 3. Consider likely cost 1. Review weights 2. Review scores 3. Review results Go to Process 3 5 5

Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart EVK4-CT-2002-00082 Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) Activity Chart SUPPORT GUIDANCE How to navigate the framework 1a Formulating river rehabilitation goals 1b Defining method of assessment River Rehabilitation Information 1 Setting up the project DECISION GUIDANCE 2a Development of options 2b Assessment of options 3 Implement, monitor and review What tools and assessment procedures are available? 2 Deciding options 3 Implementing GENERIC APPROACH TO ASSESSING AND MANAGING RIVER REHABILITATION Indicators of success Key

3 Implement, monitor and review This stage involves the construction and realisation of outcomes of the rehabilitation project. It is important to appraise the success of the project during and after implementation so that a strategy can be developed if the project is not achieving its objectives.

Process 3 - Implement, Monitor & Review End No Is monitoring still needed? From Process 2b Yes 3.1 Design Monitoring Programme S 3.2 Implement Option and Monitoring Review Monitoring Results 3.3 4.3 3.4 Report Any Lessons Learnt Review Monitoring Programme 3.5 10 1. Select parameters to monitor from indicators of success (1b.1) considering cost, difficulty and value of monitoring 2. Decide where and when to monitor (before, during and/or after implementation) 6. Decide actions in event of not meeting objectives 2 No Any new info. that might alter objectives? Are results acceptable? S Yes Yes No Go to Process 1a 3, 4, 6, 7, 8,10

Conclusions The framework describes all the outputs from the URBEM project This gives decision makers an overview of the tools and information available to support the river rehabilitation process The implementation of assessing and managing river rehabilitation will involve the input of a wide range of technical specialists from a variety of disciplines Stakeholder engagement and participation (including the public) is an important part of any project