Status Nearly 30 scenarios completed for NAB and CBP over a year’s effort. Report on application of CBEMP in preparation. October time frame for draft.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chesapeake Bay Environmental Model Package A coupled system of watershed, hydrodynamic and eutrophication models The same package used for the 2002 load.
Advertisements

RICE CREEK CHAIN OF LAKES TMDL. PELTIER LAKE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS MONITORING DATA.
The Effect of the Changing Dynamics of the Conowingo Dam on the Chesapeake Bay Mukhtar Ibrahim and Karl Berger, COG staff Water Resources Technical Committee.
James River Chlorophyll Study Status Update: January 2015 House Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources Committee David K. Paylor, DEQ Director.
Complexities of the Carters Lake TMDL Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, H.I.T. Tetra Tech Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, H.I.T. Tetra Tech 26th Annual Alabama Water.
Conowingo Dam and Lower Susquehanna River Sediment Mt. Airy Water and Sewer Board December 12, 2013 Bruce Michael Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
OMSAP Public Meeting September 1999 The Utility of the Bays Eutrophication Model in the Harbor Outfall Monitoring Program James Fitzpatrick HydroQual,
Developing a Nutrient Management Plan for the Napa River Watershed Group Members Vinod Kella  Rebecca Kwaan  Luke Montague Linsey Shariq  Peng Wang.
1 Sediment Management for Dam Removal: An HEC-6 Approach.
Lower Susquehanna River Dam Sediment and Solutions Conowingo Relicensing; LSRWA; MD County Resistance; Solutions; CAC Involvement Thursday November 29.
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Two.
Update on the HEC-RAS Reservoir Transport Simulation Mike Langland and Ed Koerkle 03/30/2012.
Dams Helpful or Hurtful?. What do you already know?  Brainstorm with your partners what you know about dams.  Be ready to report out!
Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Citizens Advisory Committee November 29, 2012 Anna Compton USACE 1.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Changes in Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in the Assabet River Following Mandated Reductions in Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharges U.S. Geological.
 Nutrient Limitation What’s happening in the Chesapeake Bay and how does it compare to our results?
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
Point Source Loads and Decision Criteria for Toxics Modeling Baltimore Harbor TMDL Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
Prevention and Cure. Contents Introduction to Reservoirs Preventing Siltation Cure Cost Benefit Analysis Conclusion.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.
Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay.
Describe the features and characteristics of the Three Gorges Dam.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. Temporal Changes in SAV Coverage Total # of Species Total No. of All Species Eurasian Watermilfoil Dominant.
Dams Helpful or Hurtful?.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Technical Support in Engineering Construction Phase of Craney Island Eastward Expansion Mac Sisson, Harry Wang, Jian Shen, Albert Kuo, and Wenping Gong.
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
Marjorie Friedrichs, Raleigh Hood and Aaron Bever
Citizens Advisory Council
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
DEP Citizen Advisory Committee October 17, 2017
Impact of Meteorological Events and Sand Excavation on Turbidity and Total Suspended Solids Levels of Imo River by Dr. Chinedu E. Ihejirika Department.
State Profile Maryland
Elizabeth River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections
State Profile Delaware
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Water Quality Monitoring Update – Summary August 15, 2017.
Lake Spokane 2012 Nutrient Monitoring Data
Local Government Engagement Initiative January 16, 2018
James River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
State Profile Pennsylvania
River Flow into Chesapeake Bay
State Profile New York.
Conowingo Dam Update Presented to the Citizens Advisory Committee
State Profile West Virginia
2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.
Local Government Advisory Committee
PCB Concentrations in the Ambient Waters of the Delaware Estuary and Coastal Waters: Implications for TMDLs for PCBs Thomas J. Fikslin and Gregory Cavallo.
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
How are lakes and streams similar? How are they different?
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Dams Helpful or Hurtful?.
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment
Overview of Climate Impact Assessment Framework and Implementation
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0
Enforcement Advocacy Stewardship Education
Chesapeake Bay Suite of Modeling Tools
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Presentation transcript:

Status Nearly 30 scenarios completed for NAB and CBP over a year’s effort. Report on application of CBEMP in preparation. October time frame for draft. Targeted management scenarios in progress: Dredging, remove 3 mcy. Completed. Dredging, remove 3 mcy with sediment bypass. Mid-September. Dredging, remove 31 mcy, equivalent to 1996 bathymetry. Completed.

Scenario Procedure The CBEMP is run for 1991 – 2001. Today’s runs are based on Chesapeake Bay TMDL loadings. Loads from a major scour event in January 1996 are added to the WSM loads. Scour is computed by ADH applied to 2008 – 2011 hydrology including TS Lee. We obtain 1996 scour by a scaling procedure. Nutrient composition of solids is based on observations during TS Lee.

Conceptual Model of Sediment Movement through Conowingo Reservoir Sediment and nutrient releases are event-oriented. Upstream Reservoirs and Watershed Water Column Erosion event increases depth, diminishes subsequent erosion events. Conowingo Dam WIPS decrease sediment loads. Also decrease deposition. Bed Sediments Sedimentation rate is largely independent of bathymetry. Scour is strongly dependent on bathymetry.

1996 Scour Loads for Three Bathymetries

Model Results We’re going to concentrate on difference plots. Dredging 3 mcy (LSWRA28) – TMDL with existing bathymetry (LSRWA21). Dredging 31 mcy (LSRWA13) – TMDL with equilibrium bathymetry (LSWRA19).

Dredge 3 mcy Decrease Increase Dredge 31 mcy Decrease Increase

Dredge 3 mcy Decrease Increase Dredge 31 mcy Decrease Increase

Decrease Increase Dredge 3 mcy Decrease Increase Dredge 31 mcy

Decrease Increase Dredge 3 mcy Decrease Increase Dredge 31 mcy

Decrease Increase Dredge 3 mcy Decrease Increase Dredge 31 mcy

Decrease Increase Dredge 3 mcy Decrease Increase Dredge 31 mcy

Decrease Increase Dredge 3 mcy Decrease Increase Dredge 31 mcy

Decrease Increase Dredge 3 mcy Decrease Increase Dredge 31 mcy

Decrease Increase Dredge 3 mcy Decrease Increase Dredge 31 mcy

Decrease Increase Dredge 3 mcy Decrease Increase Dredge 31 mcy

Conclusions Dredging 3 mcy will improve summer-average bottom DO in the deep trench of the bay, Potomac River, and Baltimore Harbor by 0.02 to 0.04 mg/L based on a 1996 scour event. Dredging 31 mcy will improve summer-average bottom DO in the deep trench of the bay, Potomac River, and Baltimore Harbor by 0.04 to 0.06 mg/L based on a 1996 scour event.

Conclusions Dredging 3 mcy will reduce SAV growing-season chlorophyll by 0.02 to 0.05 in a large expanse of the bay, extending from Baltimore harbor past the mouth of the Potomac River, based on a 1996 scour event. The magnitude of chlorophyll reduction from dredging 31 mcy is comparable to dredging 3 mcy, based on a 1996 scour event. The improvement is more extensive and prolonged, however.

Conclusions Improvements in SAV growing-season light attenuation obtained by dredging are limited, generally less than 0.01 / m. These results are influenced by the timing of the scour event, January 1996. Most solids have settled out by the subsequent SAV growing season.