Information for panellists

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Presenting: Units A1 and A2

Advertisements

Role and responsibilities of district review panellists.

Head teacher Performance Management

What is verification? Information for panellists.

What is Monitoring? Information for panellists. Quality assurance of Authority subjects Monitoring poses the question: “How well is the school implementing.

Business Management CPD Presentation External Verification School SQA Co-ordinators will receive notification of Verification Selection and Verification.

Internal verification and external standards moderation.

Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services

Doc.: IEEE /024 Submission January 2001 Jim Carlo, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Patents and IEEE 802 Stds IEEE 802 Chair’s Viewpoint Jim Carlo General.

SQA UNIT ASSESSMENT UPDATE SATH NOVEMBER 8 TH NOV 2014.

Stage One: Registrant, (N.M.C., 2006). Student Handout. (May, 2008).

Taking forward ASYE in adult services October 2014.

Queensland Studies Authority Quality-assurance processes.

Accreditation Support for Teachers

SUBTITLE DAY, MONTH, YEAR Accreditation Support for Teachers Introduction to Accreditation at Proficient Teacher Module 3 of 5.

Enhancing assessment capacity For teachers of Authority and Authority-registered subjects.

APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING

Computing Science CPD Presentation Internal Verification of National 4 and National 5 Units.

Religious Moral and Philosophical Studies CPD Presentation.

The Department of Educational Administration Assessment Report School of Education and Human Services Carol Godsave, Chair, Assessment Coordinator.

Mentor Training Brunel University Primary Partnership PGCert Primary January 2014.

APECL For Partners 14 th March What is APECL? APECL stands for the Accreditation of Prior Experiential and Certificated Learning (APECL). APECL.

ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.

Stages of the verification process Information for panellists.

Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.

TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.

APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.

Mentor Training Brunel University Primary Partnership PGCert Primary May 2014.

Stages of monitoring Information for panellists. Monitoring Occurs mid-way through the course of study Review panels consider how schools have implemented.

Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.

History CPD Presentation The Verification Process and Making Assessment Decisions.

Learn Local Quality Preaccredited Teachers Community of Practice Moderation Workshop South East Victoria ACFE Region 5 th August 2015.

NSW Record of School Achievement A pathway to the HSC A pathway to employment Implementing a proposed NSW Record of School Achievement Board of Studies.

National 4 & 5 Physical Education. Documents available on website Unit by Unit approach to Performance (package 1) Unit by Unit approach to Factors impacting.

APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.

Accreditation Support for Teachers

Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event

Using evidence to review and moderate students’ progress against the Teachers’ Standards Explain that students should have provided their TP files and.

Polices, procedures & protocols

MODULE 8: GOVERNANCE AUDIT EVIDENCE AND REVIEW

Hilary Wilson and Paul Rooney

External Verification Report 2014/15

An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation

Implementing and reviewing additional admissions assessments

Their role within Schools and Colleges

External Quality Assurance 2017 – New Approach and New Opportunities

NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar

English Communications

Alternative Assessment (Portfolio)

Our Vision Our vision is to be recognised nationally and internationally as a leader in qualification, assessment and verification.

Postgraduate Research Student Supervision

Stages of the monitoring process

Stages of the verification process

European TRAINING FOUNDATION

Implementing English II Benchmarks

Information for panellists

English II Benchmarks September 24, 2014

Human Subjects Research Requirements (EDGAR Part 97)

Assessment of student achievement of outcomes from the 7-10 Science syllabus Use this as a screen saver.

Information and Guidelines booklets

Section 504 Training- Teachers

Monitoring and Pre-scoring Activities

Teacher Evaluation Process Training

Their role within Schools and Colleges

Campus Improvement Planning

Evaluation Information

Their role within Schools and Colleges

Curriculum Coordinator: Pamela Quinn Date of Presentation: 1/19/18

Roles and Responsibilities

Western Australian Curriculum: Technologies

Presentation transcript:

Information for panellists What is monitoring? Information for panellists

Quality assurance of Authority subjects Syllabus development Work program approval Monitoring Verification Comparability Random sampling Confirmation Monitoring poses the question: ‘How well is the school implementing the course of study?’

What is in a monitoring submission? Form R3 Copy of the approved work program Clean copies of assessment tasks (including data on conditions) Minimum of two sample student folios (unless the cohort has only one student) Documentation of student performances

Role of panellists at monitoring Look for evidence in sample folios to support school judgments about student responses. Review submissions prior to the monitoring meeting. Complete detailed pre-review notes to record your findings. Conduct further reviews at the monitoring meeting and complete detailed review notes. Conference with other panellists to construct a consensus report for each school submission.

Role of review panel At monitoring, review panels consider the: implementation of the relevant senior syllabus effectiveness of assessment instruments in offering students opportunities to demonstrate syllabus general objectives and standards school’s matching of the appropriate standards descriptors with the qualities of student work based on evidence in the sample folios interim levels of achievement decisions.

Form R3 Review panel chairs provide written advice on behalf of review panels with the Form R3. Written advice concerns the school’s implementation of the syllabus as demonstrated by the assessment evidence provided in the submission.

Written advice to schools Based on evidence found in the submission Clear, concise, constructive, factual, respectful and relevant Language reflects the spirit of cooperation and professional respect Point in time ― does not pre-empt or make assumptions about future events

Observers at monitoring meetings A limited number of observers may attend meetings. Schools may request that teachers be allowed to attend as observers. District panel chairs may also make requests. District coordinators are informed of all requests and manage the process.