Key Concepts & Questions Adequate Yearly Progress

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.

Advertisements

MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.

California English Language Development Test (CELDT) and Reclassification Palm Middle School

Poway Unified Board of Education Academic Performance Index (API) and Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) October 15, 2012.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.

2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.

Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.

ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.

Nevada Transitioning from measuring status and reporting AYP, to measuring growth and reporting on School Performance.

Assessment & Accountability TEP 128A March 7, 2006.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.

Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.

California Standards Test and CAHSEE Correlation Use of Student Data for Targeted Preemptive Intervention November 1, 2006 Dr. Janis Fries-Martinez, Principal.

Title I Coordinators’ Meeting: Guiding Students to Proficiency December 07, 2005.

Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.

San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.

ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.

Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.

1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.

Understandin g the API & the AYP APLUS+ Annual Conference October 2010 Del Mar, California Diane Grotjohn

Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.

School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.

Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September

State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.

Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.

Park County School District #6 MAP and PAWS DATA REPORT FOR

CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Analysis of the Mathematics Section of the California Standards Test (CST) Data Elementary.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.

Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)

Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability.

Information About the Accountability Provisions of No Child Left Behind California Department of Education Policy and Evaluation Division July 2003.

Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.

Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 

Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.

1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.

No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.

SANGER HIGH SCHOOL CALIFORNIA DISTINGUISHED SCHOOL CALSTAT LEADERSHIP SITE FOR COLLABORATION

- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.

2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.

Corona-Norco Unified School District Accountability Update RAN Meeting May 15, 2015.

California Standards Tests (CSTs) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Grade 10 Census Report Data to inform the evaluation of the district’s.

2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.

Response to Intervention Does it work for ELL & Poverty Children Highland Pacific Elementary School San Bernardino City Unified School District CASP March.

Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District Catch A Rising STAR Understanding Your STAR Student Report (Revised 2012)

1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.

Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP

Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP

Accountability in California Before and After NCLB

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

Alaska Superintendents Association Fall Meeting 2016

January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability Unit

What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.

Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010

STAR CST Reports and AYP Predictions

Wade Hayashida Local District 8

Data Review CST (AYP) inserted into your SPSA by DTS

CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL 2010 MCAS Presentation October 26, 2010.

Academic Achievement Alameda County School Districts

Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School

Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School

Presentation transcript:

Key Concepts & Questions Adequate Yearly Progress NCLB Key Concepts & Questions Adequate Yearly Progress

THE KEY CONCEPT

AYP FORMULA AYP = AMOs + Participation Rate + API + (Grad Rate)

WHAT IS YOUR PERFORMANCE LEVEL?

AYP (BASIC LEVEL) AMO stands for: a) Annual Major Objective b) Adequate Minimum Outcome c) Annual Measurable Objective d) Assessed Measurable Outcome (Choose One)

AYP (PROFICIENT LEVEL) True or False: The passing score on the CAHSEE corresponds to the proficient level cut score for AYP purposes. The AMOs for a High School District with grades 7-12 are different from those for a High School District with grades 9-12. Progress on the API is the same as meeting the 5% growth target.

AYP (ADVANCED LEVEL) Golden Poppy Elementary has 500 students with valid scores in CST ELA. 74 of these students are socioeconomically disadvantaged. Is this group numerically significant for AYP purposes? (Explain your response) Why is the 2003 ELA AMO for Unified and High School Districts (Grades 7 to 12) 12.0% AND NOT 12.4%? (Show your work)

School and District AMOs Elementary/Middle School Elementary District AMOs AMOs Unified District, High School District (7-12) AMOs High School AMOs High School District (9-12) AMOs