A method for successful peer reviews

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rules of Peer Editing It must be ABSOLUTELY SILENT! No talking, whispering, etc. Little distractions are annoyances while you are trying to give great.
Advertisements

Characteristics of Descriptive Feedback
Zero Problem for Two Digit Addition Zero Problem for Two Digit Addition - Step 1 Some students want to write “50” in the tens place instead.
EVALUATING WRITING What, Why, and How? Workshopping explanation and guidelines Rubrics: for students and instructors Students Responding to Instructor.
Providing Constructive Feedback
Peer Coaching Dr. Barbara Gottesman
Copyright © 2003 Center for Farm Financial Management, University of Minnesota Business Plan Once the research is complete, questions answered, and strategy.
Looking at Texts from a Reader’s Point of View
Copyright © 2003 Center for Farm Financial Management, University of Minnesota Business Plan Once the research is complete, questions answered, and strategy.
Title and Authors of the Paper you reviewed goes here Your name goes here.
Critical Colleagues Grant development and writing support Research and Graduate Studies.
PEER REVIEW DAY. WRITER Read through your paper once. The back of your paper, list (a) what you believe your strengths are on this draft, and (b)what.
NO COMPUTERS!!!!. Full Conversation Write-Up 1.HONESTY. Admit where you could not find variety. Speculate why that was – your searching OR your question.
Performance Management Delivering Performance Feedback.
Burton Style Analysis Essay: Plan, Outline, & Draft Plan, outline, and draft your essay (see rubric) Remember the prompt: What have you learned about style.
Have you implemented “Number Talks” in your classroom? What are the pros? What are the cons? Any suggestions?????
Mentorship in SCA We encourage you to explore the mentor/mentee relationship between you and your intern. SCA members are looking for someone to engage.
1.Take a quarter sheet of paper from the basket at the back of the room. 2.At the top of your paper, write: First and last name Date (9-4) And title “Civic.
The basics of editing and how to assess your classmates.
Which Strategies Will Provide Evidence of Student Learning?
GRAMMAR: RUN-ON SENTENCES AND MORE. Run On Sentences This chapter starts on p. 125 of your Pathways textbook. A RUN-ON occurs when two (or more) independent.
Session II Mentoring the Mentee: The Learning/Supportive Relationship.
-Feedback- Yourself & FBHS 9 th -11 th Advisory June 3, 2013.
Welcome to CE499: 6 th Seminar We will begin class at the top of the hour. Until then please feel free to share in conversation with your classmates.
What Do Authors Do? 8 Steps of the Writing Process.
Ensuring Active Thinking and Participation: Asking Good Questions and Holding Students Accountable.
DISCUSS WORKSHOPS AND PEER EDITING How to get the most out of your Peer Review.
Writing Group Support California State University San Marcos.
Peer Review Workshop ENG 113: Composition I. What Is a Peer Review Workshop?  You will be paired with a classmate  Read each narrative  Provide detailed.
Welcome! Opening activity: On the post-it note at your table, answer the question: “What one strategy do you implement in the classroom to manage conferences?”
Successful Peer Review Strategies. Getting Ready for Peer Review What you get out of peer review depends on what you put into it. Your job as a writer.
TODAY’S GOALS Peer review the second draft of your WTE essays Continue refining your theses and adding details to the body paragraphs of your WTE essays.
Practicing Communication Skills In this lesson, you will Learn About… How body language can help you communicate. Why “I” statements are more effective.
Peer Consultancy: Observation, Debrief, Analysis.
PEER RESPONSE: Teaching students the art of reviewing Joonna Smitherman Trapp Emory University, 2015.
Troubleshooting Peer Review in the ESL classroom
7 Things to Remember About Feedback
Providing Effective Feedback Student Conferencing
Sept 29, 2017: Assessment Workshop
Peer Edit.
Peer Review Workshop ENG 113: Composition I.
The full, original PPT can be downloaded here:
Analyzing and Documenting Your Teaching University of Virginia
EDSS 511 Week 6 Product & Management
3/3/16 If you need to print your rough draft tell Ms. Smith IMMEDIATELY - you should have done this already  Turn in the “Barbara Frietchie” work if.
Peer Assessment Guidelines
Peer Reviews Tips for the author.
Understanding the Assessment Process
S. Barker Dalry Primary School
Ensuring Success through Assessment – Involve Students
How to become a GREAT peer editor!
Lesson 4 – Social Skill: Giving Feedback.
Successful Peer Review Strategies
English Week 2 – Monday, June 4.
2018 Senior Games Conference
Unit 4: Dance Assessments
Warm-Up: Check the vignette
Challenge Driven Education
Resilience Narrative Warm-Up
Presentation title in White, Arial Bold 30pt on one or two
Your Idea should be Viable
Peer Editing Take notes!.
Collaborative Groups and Tutorials
How to be an effective Learning Helper in the classroom
Assessment Day Strategy
Friday, March 1st, 2019  LT Evaluate current beliefs, biases, and wonderings about unit content and terminology Find present day examples; find historical.
Preparing Students for World Lit Paper 1
BE KIND BE HELPFUL BE SPECIFIC
NCWE Mentoring for Success
Do Now: Below is a proof given by a student. Evaluate the student’s proof by giving it a score out of 10 points, explaining your score (ie, what was good.
Presentation transcript:

A method for successful peer reviews PQP Strategy A method for successful peer reviews 1 min = 1 min of 61 minutes total for full ppt

Peers - Support Resource Your peers are all going through the same process and can be a great resource to guide your through the writing process. Peers can proof read your work and give you helpful advice. The PQP method is designed to guide you through a process to help you give constructive criticism to a colleague. + 2 minutes = 3 minutes

Praise, Question & Polish (PQP) Praise: Praise the strong parts of the paper. Be specific. Questions: Identify what questions you had about the paper. Ask questions that probe and push the author to articulate what they mean. Polish: What could be done to polish up the paper? Be specific. + 5 minutes = 8

Constructive Criticism Be helpful, but kind. Tell them what they need to hear, in a kind way, so they hear you. Be honest about what needs to be changed. Remember it is not helpful to tell someone it is good, if it is not. Give specific suggestions. Help the author make the needed changes. + 5 minutes = 13 minutes

Write Up Feedback Take notes on paper. Look at your notes on the paper and organize the feedback in the Praise, Question and Polish (PQP)categories. Write up a separate set of notes for the Praise, Question and Polish Feedback (PQP). + 3 minutes = 16 minutes

Praise What did the author do well? Write down all the positives. +5 minutes = 41 minutes

Questions Write down what questions you had about the paper. Ask questions that probe and push the author to articulate what they mean. Use questions to prompt the author to meet the expectations in the rubric. +5 minutes = 46 minutes

Polish What could be done to polish up the paper? Be specific. Look back at the questions you listed, how could the author address them? Give the author tangible ideas on what he/she can change and how. +5 minutes = 51 minutes

Peer Review Evaluation What did you learned by reading and receiving feedback from your peers. Develop a plan to implement improvement strategies. +5 minutes = 56 minutes