NARCO ANALYSIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CJ305: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence Welcome to Unit 6! Instructor: K. Austin Zimmer, J.D. Make sure you adjust your speakers and audio settings.
Advertisements

AJ 104 Chapter 14 Self-Incrimination.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE
The Bill of Rights and the Criminal Trial Process.
+ Courtroom Participants. + 2 Fundamental Principles An accused person is innocent until proven guilty. Guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
1 Book Cover Here Chapter 10 INTERROGATION OF SUSPECTS AND HOSTILE WITNESSES Guidelines and Procedures Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing.
Criminal Psychology Chapter 11(a) Interrogations and Confessions Talbot Kellogg Community College.
Chapter 2 The criminal investigation process. In this chapter, you will look at the role of police and the courts in the criminal investigation process.
Our Court System Terms, procedures, and ideas you need to know.
Rights When Arrested Objective 2.01 Recognize types of courts. Business Law.
INVESTIGATION AND TRIAL OF OFFENCES. INVESTIGATION OF OFFENCES.
Types of Evidence From Arraignment to Verdict. Self-Incrimination The Canada Evidence Act - regulates rules of evidence (1893). Applies to federal jurisdictions.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3 RULES AND TYPES OF EVIDENCE LAW 12 MUNDY
Chapter 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation © 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the historical evolution.
Chapter Fifteen Criminal Procedure Before Trial. Introduction to Law, 4 th Edition Hames and Ekern © 2010 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River,
Law & Justice Chapter 12 Criminal Investigations.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
Journal 1.Can a police officer “stop and frisk” you? 2.True or False - The 4th amendment protects us against all searches and seizures 3.Do the police.
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 4 Seminar Trial options and the Defendants Rights Or I am in trouble, I need a good attorney, fast Who will decide my fate?
Chapter 10 The Criminal Process. A.k.a. Procedural criminal law Two most essential elements of Canadian Criminal Process are: - Truth - Justice.
SELF-INCRIMINATION “No person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself[.]” The 5 th Amendment “I plead the Fifth!”
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
 Understanding the Texas Criminal Legal System. Definitions  Your individually responsible for looking up definitions of words, that I have put in red.
EVIDENCE ACT Law of evidence lay rules for the production of evidence in the court of law.
Legal Studies * Mr. Marinello ARRESTS AND WARRANTS.
Supreme Court Cases on Self Incrimination Sarah Claypoole.
The Bill of Rights and the Criminal Trial Process.
HEARSAY! BY MICHAEL JOHNSON. COMMON LAW DEFINITION “ An out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted”
Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.
The Bill of Rights and Search and Seizure. The students will be able to: 1. Discuss the amendments involved from the Bill of Rights that pertain to obtaining.
What are our rights and how do we protect them?. How do we balance our personal rights against the right of society to be safe and secure?
Know Your Rights Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.
International Congress of the Brazilian Judges’ Association
Forensic Psychology.
Chapter 2 The criminal investigation process
Prosecution Process.
Due Process Court Systems and Practices.
Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.
Law of Evidence Oral Evidence.
Courtroom Participants
The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
Amendments to the Constitution Bill of Rights
SEARCH, AN OUTLINE.
The Participants.
Crime Scene Processing 5th & 6th Amendments
Common Errors committed by the officers during the investigation & preparation of documents. – Discussion on relevant case laws.
Rights of the Accused in the 5thAmendment
Amended Section 41 of Criminal Procedure Code
Fourth Amendment And Probable Cause.
ПОСИЛЕННЯ ПОТЕНЦІАЛУ ІНСТИТУЦІЇ УКРАЇНСЬКОГО ОМБУДСМЕНА:
Facts which need not be proved by evidence
Search and Seizure Concepts
The Spirituous Preparations Control Act, 1955
2.2 Civil Liberties 4th 5th, 6th, and 8th Amendments.
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Law of Evidence CONFESSIONS 9/12/2014 Chapter 10.
BRAIN MAPPING.
Trial before court of session
Pre-Trial Procedures Search and Seizure.
Interrogations and Confessions
Polygraph test.
Miranda Rights You have the right to remain silent…
DETENTION AND INTERROGATION;
YOU WILL NEED YOUR STUDY GUIDE OUT & A BLANK PIECE OF PAPER
Protecting the basic freedoms since 1791
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3
Yoyo: QUESTION: A man was found dead with a cassette recorder in one hand and a gun in the other. When the police came in, they immediately pressed the.
Legal provisions governing the taking of witness statements
Presentation transcript:

NARCO ANALYSIS

Narcoanalysis Test. This test is done to have verbal elicitations from a suspect when brain mapping indicates that the subject has definite information about commission of crime. It is also known as truth serum test based on the concept that if a person is administered a drug which suppresses his reasoning power without affecting his memory& speech. He will speak the truth In this test persons imagination is suppressed/neutralized &reasoning faculty affected making him semiconscious . He is not in position to speak up on his own but can answer specific &simple questions . It becomes difficult for him to lie & his answers would be restricted to facts he is already aware of as he is unable to manipulate his answers being semiconscious.

Procedure for conducting Test. It is conducted by mixing 3gms of sodium pentothal or Sodium Amytal dissolved in 3000ml of distilled water depending on the persons age ,health ,& physical condition . This mixture is intravenously along with 10% of dextrose over a period of three hours. The rate is controlled to take accused to hypnotic trance &then interrogated by the investigating officer in the presence of team consisting of doctors including Physician ,anesthetist ,&psychologist. The revelations made during this stage are recorded both in video &audio cassettes . The report is prepared by the experts is used in the collection of evidence. This is conducted in Government hospital after a court order is passed order to the doctor or hospital authorities.

Pre Condition For Narcoanalysis Test Permission from the jurisdictional court is essential. Consent from the individual is mandatory. Medical fitness certificate by a physician is obtained prior to the test. A request has to be made by I.O through DCP concerned to AddL DG F.S.L Bangalore or Director State F.SL, Gandhinagar.

Legal Aspects of Narcoanalysis Test. It is only admissible in the court of law if it is supported by some recovery of weapon or case property. In 2006 judgment (Dinesh Dalmia Vstate) Madras High court held subjecting an accused to NA does not tantamount to testimony by compulsion .The court said about the accused “he may be taken to laboratory for such test against his will, but the revelations during such tests is quite voluntary”.

In 2004,the Bombay High court ruled in the multi crore rupee fake stamp paper case that subjecting an accused to certain test like NA does not violate the fundamental right against self incrimination ,Article 20(3) states no person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself ,statement made under Na test is not admissible in evidence but recoveries resulting from such druggedintervews are admissible as corroborative evidence. Bombay high court in verdict Ramchandra Reddy &others Vstate of Maharashtra upheld the legality of use ofP300 or brain mapping &Narcoanalysis test, the court also said evidence procured under the effect of NA test is also admissible Sec39crpc casts duty upon every person to furnish information regarding offences. Sec 53 Crpc provides scope for the efficient & scientific investigation ,which enables to collect evidence to prpve guilt or innocence of the person accused of committing the crime.