Tone Grouping Factors and NDP Format for ax

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0365r0 Submission March 2015 Kiseon Ryu, et al. (LG Electronics)Slide 1 UL MU Procedure Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Advertisements

Liwen Chu et al. (Marvell)
Doc.: IEEE /0580 Submission 11ax Coding Discussions May, 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Hongyuan Zhang.
Submission /0615r3July 2015 UL OFDMA Bandwidth Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Liwen Chu Marvell 5488 Marvell.
Doc.: IEEE /0812r1 Submission Pilot Design for Data Section Slide 1 Date: Authors: Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm) NameCompanyAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1103r0 Submission September 2015 Chittabrata Ghosh, et al. (Intel)Slide 1 DL Sounding Sequence with UL MU Feedback Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1105r0 Submission September 2015 Chittabrata Ghosh, et al. (Intel)Slide 1 UL OFDMA-based Random Access Procedure Date:
Tone Grouping Factors and NDP Format for ax
Doc.: IEEE /0580 Submission 11ax Coding Discussions Sept, 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Hongyuan Zhang.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0813r0 July 2015 CP Indication for UL MU Transmission Date: Slide 1Zhigang Rong, Huawei, et., al. Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0580 Submission 11ax Coding Discussions July, 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Hongyuan Zhang.
Submission /0054r0Jan 2016 UL MU CCA Response Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Kaiying Lv Kaiying Lv (ZTE) #9.
Doc.: IEEE /0088 Submission Ng for compressed beamforming feedback January, 2016 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Ron Porat, Broadcom, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /0034 Submission Beamforming with HE-LTF Compression Jan, 2016 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Hongyuan Zhang, Marvell, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /0071r1 Submission Packet Extension Follow Up January, 2016 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Ron Porat, Broadcom, et. al. NameAffiliation.
Submission /0051r1Jan 2016 Slide 1David Xun Yang et al. (Huawei) Response Given Trigger Frame Type Date: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0643r0 Submission UL MU Response Scheduling May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1137 Submission Triggered OFDMA Random Access Observations Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Russell.
Doc.: IEEE /0875r1 Submission July 2015 Chittabrata Ghosh, et al. (Intel)Slide 1 Random Access with Trigger Frames using OFDMA Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0089r1 Submission Single Stream Pilots in UL MU MIMO January, 2016 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Ron Porat, Broadcom, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /0822r2 Submission Slide 1 NameAffiliationAddressPhone Jianhan Liu Mediatek No. 1 Dusing 1 st Road, Hsinchu, Taiwan
Trigger type specific information
Random Access with Trigger Frames using OFDMA
SIG-B Encoding Structure
1x HE-LTF For UL-MUMIMO Date: Authors: Jan, 2016
MU Minimum MPDU Start Spacing
In-device Multi-radio Coexistence and UL MU operation
802.11ax Preamble Design and Auto-detection
Tone Grouping Factors and NDP Format for ax
HE-SIGA transmission for range extension
SIG-B Encoding Structure Part II
BSS color and multiple BSSID
Fragmentation with MU Operation
UL multi-TIDs aggregation
Spatial Configuration And Signaling for MU-MIMO
Left over Issues in R Signaling for HE-SIGB
HE Beamforming Feedback
PHY Padding Remaining Issues
Spectral Mask Discussions
MAC Padding in Trigger Frame
MCS Rules for Acknowledging UL OFDMA
Broadcast and Unicast (Trigger) in DL MU
Acknowledgement to DL MU
Packet Extension Follow Up
Maximal A-MPDU Size Date: Hongyuan Zhang Marvell
Cascading Structure Date: David X. Yang Peter Loc Le Liu
HE-SIGA transmission for range extension
Multi-TID A-MPDU in MU Transmission
TA address field in Trigger Frame
Performance evaluation of SU/MU-MIMO in OFDMA
NAV Consideration for UL MU Response to Trigger frame
UL MU Carrier Sensing (CS) Rules
UL MU CCA Response Date: Authors: Hyeyoung Choi
OBSS NAV and PD Threshold Rule for Spatial Reuse
Spatial Configuration And Signaling for MU-MIMO
Pilot Design for Data Section
SIG-B Encoding Structure Part II
SS Allocation in Trigger Frame
Spectral Mask Discussions
Number of BSS Color bits
MAC Padding in Trigger Frame
5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, 95054
Further consideration on Multi-STA Block ACK
Triggered OFDMA Random Access Observations
UL multi-TIDs aggregation
Duration and MAC Padding for MU PPDUs
SIG-A Structure in 11ax Preamble
Random Access with Trigger Frames using OFDMA
NAV Consideration for UL MU Response to Trigger frame
Response Given Trigger Frame Type
Presentation transcript:

Tone Grouping Factors and NDP Format for 802.11ax Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Tone Grouping Factors and NDP Format for 802.11ax Date: 2015-09-13 Authors: Name Company Address Phone Email Sameer Vermani Qualcomm 5775 Morehouse Dr San Diego, CA    svverman@qti.qualcomm.com Alice Chen Lin Yang Bin Tian Tao Tian Arjun Bharadwaj Hemanth Sampath Richard Van Nee Straatweg 66-S Breukelen, 3621 BR Netherlands Allert Van Zelst Youhan Kim 1700 Technology Drive San Jose, CA 95110, USA VK Jones Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm) Hongyuan Zhang, Marvell; etc.

Authors (continued) Qinghua Li Intel Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Qinghua Li Intel 2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA     +1-408-765-9698   quinghua.li@intel.com Xiaogang Chen xiaogang.c.chen@intel.com Robert Stacey robert.stacey@intel.com Po-Kai Huang po-kai.huang@intel.com Chitto Ghosh chittabrata.ghosh@intel.com Rongzhen Yang rongzhen.yang@intel.com Hongyuan Zhang Marvell 5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, 95054 +408-222-2500 hongyuan@marvell.com Yakun Sun yakunsun@marvell.com Lei Wang Leileiw@marvell.com Liwen Chu liwenchu@marvell.com Jinjing Jiang jinjing@marvell.com Yan Zhang yzhang@marvell.com Rui Cao ruicao@marvell.com Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, 95054 Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Authors (continued) Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Sudhir Srinivasa Marvell (Cont’d) 5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, 95054 408-222-2500 sudhirs@marvell.com Saga Tamhane sagar@marvell.com Mao Yu my@marvel..com Edward Au edwardau@marvell.com Hui-Ling Lou hlou@marvell.com Ron Porat Broadcom   rporat@broadcom.com Matthew Fischer mfischer@broadcom.com Sriram Venkateswaran Tu Nguyen Vinko Erceg Brian Hart Cisco Systems 170 W Tasman Dr, San Jose, CA 95134 brianh@cisco.com Pooya Monajemi pmonajem@cisco.com Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm) Hongyuan Zhang, Marvell; etc.

19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-130, Korea Authors (continued) Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Kiseon Ryu LG Electronics 19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-130, Korea   kiseon.ryu@lge.com Jinyoung Chun jiny.chun@lge.com Jinsoo Choi js.choi@lge.com Jeongki Kim jeongki.kim@lge.com Giwon Park giwon.park@lge.com Dongguk Lim dongguk.lim@lge.com Suhwook Kim suhwook.kim@lge.com Eunsung Park esung.park@lge.com HanGyu Cho hg.cho@lge.com Thomas Derham Orange thomas.derham@orange.com Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Authors (continued) Fei Tong Hyunjeong Kang Samsung Kaushik Josiam Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Fei Tong Samsung Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS (U.K.) +44 1223 434633 f.tong@samsung.com Hyunjeong Kang Maetan 3-dong; Yongtong-Gu Suwon; South Korea +82-31-279-9028 hyunjeong.kang@samsung.com Kaushik Josiam 1301, E. Lookout Dr, Richardson TX 75070 (972) 761 7437 k.josiam@samsung.com Mark Rison +44 1223 434600 m.rison@samsung.com Rakesh Taori (972) 761 7470 rakesh.taori@samsung.com Sanghyun Chang +82-10-8864-1751 s29.chang@samsung.com Yasushi Takatori NTT 1-1 Hikari-no-oka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 239-0847 Japan   takatori.yasushi@lab.ntt.co.jp Yasuhiko Inoue inoue.yasuhiko@lab.ntt.co.jp Yusuke Asai asai.yusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp Koichi Ishihara ishihara.koichi@lab.ntt.co.jp Akira Kishida kishida.akira@lab.ntt.co.jp Akira Yamada NTT DOCOMO 3-6, Hikarinooka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, 239-8536, Japan yamadaakira@nttdocomo.com Fujio Watanabe 3240 Hillview Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94304 watanabe@docomoinnovations.com Haralabos Papadopoulos hpapadopoulos@docomoinnovations.com Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Authors (continued) Phillip Barber Peter Loc Le Liu Jun Luo Huawei Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Phillip Barber Huawei The Lone Star State, TX   pbarber@broadbandmobiletech.com Peter Loc peterloc@iwirelesstech.com Le Liu F1-17, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen +86-18601656691 liule@huawei.com Jun Luo 5B-N8, No.2222 Xinjinqiao Road, Pudong, Shanghai jun.l@huawei.com Yi Luo +86-18665891036 Roy.luoyi@huawei.com Yingpei Lin linyingpei@huawei.com Jiyong Pang pangjiyong@huawei.com Zhigang Rong 10180 Telesis Court, Suite 365, San Diego, CA  92121 NA zhigang.rong@huawei.com Rob Sun 303 Terry Fox, Suite 400 Kanata, Ottawa, Canada Rob.Sun@huawei.com David X. Yang david.yangxun@huawei.com Yunsong Yang yangyunsong@huawei.com Zhou Lan F1-17, Huawei Base, Bantian, SHenzhen +86-18565826350 Lanzhou1@huawei.com Junghoon Suh Junghoon.Suh@huawei.com Jiayin Zhang zhangjiayin@huawei.com Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Authors (continued) James Yee Mediatek Name Affiliation Address Phone Email James Yee Mediatek No. 1 Dusing 1st Road, Hsinchu, Taiwan +886-3-567-0766  james.yee@mediatek.com Alan Jauh   alan.jauh@mediatek.com Chingwa Hu chinghwa.yu@mediatek.com Frank Hsu frank.hsu@mediatek.com Thomas Pare USA 2860 Junction Ave, San Jose, CA 95134, USA +1-408-526-1899 thomas.pare@mediatek.com ChaoChun Wang chaochun.wang@mediatek.com James Wang james.wang@mediatek.com Jianhan Liu Jianhan.Liu@mediatek.com Tianyu Wu tianyu.wu@mediatek.com Russell Huang russell.huang@mediatek.com Eric Wong Apple Cupertino, CA +1-408-9745967 ericwong@apple.com Chris Hartman Aon Mujtaba Joonsuk Kim joonsuk@apple.com  Guoqing Li +1-408-974-9164  guoqing_li@apple.com  Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Authors (continued) Weimin Xing ZTE Corp. Xing.weimin@zte.com.cn Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Weimin Xing ZTE Corp. Xing.weimin@zte.com.cn Kaiying Lv lv.kaiying@zte.com.cn Ke Yao Yao.ke@zte.com.cn Bo Sun Sun.bo1@zte.com.cn Yonggang Fang ZTE TX yfang@ztetx.com Kazuyuki Sakoda           Sony Electronics Kazuyuki.Sakoda@am.sony.com Yusuke Tanaka YusukeC.Tanaka@jp.sony.com Eisuke Sakai Eisuke.Sakai@jp.sony.com Yuichi Morioka Yuichi.Morioka@jp.sony.com Masahito Mori Masahito.Mori@jp.sony.com Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Introduction In these slides, we cover the following two topics July 2008 Introduction In these slides, we cover the following two topics Tone grouping factors for CSI feedback Show simulations for MU-MIMO performance NDP Frame Format Propose the following Disallow Ng=1 feedback in 802.11ax Use the SU frame format for HE-NDP Terminology: In these slides, tone grouping factor is always defined with respect to data tones of the 11ax PPDU (regardless of the LTF duration used in NDP or data packet) E.g., Ng=4 in 11ax means 1 out of every 4 data tones of 11ax packet Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Tone Grouping Factors In 802.11ac, the process of sub-sampling the CSI feedback is called tone-grouping Sending one value of V or one value of S for a “group” of tones E.g. Tone grouping factor, Ng =2 means that one V is sent for a group of 2 tones Once Ng has been chosen, Ng’ = 2* Ng is the tone-grouping factor used for S Ng=1 feedback in 11ax would be prohibitively expensive Would be approximately 4 times in size compared to Ng=1 feedback in 11ac Tones in 11ax are 4 times thinner Based on our results, even Ng=4 for 11ax works for indoor channels Will show simulation results in subsequent slides Suggest restricting Ng to be greater than equal to 2 for 11ax Ng=4 works well for most practical scenarios where MU-MIMO will be used Ng=2 might have some use for outdoor channels Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Simulations for Tone-grouping Factors Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Simulations for Tone-grouping Factors Compared the 20MHz DL MU-MIMO performance with various options Tone-grouping factor, Ng=1 and 4 LTF durations used in NDP 4x when Ng=1, and 1x when Ng=4 1x LTFs in NDP have two options VHT-LTF with 56 tones HE-1x-LTF: A modified VHT-LTF with more edge tones leading to total 60 tones Tried both 2x and 4x LTFs in DL MU-MIMO data packet Minimal performance difference for indoor channels Show that Ng=4 with 1x LTFs in NDP (and no edge tone augmentation) has good performance for indoor channels Similar performance as Ng=1 with 4x LTFs in NDP Assumed simple linear interpolation at the AP and phase alignment of V Simulated both channel models D-NLOS and E-NLOS Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm) Hongyuan Zhang, Marvell; etc.

Simulation Assumptions Considered a 20MHz DL MU-MIMO system with 8 Tx AP, and 3 STAs with 2 Rx antennas each, 2 streams per STA MMSE precoding done at the AP Capacity averaged post processing SINRs mapped to PHY throughputs using AWGN rate table Plot the 10th percentile and 50th percentile PHY throughputs for 200 channel realizations of D-NLOS/E-NLOS as a function of path-loss Sum PHY throughput at the AP Aging Loss = -30 dBc Tx Distortion = -35 dBc Channel estimation loss is considered both in sounding and in actual data transmission No quantization is considered to isolate the impact of interpolations No smoothing at the STA is assumed Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Simulation Results: D-NLOS Ng=4 feedback with 1x LTFs in NDP shows some smoothing gain compared to Ng=1 with 4x LTFs in NDP In reality Ng=1 can also benefit from smoothing Nevertheless, these results give confidence in Ng=4 with 1x LTFs in NDP Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Simulation Results: E-NLOS Ng=4 feedback with 1x LTFs in NDP shows some smoothing gain compared to Ng=1 with 4x LTFs in NDP In reality Ng=1 can also benefit from smoothing Nevertheless, these results give confidence in Ng=4 with 1x LTFs in NDP Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

HE-NDP HE-NDP is needed to cover outdoor use-case Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 HE-NDP HE-NDP is needed to cover outdoor use-case May allow multiple HE-LTF durations in an HE-NDP A subset of 1x, 2x and 4x LTFs may be allowed Re-use the SU frame format for the HE-NDP HE-SIG-B is not needed May need some packet extension at the end Format of HE-NDP L-STF L-LTF L-SIG RL-SIG HE-SIG-A HE-STF HE-LTFs Packet Extension Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm) Hongyuan Zhang, Marvell; etc.

Summary Ng=1 feedback is very expensive for 11ax Has 4 times overhead when compared to the Ng=1 feedback of 11ac Showed simulations to show that Ng=4 in 11ax gives satisfactory performance in indoor channels for MU-MIMO Suggest disallowing Ng=1 sounding feedback in 802.11ax Also recommend to use the SU frame format for HE-NDP Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Straw-poll 1 Do you agree to add the following text to the TGax spec framework document: “802.11ax spec shall not support Ng=1 for sounding feedback. Note that the tone grouping factor, Ng is defined with respect to data tones. ” Y N A Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Straw-poll 2 Do you support to add the following text and diagram to the SFD The spec shall define an HE-NDP for collecting sounding feedback, whose frame format is shown in the diagram below. The presence and duration of packet extension at the end of HE-NDP is TBD. Format of HE-NDP L-STF L-LTF L-SIG RL-SIG HE-SIG-A HE-STF HE-LTFs Packet Extension Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Motion 1 Move to add the following text to the TGax spec framework document: “802.11ax spec shall not support Ng=1 for sounding feedback. Note that the tone grouping factor, Ng is defined with respect to data tones.” Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Motion 2 Move to add the following text and diagram to the SFD The spec shall define an HE-NDP for collecting sounding feedback, whose frame format is shown in the diagram below. The presence and duration of packet extension at the end of HE-NDP is TBD. Format of HE-NDP L-STF L-LTF L-SIG RL-SIG HE-SIG-A HE-STF HE-LTFs Packet Extension Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)