MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The North American Experience Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dental Treatment Needs of Active Duty Military Personnel 1994 and 2003 Andrew K. York, CAPT, DC, USN Susan W. Mongeau, Lt Col, USAF, DC David L. Moss,
Advertisements

Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Resources: Developing an Assessment Infrastructure for Libraries, State, and Other Types of Consortia Presented.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University of Connecticut Libraries MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The.
Nancy Turner Syracuse University Library ARL Survey Coordinators and SPEC Liaisons January 19, 2007 E-Metrics Services and ARL Statistics.
Ontario University Library Consortia Activity Ontario University Library Consortia Activity Gwendolyn Ebbett Dean of the Library University of Windsor.
DigiQUAL™ Regrounding LibQUAL+® for the Digital Library Environment: An Analysis of the DigiQUAL® Data Presented at 9 th Northumbria by.
Health Center Library Overview Evelyn Morgen, Director March 2007.
Academic Research Library Support of Sponsored Research in the United States Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries Qualitative.
Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services: Developing Assessment Infrastructure for Libraries, State, and Other Types of Consortia Presented.
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
The ARL E-Metrics Project Measures for Electronic Resources ACRL/NEC Information Technology Interest Group May 17, 2002 Brinley Franklin Director, University.
The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Overview Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality APHA CEI Session  November 2006.
Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.
Martha Kyrillidou Brinley Franklin Terry Plum MINES for Libraries TM ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES Assessing the Value of Networked Electronic Services:
ACRL: Outcome Assessment Tools for the Library of the Future: MINES at OCUL Association of College and Research Libraries ACRL Conference 2005 Minneapolis.
Demonstrating Value and Creating Value: Evidence-Based Library Management through MINES for Libraries™
September 9, 2005 Washington, D.C. My.Medicare.gov - The Medicare Beneficiary Portal The Future of Beneficiary Self-Service.
Relais Express Implementation in OCUL libraries in Canada ILL Discussion Group meeting, ALA Mary Lehane June 23, 2012.
Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work” Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries ARL Visiting Program.
Web-Based Usage Surveys MINES for Libraries TM Brinley Franklin University of Connecticut Terry Plum Simmons GSLIS
Dana Thomas, Ontario Council of University Libraries Alan Darnell, Ontario Council of University Libraries Understanding Use of Networked Information Content:
ARL Statistics and Measurement Program Effective, Sustainable and Practical Assessment Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics and Service Quality Programs.
Assessing the Scholars Portal Melody Burton, Queen’s University Toni Olshen, York University Ontario Library Association Superconference February 3, 2005.
HW215: Models of Health & Wellness Unit 7: Health and Wellness Models Geo-political Influences.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
MINES for Libraries™ Presented by Martha Kyrillidou Director of the ARL Statistics and Service.
Use Measures for Electronic Resources: Theory and Practice A Librarian’s Perspective ALA / ALCTS June 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois Brinley Franklin Vice.
MINES for Libraries™ Presented by Martha Kyrillidou Director of the ARL Statistics and Service.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries MINES for Libraries.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Scholarly Reading in a Digital Age: Some things change, some stay the same Carol Tenopir University of.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Greater Western Library Alliance 2006 Spring Membership Meeting Arizona State University, Tempe AZ February 27, 2006 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University.
Webmetrics Workshop American Library Association Chicago, IL June 24, 2004 Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics and Measurement Program Association.
Assessing the Value and Impact of Digital Content Brinley Franklin Vice Provost for University Libraries University of Connecticut March 1, 2007.
Data to be released after chamber annual meeting and Methodology Statement.
Jordan J 1,2, Jones D 3, Williams D 4, Druck J 5 1 Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 2 David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Making MINES for Libraries © Work for Your Library Karen R. Harker, Collection Assessment Librarian Priya B. Parwani, Collection Development Graduate Library.
Shubhangi Arora1; Eden Haverfield2; Gabriele Richard2; Susanne B
2016 STS Data Manager Survey Results
Brinley Franklin and Terry Plum August 18, 2005
ARL New Measures MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Table 2.1: Number of Community Hospitals,(1) 1994 – 2014
Problem Data colletion in research is difficult + expensive
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
Right-sized Evaluation
Evaluating the Portal: The Story Behind the Numbers
Assessing Library Performance:
Defining and Analyzing Financial Wellness
Clinical Study Results Publication
Table 2.1: Number of Community Hospitals,(1) 1981 – 2005
M-Learning Libraries in Distance Education: A Proposed Model for IGNOU
Cluster Randomized Trials
Understanding the Issues: Textbook Affordability at USF
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
In Search of a Common Numerator Measuring Shutoffs Across the Country
Sweeps Week Program An introduction and update
Standards for Use Measures for Electronic Resources
FIRST PLACEMENT IS THE RIGHT PLACEMENT
Observational Studies vs. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)
Readiness Survey Results Summary
Is There a (Data) Point? Are All of These Measures Useful?
The Story Behind the Numbers: Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES) and the Assessment of the Ontario Council of University Libraries’
COUNTER Update February 2006.
2011 POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS PREPARATORY WORKS
Denver Health External Referrals Update 5/03/2016 Mile High Health Alliance Specialty Care Access Group.
Mining EZProxy Data: User Demographics and Electronic Resources
Collecting Library Statistics for Management Decision-making
Amani Abdullah Bahdailah
Provider Survey Peer-led sessions Initial remarks on local sites
Presentation transcript:

MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The North American Experience Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University of Connecticut Libraries

What is MINES? MINES is a research methodology consisting of a web-based survey form and a sampling plan. MINES measures who is using electronic resources, where users are located at the time of use, and their purpose of use. MINES was adopted by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) as part of the “New Measures” toolkit in May, 2003. MINES is different from other electronic resource usage measures that quantify total usage (e.g., COUNTER, EQUINOX, E-Metrics, ICOLC Guidelines, ISO and NISO standards) or measure how well a library makes electronic resources accessible (LibQual+TM).

Collection Activities Recent Data Collection Activities Data was collected at 18 university libraries in Ontario, Canada (OCUL) between May, 2004 and April, 2005. Data was also collected at 14 university libraries in the United States between January, 2003 and April, 2005. Main University Libraries Academic Medical Libraries University of Colorado University of Connecticut Health Center University of Connecticut University of North Carolina University of Texas Medical Branch Oregon State University University of Texas Southwestern University of Utah University of Virginia Washington University

Collection Activities Recent Data Collection Activities More than 50,000 networked electronic services uses in the U.S. were surveyed. At each U.S. library, the MINES survey was one component of a comprehensive cost analysis study that assigned all library costs to sponsored research, instruction/education/non-sponsored research, patient care, other sponsored activities and other activities. MINES was also conducted by the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) in 2004-2005 in conjunction with ARL. More than 20,000 users were surveyed.

MINES Methodological Considerations A representative sampling plan, including sample size, is determined at the outset. Typically, there are 48 hours of surveying over 12 months at a medical library and 24 hours a year at a main library. Random moment/web-based surveys are employed at each site. Participation is usually mandatory, negating non-respondent bias, and is based on actual use in real-time. Libraries with database-to-web gateways or proxy re-writers offer the most comprehensive networking solution for surveying all networked services users during survey periods.

Library User Survey

Library User Survey Patron Status

Library User Survey Affiliation

Library User Survey Location

Library User Survey Purpose of Use

Purpose of Use By Location U.S. Medical Libraries 2003 – 2005 On-Campus, Not in the Library n = 15,948 In the Library n = 6,590 Overall Use n = 27,390 Off-Campus n = 4,852 3 *83% of sponsored research usage occurred outside the library. 92% of this use took place on-campus.

Purpose of Use By Location U.S. Main Campus Libraries 2003 – 2005 On-Campus, Not in the Library n = 9,460 In the Library n = 9,733 All Usage n = 26,983 Off-Campus n = 7,790 3 *72% of sponsored research usage of electronic resources occurred outside the library; 83% of this took place on-campus.

Location of Users 2003-2005 U.S. Medical Library U.S. Main Library 76% 64% 24% 36% All Libraries 70% 30%

Demographics by Location of User U.S. Main Libraries Inside the Library n = 9,172 On Campus, Not in the Library n = 6,391 Off-Campus n = 4,953 Total Users n = 25,698

Demographics by Location of User U.S. Medical Libraries Inside the Library n = 6,819 On Campus, Not in the Library n = 19,582 Off-Campus n = 5,133 Total Users n = 31,883

Location of Users All U.S. Libraries 28% 52% 20% 28% 72%

Demographics of OCUL Users (n=20,300)

OCUL Scholars Portal Users by Purpose of Use (n=20,300)

Location of Networked Electronic Services Users- U. S Location of Networked Electronic Services Users- U.S. and Canadian University Libraries OCUL U.S.

brinley.franklin@uconn.edu terry.plum@simmons.edu martha@arl.org http://www.minesforlibraries.org