Maximising student engagement in learning gain measurement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Human Resource Management 2 Review of the course.
Advertisements

PDP and the HEAR: new opportunities? Rob Ward The Centre for Recording Achievement
Placement Workshop Y2, Sem 2 Professional Practice Module (PPM)
Hillsmeade Primary School Term Teacher Professional Leave These PD and focus group sessions are designed to assist all staff to gain an understanding.
Formative assessment of the Engineering Design process
The NAR flowchart – the moderation cycle
Influencing critical engagement with assessment criteria Darrin Beattie, Careers Service Curriculum Development Officer Coherent Curriculum themes: assessment.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Introduction to the SLTA Project Dr Rosa Spencer Academic Development Officer (Awards and Recognition) November 2013.
Deb Hearle and Nina Cogger.  Cardiff University: Periodic Review & Re-validation  Health Professions Council: Re-Approval  College of Occupational.
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Exploration of Students & Mentors Experiences of Grading Student Competence in Practice. Janet ScammellVanessa Heaslip Senior Academic.
EVIDENCE BASED WRITING LEARN HOW TO WRITE A DETAILED RESPONSE TO A CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE QUESTION!! 5 th Grade ReadingMs. Nelson EDU 643Instructional.
Session 3: Submitting Quality Resources DATE 2013.
Developing a Strategy for Technology Enhanced Learning at UEL.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Lecture 3 THE KEY SKILLS TESTED IN A DISSERTATION.
EFQM Excellence Model & Levels of Excellence Learning Edge - July 05.
Basic Impact Evaluation Course Poverty Analysis Initiative (C102) Poverty Analysis Initiative (C102) World Bank Institute Attacking Poverty Program.
An introduction to the Care Act Learning and Development Programme Staffordshire Managers Quality Network Forum Olivia Redgrave, Area Officer, Skills for.
Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.
Developing Inclusive Learning and Teaching for Disabled Students: The Importance of Staff Training and Continuing Professional Development Alan Hurst Trustee.
Digital Futures in Teacher Education: Briefing meeting for the core team 19 October 2011, SHU.
1 Part 4 Self-review and certification Your progress as a curriculum developer Part 4 Self-review and certification Your progress as a curriculum developer.
Developing a Sustainable Procurement Policy and Strategy EAUC – EAF Programme.
Researching and Writing Dissertations Roy Horn Researching and Writing Dissertations.
Staff: Enhancing Teaching Rowena Pelik, Edinburgh Napier University Together with: Dr Pete Cannell, OU Scotland and topic lead.
Welcome to the First Meeting of the Internationalisation Change programme 22 May 2012.
Building Effective Staff Development to Support Employer Engagement Jane Timlin & Renata Eyres The University of Salford.
Digital Futures in Teacher Education: Open educational resources and quality of teaching Project Lead: Richard Pountney, Faculty of Development and Society.
Application Individualization and Differentiation in Czech Primary Schools - One of the Characteristic Features of Inclusion Application Individualization.
In partnership with Global Learning Programme: Critical thinking in global learning.
CHRISTY GABBARD DR. MARISA RAMIREZ STUKEY Transforming Practice through Building Knowledge and Collaborative Conversations
Main strand session 17 Session Seventeen Measuring Learning 2: Assessment evidence Jim Rogers.
Supporting Teacher Assessment - English. “This half-day meeting is part of a package available to purchase through our e-store. The package is designed.
Using Victorian Curriculum to plan learning in Visual & Media Arts F - 6 Webinar, 23 November 2016.
Spelling and beyond – Curriculum
The British Accreditation Council: ensuring standards
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
MGMT 631 Entrepreneurism Introduction
Proactive librarianship & Effective training skills
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
Learning and Teaching –
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
Reading Between the Lines
Can Embedding Assessment Literacy Exercises within the Curriculum Raise Levels of Student Achievement and Satisfaction with Assessment and Feedback? Learning.
The Literacy Hub Introduction Literacy Toolkit
Diagnostic Essay Feedback Analysis
Encouraging student engagement to increase learning gain
Spelling and beyond Literacy Toolkit HGIOS
CS3004: Research Methods Literature Review
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners Literacy
Learning gain metrics and personal tutoring: Opportunities and ethics
Learning gain metrics and personal tutoring: Opportunities and ethics
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Hull UK City of Culture 2017 and its impacts on wellbeing: key findings, themes and issues from the preliminary outcomes evaluation Professor Franco Bianchini.
Sheffield Hallam University
Nanotechnology & Society
The MODERATION cycle.
Applying for promotion on learning and teaching 1 Gathering Evidence
Evidence for Enhancement: Students Using Students’ Data
Evidence for Enhancement: Engaging Student and Staff Voices
Experts by Experience Group Observations.
Conference name, location
Making it meaningful A continuous cycle to ensure improved outcomes and impact of careers encounters.
Introduction to Extended Reflection 1 Term 1, Development Day 1
Presentation transcript:

Maximising student engagement in learning gain measurement Dr Liz Austen, Nathaniel Pickering and Alan Donnelly Sheffield Hallam University

www.blogs.shu.ac.uk/steer @SHU_StEER Institutional research and evaluation Student experience data Student engagement Student communications Brief introduction to STEER www.blogs.shu.ac.uk/steer @SHU_StEER

NMMLG (Office for Students) Interim evaluation highlighted a number of issues with the data collection process and a low response rate for the longitudinal sample. The evaluation of the NMMLG project, led by Sheffield Hallam University, will continue in the autumn, working with providers and others involved in the project and focusing on improving our understanding of students’ perceptions of learning gain. Brief overview of our role in LG (only use text from OFS announcement) Discuss need to fully understand student engagement/motivation/support/impact (wellbeing) www.blogs.shu.ac.uk/steer @SHU_StEER

www.blogs.shu.ac.uk/steer @SHU_StEER Student engagement LEGACY analysis indicates that to be effective and ensure engagement, learning gain needs to be embedded in the curriculum or as part of developing a set of capabilities and skills that students recognise as necessary. Define student engagement in relation to LG measures www.blogs.shu.ac.uk/steer @SHU_StEER

Survey Design Checklist 1. Access to survey 2. Level of student support 3. Incentives 4. Optimal length of survey 5. Timing and possible information fatigue 6. Question wording and ordering 7. Survey question formats 8. Reporting and debriefing Do we really need another survey? institutional approaches to surveys (using surveys as description of quantitative LG measurement) - referred to as exercise, test etc - VOLUME - REPETITION (of methods and theme) - EXPLOITATION - some HEIs have a blanket ban without a clear business case brief overview of SDC - developed by STEER and used as a basis for evaluation of NMMLG (CAN WE SAY THIS) can be used more widely than LG - handout to follow at the end of the session - contact us for more info and if you want to use please feedback to tell us how Click to animate - all discussion require the questions "do we really need another survey?" to be discussed and debated

Survey Design Checklist Criterion Sector Evidence LG Evidence Incentives - response rates improve when providing a clear narrative for how scheme incentives are administered at the outset - immediate and guaranteed reward alongside longer-term 'lottery' opportunities is optimum Fan and Yan (2010), Cobanoglu and Cobanoglu (2003), Porter and Whitcomb (2003), Singer and Ye (2013) - Retail voucher payment - Charitable donation - Prize draw (two prizes of £500 and five prizes of - £100) - Printing credit - Drink vouchers - Results/personal development - None SDC - each criterion was reviewed to draw on sector evidence to cite best practice. All areas can be applied to LG methodologies. literature review to build checklist - linked to evidence - linked to context (LG - but could be satisfaction, experience, engagement, emplyability)

How can we maximise student engagement in learning gain measurement? Apply your knowledge of LG best practice to the criteria on your handout. Discuss with the person next to you and design the best approach to maximise student engagement (one criterion per pair/group). Provide handouts each with one of the eight criteria for effective survey design (if you really have to do one). In pairs, discuss how you would operationalise this aspect of methodological design to maximise student engagement. www.blogs.shu.ac.uk/steer @SHU_StEER

Reflections and next steps Thoughts on best practice? Handout print version of SDC - Creative Commons license attribute to STEER @ SHU Publication to follow ACCESS - Response rates for students are usually much higher if surveys are embedded within their own programmes of study, rather than seen as additional or institutional. LENGTH - Studies show that an optimal time for students to engage in any survey is approximately 13 minutes. Handout print version of SDC - Creative Commons license attribute to STEER @ SHU take reflections from the audience? (Time) www.blogs.shu.ac.uk/steer @SHU_StEER

www.blogs.shu.ac.uk/steer @SHU_StEER