Beam impedance of 63mm VM with unshielded Bellows

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to RF for Accelerators
Advertisements

Impedance of the TOTEM Roman Pots Nicola Minafra, Benoit Salvant, Nicolò Biancacci, …
Impedance of SPS travelling wave cavities (200 MHz) A. Grudiev, E. Métral, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova, B. Spataro Acknowledgments: Erk Jensen, Eric Montesinos,
1 Presented at ColUSM by D. Ramos on behalf of the Cold Collimator Feasibility Study Working Group Longitudinal.
Calculations of wakefields for the LHCb VeLo. Olga Zagorodnova Desy Hamburg April 29,
RF contact non conformities in LHC interconnects: Impedance aspects N. Mounet, B. Salvant With the help of: Gianluigi Arduini, Vincent Baglin, Serge Claudet,
Particle Studio simulations of the resistive wall impedance of copper cylindrical and rectangular beam pipes C. Zannini E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
TDI longitudinal impedance simulation with CST PS A.Grudiev 20/03/2012.
Introduction to beam impedance O.Berrig 23/
Update on the kicker impedance model and measurements of material properties V.G. Vaccaro, C. Zannini and G. Rumolo Thanks to: M. Barnes, N. Biancacci,
Studies of impedance effects for a composite beam pipe for the experimental areas Request from M. Galilee, G. Schneider (TE/VSC)
Agenda: General kickers analysis Wang-Tsutsui method for computing impedances Benchmarks Conclusions Bibliography Acknowledgments: E.Métral, M.Migliorati,
Outline: Motivation The Mode-Matching Method Analysis of a simple 3D structure Outlook Beam Coupling Impedance for finite length devices N.Biancacci, B.Salvant,
Simulation of Beam Instabilities in SPring-8 T. Nakamura JASRI / SPring-8
Status of the PSB impedance model C. Zannini and G. Rumolo Thanks to: E. Benedetto, N. Biancacci, E. Métral, N. Mounet, T. Rijoff, B. Salvant.
Update of the SPS transverse impedance model Benoit for the impedance team.
IMPEDANCE OF Y-CHAMBER FOR SPS CRAB CAVITY By Phoevos Kardasopoulos Thanks to Benoit Salvant, Pei Zhang, Fred Galleazzi, Roberto Torres-Sanchez and Alick.
Updated status of the PSB impedance model C. Zannini and G. Rumolo Thanks to: E. Benedetto, N. Biancacci, E. Métral, B. Mikulec, N. Mounet, T. Rijoff,
Calculations of wakefields for the LHCb VeLo. Olga Zagorodnova Desy Hamburg April 8,
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator A.Grudiev.
Lecture 25 - E. Wilson - 12/15/ Slide 1 Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
11 Update of the SPS impedance model G. Arduini, O. Berrig, F. Caspers, A. Grudiev, E. Métral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova, B. Spataro (INFN),
Outline: Motivation Comparisons with: > Thick wall formula > CST Thin inserts models Tests on the Mode Matching Method Webmeeting N.Biancacci,
Main activities and news from the Impedance working group.
1 Update on the impedance of the SPS kickers E. Métral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, C. Zannini SPS impedance meeting - Oct. 16 th 2009 Acknowledgments: F. Caspers,
Cavity BPM Simulations A. Liapine. Analysis of the Existing BPMs BINP KEK.
Longitudinal impedance of new RF fingers O. Berrig, C. Garion, B. Salvant.
Update on the TDI impedance simulations and RF heating for HL- LHC beams Alexej Grudiev on behalf of the impedance team TDI re-design meeting 30/10/2012.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
HWR, SSR1 and SSR2 transverse kick summary Paolo Berrutti, Vyacheslav Yakovlev.
Geometric Impedance of LHC Collimators O. Frasciello, S. Tomassini, M. Zobov LNF-INFN Frascati, Italy With contributions and help of N.Mounet (CERN), A.Grudiev.
Finemet cavity impedance studies
Kickers analysis and benchmark
Update on HL-LHC triplet fingers
Benoit Salvant, Kyrre Sjobak, Christine Vollinger, Na Wang
MDI: Trapped modes and other power losses
HOM power in FCC-ee cavities
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
A.KOLOMIETS & A.KOVALENKO
Laser-engineered surface structures (LESS) What is the beam impedance?
TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY
E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant
TCTP the CST side F. Caspers, H. Day, A. Grudiev, E. Metral, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: R. Assmann, A. Dallocchio, L. Gentini, C. Zannini Impedance Meeting.
Beam impedance of 63mm VM with unshielded Bellows
Electromagnetic fields in a resistive cylindrical beam pipe
Laser-engineered surface structures (LESS) What is the beam impedance?
Na Wang and Qing Qin Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, C. Zannini (CERN – BE-ABP-LIS)
Status with Particle Studio simulations
Simulation of Monopole modes trapped in LHC collimator
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator
NEWS ABOUT COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE
Longitudinal Impedance Studies of VMTSA
Simulations and RF Measurements of SPS Beam Position Monitors (BPV and BPH) G. Arduini, C. Boccard, R. Calaga, F. Caspers, A. Grudiev, E. Metral, F. Roncarolo,
Tune shifts in LHC from collimators impedance
Simulation with Particle Studio
Some results on the LHC multibunch modes at 7 TeV/c
CMS vacuum chamber. Geometry for wakefield calculations
TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY
Simulation of Monopole modes trapped in LHC collimator
Power loss in the LHC beam screen at 7 TeV due to the multi-layer longitudinal impedance N. Mounet and E. Métral Goal: Check the effect of the multi-layer.
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
Status of the EM simulations and modeling of ferrite loaded kickers
LHC collimation review follow-up Impedance with IR3MBC option & comparison with phase 1 tight settings N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral Acknowledgements:
Two beam coupling impedance simulations
2nd Week Seminar Sunryul Kim Antennas & RF Devices Lab.
Results on RF-Measurements on 3-Convolution HL-LHC fingers
Current impedance issues
Beam Coupling Impedance for finite length devices
Presentation transcript:

Beam impedance of 63mm VM with unshielded Bellows Tuesday 6/11 2012 O.Berrig & B. Salvant

CST model of the VM module (diameter = 63 mm)

CST model of the RF fingers The natural state of the RF fingers ( The RF fingers will naturally go back to this state ) RF fingers in the machine (cold and stretched)

Theory http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/118026/files/p1.pdf ( page 87 ) This term vanishes at high energy (ɣ large ) ZL = Longitudinal impedance. It is a function of frequency ZL(f) n = (f/frev) frev = Revolution frequency. For the LHC it is 11.2455 kHz = Relativistic beta ~ 1 = Relativistic gamma Z0 = Intrinsic impedance ( ) a = Radius of the beam b = Radius of the inner of the bellow (= radius of beam pipe) b’ = Radius of the outer fold of bellow L = Accumulated length of the bellow, with an outer radius. It is approximately half of the length of the bellow, since approximately half the length has an outer radius, and half of the length has an inner radius R = Radius of the accelerator. For LHC it is (26659 m / 2π)

Theory This formula is only valid up to the first cut-off frequency ====== Value of the beam impedance, when the RF fingers are not pressed together Where: p = 2.405 for the first zero of the TM mode [ J0(p)=0 for cylindrical geometry ] c = speed of light b = radius of beam pipe

Simulation in CST. First task, find the number of meshcells, where the calculations are precise i.e. converge When the lpw (lines per wavelength) is greater than 50, then the Wake impedance converge. The mesh on the left is shown for lpw=60. All further calculations were done with lpw=100 and bunch sigma= 20 ns (the bunch sigma also influence the mesh) corresponding to ~ 40M meshcells.

Effect of pressing the RF fingers together

Difference – with or without holes Zlongitudinal/n = 0.7 *10-4 Ω Zlongitudinal/n = 1.1 *10-4 Ω

Transverse impedance Dipolar impedance Quadrupolar impedance The beam is offset by 5 mm The imaginary dipole impedance = -2.2 Ohm (the real component is zero) Quadrupolar impedance The testbeam is offset by 5 mm The imaginary dipole impedance = 0.003 Ohm (the real component is zero)

Horizontal offset Unfortunately, both of the following structures: “the real structure with the RF-fingers” and a “simplified model”, have problems with unphysical fields that introduces constant potentials in the wake-functions. Reported to CST.

No cavity effect, i.e. fields are not captured

CONCLUSION The longitudinal impedance depends on how much the RF fingers are stretched. The impedance is close to zero in either completely compressed state or completely stretched state. The maximum normalized longitudinal impedance is about: Zlongitudinal/n = 1.5 *10-4 Ω A normalized impedance of 1.5 *10-4 Ω can not be used for all the PIM modules, but only in selected equipment.

Additional Impendance of a structure that is 10mm horizontal offset. There are no vacuum chambers on each side. The structure is seen from above. Horizontal Vertical Longitudinal