Erroneously filed elements of international application

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects STCU/NATO Workshop From Science to Business Kiev, Ukraine October 11, 2006 Judson R. Hightower.
Advertisements

Key Decision Points in the PCT System
Changes to the PCT Regulations that entered into force on 1 April 2007 The Smart Patenting Solution.
Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration
Interim measures in Russian courts in support of international arbitration: principles, procedure and the range of remedies available BRLA seminar 25 January.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
Interface between patent and sui generis systems of protection of plant varieties The 1978 UPOV Act does not allow both systems to be applied to the same.
VIEWS ON THE NEW INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY REPORT ON PATENTABILITY PROCEDURE (“MERGER OF PCT CHAPTERS I AND II”): ADVANTAGES, PROBLEMS AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Company Registration is one of the vital steps after the formation of a company as it gives an identity and legal rights to it. Different countries follow.
Applications for Intellectual Property International IP Protection IP Enforcement Protecting Software JEFFREY L. SNOW, PARTNER NATIONAL SBIR/STTR CONFERENCE.
Software Protection & Scope of the Right holder Options for Developing Countries Presentation by: Dr. Ahmed El Saghir Judge at the Council of State Courts.
Canada OPICCIPO Office de la propriété intellectuelle du Canada Un organisme d’industrie Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office An Agency of Industry.
SAS 70 (Statement on Auditing Standards No. 70) Kelley Piner Charles Roberts Ashley Walker.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association MADRID SYSTEM VS. DIRECT INTERNATIONAL FILINGS BY U.S. PARTIES JPO/AIPLA Joint Meeting.
ACTING FOR THE IP PROFESSION WORLDWIDE State of Play and Expectations in Substantive Patent Law Harmonisation: IP5, the Global Dossier and.
Patents- Practical Aspects of International Patent Procurement/Prosecution June 2015 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Practice Overview.
1 World Intellectual Property Organization PCT-SAFE Preparing PCT Applications Electronically South Africa, February 5-9, 2007.
Corrections/Amendments and Priority/Benefit Claims in International and National Stage Applications
PCT FILING - ADVANTAGES© Dr. S. Padmaja, Managing Partner, iProPAT June 21, 2012.
Why and How the PCT is Used - Advantages and Problems Michael J Caine Convenor - International Patents Committee The Institute of Patent and Trade Mark.
WIPO Global Forum Of Intellectual Property Authorities Geneva, September 17-18, 2009 Panel 5B: Industrial Design Registration Key Design.
SM © 2012 Patterson Thuente Christensen Pedersen, P.A., some rights reserved - DISCLAIMER: This presentation and any information.
1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs John (Jack) J. Penny, V Event.
1 Report of Patents Committee Meeting October 19, 2010 Kenji Asai Co-chair of the Patents Committee.
Margaret Polson Polson Intellectual Property Law, PC US Design Patents Overview.
The Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Kiev March Noëlle Moutout Assistant Legal Officer.
PCT PATENT COOPERATION TREATY By: Nico Reyes & Keziah Tan.
Building Industry Authority Determination 2003/3 Commentary Paul Clements.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
Patents Around the World: India Dr. Rajeshkumar Acharya.
WIPO Patent Search. DO I NEED A PATENT SEARCH ? A patent search is a good idea but it costs money upfront. Deciding whether to spend the money on a patent.
The International Patent System July 2016 PCT Rule Changes Matthias Reischle-Park Deputy Director, PCT Legal Division June 28, 2016.
The International Patent System Amendments to the PCT Regulations as from 1 July 2016.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
IP experiences and challenges of SMEs of the Republic of Tajikistan
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
Recent Developments at the International Level
INTELECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Webinar on ePCT Electronic portal for PCT applications
Patenting innovative products
PATENT OFFICE PROSECUTION
PATENT Designed and Developed by IP Laboratory, MNNIT Allahabad , Uttar Pradesh, India.
AMENDMENT ON TAX LAWS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION LAWS
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way
Introduction to the International World of Intellectual Property (IP)
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
IP Protection under the WTO
Welcome to IST e-Lab Entrepreneurship Lab, 3rd Session, 06 November 2017.
Accelerating your Patent Prosecution in Mexico
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Workshop on Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts
Best Practices in Maintaining Personnel Files
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects
Transmitted by the expert
Best practices in the PCT international phase Session 2
Business benefits and advantages of protecting intellectual property
The IP International framework Seminar on the Role of IP for SMEs Damascus, November 17 and 18, 2008 Marco Marzano de Marinis, Program Officer.
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Third Session Santiago January 20 to 22, 2016.
Workshop on Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts
Appeal Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
Workshop on Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts
UNION-IP UNION of European Practitioners in Intellectual Property
Japan Intellectual Property Association
Unity of invention – outcome of the IP5 work MEETING OF INTERNATIONAL AUTHORITIES – QUALITY SUBGROUP Camille Bogliolo (PCT Affairs) and Luigi Petrucci.
Review on new matters under 20.5 & 20.5bis
Katherine Hawthorne, BS, rn, CCRP Program Manager
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

Erroneously filed elements of international application FICPI perspective Presented on Workshop at WIPO in Geneva, 19.06.2018 by Mr. Vladimir Rybakov

FICPI - International Federation of Intellectual Property Attorneys FICPI is unique, being the only international NGO whose membership consists exclusively of IP attorneys in private practice. FICPI thus represents an important constituency within the international IP system. Some key facts: Founded over 100 years ago, in 1906, FICPI now has more than 5,000 members in more than 80 countries on six continents. Before being admitted, an applicant for membership of FICPI must satisfy prescribed criteria as to their character, experience and international reputation. FICPI members represent their clients in patent, trade mark and design matters, and related forms of IP, at the national, regional and international levels. Clients of FICPI members range from individuals and SMEs to multi-national industries, as well as universities, governmental and non-governmental organizations and other institutions, who are applicants and non-applicants alike. Acting for the IP profession worldwide www.ficpi.org

Erroneously filed elements or parts thereof In recent years FICPI has observed a global trend to make patent systems more and more user-friendly. The incorporation of provisions of the Patent Law Treaty ( PLT) into the patent laws of many countries and regions has given many new approaches correcting mistakes and extending time limits with respect to formal aspects of the patenting procedure. We believe PCT is also subject to move in this direction, and the incorporation of provisions similar to those in the PLT into the PCT is an example of this. Acting for the IP profession worldwide www.ficpi.org

Erroneously filed elements or parts thereof FICPI believes that applicants should be permitted to correct very formal and obvious mistakes. This extends to the substitution of erroneously filed elements or parts thereof with the correct element or part as contained wholly in one or more priority application, provided that requirements of Rule 20 are met. The increased use of ePCT which involves the uploading of documents stored on a computer increases the opportunity for incorrect documents to be uploaded. In this regard it is easy for an assistant to upload an incorrect document even when the responsible attorney has signed off on a particular specification to be used for the filing. Accordingly, the move to electronic filing systems such as ePCT has increased the need for such a remedial provision. Acting for the IP profession worldwide www.ficpi.org

Erroneously filed elements or parts thereof Missing part = omitted by mistake Erroneously filed element = unintentionally filed Missing part – usually a sheet of paper accidentally missed when printing or copying paper workflow – XX century Erroneously filed element – usually an electronic file accidentally (by mistake)uploaded when using electronic filing system. paperless (electronic) workflow - XXI century Acting for the IP profession worldwide www.ficpi.org

Erroneously filed elements or parts thereof In providing for this ability it will important to include some safeguards to avoid use of this option by applicants to exchange elements to intentionally gain advantages, for example with respect to third parties, but not to correct an actual mistake. To achieve this balance, we offer the following approach. FICPI would welcome any amendment to the PCT Rules to introduce (or clarify) that an erroneous element or part thereof, filed together with the Request in a PCT application, can be replaced with the correct element or part thereof provided that the following conditions are met: Acting for the IP profession worldwide www.ficpi.org

APPROACH OF FICPI - CONDITIONS At the time of filing the PCT application, in the Request or separately, the applicant has claimed priority to one or more earlier applications and also has made a statement of incorporation by reference, in respect of those earlier applications; The replacement of the erroneous element or part is made before the publication of the PCT application, within the time limits referred to in the Rule 20.7 (or a possible new rule); Acting for the IP profession worldwide www.ficpi.org

APPROACH OF FICPI - CONDITIONS There should be a statement by the applicant explaining why a filed element or part thereof should be considered as erroneous, and possibly also a fee for processing the substitution; The particular element or part should be totally removed from the application with reference to Rule 9 PCT, or similar rule to cover removal or erroneous element or part thereof. Acting for the IP profession worldwide www.ficpi.org

APPROACH OF FICPI - JUSTIFICATION It is reasonable that a replacement (of an entire element or a part thereof ) is allowed under these conditions, taking into account The possibility of extending the priority term from 12 month up to 14 month, after even more serious mistake by the applicant, namely a failure to file PCT application within the prescribed 12 month term, And that, under the Rule 2(5) PLT, the description and any drawings may be replaced when filing a national or national entry patent application (though it does not rule directly International phase of PCT applications) Acting for the IP profession worldwide www.ficpi.org

APPROACH OF FICPI FICPI does not put this proposal forward as an exhaustive solution to the problem, but considers it to be a good starting point for consideration. Acting for the IP profession worldwide www.ficpi.org

FICPI - International Federation of Intellectual Property Attorneys THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION Acting for the IP profession worldwide www.ficpi.org