Vito Genna, Matteo Colombo, Marco De Vivo, Marco Marcia  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Advertisements

Structure and Function of Argonaute Proteins
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Structure of the Replicating Complex of a Pol α Family DNA Polymerase
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
The Mechanism of the Translocation Step in DNA Replication by DNA Polymerase I: A Computer Simulation Analysis  Andrei A. Golosov, Joshua J. Warren, Lorena.
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Hubert Kettenberger, Karim-Jean Armache, Patrick Cramer  Cell 
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Rahul C. Deo, Caroline M. Groft, K.R. Rajashankar, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Mechanism of Poly(A) Polymerase: Structure of the Enzyme-MgATP-RNA Ternary Complex and Kinetic Analysis  Paul B. Balbo, Andrew Bohm  Structure  Volume.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
R Bryan Sutton, Stephen R Sprang  Structure 
Structural Basis for a New Templated Activity by Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase: Implications for V(D)J Recombination  Jérôme Loc'h, Sandrine Rosario,
Structural Insights into the Inhibition of Wnt Signaling by Cancer Antigen 5T4/Wnt- Activated Inhibitory Factor 1  Yuguang Zhao, Tomas Malinauskas, Karl.
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages (November 1996)
snRNA Catalysts in the Spliceosome’s Ancient Core
Structure and Function of Argonaute Proteins
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Structural Roles of Monovalent Cations in the HDV Ribozyme
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Structural Basis of Homology-Directed DNA Repair Mediated by RAD52
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Oliver Weichenrieder, Kostas Repanas, Anastassis Perrakis  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ski7 Is a GTP-Binding Protein Adopting the Characteristic Conformation of Active Translational GTPases  Eva Kowalinski, Anthony.
Structure of an mRNA Capping Enzyme Bound to the Phosphorylated Carboxy-Terminal Domain of RNA Polymerase II  Carme Fabrega, Vincent Shen, Stewart Shuman,
Qun Liu, Qingqiu Huang, Xin Gen Lei, Quan Hao  Structure 
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Brownian Dynamics Simulations of the Interaction of Chlamydomonas Cytochrome f with Plastocyanin and Cytochrome c6  Elizabeth L. Gross, Douglas C. Pearson 
DNA Synthesis across an Abasic Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase ι
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Gregory J. Miller, James H. Hurley  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Molecular Structures of Transcribing RNA Polymerase I
Structural Basis for Ligand Binding to the Guanidine-I Riboswitch
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Restriction Enzyme BsoBI–DNA Complex
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Second-Shell Basic Residues Expand the Two-Metal-Ion Architecture of DNA and RNA Processing Enzymes  Vito Genna, Matteo Colombo, Marco De Vivo, Marco Marcia  Structure  Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 40-50.e2 (January 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2017.11.008 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Structure 2018 26, 40-50.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.11.008) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structural Comparison of the Catalytic Sites of Representative Two-Metal-Ion Enzymes (A) Group II intron (PDB: 4FAR). (B) Restriction endonuclease BamHI (PDB: 2BAM). (C) SpyCas9 (RuvC active site modeled from PDB: 4CMQ and 5F9R). (D) Exonuclease Exo-λ (modeled from PDB: 4WUZ and 3SM4). (E) DNA polymerase Pol-η (PDB: 4ECS). (F) RNA polymerase Pol-II (PDB: 2E2H, predicted from medium-resolution structures, see Table S2). Each top panel presents the structure of the active site of the respective molecules in ribbon-stick representation. End each bottom panel presents the molecular surface surrounding the two-metal-ion active sites (radii 15 Å) colored by intensity of electrostatic potential (−10 kT/[darkest red] to +10 kT/e [darkest blue]). Catalytic divalent ions (MA-MB) are depicted as orange spheres, substrates are represented in green, and the backbone of the corresponding macromolecule is in gray, with acidic residues coordinating MA-MB represented as sticks. K1- and K2-like elements are depicted as spheres (for ions) or sticks (for amino acids) in blue and in red, respectively. “W” indicates water molecules. Black dashed lines indicate ionic or hydrogen-bond interactions established by K1-and K2-like elements with active site residues and reactants. K1-like elements rigidify the residues that coordinate MA-MB, while K2-like elements orient the substrates into the active site. All structures have been drawn using PyMOL. Structure 2018 26, 40-50.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.11.008) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Positioning of K1- and K2-like Elements with Respect to the Two-Metal-Centered Active Site (A) The plot reports distances in angstroms of K1-like elements from the acidic residues that coordinate MA-MB (d K1-acidic, blue dots) and of K2-like elements from the substrate (d K2-substrate, red dots). The gray shade covers the optimal range of distances for hydrogen bonds and ionic interactions (Ippolito et al., 1990). Several outliers correspond to structures solved at low resolution (i.e., PDB: 5FJ8) or with no metals in the active site (i.e., PDB: 1IAW). For enzymes in which K1 contacts acidic residues indirectly (PDB: 2BAM, 1DMU, 1QPS, and 2ALZ), we reported the closest distance to the linking residue (see also Tables 1 and S1). For structures where K2 is present, but the substrate is not resolved in the PDB file (PDB: 3S1S, 1FOK, 4OGC, 5B2O, and 5AXW), we did not plot any data point (see Tables 1 and S1). In exo-λ structure PDB: 4WUZ, the “d K1-acidic” and “d K2-substrate” data points overlap and only the blue dot is actually visible. The names of the enzymes are on the x axis, corresponding PDB codes are indicated on top of every data point. Enzymes are arranged by classes and their respective Enzymatic Classification (E.C.) numbers are indicated on the top of the graph. (B) Overlap of the structures reported in (A), aligned manually in Coot using the substrate and the two-metal-ion center as a guide. For clarity, substrate (green cartoon) and MA-MB center (orange spheres) are represented only for endonuclease BamHI. Blue and red spheres represent the position of the K1- and K2-like elements from all structures, respectively. For clarity, we only represent the position of the potassium ion (for ribozymes), of the epsilon nitrogen atom (for lysine residues), or of the guanidinium carbon atom (for arginine residues), as appropriate. Gray circles represent spheres of a radius of 4.0 Å (K1) and 3.5 Å (K2) and identify sites 4 (K1) and 3 (K2), respectively, as described in Figure 4 and in the main text. Structure 2018 26, 40-50.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.11.008) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Polymerase Pol-η Mutated at the K1- and K2-Sites Top: frequency distribution of the Watson-Crick inter-strand H-bonds in wild-type Pol-η, and in Pol-η mutated at the K1 site (K231A, K1-mutant), at the K2 site (K224A, K2-mutant), and at both K1 and K2 sites (K224A/K231A, K1-K2-mutant). Bottom: frequency distribution of the length d-newbond, defined in the main text (Genna et al., 2016a). Structure 2018 26, 40-50.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.11.008) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structural Model Recapitulating Positions and Possible Roles of K1- and K2-like Positive Charges in the Active Site of Two-Metal-Ion Enzymes In the active site, strictly conserved acidic residues (“acidic”) coordinate two divalent ions (M2+) that catalyze synthesis or scission of phosphodiester bonds in the DNA/RNA substrate. “5′-nt” and “3′-nt” indicate nucleotides on the 5′ and 3′ side of the reaction site, respectively. In all enzymes discussed in this work, the active site is completed by the presence of two positively charged elements that correspond to the group II intron K1 and K2 ions. These structural elements are either basic amino acids or monovalent cations. These elements likely contribute to rigidify the active site for optimal M2+ binding and to orient the substrate for catalysis. Sites 1, 2, and 3 are structural positions previously identified by Steitz and Steitz (1993), and site 4 is a structural site identified as described in the main text (see the Results section). Sites 3 and 4 encompass K2- and K1-like residues, respectively. Structure 2018 26, 40-50.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.11.008) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Prediction of K1- and K2-like Residues in Medium-Resolution Cryoelectron microscopy Structures of the Spliceosome (A) Representation of the active site of the spliceosomal C complex from S. cerevisiae immediately after branching (PDB: 5LJ3). (B) Electrostatic distribution around the active site. Structural elements are oriented and color coded as in Figure 1. A putative potassium ion at the K1-site is indicated (K1), although not modeled in the actual structure (see main text for details). Structure 2018 26, 40-50.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.11.008) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions