Professor Ronald L. Carter

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAPTER 4 CONDUCTION IN SEMICONDUCTORS
Advertisements

L3 January 221 Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization EE5342, Lecture 3-Spring 2002 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 6 - Fall 2010 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 5 - Fall 2009 Professor Ronald L. Carter
Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization – EE5342 Lecture 6 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 06 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
Semiconductor Device Physics
Carrier Transport Phenomena
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 14 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
L 04 Sept 041 EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 4 - Fall 2003 Professor Ronald L. Carter
Potential vs. Kinetic Energy
Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization – EE5342 Lecture 09– Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization – EE5342 Lecture 3 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 13 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 05 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
L04 24Jan021 Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization EE5342, Lecture 4-Spring 2002 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 07 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
L08 Feb 081 Lecture 08 Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization EE Spring 2001 Professor Ronald L. Carter
Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization – EE5342 Lecture 7 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization – EE5342 Lecture 5 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EXAMPLE 4.1 OBJECTIVE Solution Comment
EE105 - Spring 2007 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits
Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization – EE5342 Lecture 8 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 04 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 6 - Fall 2009 Professor Ronald L. Carter
Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization – EE5342 Lecture 10– Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
L4 January 271 Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization EE5342, Lecture 4-Spring 2005 Professor Ronald L. Carter
Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization – EE5342 Lecture 4 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EEE209/ECE230 Semiconductor Devices and Materials
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Recall-Lecture 3 Atomic structure of Group IV materials particularly on Silicon Intrinsic carrier concentration, ni.
Lecture 4 OUTLINE Semiconductor Fundamentals (cont’d)
Announcements HW1 is posted, due Tuesday 9/4
Recall-Lecture 3 Atomic structure of Group IV materials particularly on Silicon Intrinsic carrier concentration, ni.
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 06 – Spring 2011
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 4 - Fall 2009
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 13 - Fall 2010
Lecture 5 OUTLINE Semiconductor Fundamentals (cont’d)
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 4 - Fall 2010
Lecture #5 OUTLINE Intrinsic Fermi level Determination of EF
Lecture #8 OUTLINE Generation and recombination
Read: Chapter 2 (Section 2.3)
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Lecture 4 OUTLINE Semiconductor Fundamentals (cont’d)
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 14 - Fall 2010
Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 05 – Spring 2011
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 04 – Spring 2011
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Semiconductor Device Physics
Lecture 4 Carrier Transport Phenomena
Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 5 - Fall 2010
Lecture 5 OUTLINE Semiconductor Fundamentals (cont’d)
Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 5 - Fall 2003
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 14 - Fall 2009
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 13 - Fall 2009
Since (pp) >>(np)
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 07 – Spring 2011
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 13 - Fall 2003
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 6 - Fall 2003
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 13 – Spring 2011
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Presentation transcript:

Professor Ronald L. Carter ronc@uta.edu http://www.uta.edu/ronc/ Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization EE5342, Lecture 4-Spring 2004 Professor Ronald L. Carter ronc@uta.edu http://www.uta.edu/ronc/ L4 January 29

Web Pages You should be aware of information at R. L. Carter’s web page www.uta.edu/ronc/ EE 5342 web page and syllabus www.uta.edu/ronc/5342/syllabus.htm University and College Ethics Policies www2.uta.edu/discipline/ www.uta.edu/ronc/5342/Ethics.htm Submit a signed copy to Dr. Carter L4 January 29

First Assignment e-mail to listserv@listserv.uta.edu In the body of the message include subscribe EE5342 This will subscribe you to the EE5342 list. Will receive all EE5342 messages If you have any questions, send to ronc@uta.edu, with EE5342 in subject line. L4 January 29

Equilibrium concentrations Charge neutrality requires q(po + Nd+) + (-q)(no + Na-) = 0 Assuming complete ionization, so Nd+ = Nd and Na- = Na Gives two equations to be solved simultaneously 1. Mass action, no po = ni2, and 2. Neutrality po + Nd = no + Na L4 January 29

Equilibrium electron conc. and energies L4 January 29

Equilibrium hole conc. and energies L4 January 29

Mobility Summary The concept of mobility introduced as a response function to the electric field in establishing a drift current Resistivity and conductivity defined Model equation def for m(Nd,Na,T) Resistivity models developed for extrinsic and compensated materials L4 January 29

Drift current resistance Given: a semiconductor resistor with length, l, and cross-section, A. What is the resistance? As stated previously, the conductivity, s = nqmn + pqmp So the resistivity, r = 1/s = 1/(nqmn + pqmp) L4 January 29

Exp. mobility model function for Si1 Parameter As P B mmin 52.2 68.5 44.9 mmax 1417 1414 470.5 Nref 9.68e16 9.20e16 2.23e17 a 0.680 0.711 0.719 L4 January 29

Exp. mobility model for P, As and B in Si L4 January 29

Carrier mobility functions (cont.) The parameter mmax models 1/tlattice the thermal collision rate The parameters mmin, Nref and a model 1/timpur the impurity collision rate The function is approximately of the ideal theoretical form: 1/mtotal = 1/mthermal + 1/mimpurity L4 January 29

Carrier mobility functions (ex.) Let Nd = 1.78E17/cm3 of phosphorous, so mmin = 68.5, mmax = 1414, Nref = 9.20e16 and a = 0.711. Thus mn = 586 cm2/V-s Let Na = 5.62E17/cm3 of boron, so mmin = 44.9, mmax = 470.5, Nref = 9.68e16 and a = 0.680. Thus mp = 189 cm2/V-s L4 January 29

Lattice mobility The mlattice is the lattice scattering mobility due to thermal vibrations Simple theory gives mlattice ~ T-3/2 Experimentally mn,lattice ~ T-n where n = 2.42 for electrons and 2.2 for holes Consequently, the model equation is mlattice(T) = mlattice(300)(T/300)-n L4 January 29

Ionized impurity mobility function The mimpur is the scattering mobility due to ionized impurities Simple theory gives mimpur ~ T3/2/Nimpur Consequently, the model equation is mimpur(T) = mimpur(300)(T/300)3/2 L4 January 29

Net silicon (ex- trinsic) resistivity Since r = s-1 = (nqmn + pqmp)-1 The net conductivity can be obtained by using the model equation for the mobilities as functions of doping concentrations. The model function gives agreement with the measured s(Nimpur) L4 January 29

Net silicon extr resistivity (cont.) L4 January 29

Net silicon extr resistivity (cont.) Since r = (nqmn + pqmp)-1, and mn > mp, (m = qt/m*) we have rp > rn Note that since 1.6(high conc.) < rp/rn < 3(low conc.), so 1.6(high conc.) < mn/mp < 3(low conc.) L4 January 29

Net silicon (com- pensated) res. For an n-type (n >> p) compensated semiconductor, r = (nqmn)-1 But now n = N = Nd - Na, and the mobility must be considered to be determined by the total ionized impurity scattering Nd + Na = NI Consequently, a good estimate is r = (nqmn)-1 = [Nqmn(NI)]-1 L4 January 29

Equipartition theorem The thermodynamic energy per degree of freedom is kT/2 Consequently, L4 January 29

Carrier velocity saturation1 The mobility relationship v = mE is limited to “low” fields v < vth = (3kT/m*)1/2 defines “low” v = moE[1+(E/Ec)b]-1/b, mo = v1/Ec for Si parameter electrons holes v1 (cm/s) 1.53E9 T-0.87 1.62E8 T-0.52 Ec (V/cm) 1.01 T1.55 1.24 T1.68 b 2.57E-2 T0.66 0.46 T0.17 L4 January 29

vdrift [cm/s] vs. E [V/cm] (Sze2, fig. 29a) L4 January 29

Carrier velocity saturation (cont.) At 300K, for electrons, mo = v1/Ec = 1.53E9(300)-0.87/1.01(300)1.55 = 1504 cm2/V-s, the low-field mobility The maximum velocity (300K) is vsat = moEc = v1 = 1.53E9 (300)-0.87 = 1.07E7 cm/s L4 January 29

Diffusion of carriers In a gradient of electrons or holes, =p and =n are not zero Diffusion current,`J =`Jp +`Jn (note Dp and Dn are diffusion coefficients) L4 January 29

Diffusion of carriers (cont.) Note (=p)x has the magnitude of dp/dx and points in the direction of increasing p (uphill) The diffusion current points in the direction of decreasing p or n (downhill) and hence the - sign in the definition of`Jp and the + sign in the definition of`Jn L4 January 29

Diffusion of Carriers (cont.) L4 January 29

Current density components L4 January 29

Total current density L4 January 29

Doping gradient induced E-field If N = Nd-Na = N(x), then so is Ef-Efi Define f = (Ef-Efi)/q = (kT/q)ln(no/ni) For equilibrium, Efi = constant, but for dN/dx not equal to zero, Ex = -df/dx =- [d(Ef-Efi)/dx](kT/q) = -(kT/q) d[ln(no/ni)]/dx = -(kT/q) (1/no)[dno/dx] = -(kT/q) (1/N)[dN/dx], N > 0 L4 January 29

Induced E-field (continued) Let Vt = kT/q, then since nopo = ni2 gives no/ni = ni/po Ex = - Vt d[ln(no/ni)]/dx = - Vt d[ln(ni/po)]/dx = - Vt d[ln(ni/|N|)]/dx, N = -Na < 0 Ex = - Vt (-1/po)dpo/dx = Vt(1/po)dpo/dx = Vt(1/Na)dNa/dx L4 January 29

The Einstein relationship For Ex = - Vt (1/no)dno/dx, and Jn,x = nqmnEx + qDn(dn/dx) = 0 This requires that nqmn[Vt (1/n)dn/dx] = qDn(dn/dx) Which is satisfied if L4 January 29

Direct carrier gen/recomb k Ec Ev (Excitation can be by light) gen rec - + Ev Ec Ef Efi L4 January 29

Direct gen/rec of excess carriers Generation rates, Gn0 = Gp0 Recombination rates, Rn0 = Rp0 In equilibrium: Gn0 = Gp0 = Rn0 = Rp0 In non-equilibrium condition: n = no + dn and p = po + dp, where nopo=ni2 and for dn and dp > 0, the recombination rates increase to R’n and R’p L4 January 29

Direct rec for low-level injection Define low-level injection as dn = dp < no, for n-type, and dn = dp < po, for p-type The recombination rates then are R’n = R’p = dn(t)/tn0, for p-type, and R’n = R’p = dp(t)/tp0, for n-type Where tn0 and tp0 are the minority-carrier lifetimes L4 January 29

Shockley-Read- Hall Recomb Indirect, like Si, so intermediate state Ec Ec ET Ef Efi Ev Ev k L4 January 29

S-R-H trap characteristics1 The Shockley-Read-Hall Theory requires an intermediate “trap” site in order to conserve both E and p If trap neutral when orbited (filled) by an excess electron - “donor-like” Gives up electron with energy Ec - ET “Donor-like” trap which has given up the extra electron is +q and “empty” L4 January 29

S-R-H trap char. (cont.) If trap neutral when orbited (filled) by an excess hole - “acceptor-like” Gives up hole with energy ET - Ev “Acceptor-like” trap which has given up the extra hole is -q and “empty” Balance of 4 processes of electron capture/emission and hole capture/ emission gives the recomb rates L4 January 29

tpo = (Ntvthsn)-1, where sn~p(rBohr)2 S-R-H recombination Recombination rate determined by: Nt (trap conc.), vth (thermal vel of the carriers), sn (capture cross sect for electrons), sp (capture cross sect for holes), with tno = (Ntvthsn)-1, and tpo = (Ntvthsn)-1, where sn~p(rBohr)2 L4 January 29

S-R-H recomb. (cont.) In the special case where tno = tpo = to the net recombination rate, U is L4 January 29

S-R-H “U” function characteristics The numerator, (np-ni2) simplifies in the case of extrinsic material at low level injection (for equil., nopo = ni2) For n-type (no > dn = dp > po = ni2/no): (np-ni2) = (no+dn)(po+dp)-ni2 = nopo - ni2 + nodp + dnpo + dndp ~ nodp (largest term) Similarly, for p-type, (np-ni2) ~ podn L4 January 29

S-R-H “U” function characteristics (cont) For n-type, as above, the denominator = to{no+dn+po+dp+2nicosh[(Et-Ei)kT]}, simplifies to the smallest value for Et~Ei, where the denom is tono, giving U = dp/to as the largest (fastest) For p-type, the same argument gives U = dn/to Rec rate, U, fixed by minority carrier L4 January 29

S-R-H net recom- bination rate, U In the special case where tno = tpo = to = (Ntvthso)-1 the net rec. rate, U is L4 January 29

S-R-H rec for excess min carr For n-type low-level injection and net excess minority carriers, (i.e., no > dn = dp > po = ni2/no), U = dp/to, (prop to exc min carr) For p-type low-level injection and net excess minority carriers, (i.e., po > dn = dp > no = ni2/po), U = dn/to, (prop to exc min carr) L4 January 29

Minority hole lifetimes. Taken from Shur3, (p.101). L4 January 29

Minority electron lifetimes. Taken from Shur3, (p.101). L4 January 29

Parameter example tmin = (45 msec) 1+(7.7E-18cm3)Ni+(4.5E-36cm6)Ni2 For Nd = 1E17cm3, tp = 25 msec Why Nd and tp ? L4 January 29

References 1Device Electronics for Integrated Circuits, 2 ed., by Muller and Kamins, Wiley, New York, 1986. 2Physics of Semiconductor Devices, by S. M. Sze, Wiley, New York, 1981. L4 January 29