Parish meeting April 23 rd Discussion of planning applications – WYE2 in detail Traffic analysis for the Neighbourhood Plan The new Our Place Wye project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Barriers and Solutions Modern Methods of Construction
Advertisements

WHAT MAKES A PLACE SPECIAL? Newtown exercise. Note  These outputs reflect the discussion at the seminar  The responses are those of the participating.
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy Update Riding Mill Parish Council 28 April.
UPAVON PARISH COUNCIL PUBLIC MEETING WHISTLEDOWN FARM DEVELOPMENT 04 JUNE 2014.
A COMMUNITY LED PLAN FOR BISHOPSTONE? Public Meeting – 18 th October 2012.
Somerford Keynes Parish Council Neighbourhood Development Plan PARISH PRESENTATION 19 th JANUARY 2015.
Urban Design PrinCIPLes UrbAn DeSigN Done By : Majed Al-madhoun 2010.
Site Location Site Bus Stop Footbridge 400, 800, 1,200 and 1,600 Metre Walk Distance Primary Shopping Areas
Public Meeting Agenda – September 13, 2007 Provide an Update on the Committee’s Work Discuss Emerging Vision for Redevelopment of Town-owned Property.
“Putting people and place before the movement of motor vehicles”….. unlocking… “the full potential of our streets to become vibrant, safe and attractive.
Arlington Traffic Management Plan Presentation to Arlington Parish AGM 19 th April 2012.
Objecting to Development
Response to the consultation document What was said How the plan has changed.
The Neighbourhood Plan Not a wish list of projects but a planning policy document Should not repeat local or national policy A blueprint for sustainable.
Public Meeting Monday 24 th February Welcome Ian Hutton Chair of Lavant Parish Council Alan Taylor Chair of LPC Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group.
Core Strategy – Radstock Action Group 14 January 09 Bath & North East Somerset’s Core Strategy David Trigwell Divisional Director Planning & Transport.
Mactaggart & Mickel Good Design…. a housebuilder’s view
Wootton Wawen Neighbourhood Plan Wootton Wawen Neighbourhood Plan Welcome Survey feedback Current status of activities What next?
City Council 2642 Second Street Appeal of Landmarks Commission Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness 07CA-009 February 12, 2008.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Richmond Highway Transit Center Feasibility Study Briefing with the Fairfax County Transportation.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Development of Lantau Island. Background of the development Lantau Island is the biggest island in Hong Kong Well recognized for its nature conservation.
Hebden Bridge Civic Trust 3rd March 2009 Conservation Areas, Appraisals & the Historic Environment Chris Edwards & Kate Peach Conservation Section Calderdale.
Planning the Future to enhance and sustain our town PETERSFIELD TOWN DESIGN STATEMENT.
Development & Building Control Welcome to e-Learning for Submission of Development Control Plan Next.
Planning for the future of our district Core strategy options Presentation to C4B Associates February 2010.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION Saint John. ATSJ VISION A City that supports a high quality of life where calm and friendly streets encourage the connection between.
Shenstone Neighbourhood Plan Working Groups launch event 18 th June 2013.
Welcome and Introduction to GNTP Forum Councillor Jane Urquhart Portfolio Holder for Transport and Area Working Nottingham City Council.
City of Suwanee 2030 comprehensive plan. TODAY’S AGENDA Process Update Community Agenda Framework “Compass” Review  Images and Questions  Comp Plan.
Your town – your plan Bishop’s Stortford Neighbourhood Plan All Saints, Central, South and part of Thorley Neighbourhood Plan Team Meeting May 12 th 2015.
Woodford Neighbourhood Forum Questionnaire Preliminary Analysis of Results.
LAND USE ZONES.
Collaton St Mary Masterplan: Additional Consultation on Access Arrange ments Introduction This consultation is about options for access into the Collaton.
Neighbourhood Development Plan December 1 st, 2013.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
+ Who will be affected by this development? (Stakeholders)
An area of significant change and identified as: Placeshaping in West Hampstead Area of Intensification in the London Plan Work completed and underway:
Update for Businesses Thursday 28 January 2016 Eloise Appleby Assistant Director (Economy & Communities) Winnall Planning Framework.
Preparing Neighbourhood Plans Joanna Widdecombe. Content A process ‘refresher’-just what have we got to do again? Site assessment and allocations- what.
Little Chalfont Community Association Little Chalfont Parish Council 0.
1 Planning 4A7 Design & the Built Environment Dept. of Civil, Structural, & Environmental John O’Connor.
Potomac Hill Campus Master Plan Preliminary Planning Principles “Observing the Past, Planning the Future” Campus Master Plan Potomac Hill.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Historic Landmarks Commission Type II Appeal of Approval LU HDZ –
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
HAVE YOUR SAY! Six week consultation period 15th February - 28th March 2016 DRAFT UTTOXETER NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN.
STAMFORD CAPACITY AND LIMITS TO GROWTH STUDY SOUTH KESTEVEN DISTRICT COUNCIL FINAL REPORT PRESENTATION PRESENTERS: UNA McGAUGHRIN JESSE HONEY 14 TH DECEMBER.
The Local Authority Experience Suzanne Parkes Senior Planning Policy Officer PAS EVENT: THURSDAY 8 th SEPTEMBER 2011 UNDERSTANDING AND RESPONDING TO PLANNING.
Woodford Neighbourhood Forum 1. 2 This presentation is a brief summary of the work of WNF. It is supported by two circulated documents The Annual Progress.
19th November 2015 Wealden Local Plan – Issues, Options and Recommendations East Hoathly with Halland Parish Council.
By Stefanie Rachmann-Davies “A discussion upon the NPPF’s use of ‘Severe’ as a term of impact severity and how this is being interpreted within the industry.”
Housing – have your say The Vale’s Local Plan proposes large numbers of new houses in Radley – see map. The Local Plan also has guidelines for the design,
shaping our future together 2016 through to 2031
 .
Feedback – key themes : Traffic
Cambourne to Cambridge Better Bus Journeys
Cambourne to Cambridge
Land South of The Street, Hatfield Peverel
The Plan - Information Stage 1
The Regeneration of Swanley
Future Village development key requirements
Shaping the future of Laverstock and Ford Parish
New Southwark Plan: Area Visions and Site Allocations Consultation
Steering and Working Groups’ Meeting of 13th January 2016
Location Plans & Site Plans
PUBLIC CONSULTATION WORKSHOP BBB VILLAGE HALL 10 NOVEMBER 2014
Neighbourhood Plans What is a Neighbourhood Plan?
Land Use 101: The Design Process
Royal Leamington Spa Neighbourhood Development Plan 2029
Presentation transcript:

Parish meeting April 23 rd Discussion of planning applications – WYE2 in detail Traffic analysis for the Neighbourhood Plan The new Our Place Wye project

Planning applications for WYE1 and WYE2 challenge the principles agreed for the Neighbourhood Plan Applications Go against the principles agreed at workshops Conflict with the agreed outlines for village design Fail to include innovative proposals to improve the village boundaries Overlook problems with traffic flow Both applications attempt to squeeze in more houses than allocated by Ashford Borough Council FOCUS ON WYE2 today

The WYE 2 site Luckley Field Map of the area highlighting access through Little Chequers Site allocated by ABC in the Tenterden and Rural Sites DPD (2010) for 20 houses Significance of the site as a gateway to Wye Opportunity to improve the area and enhance the edge of the village WYE2

Neighbourhood Plan policy for WYE2 Developed from Workshops and responding to the results of the questionnaire Workshop in action - reaching consensus over plans for sites

Images of the Neighbourhood Plan designs for WYE2 overall layout link to village centre outside 5min walk inclusion of the cycle route around the village

Images of the Neighbourhood Plan designs Red line village boundary Two access routes Transitional zone before houses Visual and physical links to the countryside

DHA application proposals for WYE2 General layout with access only through Little Chequers

More detailed comparison of views into the site The boundary has been extended in the DHA plans allowing more houses to be built –beyond the authorised red line Our plan DHA plan

Criticism of design features Guidance in the Village Design Statement and Kent Downs Landscape Design handbook has not been followed The VDS guidelines on Design states that …designs based on a confused mixture of architectural styles and decoration, that mimic but lack the integrity of genuine historic buildings, should not be considered. The Kent Downs Landscape Design Handbook identifies how locally sourced materials can address both local character and sustainability:..where possible sustainable materials should be used. In essence this means locally available and where possible renewable …it is important to consider the characteristics of the local character area. (p64) Clay bricks and tiles are the traditional building materials of the Kent Downs (p65) The VDS guidelines on Materials states All materials whether modern or traditional, should be suitable and of the highest quality feasible.

The DHA design for WYE2 includes the following features that conflict with guidelines for Wye Cul de sac design White weatherboarding The three storey semi-detached houses proposed are over-dominating for the edge of village location The architectural design takes a historical pastiche approach, with suburban designs mixed with a few unconvincing references to the Wye style Plastic framed windows inappropriate for the important edge of village site Poorly designed gable frontages Balconies shown are too small and do not fit well into the local vernacular Quality is poor due to an attempt to overfill the site with houses Based on poor design alone this application should be rejected

General traffic analysis in Wye –Jonathan Rodger MLM Modelling traffic flow across the level crossing Prediction of queues with current closures Testing various development options Map of streets with key junctions and development sites marked

Traffic flows are examined at each junction This schematic shows recorded data –the model assesses how this will be altered as development takes place

General traffic analysis in Wye – Jonathan Rodger MLM Existing constraints within Wye Quantifying local concerns – railway crossing – junctions - parking

General traffic analysis in Wye – Jonathan Rodger MLM Existing constraints within Wye Railway – fixed train times – variable closures times Before HS1 After HS1 Open - 41 secondsClosed – 20 minutes

General traffic analysis in Wye – Jonathan Rodger MLM Testing various development scenarios Impact associated with additional development within Wye Cumulative impact Queue predictions Changes in gate closure times Junction safety (i.e. visibility)

Traffic concerns The Little Chequers/Bridge St junction has very poor visibility Access via Little Chequers – parking/general constraints Improvement needed with a second access through Longs Acre as proposed in Neighbourhood Plan

The Council objects to the WYE2 application for the following reasons- traffic design treatment of the boundary complete lack of consideration of the Principles agreed for the Neighbourhood plan Copies of our objection letter are available Be warned! The developer has already proposed WYE2A another 150 houses south of WYE2

New application for WYE1 the Wye Court site Key issues, traffic, layout, design and boundary

Historic links we need to preserve The Roman Road and view to Wye Court – retaining historical continuity

The ideas incorporated in the Neighbourhood Plan show what could be achieved on this site

Disappointing features of the Taylor Wimpey design No clear views Layout does not improve the village boundary Village Design Statement guidelines have not been followed

Design features that fail to value the site – more details The concept sketch indicates a desire to create Stour Valley views along the main street & back lane but the proposed site plan blocks or obscures these views with the placement of houses and car barns. The site plan is of a generic house-builder type, proposing an inward looking development with a return loop route for vehicles from the single site entrance, this complex layout would be unnecessary if a more creative and distinctive concept had been developed. The is no serious consideration of the appearance of the external edge of the village, the north-east edge of the site.

T he edge of the site should integrate with the surrounding environment and link with the proposed cycleway View from the north looking into the development from Godmersham direction - so much better than garden fences

What can you do? Examine the proposals Consider how you will be affected and their impact on the village Think about the effect of poor design on the location of Wye within the AONB Recognise the importance of views into and out of the village Support the cycle path initiative Question the impact of extra traffic on safety at the critical junctions SEND IN YOUR OBJECTIONS TO ABC PLANNING DEPT !!

WYE3 and Imperial next!!