PSD Reform Recommendations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study on Regulatory Options for Further Market Opening in Rail Passenger Transport Stakeholder Meeting 10 February 2010 Session 4 Work Plan to Completion.
Advertisements

The CDM Policy Dialogue Margaret Mukahanana-Sangarwe Member, High-level Panel on the CDM Policy Dialogue FIRST SDM JOINT COORDINATION WORKSHOP Bonn, Germany,
TEEB Training Session 1: Integrating ecosystem services values into decision making.
PSD Workgroup David Klemp State of Montana. Problem Statements Redesignation –Untimely processing of PSD Redesignation requests and limited guidance for.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Air Quality and Land Use Planning Land Use Consultants 11 th March 2008 Susanne Underwood.
WESTAR Spring Business Meeting Villa Florence Hotel San Francisco, CA April 9-11, 2003.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
Assessing The Development Needs of the Statistical System NSDS Workshop, Trinidad and Tobago, July 27-29, 2009 Presented by Barbados.
Paint Product Stewardship Initiative Chicago, IL September 20-21, 2004.
“Analytical Tools and Data Collection” Workshop April 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR Introduction: Course Objectives and RIA Context in Turkey.
September Lori Hanson, Lead worker Dispersion Modeling (515)
Preparing for 2017 RA Update March Tampa Bay Reasonable Assurance Update Annual assessment of water quality and attainment status of chl-a.
The National Environmental Policy Act and Oil and Gas Development in Region 8 WESTAR Oil and Gas Conference October 22, 2008.
FLAG, Policy Overview 15 December 1999 Presenter - Bruce Bayle USDA/Forest Service.
What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.
FLMs, PSD Increment, and AQRVs: the Oregon experience WESTAR Fall Technical Conference Seattle September 2003 Philip Allen, Oregon DEQ.
UNFCCC WORKSHOP ON METHODOLOGIES ON CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT AND ADAPTATION back-to-back with UNDP-GEF WORKSHOP FOR DEVELOPING AN ADAPTATION POLICY FRAMEWORK.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Class I Air Quality Related Values Kevin J. Finto Hunton & Williams APPA Energy and Air Quality Task Force Washington, D.C. March 10, 2005.
EPA Superfund Program Risk Initiatives in Indian Country Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country March 14-16, 2000 Lakewood, CO James Konz U.S. EPA.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference Introduction to Class I Area Impact Analyses September 16, 2003 John Bunyak National Park Service.
Miscellaneous Stuff William Harnett WESTAR Spring Meeting April 3, 2007.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Mentor-Protégé Timeline Presented by: Office of Small Business Programs Naval Air Systems Command April 2013 Presented by: Office of Small Business Programs.
Western States / EPA Exceptional Events Meeting February 25-26, 2009.
And Then There’s Us….Phase II. ■Assumes that the state will become responsible for costs associated with health care programs (including Children’s Services.
Key to an Effective Red Book Shop JUAN R PEREZ, CHIEF OF AUDITS COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO MARCH 9, 2016.
EPA Region 10 Cumulative Effects Analysis Methodology Development Rob Wilson and Herman Wong WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 16, 2003.
THE 6 TH PROGRAM EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING PROGRESS REVIEW AND WORK PLAN FOR: TDF-2, JSDF, AND EIF By Mr. Sengphanomchone Inthasane, Director, Foreign.
Virgil Dupuis, George Godfrey, John Phillips and Susan Ratcliffe
Stakeholder consultations
David Klemp State of Montana
People and Culture Office Safety, Health and Wellbeing
Business Project: Consultancy
Sources Committee Presentation Spring 2003 WESTAR Business Meeting
Enhancing employers’ involvement in Social Protection policy debates
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
Safety Accountabilities
Session #2: Local Board Review of AEFLA Applications
RAPID RESPONSE program
Results and recommendations of the CRPD Committee’s examination of the UK 9 November 2017 Rachel Fox – Senior Associate, Treaty Monitoring 01.
Update on APEC Energy Workforce Resilience Workshop 25 April 2017
SMART Workshop Facilitation GUIDE
WESTAR PSD New Framework
Participative Process Reviews
Summary of Themes from Meetings with Air Directors and Staff
WESTAR Business Meeting April 7, 2004 Tempe, Arizona
WESTAR Technical Coordinator
Haz Mat Incident Considerations
Workshop #3 Finance and Technology Transfer
Workshop #1 On Technical Aspects
MSCOA: LESSONS LEARNT.
Session 1.3. Types of EFSA in the Region
WESTAR Sources Committee
M E A S U R E ‘G’ P R O G R A M U P D A T E
Working Group Review 14/12/11
TIBC Budget Formulation Improvement Project
Session 5.2. EFSA Response Recommendations
SCREENING SCOPING SEA QUALITY CONTROL DECISION
WESTAR (State Caucus) Recommendations
Wildland Fire Policy Revision
David Klemp State of Montana
David Klemp State of Montana
THE ENVIRONMENT THAT INFLUENCES NURSING CARE
Conducting the Assurance Engagement
Land Manager Perspectives
Presentation transcript:

PSD Reform Recommendations PSD Reform Initiative Workgroup WESTAR Spring 2005 Business Meeting

Project Goals To recommend changes to the PSD program that will: manage and protect increments and AQRVs as resources eliminate disincentives discouraging states from addressing cumulative impacts on Class I and Class II areas

Participants 47 representatives from states, FLM agencies, and EPA participated in the initiative Facilitation provided through a contract with Ross & Associates beginning mid-2004

Key Process Steps Existing framework/new framework First , address existing framework Scope of work for “New framework” recommendations to be discussed next Clarify consultation role of EPA Designated representative from each agency

Results Consensus on 14 recommendations To improve program’s effectiveness to manage increments and AQRVs To eliminate disincentives to conduct cumulative assessments

Next Steps Executive Session Discussion Endorse recommendations or direct workgroup to address remaining issues Consider delivering recommendations: Directly to EPA To STAPPA for concurrence before delivering to EPA Other options