“Reference Sound Assessment”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASEP -- Proposal for CVT -- GRB informal meeting # January 2009 JASIC GRBIG-ASEP
Advertisements

R59 : ASEP P. Steenackers / R. Valgaeren56 th GRB 4 SEP 2012 Informal document GRB (56th GRB, 3-5 September 2012, agenda item 4)
T h e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n New Snow Test Method for Tyre Class C2 Agenda 1.Scope 2.Requirements.
ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal.
Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Torque Influence on C3 category tyres Geneva WP29 / GRB 51 st session.
France consideration on maximum noise in Global Technical Regulation on Quiet Road Transport Vehicles ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRB-58 Informal document GRB
Datum (Tag.Monat.Jahr) OICA Method – short overview IG ASEP, Japan – Draft for an OICA presentation FG. GRBIG-ASEP
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Transmitted by the expert from Germany The French/German ASEP proposal Informal.
Report GRB ad hoc Working Group ASEP by the Chairman of the ASEP WG GRB 49; February 2009 Informal document No. GRB (49th GRB, February 2009,
WIND TUNNEL METHOD Christoph Lueginger (BMW), Céline Vallaude (UTAC), Folko Rohde (VW) on behalf of Annex 4 taskforce CHASSIS DYNO PRESCRIPTION.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Revision of ECE R41 ASEP Concept for Motorcycles By Heinz Steven
UN/ECE GRB R41WG DEG conclusions 8 August General - 1 In February 2007, GRB agreed: In February 2007, GRB agreed: That ISO362-2 is practical and.
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP
Anchor points in ASEP the shifting in the various proposals as the chairman has understood it ASEP meeting June 2008 v4.
ASEP Test Results CVT & Hybrid Vehicles GRB informal meeting # September 2007 JASIC.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Proposal to introduce Grouping Criteria for the approval of replacement brake lining assemblies for L-category vehicles in UN Regulation No. 90 submitted.
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
Table 3 – Value of Dimension D
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview R51 ASEP IWG July 2017.
Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-57-25
ASEP, items for clarification
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview.
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
ASEP -- Revision of D/F and OICA methods --
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Off-cycles principles
ASEP, a way to analyse methods
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process Status report
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
Heavy Duty Vehicle Requirements in EVS-GTR for HFCV-GTR Discussions
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Speed: measure of the distance an object travels per unit of time Units: m/s, km/h, mph Constant Speed: rate of change of position in which the same.
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Industry Homework from AEB 02
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
01 General requirements Road load matrix family vehicle definition 02 Annex 4 Wind tunnel for road load matrix family 03 Annex 6 CO2 interpolation range.
ASEP, from 2005 to 2019 Background informations and future works
ASEP for L5 vehicles with CVT/AT
Evaluate the limit: {image} Choose the correct answer from the following:
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Non-Calculator Questions
Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation
UN QRTV GTR Informal Working Group 6th session – Baltimore, USA, May 2018 Regulation (EU) No 540/2014: commonalities and differences with UN R
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Proposal to replace 3 s rule by 2 s rule
IMMA proposal for a test procedure towards real driving conditions
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
ASEP Annex 7 General Process Subroutine Vehicle Testing Subroutine
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Title : Alternative warm-up procedure WLTP rev1e by Japan
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
Difference between regulated light source and light source modules
CLEPA Input for 3rd IWG ASEP meeting
Additional discussion points from the gearshift issues task force
Given that {image} {image} Evaluate the limit: {image} Choose the correct answer from the following:
GRB informal group R51.03 Annex 10
Presentation transcript:

“Reference Sound Assessment” ASEP Annex 7 Statement of Compliance or Test Manufacturer Statement of Compliance Statement Test Perform Type Approval Test according to Annex 3; Report Lwoti, nwoti, Vbb_woti Establish Test Conditions According to Paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2 Perform ASEP Tests Within the Control Range According to Paragraphs 2.3 to 2.5 Assessment According to Paragraphs 3 “Slope-Assessment” Select Analysis Method Assessment According to Paragraph 4 “Lurban-Assessment” Evaluation According to Paragraph 5 “Reference Sound Assessment” Manufacturer Statement of Compliance Based on the ASEP Tests

“Reference Sound Assessment” ASEP - Annex 7 (Paragraph 5) “Reference Sound Assessment” Determine the target speed according to paragraph 5.1.2 Test or Calculation? Determine the correct gear  as given in paragraph 5.2 TEST CALC Determine the correct gear  as given in paragraph 5.2 Determine nref, for specified gear according 5.3.1 Perform test and report the maximum sound level Take or determine slope for gear  according to paragraphs 2.4, 3.1 up to 3.2.2 Calculate sound level according to paragraph 5.3.2 Sound level < Limit ? Vehicle NON-Compliant with provisions of the “Reference Sound Assessment” NO YES Vehicle Compliant with provisions of the “Reference Sound Assessment”

Paragraph 4 “Lurban- Assessment” ASEP Annex 7 (Paragraph 2) Measurement method Choose lowest gear (e.g. first gear) Select next higher gear Gear  ≤ i NO YES Move on to Paragraph 3 “Slope- Assessment” or Paragraph 4 “Lurban- Assessment” Test P1 Target : VAA = 20 km/h (or 25, 30, … km/h) a ASEP < 5m/s² NO YES n BB < n BB ASEP or v BB < 80 km/h Non Valid Gear NO YES Test P4 Target : 80 km/h or n BB ASEP Lowest valid gear Test P4 Target : 70 km/h or n BB ASEP YES NO a ASEP < 5m/s² Non Valid Gear NO YES Test P2 and P3 Target calculated using P1 and P4 measurement a ASEP < 5m/s² NO YES Valid Gear , report data for P1 to P4