Assessment and verification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Advertisements

Chemicals Inventory Management as a Tool to Check Compliance with Restricted Substances Regulations Ursula Schumacher.
1 MARPOL – Annex VI Control of Air Pollution from Ships from Ships and its Current Revision process Dr. Tim Gunner, Technical Consultant, Intertanko.
New Template of Environmental Compliance Approval with Limited Operational Flexibility Environmental Approvals Branch Presented to Air Practitioners’ Group.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
S3: Module D Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Session 3: Conformity Assessment Module D Peter Ulbig, Harry Stolz Belgrade, 31 October.
APPLICATION FOR THE EU ECO- LABEL IN PRACTICE- CASE STUDY PROF.DR.WERNER SOBOTKA.
Presentation 4: How can I know if nanomaterials are used in my workplace?
Tjenester fra Nemko Jon Ivar Tidemann. Challenges for industry  Different technical sollutions favoured in different Markets( Gas vs. El vs Coal)  Legislation.
EU-TURKEY CHAMBER FORUM PROJECT (ETCF) ETCF is funded by the European Union. 1 EU-TURKEY CHAMBER FORUM EU TURKEY CHAMBERS PARTNERSHİP GRANT SCHEME PROCUREMENT.
Proposed scope for a “Converted Paper Products” EU Ecolabel new product group EUEB 8 th March 2012 Lisa Kretschmann, FEPE Sami Lundgren, UPM Virginie ORI,
Communication in the Supply Chain
Ecolabel Sector - Service for Environmental Certifications ISPRA- National Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research Dr. Stefania Minestrini.
Workshop on Green Voluntary Mechanism Belgrade, 29 May - 30 May 2012 Ecolabel Sector - Service for Environmental Certifications ISPRA- National Italian.
Context  Brief reminder of REACH – overview and timeline  Where are we today with VOC regulations?  What to expect in the future?
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency,
CE Marking as Related to CPR Regulation (EU) No 305/2011
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
We personally care 31 May 2016 – Working Group on Cosmetic Products EU Cosmetics Regulation – Article 15.2 Criteria for exempting CMR1A and 1B from being.
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by.
European standardisation of emission testing:
Dr Pascale POUKENS-RENWART Scientific Officer
DUCC Mixtures TF October 2016
REACH Compliance Jim Casper March 2011.
66 items – 70% of circulated products
Content of Tender Dossier Instructions to Tenderers
TENDERING PROCEDURE IT-3981/EN
Certification system for prepackages
Chemical substances self – classification issues Lithuanian approach
Comparable MIMs Approach
The general obligations regarding self-classification under the CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 Sylvain BINTEIN.
Management of product authorizations for in situ cases
Implementation of the COP-4 decisions
Guidelines for choosing laboratories and test institutes
Агенција за трговину емисионим јединицама СР Немачке
REACH 2018 Registration How to prepare and mitigate Supply Chain Disruption REGISTRATION under REACH provides data on a chemical substance relating to.
Virtual testing based approval
Questions you may get from your EU customers, and
Revision of European Ecolabel Criteria for Wooden floor coverings
Technical Assistance for Development of a Strategy for Alignment with
Revision of the EU Ecolabel criteria for the product group of indoor and outdoor paints and varnishes JRC- IPTS November 2012.
Revision of the EU Ecolabel criteria for the product group of soaps, shampoos and hair conditioners (Rinse-off cosmetic products) JRC- IPTS November 2012.
EUEB special session on hazardous substance verification
Discussion on Rinse-Off Cosmetics
Updates on issues related to the EU Ecolabel
Issues of relevance in the revision of paper PGs
Revision of EU Ecolabel Criteria for Wooden Floor Coverings
Fasset Briefing Session
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Assessment and verification
EUEB special session on hazardous substance verification
Updates on issues related to the EU Ecolabel
Bed Mattresses JRC- IPTS November 2012.
Ecolabel Horizontal Task Force on Chemicals
BS EN 10204:2004 Metallic Products – Types of inspection documents
Making the completion of the Tax Professional Logbook Easy
BS EN 10204:2004 Metallic Products – Types of inspection documents
Introduction- Link with WG E activity CMEP PLENARY MEETING-PRAGUE
Drafting group Mixing Zones
CARACAL March 2013 COM Project – “The potential impact on industrial competitiveness of restrictions on certain.
Jakub Hrkal ESTAT Unit F-4
INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
Proposal for an amendment for C&G Paper: Status of the process
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Point 5: CLP classification for mixtures
GPP Training toolkit 7.6. Paints, Varnishes and Road Markings
Joint Research Centre (JRC) Product Bureau
Presentation transcript:

Assessment and verification Indoor and Outdoor Paints and Varnishes Assessment and verification Brussels, 5 March 2013

Background: Revision and merger of the separate "indoor" and "outdoor" criteria dating 2008 Among the most successful criteria: 83 companies manufacturing 1157 distinct products (end 2010) Timeline: 1st AHWG – February 2012 2nd AHWG – September 2012 EUEB – March 2013 EUEB voting - tbc

General considerations (1) Assessment and verification (a) Requirements The specific assessment and verification requirements are indicated within each criterion. Where the applicant is required to provide declarations, documentation, analyses, test reports, or other evidence to show compliance with the criteria, these may originate from the applicant and/or his supplier(s) and/or their supplier(s), as appropriate. Where appropriate, test methods other than those indicated for each criterion may be used if the competent body assessing the application accepts their equivalence. Where possible, the testing shall be performed by laboratories that meet the general requirements of European Standard EN ISO 17025 or equivalent. Where appropriate, competent bodies may require supporting documentation and may carry out independent verifications.  

General considerations (2) b) Measurement thresholds Unless otherwise indicated compliance with the ecological criteria is required for substances and mixtures intentionally added, as well as for by-products and impurities from raw materials, the concentration of which equals or exceeds 0,01 % by weight of final formulation. (c) The exact formulation of the product (trade name, chemical name, CAS no.), the function and the form of all ingredients intentionally used as well the ingoing quantity shall be provided to the competent body. Any ingredient, including known impurities, present in concentrations greater than 0,01 % shall be reported unless a lower concentration is specified elsewhere in the criteria.

General considerations (3) Where ingredients are referred to in the criteria, this includes substances and preparations. The definitions of ‘substances’ and ‘mixtures’ are given in the REACH Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 1 ). Safety data sheets for each ingredient shall be submitted to the competent body in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (d) For Ecolabelled awarded products so far the applicant declares that minor (or none) changes in its paint formula (i.e. due to replacement or reduce of hazardous materials, slight VOC reduction etc.) cannot alter the technical performance (efficiency of use criteria), then the already «submitted» performance testing.

Assessment and verification parts of different criteria: Group A: criteria 3 and 5 test report is required where test needs to be done on the bases of specific methodology no calculations Group B: criteria 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10 more detailed submissions and calculations are required

Horizontal issues: "Equivalent" test methods – laboratories should decide whether the test is equivalent Document: 'Guidelines for a procedure for checking the criteria in respect of applications: use of test laboratories'

Criteria 3 – efficiency in use 3 (a): 'Spreading rate' Test reports to be presented -ISO 6504/1, OR -ISO 6504/3, -NF T 30 073 (or equivalent) - "For bases used to produce tinted products not evaluated according to the abovementioned requirements, the applicant shall produce evidence of how the end-user will be advised to use a primer and/or grey (or other relevant shade) of undercoat before application of the product." 3 (b): 'Wet scrub resistence' Test report according to EN 13300 using the method EN ISO 11998 Ceiling paints and matt indoor paints are excluded from this requirement (information shall be given in the product packaging or related marketing material) 3 (c): 'Resistance to water' Test report using the method ISO 2812-3

Criteria 3 – efficiency in use 3 (d): 'Adhesion' Pigmented masonry primers: EN 24624 (ISO 4624) Floor coatings, floor paints, floor undercoats, metal undercoats and wood undercoats: EN 2409 Transparent primers are excluded 3 (e): Abrasion Test report using the method EN ISO 7784-2 3 (f): 'Weathering' Test report using either ISO 11507 or EN 927-6, or both (if relevant). Test reports using EN ISO 4628-2, 4, 5, 6 where applicable. Test report in conformance to ISO 7724-3. 3 (g): 'Water vapour permeability' Test report using methodology EN ISO 7783-2

Criteria 3 – efficiency in use 3 (h): Liquid water permeability Test report using methodology EN 1062-3 3 (i): 'Fungeal resistance' Test report using methodology BS 3900:G6 3 (j): 'Crack bridging' Test report using methodology DIN EN 1062-7 3(k): 'Alkali resistance' Test report using methodology ISO 2812-4

Criterion 5: 'Metals' Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a declaration of compliance with this criterion as well as declarations from raw materials (ingredients) suppliers (where applicable). Declaration signed by the applicant Declaration signed by raw materials (ingredients) suppliers (where applicable)

Criterion 1: 'White pigment' Assessment and verification: the applicant shall either provide a declaration of non-use or provide documentation showing the content of white pigments, the spreading rate and the assessment and verification criteria set out for the wet scrub resistance criterion, together with the detailed calculation showing compliance with this criterion. Declaration (paint formulation) signed by the applicant Test reports - Spreading rate (criterion 3a) - Wet scrub resistance (criterion 3b) Calculations are required

Criterion 2: 'Titanium Dioxide' Assessment and verification: the applicant shall either provide a declaration of non-use or provide the supporting documentation indicating the respective levels of emissions and discharges of wastes for these parameters, together with the titanium dioxide content of the product, showing compliance with this criterion. Declaration (Non-use OR TiO2 content in the paint formulation) signed by the applicant Declaration signed by the 'TiO2' supplier, indicating the SOx or Sulphate emissions Calculations are required

Criterion 4: 'Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)' Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a declaration of compliance with this criterion. For all products the applicant shall indicate the content of VOC and SVOC in the product. Declaration signed by the applicant Declaration signed by suppliers Calculations are required

Criterion 7. Hazardous substances and mixtures Assessment and verification: The applicant shall provide a declaration of compliance with this criterion, together with related documentation, such as declarations of compliance signed by their suppliers, and copies of relevant Safety Data Sheets for substances or mixtures in accordance with Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 for substances or mixtures. Compliance shall be based on a screening of the ingoing substances against the restricted substances and mixtures list, the current ECHA Candidate List for Substances of Very High Concern and the criteria in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. Concentration limits shall be specified in the Safety Data Sheets in accordance with Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 for substances and mixtures.

Criterion 8: 'Formaldehyde' Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a declaration of compliance with this criterion. In addition, the in-can concentration shall be determined using a standard based on High-Performance Liquid Chromatography using a national standard or validated method. The applicant shall provide test results on the concentration of in-can formaldehyde for white base, each tinting bases and one tinted paint that applicant estimate the most representative (i.e. with the highest amount of formaldehyde donor) / for base/colour tint combination which has the maximum theoretical amount of formaldehyde (this base/colour combination shall be tested).

Criterion 9: 'Formaldehyde' (continued) Alternatively, the applicant shall provide test results from raw materials suppliers using the VdL-RL 03 test method (VdL Guideline03) ‘In-can concentration of formaldehyde determined by the acetyl-acetone method’ and calculations relating the data from these tests to the final product in order to indicate that the final maximum possible concentration of formaldehyde released by formaldehyde releasing substances is not higher than 0,001 % by weight.

Criterion 10: 'Phthalates' Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a declaration of compliance with this criterion. Declaration (from applicant and raw materail supplier) stating that the final paint formulation and all raw materials do not contain the phtalates that are not permitted

Criteria 11 and 12: "consumer information" and "information appearing on the EU Ecolabel" Assessment and verification: the applicant shall declare that the product complies with the requirement and provide the competent body with an art work (as PDF or other electronic form) or samples of the user information and/or a link to a manufacturer's website containing this information as part of the application. The information in which is given advice on how to deal with the "unused paint" should also be available via the manufacturer website. Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a sample of the product packaging showing the label, together with a declaration of compliance with this criterion.